CVE-2024-58367: SurrealDB Improper Authorization Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-9722-9j67-vjcr
CVSS 6.5
CWE-285
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2024-58367 is a HIGH (CVSS 6.5) improper authorization vulnerability (CWE-285: Improper Authorization) affecting SurrealDB libraries in the crates.io ecosystem. The issue involves improper authorization in select permissions. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2.0.4.

CVE-2024-58367 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2024-58367
GHSA Identifier GHSA-9722-9j67-vjcr
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 6.5
CWE Classification CWE-285: Improper Authorization
Affected Product SurrealDB
Package Ecosystem crates.io
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 6.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2024-58367

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected SurrealDB dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

surrealdb fixed: 2.0.4
Upgrade surrealdb to 2.0.4
surrealdb-core fixed: 2.0.4
Upgrade surrealdb-core to 2.0.4
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for surrealdb

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2024-58367, inspect your project dependencies for SurrealDB:

inspect dependencies for surrealdb

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of SurrealDB in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2.0.4), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-285: Improper Authorization, where the product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. In SurrealDB, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

Due to the order in which permissions were processed, some statements, filters and computations could lead to leaking field values or record contents to users without the required permissions. This behavior could be triggered in different scenarios: - When performing a `SELECT` operation on a table, the values that would be returned were iterated over, field permissions would be validated and any unauthorized value would be removed from the result returned. However, performing a `SELECT VALUE` operation (e.g. `SELECT VALUE private FROM data`) would result in a non-iterable value, which would not be removed from the returned result. - When aliasing a field (e.g. `SELECT private AS public FROM data`) for which the user did not have `SELECT` permissions within a `SELECT` query, permissions would be checked against the field of the resulting document containing the aliased field instead of the original document containing the original field. As a consequence, the original field value would be returned as the returned field would not match the original field where permissions had been defined. - When calling a function in the context of a `SELECT` query and passing a field with permissions as an argument to the function (e.g. `SELECT string::lowercase(private) FROM data`), the function would receive the field value before it had been removed from the document due to `SELECT` permissions. As a result, the function would have access to the value of the field regardless of field permissions. This case includes functions called from within events and other clauses that support function calling. - When executing a query containing a `WHERE` clause filtering records by a field that the querying user does not have access to `SELECT` (e.g. `SELECT public FROM data WHERE private ~ "secret"`), the response of that query would still take the value of the field into account. Even though the value of the protected field would not be returned, this behavior could be used as a side channel by the querying user to infer information about the value of the field. - When performing `UPDATE` or `DELETE` operations over a table with a user that had those permissions but no `SELECT` permission, the `RETURN BEFORE` clause could be used (e.g. `DELETE data RETURN BEFORE`) to read the contents of the records prior to the authorized update or the deletion despite the querying user not being authorized to perform `SELECT` operations. - When performing `UPDATE` operations on a table for which the user had `SELECT` and `UPDATE` permissions, the `SET` clause could reference fields that the user had `UPDATE` but no `SELECT` permission for (e.g. `UPDATE data SET public = private`) in order to update the value of a field that the user had permission to `SELECT` to the value of another field for which the user did not. ### Impact Clients that were authorized by table permissions to execute `SELECT` statements for a table but were not authorized by field permissions to run `SELECT` queries for a specific field could still have been able to gain knowledge of the value of that field. Additionally, clients that were authorized to execute `UPDATE` or `DELETE` statements for a table but not authorized to execute `SELECT` statements for the same table may have been able to gain knowledge of the contents of records in that table. This could only be exploited by users who were already authorized to execute queries on the database with the affected table or field. Due to its relationship with table and field permissions, which apply mainly to record users rather than system users, this issue mostly affects users relying on SurrealDB as a backend-as-a-service rather than SurrealDB as a traditional database backend. ### Patches The behavior when evaluating table or field permissions and filtering records or fields as a result of those evaluations has been improved to consider permissions before any changes to the document have been made and, when relevant, permissions after changes to the document have taken place. When a user is unauthorized to view record contents and field values by permissions, the returned documents will behave as if the record or field did not exist in order to prevent leaking any information. - Version 2.0.4 and later are not affected by this issue. ### Workarounds Users affected by this issue and unable to update should not rely on the authorization provided by field permissions when it comes to the `SELECT` permission. Instead, read access to fields in affected versions should be restricted at the table level. When allowing the `UPDATE` or `DELETE` operations for records via table permissions, users should not rely of the authorization provided by the `SELECT` permission. Instead, users should not allow clients to `UPDATE` or `DELETE` records that they should not be able to view.

