CVE-2026-43389: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-rmwg-23c2-w7hq
CVSS 5.5
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-43389 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-43389 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-43389
GHSA Identifier GHSA-rmwg-23c2-w7hq
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.5
CWE Classification General Security Weakness
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-43389

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-43389, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: memfd_luo: always dirty all folios A dirty folio is one which has been written to. A clean folio is its opposite. Since a clean folio has no user data, it can be freed under memory pressure. memfd preservation with LUO saves the flag at preserve(). This is problematic. The folio might get dirtied later. Saving it at freeze() also doesn't work, since the dirty bit from PTE is normally synced at unmap and there might still be mappings of the file at freeze(). To see why this is a problem, say a folio is clean at preserve, but gets dirtied later. The serialized state of the folio will mark it as clean. After retrieve, the next kernel will see the folio as clean and might try to reclaim it under memory pressure. This will result in losing user data. Mark all folios of the file as dirty, and always set the MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_DIRTY flag. This comes with the side effect of making all clean folios un-reclaimable. This is a cost that has to be paid for participants of live update. It is not expected to be a common use case to preserve a lot of clean folios anyway. Since the value of pfolio->flags is a constant now, drop the flags variable and set it directly.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-43389?
CVE-2026-43389 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under General Security Weakness.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-43389?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43389?
CVE-2026-43389 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-43389?
CVE-2026-43389 is classified under General Security Weakness.
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-43389?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-rmwg-23c2-w7hq",
  "modified" : "2026-05-26T15:32:08Z",
  "published" : "2026-05-08T15:31:27Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-43389" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: memfd_luo: always dirty all folios\n\nA dirty folio is one which has been written to.  A clean folio is its\nopposite.  Since a clean folio has no user data, it can be freed under\nmemory pressure.\n\nmemfd preservation with LUO saves the flag at preserve().  This is\nproblematic.  The folio might get dirtied later.  Saving it at freeze()\nalso doesn't work, since the dirty bit from PTE is normally synced at\nunmap and there might still be mappings of the file at freeze().\n\nTo see why this is a problem, say a folio is clean at preserve, but gets\ndirtied later.  The serialized state of the folio will mark it as clean. \nAfter retrieve, the next kernel will see the folio as clean and might try\nto reclaim it under memory pressure.  This will result in losing user\ndata.\n\nMark all folios of the file as dirty, and always set the\nMEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_DIRTY flag.  This comes with the side effect of making all\nclean folios un-reclaimable.  This is a cost that has to be paid for\nparticipants of live update.  It is not expected to be a common use case\nto preserve a lot of clean folios anyway.\n\nSince the value of pfolio->flags is a constant now, drop the flags\nvariable and set it directly.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43389"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e04bf1f33151a30e06a65b74b5f2c19fc2be128"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e901c871d4b592f0042e30f3a0f031eae79744ec"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-05-08T15:16:50Z"
  }
}