CVE-2026-74632: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc
CVSS 7.8
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-74632 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.8) security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-74632 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-74632
GHSA Identifier GHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.8
CWE Classification General Security Weakness
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.8

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-74632

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-74632, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race Patch series "mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race", v2. There is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio implementation. The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker (which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn with the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a racing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there. This results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn being set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently is_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an ordinary THP folio. This can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated incorrectly. The solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and thus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very carefully. The first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around huge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to load/store ordering in the fast path. It is placed first and kept as small as possible so that it can be backported on its own. The second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent logic from the dynamically allocated one. This patch (of 2): If !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO, the huge_zero_folio is refcounted by huge_zero_refcount and returned by mm_get_huge_zero_folio(). When the caller is done with the huge zero page, its reference count is decremented. Only a shrinker can set the reference count to zero. A race can unfortunately occur between a shrinker decrementing the reference count to zero and a concurrent page fault. This is because shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() might, if very unlucky, be preempted between setting huge_zero_refcount to zero and writing an invalid value. During this time get_huge_zero_folio() could write to huge_zero_pfn before shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() resumes. In this event the huge zero folio will be persistently misidentified causing the THP code path to be entered inappropriately for the huge zero folio: CPU 0 CPU 1 =======================================|================================= shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() | atomic_cmpxchg() sets refcount to 0 | xchg() sets huge_zero_folio to NULL | get_huge_zero_folio() | | atomic_inc_not_zero() -> zero preempted for a long time | Allocate new huge zero folio | | Write valid huge_zero_folio v | Write valid huge_zero_pfn Overwrite huge_zero_pfn with ~0UL <--- Invalid overwrite! This results in is_huge_zero_pfn() and is_huge_zero_pmd() incorrectly returning false for a huge zero page which could result in issues like the huge zero folio being incorrectly split. Note that the issue is with huge_zero_pfn not huge_zero_folio, as get_huge_zero_folio() uses cmpxchg() gated on huge_zero_folio being NULL with a retry loop and shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() uses xchg() to set huge_zero_folio. Fix the issue by introducing a spinlock, huge_zero_lock, to prevent concurrent write of huge_zero_folio, huge_zero_pfn and huge_zero_refcount. There needs to be significant care taken here to ensure correctness: The fast path in get_huge_zero_folio() uses atomic_inc_not_zero(), which is outside of the critical section, and means huge zero allocation is gated on zero huge_zero_refcount. The fast path doesn't use huge_zero_lock, so the critical section is irrelevant to it. So invariants are required - huge_zero_refcount MUST: * Only be set in the huge_zero_lock critical section to ensure serialisation of huge_zero_pfn, huge_zero_folio and ---truncated---

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-74632?
CVE-2026-74632 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under General Security Weakness.
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-74632?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74632?
CVE-2026-74632 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-74632?
CVE-2026-74632 is classified under General Security Weakness.
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-74632?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc",
  "modified" : "2026-08-27T15:31:30Z",
  "published" : "2026-08-22T18:30:27Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-74632" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race\n\nPatch series \"mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race\", v2.\n\nThere is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio\nimplementation.\n\nThe fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker\n(which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn\nwith the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a\nracing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there.\n\nThis results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn\nbeing set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently\nis_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an\nordinary THP folio.\n\nThis can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated\nincorrectly.\n\nThe solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and\nthus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very\ncarefully.\n\nThe first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around\nhuge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to\nload/store ordering in the fast path.  It is placed first and kept as\nsmall as possible so that it can be backported on its own.\n\nThe second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the\nCONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent\nlogic from the dynamically allocated one.\n\n\nThis patch (of 2):\n\nIf !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO, the huge_zero_folio is refcounted\nby huge_zero_refcount and returned by mm_get_huge_zero_folio().\n\nWhen the caller is done with the huge zero page, its reference count is\ndecremented.  Only a shrinker can set the reference count to zero.\n\nA race can unfortunately occur between a shrinker decrementing the\nreference count to zero and a concurrent page fault.\n\nThis is because shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() might, if very unlucky, be\npreempted between setting huge_zero_refcount to zero and writing an\ninvalid value.\n\nDuring this time get_huge_zero_folio() could write to huge_zero_pfn before\nshrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() resumes.\n\nIn this event the huge zero folio will be persistently misidentified\ncausing the THP code path to be entered inappropriately for the huge zero\nfolio:\n\n                CPU 0                                   CPU 1\n=======================================|=================================\nshrink_huge_zero_folio_scan()          |\n   atomic_cmpxchg() sets refcount to 0 |\n   xchg() sets huge_zero_folio to NULL | get_huge_zero_folio()\n                 |                     |    atomic_inc_not_zero() -> zero\n      preempted for a long time        |    Allocate new huge zero folio\n                 |                     |    Write valid huge_zero_folio\n                 v                     |    Write valid huge_zero_pfn\n  Overwrite huge_zero_pfn with ~0UL   <--- Invalid overwrite!\n\nThis results in is_huge_zero_pfn() and is_huge_zero_pmd() incorrectly\nreturning false for a huge zero page which could result in issues like the\nhuge zero folio being incorrectly split.\n\nNote that the issue is with huge_zero_pfn not huge_zero_folio, as\nget_huge_zero_folio() uses cmpxchg() gated on huge_zero_folio being NULL\nwith a retry loop and shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() uses xchg() to set\nhuge_zero_folio.\n\nFix the issue by introducing a spinlock, huge_zero_lock, to prevent\nconcurrent write of huge_zero_folio, huge_zero_pfn and huge_zero_refcount.\n\nThere needs to be significant care taken here to ensure correctness:\n\nThe fast path in get_huge_zero_folio() uses atomic_inc_not_zero(), which\nis outside of the critical section, and means huge zero allocation is\ngated on zero huge_zero_refcount.\n\nThe fast path doesn't use huge_zero_lock, so the critical section is\nirrelevant to it.\n\nSo invariants are required - huge_zero_refcount MUST:\n\n* Only be set in the huge_zero_lock critical section to ensure\n  serialisation of huge_zero_pfn, huge_zero_folio and\n---truncated---",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74632"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/105d04edbec83010df5728f74d17fd9c108e7553"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33192a26cddea7a7e4ca66e5c3eebd36fa8be2bb"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6024f6d0d9b9ca5138bfc4ac6f6e4bdf616e42b3"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9332b080ad57650d1dc582e54517f9fc78ef89cc"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c0fd1802ce06d7709f0bae4edeb085288f28764"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab7e4b407c7f58d1a003134eff3841f303d5ccc2"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b7041ba61c5da4e0b56f9be58cfb87d7689724e4"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3a874a903053c53fb53ba287ea9eacda69c68e8"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-08-22T16:16:36Z"
  }
}