CVE-2026-53122: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2026-53122 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-667: Improper Locking) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. The weakness occurs when the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
CVE-2026-53122 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 5.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-53122
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
mvn dependency:tree
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-53122, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:
mvn dependency:tree
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-667: Improper Locking, where the product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-53122?
Which Software versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-53122?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53122?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-53122?
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-53122?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799",
"modified" : "2026-07-23T21:30:35Z",
"published" : "2026-06-24T18:32:48Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-53122" ],
"details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: fix deadlock between reflink and transaction commit when using flushoncommit\n\nWhen using the flushoncommit mount option, we can have a deadlock between\na transaction commit and a reflink operation that copied an inline extent\nto an offset beyond the current i_size of the destination node.\n\nThe deadlock happens like this:\n\n1) Task A clones an inline extent from inode X to an offset of inode Y\n that is beyond Y's current i_size. This means we copied the inline\n extent's data to a folio of inode Y that is beyond its EOF, using a\n call to copy_inline_to_page();\n\n2) Task B starts a transaction commit and calls\n btrfs_start_delalloc_flush() to flush delalloc;\n\n3) The delalloc flushing sees the new dirty folio of inode Y and when it\n attempts to flush it, it ends up at extent_writepage() and sees that\n the offset of the folio is beyond the i_size of inode Y, so it attempts\n to invalidate the folio by calling folio_invalidate(), which ends up at\n btrfs' folio invalidate callback - btrfs_invalidate_folio(). There it\n tries to lock the folio's range in inode Y's extent io tree, but it\n blocks since it's currently locked by task A - during a reflink we lock\n the inodes and the source and destination ranges after flushing all\n delalloc and waiting for ordered extent completion - after that we\n don't expect to have dirty folios in the ranges, the exception is if\n we have to copy an inline extent's data (because the destination offset\n is not zero);\n\n4) Task A then attempts to start a transaction to update the inode item,\n and then it's blocked since the current transaction is in the\n TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START state. Therefore task A has to wait for the\n current transaction to become unblocked (its state >=\n TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED).\n\n So task A is waiting for the transaction commit done by task B, and\n the later waiting on the extent lock of inode Y that is currently\n held by task A.\n\nSyzbot recently reported this with the following stack traces:\n\n INFO: task kworker/u8:7:1053 blocked for more than 143 seconds.\n Not tainted syzkaller #0\n \"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\" disables this message.\n task:kworker/u8:7 state:D stack:23520 pid:1053 tgid:1053 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208060 flags:0x00080000\n Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-46)\n Call Trace:\n <TASK>\n context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5298 [inline]\n __schedule+0x1553/0x5240 kernel/sched/core.c:6911\n __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6993 [inline]\n schedule+0x164/0x360 kernel/sched/core.c:7008\n wait_extent_bit fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:811 [inline]\n btrfs_lock_extent_bits+0x59c/0x700 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:1914\n btrfs_lock_extent fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.h:152 [inline]\n btrfs_invalidate_folio+0x43d/0xc40 fs/btrfs/inode.c:7704\n extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1852 [inline]\n extent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2580 [inline]\n btrfs_writepages+0x12ff/0x2440 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2713\n do_writepages+0x32e/0x550 mm/page-writeback.c:2554\n __writeback_single_inode+0x133/0x11a0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1750\n writeback_sb_inodes+0x995/0x19d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2042\n wb_writeback+0x456/0xb70 fs/fs-writeback.c:2227\n wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2374 [inline]\n wb_workfn+0x41a/0xf60 fs/fs-writeback.c:2414\n process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3276 [inline]\n process_scheduled_works+0xb6e/0x18c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3359\n worker_thread+0xa53/0xfc0 kernel/workqueue.c:3440\n kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436\n ret_from_fork+0x51e/0xb90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245\n </TASK>\n INFO: task syz.4.64:6910 blocked for more than 143 seconds.\n Not tainted syzkaller #0\n \"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\" disables this message.\n task:syz.4.64 state:D stack:22752 pid:6910 tgid:\n---truncated---",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53122"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f0f9c0a368aa1fe078109091322d3b0632d9380"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73be4a08306bb84f4d5d16f62cb80e1543109ffa"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a24f0000876b8755cf21972b41632f4d6f3dafb"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b48c980b6a7e409050bb3067165db31cc6205e3e"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-667" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : false,
"github_reviewed_at" : null,
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-24T17:17:26Z"
}
}