CVE-2026-89647: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-m843-78wr-m386
CVSS 7.5
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-89647 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-89647 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-89647
GHSA Identifier GHSA-m843-78wr-m386
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.5
CWE Classification General Security Weakness
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-89647

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-89647, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: do not repeat ceph_trim_dentries() if no progress possible ceph_cap_reclaim_work() re-queues itself for as long as ceph_trim_dentries() returns -EAGAIN, which happens whenever a lease walk exhausts its `nr_to_scan` budget. This creates a busy loop that consumes CPU without making any progress when there is nothing to reclaim: with no cap pressure (`count==0`) and every scanned lease still valid, each pass runs the full scan budget down to zero and returns `-EAGAIN`, only to be queued again immediately. The dir-lease walk made this worse. When `expire_dir_lease` is `false` (i.e. we have no intention of reclaiming dir leases), __dir_lease_check() returned `TOUCH` for every valid lease. `TOUCH` moves the dentry to the tail of the list and resets `di->time` via __dentry_dir_lease_touch(), so a walk over N valid leases pointlessly rewrote the list, refreshed the timestamps (preventing them from ever aging out) and always drained `nr_to_scan`, guaranteeing the `-EAGAIN` requeue. Fix this in three steps: - Return `KEEP` instead of `TOUCH` when `expire_dir_lease` is `false`. If we are not going to reclaim the lease, leave it in place instead of churning the list and resetting its timestamp; the walk then terminates naturally (or via `STOP` at the first fresh lease). - Only return `-EAGAIN` from the first (dentry-lease) walk when something was actually freed. A full batch that frees nothing means retrying the same list immediately is futile; fall through to the dir-lease walk instead. - After both walks, bail out with success (0) when nothing was freed and there is no cap pressure (`count==0`). There is no reason to keep retrying when we are not over the cap limit and made no progress. Under real cap pressure (`count>0`) the reclaim path is unchanged and still retries via `-EAGAIN`. Without this patch, I saw 500 ceph_trim_dentries() calls per second on our web servers. This is very visible in `/proc/lock_stat` (5 minute capture): class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg &mdsc->dentry_list_lock: 126180 128218 0.04 8063.44 15986965.20 124.69 1573354 5296812 0.04 8291.28 74164526.48 14.00 ----------------------- &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 111736 [<000000007b11e319>] __ceph_dentry_dir_lease_touch+0x7c/0xa8 &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 2631 [<0000000050597999>] __dentry_leases_walk+0x64/0x2c8 &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 3878 [<00000000c0022f62>] __ceph_dentry_lease_touch+0x5c/0xa8 &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 9973 [<000000002f27cb6f>] __dentry_lease_unlist+0x50/0xa0 ----------------------- &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 123621 [<0000000050597999>] __dentry_leases_walk+0x64/0x2c8 &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 1822 [<000000007b11e319>] __ceph_dentry_dir_lease_touch+0x7c/0xa8 &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 2720 [<000000002f27cb6f>] __dentry_lease_unlist+0x50/0xa0 &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 55 [<00000000c0022f62>] __ceph_dentry_lease_touch+0x5c/0xa8 With this patch: class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg &mdsc->dentry_list_lock: 1203 1215 0.16 408.88 33082.88 27.23 4320501 7357389 0.04 500.64 1961578.00 0.27 ----------------------- &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 1029 [<000000003c9aea8a>] __ceph_dentry_dir_lease_touch+0x7c/0xa8 &mdsc->dentry_list_lock 1 ---truncated---

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-89647?
CVE-2026-89647 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under General Security Weakness.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-89647?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89647?
CVE-2026-89647 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-89647?
CVE-2026-89647 is classified under General Security Weakness.
