CVE-2026-46299: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-r7xr-jh3w-26ww
CVSS 7.0
CWE-667
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-46299 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.0) security vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-667: Improper Locking) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. The weakness occurs when the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-46299 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-46299
GHSA Identifier GHSA-r7xr-jh3w-26ww
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.0
CWE Classification CWE-667: Improper Locking
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.0

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity High (AC:H)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-46299

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-46299, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking, where the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hfsplus: fix held lock freed on hfsplus_fill_super() hfsplus_fill_super() calls hfs_find_init() to initialize a search structure, which acquires tree->tree_lock. If the subsequent call to hfsplus_cat_build_key() fails, the function jumps to the out_put_root error label without releasing the lock. The later cleanup path then frees the tree data structure with the lock still held, triggering a held lock freed warning. Fix this by adding the missing hfs_find_exit(&fd) call before jumping to the out_put_root error label. This ensures that tree->tree_lock is properly released on the error path. The bug was originally detected on v6.13-rc1 using an experimental static analysis tool we are developing, and we have verified that the issue persists in the latest mainline kernel. The tool is specifically designed to detect memory management issues. It is currently under active development and not yet publicly available. We confirmed the bug by runtime testing under QEMU with x86_64 defconfig, lockdep enabled, and CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS=y. To trigger the error path, we used GDB to dynamically shrink the max_unistr_len parameter to 1 before hfsplus_asc2uni() is called. This forces hfsplus_asc2uni() to naturally return -ENAMETOOLONG, which propagates to hfsplus_cat_build_key() and exercises the faulty error path. The following warning was observed during mount: ========================= WARNING: held lock freed! 7.0.0-rc3-00016-gb4f0dd314b39 #4 Not tainted ------------------------- mount/174 is freeing memory ffff888103f92000-ffff888103f92fff, with a lock still held there! ffff888103f920b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x154/0x1e0 2 locks held by mount/174: #0: ffff888103f960e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.constprop.0+0x167/0xa40 #1: ffff888103f920b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x154/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 174 Comm: mount Not tainted 7.0.0-rc3-00016-gb4f0dd314b39 #4 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x13a/0x180 kfree+0x16b/0x510 ? hfsplus_fill_super+0xcb4/0x18a0 hfsplus_fill_super+0xcb4/0x18a0 ? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? bdev_open+0x65f/0xc30 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? pointer+0x4ce/0xbf0 ? trace_contention_end+0x11c/0x150 ? __pfx_pointer+0x10/0x10 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? bdev_open+0x79b/0xc30 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? vsnprintf+0x6da/0x1270 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x157/0x740 ? __pfx_vsnprintf+0x10/0x10 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? irqentry_exit+0x17b/0x5e0 ? trace_irq_disable.constprop.0+0x116/0x150 ? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10 get_tree_bdev_flags+0x302/0x580 ? __pfx_get_tree_bdev_flags+0x10/0x10 ? vfs_parse_fs_qstr+0x129/0x1a0 ? __pfx_vfs_parse_fs_qstr+0x3/0x10 vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x320 fc_mount+0x10/0x1d0 path_mount+0x5c5/0x21c0 ? __pfx_path_mount+0x10/0x10 ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0x116/0x150 ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0x116/0x150 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? kmem_cache_free+0x307/0x540 ? user_path_at+0x51/0x60 ? __x64_sys_mount+0x212/0x280 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f __x64_sys_mount+0x212/0x280 ? __pfx___x64_sys_mount+0x10/0x10 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0x116/0x150 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f do_syscall_64+0x111/0x680 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7ffacad55eae Code: 48 8b 0d 85 1f 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 8 RSP: 002b ---truncated---

