GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86: SurrealDB `RELATE` Overwrites Existing Edge Records Vulnerability

MODERATE
CVSS 4.3
CWE-285
Published
Advisory Summary

GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86 is a MODERATE (CVSS 4.3) `relate` overwrites existing edge records vulnerability (CWE-285: Improper Authorization) affecting SurrealDB libraries in the crates.io ecosystem. The issue involves `relate` overwrites existing edge records without `update` permission. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.1.0.

GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86 at a Glance

CVE Identifier N/A
GHSA Identifier GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 4.3
CWE Classification CWE-285: Improper Authorization
Affected Product SurrealDB
Package Ecosystem crates.io
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 4.3

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity Low (I:L)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected SurrealDB dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

surrealdb fixed: 3.1.0
Upgrade surrealdb to 3.1.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for surrealdb

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86, inspect your project dependencies for SurrealDB:

inspect dependencies for surrealdb

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of SurrealDB in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.1.0), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-285: Improper Authorization, where the product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. In SurrealDB, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

`RELATE` creates an edge record between two existing records, and SurrealDB enforces the `CREATE` permission on the edge table for this operation. When the statement included a `SET id = edge:existing` clause, however, the new edge's id ended up pointing at an record that was already in storage. Rather than failing because the target already existed — which is what a create operation should do — the storage layer silently overwrote the existing edge. A caller with `CREATE` permission could therefore replace any existing edge on the table, even without `UPDATE` permission for that record. ### Impact An authenticated user with `CREATE` permission on an edge table could overwrite any existing record on that table — including edges they had no `UPDATE` permission for — by issuing a `RELATE` whose `SET id = …` resolved to the target record's id. The attack is integrity-only. ### Patches A patch has been introduced that adds an explicit `Statement::Relate` arm using `put_record` instead of `set_record` when the create path is selected. Conflicting writes now return a `RecordExists` error. - Versions 3.1.0 and later are not affected by this issue. This is a behaviour change for applications that relied on RELATE … SET id = … to silently replace existing edges; after the patch those calls return RecordExists instead. Applications that need "create or replace" semantics should use UPSERT (which is correctly permission-gated for the update half). ### Workarounds The defect only fires when the `RELATE` statement includes a `SET id = …` clause that resolves to an existing edge id. Applications that let SurrealDB auto-generate the edge id (the default — `RELATE a:1 -> edge -> b:1 SET <data>` with no `id` override) are not affected, because auto-generated ids do not collide with existing records. Where applications must use `SET id = …` (for example, to produce deterministic edge ids for idempotency), they should first verify that no record with the target id exists before issuing the statement, or restrict `CREATE` permission on the edge table to principals trusted with `UPDATE` on the same table.

GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86 Affected SurrealDB Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
3.1.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
surrealdb
crates.io
< 3.1.0
3.1.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86?
GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86 is a security vulnerability in SurrealDB involving `RELATE` overwrites existing edge records without `UPDATE` permission under CWE-285: Improper Authorization.
Which SurrealDB versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 3.1.0 across affected packages: surrealdb.
What version fixes GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86?
Upgrading to 3.1.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is surrealdb affected?
Yes, surrealdb is affected in releases prior to 3.1.0. Upgrade your dependency to 3.1.0 or later.
What is the CVSS score of GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86?
GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.3 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N.
What CWE is associated with GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86?
GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86 is classified under CWE-285: Improper Authorization (The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.).
How can I check crates.io dependencies for GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for surrealdb'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86",
  "modified" : "2026-07-01T20:19:17Z",
  "published" : "2026-07-01T20:19:17Z",
  "aliases" : [ ],
  "summary" : "SurrealDB: `RELATE` overwrites existing edge records without `UPDATE` permission",
  "details" : "`RELATE` creates an edge record between two existing records, and SurrealDB enforces the `CREATE` permission on the edge table for this operation. When the statement included a `SET id = edge:existing` clause, however, the new edge's id ended up pointing at an record that was already in storage. Rather than failing because the target already existed — which is what a create operation should do — the storage layer silently overwrote the existing edge. A caller with `CREATE` permission could therefore replace any existing edge on the table, even without `UPDATE` permission for that record.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn authenticated user with `CREATE` permission on an edge table could overwrite any existing record on that table — including edges they had no `UPDATE` permission for — by issuing a `RELATE` whose `SET id = …` resolved to the target record's id. The attack is integrity-only.\n\n### Patches\n\nA patch has been introduced that adds an explicit `Statement::Relate` arm using `put_record` instead of `set_record` when the create path is selected. Conflicting writes now return a `RecordExists` error.\n\n- Versions 3.1.0 and later are not affected by this issue.\n\nThis is a behaviour change for applications that relied on RELATE … SET id = … to silently replace existing edges; after the patch those calls return RecordExists instead. Applications that need \"create or replace\" semantics should use UPSERT (which is correctly permission-gated for the update half).\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThe defect only fires when the `RELATE` statement includes a `SET id = …` clause that resolves to an existing edge id. Applications that let SurrealDB auto-generate the edge id (the default — `RELATE a:1 -> edge -> b:1 SET <data>` with no `id` override) are not affected, because auto-generated ids do not collide with existing records.\n\nWhere applications must use `SET id = …` (for example, to produce deterministic edge ids for idempotency), they should first verify that no record with the target id exists before issuing the statement, or restrict `CREATE` permission on the edge table to principals trusted with `UPDATE` on the same table.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "crates.io",
      "name" : "surrealdb"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.1.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/security/advisories/GHSA-f82j-v89j-mf86"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/commit/79aef90d9baf56147d21f6dcea7a59189ade0eb3"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/orgs/surrealdb/discussions/110"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-285" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-01T20:19:17Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}