CVE-2025-71126: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-cqcj-p3px-rprf
CVSS 5.5
CWE-362 CWE-667
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2025-71126 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.5) security vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. The weakness occurs when the product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2025-71126 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2025-71126
GHSA Identifier GHSA-cqcj-p3px-rprf
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.5
CWE Classification CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2025-71126

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2025-71126, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'), where the product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: avoid deadlock on fallback while reinjecting Jakub reported an MPTCP deadlock at fallback time: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 but task is already holding lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&msk->fallback_lock); lock(&msk->fallback_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858: #0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0 #1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0 #2: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0 __lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740 lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50 __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050 __mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0 mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70 release_sock+0xab/0x1d0 mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0 sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0 new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0 vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0 ksys_write+0x17e/0x200 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <c9> c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920 R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c The packet scheduler could attempt a reinjection after receiving an MP_FAIL and before the infinite map has been transmitted, causing a deadlock since MPTCP needs to do the reinjection atomically from WRT fallback. Address the issue explicitly avoiding the reinjection in the critical scenario. Note that this is the only fallback critical section that could potentially send packets and hit the double-lock.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2025-71126?
CVE-2025-71126 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition').
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2025-71126?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-71126?
CVE-2025-71126 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2025-71126?
CVE-2025-71126 is classified under CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') (The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.).
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2025-71126?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-cqcj-p3px-rprf",
  "modified" : "2026-03-25T21:30:22Z",
  "published" : "2026-01-14T15:33:02Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2025-71126" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: avoid deadlock on fallback while reinjecting\n\nJakub reported an MPTCP deadlock at fallback time:\n\n WARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted\n --------------------------------------------\n mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock:\n ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280\n\n but task is already holding lock:\n ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0\n\n other info that might help us debug this:\n  Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n        CPU0\n        ----\n   lock(&msk->fallback_lock);\n   lock(&msk->fallback_lock);\n\n  *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n  May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n 3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858:\n  #0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0\n  #1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0\n  #2: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0\n\n stack backtrace:\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full)\n Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011\n Call Trace:\n  <TASK>\n  dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0\n  print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd\n  validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0\n  __lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740\n  lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260\n  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50\n  __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280\n  mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050\n  __mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0\n  mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70\n  release_sock+0xab/0x1d0\n  mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0\n  sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0\n  new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0\n  vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0\n  ksys_write+0x17e/0x200\n  do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0\n  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e\n Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <c9> c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa\n RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e\n RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005\n RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920\n R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c\n\nThe packet scheduler could attempt a reinjection after receiving an\nMP_FAIL and before the infinite map has been transmitted, causing a\ndeadlock since MPTCP needs to do the reinjection atomically from WRT\nfallback.\n\nAddress the issue explicitly avoiding the reinjection in the critical\nscenario. Note that this is the only fallback critical section that\ncould potentially send packets and hit the double-lock.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71126"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0107442e82c0f8d6010e07e6030741c59c520d6e"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ca9fb4335e726dab4f23b3bfe87271d8f005f41"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/252892d5a6a2f163ce18f32716e46fa4da7d4e79"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50f47c02be419bf0a3ae94c118addf67beef359f"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ffb8c27b0539dd90262d1021488e7817fae57c42"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-362", "CWE-667" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-01-14T15:16:02Z"
  }
}