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-46299?
CVE-2026-46299 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under CWE-667: Improper Locking.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-46299?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46299?
CVE-2026-46299 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.0 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-46299?
CVE-2026-46299 is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking (The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.).
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-46299?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-r7xr-jh3w-26ww",
  "modified" : "2026-06-19T15:33:14Z",
  "published" : "2026-06-08T18:31:52Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-46299" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhfsplus: fix held lock freed on hfsplus_fill_super()\n\nhfsplus_fill_super() calls hfs_find_init() to initialize a search\nstructure, which acquires tree->tree_lock. If the subsequent call to\nhfsplus_cat_build_key() fails, the function jumps to the out_put_root\nerror label without releasing the lock. The later cleanup path then\nfrees the tree data structure with the lock still held, triggering a\nheld lock freed warning.\n\nFix this by adding the missing hfs_find_exit(&fd) call before jumping\nto the out_put_root error label. This ensures that tree->tree_lock is\nproperly released on the error path.\n\nThe bug was originally detected on v6.13-rc1 using an experimental\nstatic analysis tool we are developing, and we have verified that the\nissue persists in the latest mainline kernel. The tool is specifically\ndesigned to detect memory management issues. It is currently under active\ndevelopment and not yet publicly available.\n\nWe confirmed the bug by runtime testing under QEMU with x86_64 defconfig,\nlockdep enabled, and CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS=y. To trigger the error path, we\nused GDB to dynamically shrink the max_unistr_len parameter to 1 before\nhfsplus_asc2uni() is called. This forces hfsplus_asc2uni() to naturally\nreturn -ENAMETOOLONG, which propagates to hfsplus_cat_build_key() and\nexercises the faulty error path. The following warning was observed\nduring mount:\n\n\t=========================\n\tWARNING: held lock freed!\n\t7.0.0-rc3-00016-gb4f0dd314b39 #4 Not tainted\n\t-------------------------\n\tmount/174 is freeing memory ffff888103f92000-ffff888103f92fff, with a lock still held there!\n\tffff888103f920b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x154/0x1e0\n\t2 locks held by mount/174:\n\t#0: ffff888103f960e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.constprop.0+0x167/0xa40\n\t#1: ffff888103f920b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x154/0x1e0\n\n\tstack backtrace:\n\tCPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 174 Comm: mount Not tainted 7.0.0-rc3-00016-gb4f0dd314b39 #4 PREEMPT(lazy)\n\tHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n\tCall Trace:\n\t<TASK>\n\tdump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0\n\tdebug_check_no_locks_freed+0x13a/0x180\n\tkfree+0x16b/0x510\n\t? hfsplus_fill_super+0xcb4/0x18a0\n\thfsplus_fill_super+0xcb4/0x18a0\n\t? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? bdev_open+0x65f/0xc30\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? pointer+0x4ce/0xbf0\n\t? trace_contention_end+0x11c/0x150\n\t? __pfx_pointer+0x10/0x10\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? bdev_open+0x79b/0xc30\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? vsnprintf+0x6da/0x1270\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x157/0x740\n\t? __pfx_vsnprintf+0x10/0x10\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? irqentry_exit+0x17b/0x5e0\n\t? trace_irq_disable.constprop.0+0x116/0x150\n\t? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10\n\t? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10\n\tget_tree_bdev_flags+0x302/0x580\n\t? __pfx_get_tree_bdev_flags+0x10/0x10\n\t? vfs_parse_fs_qstr+0x129/0x1a0\n\t? __pfx_vfs_parse_fs_qstr+0x3/0x10\n\tvfs_get_tree+0x89/0x320\n\tfc_mount+0x10/0x1d0\n\tpath_mount+0x5c5/0x21c0\n\t? __pfx_path_mount+0x10/0x10\n\t? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0x116/0x150\n\t? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0x116/0x150\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? kmem_cache_free+0x307/0x540\n\t? user_path_at+0x51/0x60\n\t? __x64_sys_mount+0x212/0x280\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t__x64_sys_mount+0x212/0x280\n\t? __pfx___x64_sys_mount+0x10/0x10\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\t? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0x116/0x150\n\t? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f\n\tdo_syscall_64+0x111/0x680\n\tentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\tRIP: 0033:0x7ffacad55eae\n\tCode: 48 8b 0d 85 1f 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 8\n\tRSP: 002b\n---truncated---",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46299"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/041acda6d9f96006703466449c10c9a69590c8b9"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3ca80e3012c8be85b4f8d0d20eac8d3b17ff257e"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6499c9c8ec437a369e7e221dad91f6122b50759d"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90c500e4fd83fa33c09bc7ee23b6d9cc487ac733"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfbcce6a7b0552a390620d9b2c4d2bcb1825cbdc"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c554ddc87af4d4e4be42f8aed1baec9e1c7588e0"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d309d3308de658d87c42d97e044c89a226327526"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e890656accee4c26d932ea388eb8936a6e22184d"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-667" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-08T17:16:48Z"
  }
}