CVE-2024-58367 Affected SurrealDB Versions

2 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
2.0.4
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
surrealdb
crates.io
< 2.0.4
2.0.4
surrealdb-core
crates.io
< 2.0.4
2.0.4

References

GitHub Advisory / Wiki ADVISORY
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/security/advisories/GHSA-9722-9j67-vjcr
NVD — CVE-2024-58367 NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58367
SurrealDB Source Repository REPOSITORY
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/issues/2161
SurrealDB Source Repository REPOSITORY
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/issues/3924
SurrealDB Source Repository REPOSITORY
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/pull/4785
SurrealDB Source Repository REPOSITORY
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/pull/4800
SurrealDB Source Repository REPOSITORY
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/pull/4873
Security Fix Commit FIX COMMIT
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/commit/439ab99e15314ec5cf87047bf58246db646e3f8c
Security Fix Commit FIX COMMIT
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/commit/c382fa158dc84b329328606f663efe574f102a7d
Security Fix Commit FIX COMMIT
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/commit/e75e7736b3a028c4b6a4a4bdf00791d76f77e339
SurrealDB Source Repository REPOSITORY
https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb
SurrealDB Security Information SECURITY
https://surrealdb.com/docs/surrealdb/security/summary#permissions
SurrealDB Security Information SECURITY
https://surrealdb.com/docs/surrealql/statements/define/field#setting-permissions-on-fields
SurrealDB Security Information SECURITY
https://surrealdb.com/docs/surrealql/statements/define/table#defining-permissions
www.vulncheck.com/advisories/surreald... WEB
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/surrealdb-before-improper-authorization-via-select-permissions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2024-58367?
CVE-2024-58367 is a security vulnerability in SurrealDB involving Improper Authorization in Select Permissions under CWE-285: Improper Authorization.
Which SurrealDB versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 2.0.4 across affected packages: surrealdb, surrealdb-core.
What version fixes CVE-2024-58367?
Upgrading to 2.0.4 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is surrealdb affected?
Yes, surrealdb is affected in releases prior to 2.0.4. Upgrade your dependency to 2.0.4 or later.
Is surrealdb-core affected?
Yes, surrealdb-core is affected in releases prior to 2.0.4. Upgrade your dependency to 2.0.4 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-58367?
CVE-2024-58367 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2024-58367?
CVE-2024-58367 is classified under CWE-285: Improper Authorization (The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.).
How can I check crates.io dependencies for CVE-2024-58367?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for surrealdb'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-9722-9j67-vjcr",
  "modified" : "2026-09-04T19:38:36Z",
  "published" : "2024-10-08T22:21:09Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2024-58367" ],
  "summary" : "SurrealDB: Improper Authorization in Select Permissions",
  "details" : "Due to the order in which permissions were processed, some statements, filters and computations could lead to leaking field values or record contents to users without the required permissions. This behavior could be triggered in different scenarios:\n\n- When performing a `SELECT` operation on a table, the values that would be returned were iterated over, field permissions would be validated and any unauthorized value would be removed from the result returned. However, performing a `SELECT VALUE` operation (e.g. `SELECT VALUE private FROM data`) would result in a non-iterable value, which would not be removed from the returned result.\n\n- When aliasing a field (e.g. `SELECT private AS public FROM data`) for which the user did not have `SELECT` permissions within a `SELECT` query, permissions would be checked against the field of the resulting document containing the aliased field instead of the original document containing the original field. As a consequence, the original field value would be returned as the returned field would not match the original field where permissions had been defined.\n\n- When calling a function in the context of a `SELECT` query and passing a field with permissions as an argument to the function (e.g. `SELECT string::lowercase(private) FROM data`), the function would receive the field value before it had been removed from the document due to `SELECT` permissions. As a result, the function would have access to the value of the field regardless of field permissions. This case includes functions called from within events and other clauses that support function calling.