CVE-2024-32884: Gix transport Gix-transport Indirect Code Execution Vulnerability
MODERATECVE-2024-32884 is a MODERATE (CVSS 6.4) gix-transport indirect code execution vulnerability (CWE-88: Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')) affecting Gix transport libraries in the crates.io ecosystem. The issue involves gix-transport indirect code execution via malicious username. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.42.0, 0.62, 0.35.
CVE-2024-32884 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 6.4
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L).
How to Fix CVE-2024-32884
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Gix transport dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade gix-transport to 0.42.0
Upgrade gix to 0.62
Upgrade gitoxide to 0.35
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for gix-transport
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2024-32884, inspect your project dependencies for Gix transport:
inspect dependencies for gix-transport
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Gix transport in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.42.0), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-88: Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection'), where the product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string. In Gix transport, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2024-32884 Affected Gix transport Versions
3 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
gix-transport
|
crates.io |
< 0.42.0
|
0.42.0
|
|
gix
|
crates.io |
< 0.62
|
0.62
|
|
gitoxide
|
crates.io |
< 0.35
|
0.35
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2024-32884?
Which Gix transport versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2024-32884?
Is gix-transport affected?
Is gix affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-32884?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2024-32884?
How can I check crates.io dependencies for CVE-2024-32884?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-98p4-xjmm-8mfh",
"modified" : "2024-07-05T18:07:37Z",
"published" : "2024-04-15T19:33:03Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2024-32884" ],
"summary" : "gix-transport indirect code execution via malicious username",
"details" : "### Summary\n\n`gix-transport` does not check the username part of a URL for text that the external `ssh` program would interpret as an option. A specially crafted clone URL can smuggle options to SSH. The possibilities are syntactically limited, but if a malicious clone URL is used by an application whose current working directory contains a malicious file, arbitrary code execution occurs.\n\n### Details\n\nThis is related to the patched vulnerability https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rrjw-j4m2-mf34, but appears less severe due to a greater attack complexity. Since https://github.com/Byron/gitoxide/pull/1032, `gix-transport` checks the host and path portions of a URL for text that has a `-` in a position that will cause `ssh` to interpret part of all of the URL as an option argument. But it does not check the non-mandatory username portion of the URL.\n\nAs in Git, when an address is a URL of the form `ssh://username@hostname/path`, or when it takes the special form `username@hostname:dirs/repo`, this is treated as an SSH URL. `gix-transport` will replace some characters in `username` with their `%`-based URL encodings, but otherwise passes `username@hostname` as an argument to the external `ssh` command. This happens even if `username` begins with a hyphen. In that case, `ssh` treats that argument as an option argument, and attempts to interpret and honor it as a sequence of one or more options possibly followed by an operand for the last option.\n\nThis is harder to exploit than GHSA-rrjw-j4m2-mf34, because the possibilities are constrained by:\n\n- The difficulty of forming an option argument `ssh` accepts, given that characters such as `=`, `/`, and `\\`, are URL-encoded, `:` is removed, and the argument passed to `ssh` contains the `@` sign and subsequent host identifier, which in an effective attack must be parseable as a suffix of the operand passed to the last option.\n\n The inability to include a literal `=` prevents the use of `-oNAME=VALUE` (e.g., `-oProxyCommand=payload`). The inability to include a literal `/` or `\\` prevents smuggling in a path operand residing outside the current working directory, incuding on Windows. (Although a `~` character may be smuggled in, `ssh` does not perform its own tilde expansion, so it does not form an absolute path.)\n\n- The difficulty, or perhaps impossibility, of completing a connection (other than when arbitrary code execution has been achieved). This complicates or altogether prevents the use of options such as `-A` and `-X` together with a connection to a real but malicious server. The reason a connection cannot generally be completed when exploiting this vulnerability is that, because the argument `gix-transport` intends as a URL is treated as an option argument, `ssh` treats the subsequent non-option argument `git-upload-pack` as the host instead of the command, but it is not a valid host name.\n\n Although `ssh` supports aliases for hosts, even if `git-upload-pack` could be made an alias, that is made difficult by the URL-encoding transformation.\n\nHowever, an attacker who is able to cause a specially named `ssh` configuration file to be placed in the current working directory can smuggle in an `-F` option referencing the file, and this allows arbitrary command execution.\n\nThis scenario is especially plausible because programs that operate on git repositories are often run in untrusted git repositories, sometimes even to operate on another repository. Situations where this is likely, such that an attacker could predict or arrange it, may for some applications include a malicious repository with a malicious submodule configuration.\n\nOther avenues of exploitation exist, but appear to be less severe. For example, the `-E` option can be smuggled to create or append to a file in the current directory (or its target, if it is a symlink). There may also be other significant ways to exploit this that have not yet been discovered, or that would arise with new options in future versions of `ssh`.\n\n### PoC\n\nTo reproduce the known case that facilitates arbitrary code execution, first create a file in the current directory named `configfile@example.com`, of the form\n\n```text\nProxyCommand payload\n```\n\nwhere `payload` is a command with an observable side effect. On Unix-like systems, this could be `date | tee vulnerable` or an `xdg-open`, `open`, or other command command to launch a graphical application. On Windows, this could be the name of a graphical application already in the search path, such as `calc.exe`.\n\n(Although the syntax permitted in the value of `ProxyCommand` may vary by platform, this is not limited to running commands in the current directory. That limitation only applies to paths directly smuggled in the username, not to the contents of a separate malicious configuration file. Arbitrary other settings may be specified in `configfile@example.com` as well.)\n\nThen run:\n\n```sh\ngix clone 'ssh://-Fconfigfile@example.com/abc'\n```\n\nOr:\n\n```sh\ngix clone -- '-Fconfigfile@example.com:abc/def'\n```\n\n(The `--` is required to ensure that `gix` is really passing the argument as a URL for use in `gix-transport`, rather than interpreting it as an option itself, which would not necessarily be a vulnerability.)\n\nIn either case, the payload specified in `configfile@example.com` runs, and its side effect can be observed.\n\nOther cases may likewise be produced, in either of the above two forms of SSH addresses. For example, to create or append to the file `errors@example.com`, or to create or append to its target if it is a symlink:\n\n```sh\ngix clone 'ssh://-Eerrors@example.com/abc'\n```\n\n```sh\ngix clone -- '-Eerrors@example.com:abc/def'\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAs in https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rrjw-j4m2-mf34, this would typically require user interaction to trigger an attempt to clone or otherwise connect using the malicious URL. Furthermore, known means of exploiting this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands require further preparatory steps to establish a specially named file in the current directory. The impact is therefore expected to be lesser, though it is difficult to predict it with certainty because it is not known exactly what scenarios will arise when using the `gix-transport` library.\n\nUsers who use applications that make use of `gix-transport` are potentially vulnerable, especially:\n\n- On repositories with submodules that are automatically added, depending how the application manages submodules.\n- When operating on other repositories from inside an untrusted repository.\n- When reviewing contributions from untrusted developers by checking out a branch from an untrusted fork and performing clones from that location.\n",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "crates.io",
"name" : "gix-transport"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.42.0"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "crates.io",
"name" : "gix"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.62"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "crates.io",
"name" : "gitoxide"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.35"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Byron/gitoxide/security/advisories/GHSA-98p4-xjmm-8mfh"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32884"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/Byron/gitoxide"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0335.html"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-77", "CWE-88" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2024-04-15T19:33:03Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2024-04-26T18:15:46Z"
}
}