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-89647?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-m843-78wr-m386",
  "modified" : "2026-09-13T09:32:26Z",
  "published" : "2026-09-11T21:31:35Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-89647" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nceph: do not repeat ceph_trim_dentries() if no progress possible\n\nceph_cap_reclaim_work() re-queues itself for as long as\nceph_trim_dentries() returns -EAGAIN, which happens whenever a lease\nwalk exhausts its `nr_to_scan` budget.  This creates a busy loop that\nconsumes CPU without making any progress when there is nothing to\nreclaim: with no cap pressure (`count==0`) and every scanned lease\nstill valid, each pass runs the full scan budget down to zero and\nreturns `-EAGAIN`, only to be queued again immediately.\n\nThe dir-lease walk made this worse.  When `expire_dir_lease` is\n`false` (i.e. we have no intention of reclaiming dir leases),\n__dir_lease_check() returned `TOUCH` for every valid lease.  `TOUCH`\nmoves the dentry to the tail of the list and resets `di->time` via\n__dentry_dir_lease_touch(), so a walk over N valid leases pointlessly\nrewrote the list, refreshed the timestamps (preventing them from ever\naging out) and always drained `nr_to_scan`, guaranteeing the `-EAGAIN`\nrequeue.\n\nFix this in three steps:\n\n - Return `KEEP` instead of `TOUCH` when `expire_dir_lease` is\n   `false`.  If we are not going to reclaim the lease, leave it in\n   place instead of churning the list and resetting its timestamp; the\n   walk then terminates naturally (or via `STOP` at the first fresh\n   lease).\n\n - Only return `-EAGAIN` from the first (dentry-lease) walk when something\n   was actually freed.  A full batch that frees nothing means retrying\n   the same list immediately is futile; fall through to the dir-lease\n   walk instead.\n\n - After both walks, bail out with success (0) when nothing was freed\n   and there is no cap pressure (`count==0`).  There is no reason to\n   keep retrying when we are not over the cap limit and made no\n   progress.\n\nUnder real cap pressure (`count>0`) the reclaim path is unchanged and\nstill retries via `-EAGAIN`.\n\nWithout this patch, I saw 500 ceph_trim_dentries() calls per second on\nour web servers.  This is very visible in `/proc/lock_stat` (5 minute\ncapture):\n\n              class name    con-bounces    contentions   waittime-min   waittime-max waittime-total   waittime-avg    acq-bounces   acquisitions   holdtime-min   holdtime-max holdtime-total   holdtime-avg\n\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock:        126180         128218           0.04        8063.44    15986965.20         124.69        1573354        5296812           0.04        8291.28    74164526.48          14.00\n -----------------------\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock         111736          [<000000007b11e319>] __ceph_dentry_dir_lease_touch+0x7c/0xa8\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock           2631          [<0000000050597999>] __dentry_leases_walk+0x64/0x2c8\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock           3878          [<00000000c0022f62>] __ceph_dentry_lease_touch+0x5c/0xa8\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock           9973          [<000000002f27cb6f>] __dentry_lease_unlist+0x50/0xa0\n -----------------------\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock         123621          [<0000000050597999>] __dentry_leases_walk+0x64/0x2c8\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock           1822          [<000000007b11e319>] __ceph_dentry_dir_lease_touch+0x7c/0xa8\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock           2720          [<000000002f27cb6f>] __dentry_lease_unlist+0x50/0xa0\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock             55          [<00000000c0022f62>] __ceph_dentry_lease_touch+0x5c/0xa8\n\nWith this patch:\n\n              class name    con-bounces    contentions   waittime-min   waittime-max waittime-total   waittime-avg    acq-bounces   acquisitions   holdtime-min   holdtime-max holdtime-total   holdtime-avg\n\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock:          1203           1215           0.16         408.88       33082.88          27.23        4320501        7357389           0.04         500.64     1961578.00           0.27\n -----------------------\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock           1029          [<000000003c9aea8a>] __ceph_dentry_dir_lease_touch+0x7c/0xa8\n &mdsc->dentry_list_lock            1\n---truncated---",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89647"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37d6edb2f03b29399a3a337fae78674de51e1695"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d122b2feb1dd76bb5041bdea5e1e1b007d8d415"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a541eb401acb89d791da41189d7a79220164b93"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e7d7aa7b730178278109c41fa1b17b06873065d5"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-09-11T20:19:50Z"
  }
}