CVE-2026-93243: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability
UNKNOWNCVE-2026-93243 is a security vulnerability vulnerability (General Security Weakness) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
CVE-2026-93243 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-93243
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
mvn dependency:tree
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-93243, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:
mvn dependency:tree
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under General Security Weakness. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-93243?
Which Software versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-93243?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-93243?
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-93243?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-9q86-wxfp-682m",
"modified" : "2026-10-15T12:30:53Z",
"published" : "2026-09-24T18:31:23Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-93243" ],
"details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/secretmem: properly account locked pages\n\nsecretmem accounts folios by treating memory as if it were mlock()'d and\nthus limited by the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit.\n\nHowever the folios are unevictable and remain so until the inode is\nevicted, eliminating usual mlock() semantics - mapping folios then\nunmapping them does not clear their unevictable state, since it depends on\nAS_UNEVICTABLE, not PG_mlocked.\n\nA user can therefore easily work around the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit - simply\nmap then unmap and VmLck no longer counts the secretmem range. Worse,\nfolios are not accounted in the process's RSS, meaning the OOM killer\nwon't know to kill the process.\n\nRepeatedly mapping/unmapping (or forking) can then result in the\nconsumption of all available system memory with unevictable folios and\ncause system instability.\n\nA secretmem fd can be passed between processes and over fork so a\nper-process limit simply does not make sense, so follow the precedent set\nby io_uring, perf, skbuff, iommufd and xdp by tracking the number of\nlocked pages in user_struct->locked_vm.\n\nSince the scope tracked is actually inode lifetime, the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK\napplies per-user not per-process, so it doesn't make sense to bypass for\nusers with CAP_IPC_LOCK, therefore remove this bypass.\n\nThere is simply no reason to carry on marking the mapping as mlock()'d\nsince it's misleading and the lifecycle is now correctly handled, so\nremove this too.\n\nNote that secretmem does not support any form of truncation (including\nhole punching) and the folios are unreclaimable, so the folios need only\nbe accounted on fault and unaccounted on inode destruction.\n\n__secretmem_account_pages() is more or less a duplicate of the code that\nio_uring etc. use, but since this is a bug fix that needs backporting,\ndefer any de-duplication efforts to a follow-up.\n\ntest_mlock_limit() asserts mlock_future_ok() on mmap(), however this has\nbeen removed, so remove the test altogether for the fix. A new test will\nbe sent separately for upstream.",
"severity" : [ ],
"affected" : [ ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93243"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b4f72bdddff69819d665395376329ef21f37a06"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/853043cb129473ff2fa0090602be944d96b9d5c9"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/97d34aa65c29cca85e3e9050f4c936389b38a054"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a41c95ac90f285cbe473b9606428b14518896ea4"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ ],
"severity" : null,
"github_reviewed" : false,
"github_reviewed_at" : null,
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-09-24T16:17:20Z"
}
}