\n\n- When executing a query containing a `WHERE` clause filtering records by a field that the querying user does not have access to `SELECT` (e.g. `SELECT public FROM data WHERE private ~ \"secret\"`), the response of that query would still take the value of the field into account. Even though the value of the protected field would not be returned, this behavior could be used as a side channel by the querying user to infer information about the value of the field.\n\n- When performing `UPDATE` or `DELETE` operations over a table with a user that had those permissions but no `SELECT` permission, the `RETURN BEFORE` clause could be used (e.g. `DELETE data RETURN BEFORE`) to read the contents of the records prior to the authorized update or the deletion despite the querying user not being authorized to perform `SELECT` operations.\n\n- When performing `UPDATE` operations on a table for which the user had `SELECT` and `UPDATE` permissions, the `SET` clause could reference fields that the user had `UPDATE` but no `SELECT` permission for (e.g. `UPDATE data SET public = private`) in order to update the value of a field that the user had permission to `SELECT` to the value of another field for which the user did not.\n\n### Impact\n\nClients that were authorized by table permissions to execute `SELECT` statements for a table but were not authorized by field permissions to run `SELECT` queries for a specific field could still have been able to gain knowledge of the value of that field. Additionally, clients that were authorized to execute `UPDATE` or `DELETE` statements for a table but not authorized to execute `SELECT` statements for the same table may have been able to gain knowledge of the contents of records in that table. This could only be exploited by users who were already authorized to execute queries on the database with the affected table or field.\n\nDue to its relationship with table and field permissions, which apply mainly to record users rather than system users, this issue mostly affects users relying on SurrealDB as a backend-as-a-service rather than SurrealDB as a traditional database backend.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe behavior when evaluating table or field permissions and filtering records or fields as a result of those evaluations has been improved to consider permissions before any changes to the document have been made and, when relevant, permissions after changes to the document have taken place. When a user is unauthorized to view record contents and field values by permissions, the returned documents will behave as if the record or field did not exist in order to prevent leaking any information.\n\n- Version 2.0.4 and later are not affected by this issue.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUsers affected by this issue and unable to update should not rely on the authorization provided by field permissions when it comes to the `SELECT` permission. Instead, read access to fields in affected versions should be restricted at the table level. When allowing the `UPDATE` or `DELETE` operations for records via table permissions, users should not rely of the authorization provided by the `SELECT` permission. Instead, users should not allow clients to `UPDATE` or `DELETE` records that they should not be able to view.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N"
  }, {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "crates.io",
      "name" : "surrealdb"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "2.0.4"
      } ]
    } ]
  }, {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "crates.io",
      "name" : "surrealdb-core"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "2.0.4"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/security/advisories/GHSA-9722-9j67-vjcr"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58367"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/issues/2161"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/issues/3924"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/pull/4785"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/pull/4800"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/pull/4873"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/commit/439ab99e15314ec5cf87047bf58246db646e3f8c"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/commit/c382fa158dc84b329328606f663efe574f102a7d"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/commit/e75e7736b3a028c4b6a4a4bdf00791d76f77e339"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://surrealdb.com/docs/surrealdb/security/summary#permissions"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://surrealdb.com/docs/surrealql/statements/define/field#setting-permissions-on-fields"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://surrealdb.com/docs/surrealql/statements/define/table#defining-permissions"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/surrealdb-before-improper-authorization-via-select-permissions"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-285" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2024-10-08T22:21:09Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}