CVE-2026-93228: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

CRITICAL
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-g29j-c673-5ccw
CVSS 9.1
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-93228 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 9.1) security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-93228 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-93228
GHSA Identifier GHSA-g29j-c673-5ccw
Severity CRITICAL
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 9.1
CWE Classification General Security Weakness
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 9.1

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-93228

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-93228, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: svcrdma: Reject Write/Reply chunks with segcount 0 A peer can send a Write or Reply chunk whose segcount field is zero. xdr_check_write_chunk() only rejects segcount > rc_maxpages, so zero passes the range check, and xdr_inline_decode(stream, 0) returns the current (non-NULL) cursor without advancing. The function returns true and pcl_alloc_write() then links a struct svc_rdma_chunk with ch_segcount == 0 onto rc_write_pcl or rc_reply_pcl. An earlier patch in this series made pcl_for_each_segment() safe for ch_segcount == 0, so this no longer drives the memory walk it used to. Rejecting the malformed frame at the decode boundary is still worthwhile as defense in depth: it keeps degenerate zero-segment chunks off the parsed chunk lists entirely, so any future consumer that walks ch_segments directly cannot observe one, and it makes the zero-floor easy to backport to trees where the macro change is more intrusive. RFC 8166 has no meaning for a Write/Reply chunk that describes no remote buffer, so no legitimate client is affected. xdr_check_reply_chunk() funnels Reply chunks through xdr_check_write_chunk() and inherits the same rejection. pcl_alloc_write() also links each chunk onto the parsed chunk list before filling its segment array. If a future change weakens the segcount-0 rejection, an incomplete chunk is visible to consumers during the fill loop. Reorder so that list_add_tail() follows the segment fill loop, ensuring only fully-populated chunks appear on the list.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-93228?
CVE-2026-93228 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under General Security Weakness.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-93228?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93228?
CVE-2026-93228 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (CRITICAL) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-93228?
CVE-2026-93228 is classified under General Security Weakness.
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-93228?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-g29j-c673-5ccw",
  "modified" : "2026-09-25T06:30:27Z",
  "published" : "2026-09-24T18:31:23Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-93228" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsvcrdma: Reject Write/Reply chunks with segcount 0\n\nA peer can send a Write or Reply chunk whose segcount field is zero.\nxdr_check_write_chunk() only rejects segcount > rc_maxpages, so zero\npasses the range check, and xdr_inline_decode(stream, 0) returns the\ncurrent (non-NULL) cursor without advancing. The function returns\ntrue and pcl_alloc_write() then links a struct svc_rdma_chunk with\nch_segcount == 0 onto rc_write_pcl or rc_reply_pcl.\n\nAn earlier patch in this series made pcl_for_each_segment() safe for\nch_segcount == 0, so this no longer drives the memory walk it used\nto. Rejecting the malformed frame at the decode boundary is still\nworthwhile as defense in depth: it keeps degenerate zero-segment\nchunks off the parsed chunk lists entirely, so any future consumer\nthat walks ch_segments directly cannot observe one, and it makes the\nzero-floor easy to backport to trees where the macro change is more\nintrusive. RFC 8166 has no meaning for a Write/Reply chunk that\ndescribes no remote buffer, so no legitimate client is affected.\n\nxdr_check_reply_chunk() funnels Reply chunks through\nxdr_check_write_chunk() and inherits the same rejection.\n\npcl_alloc_write() also links each chunk onto the parsed chunk list\nbefore filling its segment array. If a future change weakens the\nsegcount-0 rejection, an incomplete chunk is visible to consumers\nduring the fill loop. Reorder so that list_add_tail() follows the\nsegment fill loop, ensuring only fully-populated chunks appear on\nthe list.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93228"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45dbdb2637b7fc5f1355b588780d2a7fb0516805"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9808eb7656666acc7291bae9ab6b987bd16e47e0"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a798714b58041e88716db3bf8fb03ae13eecd54a"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe533ae1bed2ef2b3d54ee7ab410da1874ed3d4f"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ ],
    "severity" : "CRITICAL",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-09-24T16:17:18Z"
  }
}