CVE-2026-41164: Github.com/nuts foundation/nuts node Nuts-node Has JWT Type Confusion Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2026-41164 is a MODERATE (CVSS 4.4) nuts-node has jwt type confusion vulnerability (CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity) affecting Github.com/nuts foundation/nuts node libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves nuts-node has jwt type confusion in v1 access token introspection that allows vp replay as access token. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.
CVE-2026-41164 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 4.4
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-41164
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Github.com/nuts foundation/nuts node dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node to Latest secure release
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-41164, inspect your project dependencies for Github.com/nuts foundation/nuts node:
inspect dependencies for github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Github.com/nuts foundation/nuts node in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity, where the product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data. In Github.com/nuts foundation/nuts node, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-41164 Affected Github.com/nuts foundation/nuts node Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node
|
Go |
≤ 1.1.0
|
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-41164?
Which Github.com/nuts foundation/nuts node versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-41164?
Is github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41164?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-41164?
How can I check Go dependencies for CVE-2026-41164?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-9hmg-827w-9rhj",
"modified" : "2026-06-08T23:28:00Z",
"published" : "2026-05-05T17:15:32Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-41164" ],
"summary" : "nuts-node has JWT type confusion in v1 access token introspection that allows VP replay as access token",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nThe v1 access token introspection endpoint (`/auth/v1/introspect_access_token`) accepts any JWT signed by a key present on the node, without validating the JWT type, issuer-to-key binding, or required claims. This allows a Verifiable Presentation (VP) JWT to be replayed as an access token and receive an `active: true` introspection response.\n\n## Background\n\nIn the v1 auth flow ([Nuts RFC003](https://nuts-foundation.gitbook.io/v1/rfc/rfc003-oauth2-authorization)), access tokens are JWTs signed by the authorizer's key with:\n- `iss` = authorizer organization DID\n- `sub` = requester organization DID\n- `service` = purpose of use (e.g. `\"eOverdracht\"`)\n- `typ` header = `\"JWT\"` (default, not explicitly set)\n\nVerifiable Presentations are also JWTs with `typ: \"JWT\"` (per W3C VC Data Model 1.1). The W3C VC Data Model 2.0 changed this to `vp+jwt` specifically to prevent this class of confusion attack (See [Securing Verifiable Credentials using JOSE and COSE 3.1.1](https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-jose-cose/#securing-with-jose)).\n\n## Vulnerability details\n\nThe introspection endpoint performs only standard JWT checks. It does not perform the following Nuts-specific access token checks:\n\n1. **Validate the `typ` header**: both ATs and VPs use `\"JWT\"`\n2. **Bind `iss` to the signing key**: it doesn't verify that the `iss` claim matches the DID extracted from the `kid`\n3. **Validate required claims**: `service` can be empty; `vp` claim is silently ignored by `FromMap()` which uses lenient JSON unmarshaling\n\n## Attack scenario\n\n**Prerequisites:** Attacker (Org B) has received a VP JWT from the victim (Org A) during a normal access token request flow.\n\n1. Org A creates a VP JWT signed with Org A's key and sends it to Org B (normal protocol flow) to request an access token\n2. Org B presents this VP JWT to Org A's resource server as a bearer access token\n3. Resource server calls Org A's v1 introspection endpoint\n4. Introspection checks `privateKeyStore.Exists(kid)`, which passes, because Org A's key is on Org A's node\n5. JSON unmarshaling is lenient; the `vp` claim is silently ignored\n6. Returns `active: true` with `service: \"\"`, `iss: \"\"`, `sub: <Org A's DID>`\n\n## Mitigating factors\n\n- **`service` is empty**: resource servers that strictly require a non-empty `service` field may reject the request at the application level\n- **`iss` is empty**: VP JWTs don't set `iss`, so resource servers checking this field would see an empty value\n- **Short-lived VPs**: VPs typically expire within minutes, narrowing the attack window\n- **v1 is legacy**: the v2 flow uses opaque access tokens and is not affected\n\n## Severity rationale\n\nWhile the introspection endpoint incorrectly returns `active: true` for a replayed VP, we consider this not practically exploitable in the current deployment landscape. Resource servers require valid `service`, `iss` and `aud` values to route requests to the correct databases. A replayed VP returns empty `service`, empty `iss`, and wrong `sub` (Org A instead of B), making it unusable for meaningful access. The attack also requires the victim to first present a VP to the attacker through a legitimate protocol flow, and VPs are short-lived.\n\nThe severity reflects that the protection against exploitation is accidental (resource servers need `service` for routing, not for security) and we cannot guarantee how all resource server implementations handle the `active: true` response with missing fields.\n\n## The fix\n\nAffected versions: all v5.x releases prior to v5.4.31, and all v6.x releases prior to v6.2.3. From v5.4.31 and v6.2.3 onward, the following checks have been added to `IntrospectAccessToken`:\n\n1. **`iss`-to-`kid` binding**: extract the DID from the `kid` header and verify it matches the `iss` claim\n2. **Required claims validation**: reject tokens where `service` is empty\n3. **`typ` header validation**: requires access tokens to be of `typ: \"at+jwt\"`\n\nAdditionally, the access token creation code has been updated to use `typ: \"at+jwt\"` per RFC 9068.\n\n## Patch\n\nPatches are available at https://github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node/releases/tag/v5.4.31 and https://github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node/releases/tag/v6.2.3.\n\n## Workaround\n\nIf users are unable to update their nuts-node, resource servers can mitigate this risk by explicitly validating the introspection response: reject responses where `service` is empty, where `iss` is empty or does not match the expected authorizer DID, or where `sub` does not match the expected requester DID (Org B instead of A).",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Go",
"name" : "github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"last_affected" : "1.1.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node/security/advisories/GHSA-9hmg-827w-9rhj"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41164"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node/releases/tag/v5.4.31"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/nuts-foundation/nuts-node/releases/tag/v6.2.3"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-345" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-05T17:15:32Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-05-26T18:16:47Z"
}
}