CVE-2026-61598: djust Client Mass-assignment Of Arbitrary View Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj
CWE-915
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-61598 is a HIGH client mass-assignment of arbitrary view vulnerability (CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes) affecting djust libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves client mass-assignment of arbitrary view attributes via the default dj-model update_model handler. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.0.7.

CVE-2026-61598 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-61598
GHSA Identifier GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
Affected Product djust
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix CVE-2026-61598

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected djust dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

djust fixed: 1.0.7
pip install djust>=1.0.7
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show djust

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-61598, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show djust

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of djust in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.0.7), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show djust command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes, where the product receives input from an upstream component that specifies multiple attributes, properties, or fields that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control which attributes can be modified. In djust, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Impact `djust.mixins.model_binding.ModelBindingMixin` provides a default `update_model` event handler and is part of the **LiveView base MRO**, so every LiveView exposes it. It `setattr`s a view attribute whose **name is client-supplied** (`field`), gated only by: reject `_`-prefixed names; reject a **14-entry denylist** of framework internals (`FORBIDDEN_MODEL_FIELDS`); optional `allowed_model_fields` which **defaults to None = allow all**; and `hasattr` existence. Result: a client can set **any public, existing view attribute — not just the fields actually bound with `dj-model=` in the rendered template**. The denylist covers framework plumbing but nothing about developer business/authz state, and the allowlist is opt-in (off by default). A developer who binds one `dj-model="search"` input and also keeps `self.account_id` / `self.is_admin` / `self.total_price` as view state does not realize a client can set ALL of them via `{type:event, event:"update_model", params:{field, value}}` over the WebSocket. Type coercion matches the target attribute's type (so `"true"` -> bool True), aiding the attacker. **Severity High** for apps that hold authorization/ownership/business state in public view attributes (the normal djust pattern) -> state tampering / IDOR / authz-flag manipulation; Low otherwise. Default-on across every LiveView. For a public (no-login) view an anonymous client can mass-assign; for an authenticated view a logged-in user can tamper their own session's view state (the IDOR/authz vector when downstream handlers act on it without re-authorizing). Reproduced: a view with `account_id/is_admin/total_price` (none bound with dj-model) had all three set via `update_model` calls. ### Patches Restrict the default handler to fields actually exposed via `dj-model=`: have the template renderer record the bound-field set per render and reject any `field` outside it (preferred, secure + zero-config); or make `allowed_model_fields` fail-closed (required). Keep `FORBIDDEN_MODEL_FIELDS` only as defense-in-depth. Add a regression that a non-`dj-model` public attribute (e.g. `is_admin`) is rejected while a bound field still updates. ### Workarounds Set `allowed_model_fields` explicitly on every view using dj-model (or subclassing LiveView) to the minimal list of bindable fields; do not keep authorization/ownership state in public view attributes that share the view with dj-model bindings. ### References Reproducer + finding writeup retained privately by the maintainer.

CVE-2026-61598 Affected djust Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
1.0.7
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
djust
PyPI
< 1.0.7
1.0.7

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-61598?
CVE-2026-61598 is a security vulnerability in djust involving Client mass-assignment of arbitrary view attributes via the default dj-model update_model handler under CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes.
Which djust versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 1.0.7 across affected packages: djust.
What version fixes CVE-2026-61598?
Upgrading to 1.0.7 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is djust affected?
Yes, djust is affected in releases prior to 1.0.7. Upgrade your dependency to 1.0.7 or later.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-61598?
CVE-2026-61598 is classified under CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes (The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies multiple attributes, properties, or fields that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control which attributes can be modified.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-61598?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show djust'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj",
  "modified" : "2026-09-16T13:55:48Z",
  "published" : "2026-09-16T13:55:48Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-61598" ],
  "summary" : "djust: Client mass-assignment of arbitrary view attributes via the default dj-model update_model handler",
  "details" : "### Impact\n`djust.mixins.model_binding.ModelBindingMixin` provides a default `update_model` event handler and is part of the **LiveView base MRO**, so every LiveView exposes it. It `setattr`s a view attribute whose **name is client-supplied** (`field`), gated only by: reject `_`-prefixed names; reject a **14-entry denylist** of framework internals (`FORBIDDEN_MODEL_FIELDS`); optional `allowed_model_fields` which **defaults to None = allow all**; and `hasattr` existence.\n\nResult: a client can set **any public, existing view attribute — not just the fields actually bound with `dj-model=` in the rendered template**. The denylist covers framework plumbing but nothing about developer business/authz state, and the allowlist is opt-in (off by default). A developer who binds one `dj-model=\"search\"` input and also keeps `self.account_id` / `self.is_admin` / `self.total_price` as view state does not realize a client can set ALL of them via `{type:event, event:\"update_model\", params:{field, value}}` over the WebSocket. Type coercion matches the target attribute's type (so `\"true\"` -> bool True), aiding the attacker.\n\n**Severity High** for apps that hold authorization/ownership/business state in public view attributes (the normal djust pattern) -> state tampering / IDOR / authz-flag manipulation; Low otherwise. Default-on across every LiveView. For a public (no-login) view an anonymous client can mass-assign; for an authenticated view a logged-in user can tamper their own session's view state (the IDOR/authz vector when downstream handlers act on it without re-authorizing).\n\nReproduced: a view with `account_id/is_admin/total_price` (none bound with dj-model) had all three set via `update_model` calls.\n\n### Patches\nRestrict the default handler to fields actually exposed via `dj-model=`: have the template renderer record the bound-field set per render and reject any `field` outside it (preferred, secure + zero-config); or make `allowed_model_fields` fail-closed (required). Keep `FORBIDDEN_MODEL_FIELDS` only as defense-in-depth. Add a regression that a non-`dj-model` public attribute (e.g. `is_admin`) is rejected while a bound field still updates.\n\n### Workarounds\nSet `allowed_model_fields` explicitly on every view using dj-model (or subclassing LiveView) to the minimal list of bindable fields; do not keep authorization/ownership state in public view attributes that share the view with dj-model bindings.\n\n### References\nReproducer + finding writeup retained privately by the maintainer.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "djust"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "1.0.7"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advisories/GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/djust-org/djust"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-915" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-16T13:55:48Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}