CVE-2026-57116: PraisonAI AgentOS Remains Unauthenticated After Incomplete Vulnerability
CRITICALCVE-2026-57116 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 9.8) agentos remains unauthenticated after incomplete vulnerability (CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function) affecting PraisonAI libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves agentos remains unauthenticated after incomplete fix version and allows remote agent invocation. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 4.6.59.
CVE-2026-57116 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 9.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-57116
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected PraisonAI dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install praisonai>=4.6.59
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show praisonai
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-57116, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show praisonai
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of PraisonAI in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 4.6.59), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show praisonai command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function, where the product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources. In PraisonAI, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-57116 Affected PraisonAI Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
praisonai
|
PyPI |
≥ 4.2.1
< 4.6.59
|
4.6.59
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-57116?
Which PraisonAI versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-57116?
Is praisonai affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57116?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-57116?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-57116?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-892r-p3jq-jp24",
"modified" : "2026-07-20T21:24:12Z",
"published" : "2026-06-18T13:57:47Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-57116" ],
"summary" : "PraisonAI: AgentOS remains unauthenticated after incomplete fix version and allows remote agent invocation",
"details" : "# AgentOS remains unauthenticated after GHSA-pm96 patched version and allows remote agent invocation\n\n## Summary\n\nPraisonAI's `AgentOS` FastAPI deployment surface remains unauthenticated in\ncurrent main and in releases after the published patched version for\n`GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x` / `CVE-2026-40151`.\n\nThe public AgentOS advisory is published as an instruction-disclosure issue\nwith affected versions `< 4.5.128` and patched version `4.5.128`. However,\n`v4.5.128`, latest release `v4.6.57`, and current main still register\n`GET /api/agents` and `POST /api/chat` without authentication. The chat route\ndirectly calls `agent.chat(request.message)`. No-auth and wrong-bearer requests\nboth execute the deployed agent.\n\nThis is broader than passive metadata disclosure. In any deployment where\nAgentOS wraps agents with tools, private context, memory, API integrations, or\ncost-bearing model calls, an unauthenticated reachable client can drive those\nagents.\n\n## Affected Product\n\n- Repository: `MervinPraison/PraisonAI`\n- Package: `praisonai`\n- Component: `src/praisonai/praisonai/app/agentos.py`\n- Config component: `src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/app/config.py`\n- Public advisory incomplete-fix reference: `GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x` /\n `CVE-2026-40151`\n\nConfirmed affected dynamically:\n\n- `v4.5.126`\n- `v4.5.128` (published patched version for `GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x`)\n- `v4.6.9`\n- `v4.6.10`\n- `v4.6.56`\n- `v4.6.57`\n- current main `2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1`\n\nStatic source review found the same unauthenticated route pattern and\n`0.0.0.0` default in `v4.2.1`.\n\nSuggested affected range: `>= 4.2.1, <= 4.6.57`.\n\n## Root Cause\n\n`AgentOSConfig` / `AgentAppConfig` defaults the deployment host to all\ninterfaces and has no authentication fields:\n\n```python\nname: str = \"PraisonAI App\"\nhost: str = \"0.0.0.0\"\nport: int = 8000\napi_prefix: str = \"/api\"\n```\n\n`AgentOS._register_routes()` registers public agent metadata and chat routes\nwithout middleware, dependency, API key check, bearer-token check, or startup\nfail-closed guard:\n\n```python\n@app.get(f\"{self.config.api_prefix}/agents\")\nasync def list_agents():\n return {\"agents\": [...]}\n\n@app.post(f\"{self.config.api_prefix}/chat\", response_model=ChatResponse)\nasync def chat(request: ChatRequest):\n ...\n response = agent.chat(request.message)\n```\n\nA wrong `Authorization` header is ignored because the route does not inspect it.\n\nCurrent main also has a root-export bug where `from praisonai import AgentOS`\nraises `ImportError`, but this does not mitigate the issue. The same class\nremains reachable through `from praisonai import AgentApp` and\n`from praisonai.app import AgentOS`.\n\n## Why This Is Not Intended Behavior\n\nPraisonAI's security documentation says API servers were hardened so anonymous\nrequests return `401` and default binding changed from `0.0.0.0` to\n`127.0.0.1` after the prior unauthenticated API server class.\n\nThe API Server Authentication docs say bearer auth is enabled by default,\ndisabling auth is not recommended for production, and `0.0.0.0` should be used\nonly behind an authenticating proxy.\n\nThe local PoV includes a hardened sibling control for the generated deploy API\non current main. It returns:\n\n- no auth: `401`\n- wrong bearer: `401`\n- correct bearer: `200`\n\nAgentOS remains outside that control plane and still accepts no-auth and\nwrong-bearer `/api/chat` requests.\n\n## Local PoV\n\nThe PoV is local-only. It uses FastAPI's in-process test client, a stub agent,\nand a temporary file side effect. It does not start a network listener, call an\nLLM provider, or contact any external service.\n\nCommand:\n\n```bash\nenv PYTHONPATH=\"artifacts/repos/praisonai-current/src/praisonai:artifacts/repos/praisonai-current/src/praisonai-agents\" \\\n uv run --with fastapi --with httpx --with flask --with flask-cors \\\n --with pydantic --with typing-extensions --with rich --with python-dotenv \\\n submission-bundle/praisonai-prai-cand-007-agentos-incomplete-auth-fix/poc/prai_cand_007_agentos_incomplete_auth_fix.py \\\n --repo artifacts/repos/praisonai-current \\\n --label current-head\n```\n\nCurrent-head result summary:\n\n```json\n{\n \"describe\": \"v4.6.57-4-g2f9677ab\",\n \"head\": \"2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1\",\n \"agentos_vulnerable\": true,\n \"entrypoints\": [\n {\n \"entrypoint\": \"agentapp_alias\",\n \"statuses\": [200, 200, 200],\n \"side_effects\": [\"no-auth-marker\", \"wrong-bearer-marker\"]\n },\n {\n \"entrypoint\": \"direct_agentos\",\n \"statuses\": [200, 200, 200],\n \"side_effects\": [\"no-auth-marker\", \"wrong-bearer-marker\"]\n }\n ],\n \"deploy_api_control\": {\n \"control_passed\": true,\n \"statuses\": [401, 401, 200]\n }\n}\n```\n\nThe three AgentOS statuses are for:\n\n- unauthenticated `GET /api/agents`;\n- unauthenticated `POST /api/chat`;\n- wrong-bearer `POST /api/chat`.\n\nThe side-effect list proves both unauthenticated chat requests invoked the\nagent method.\n\nMinimal inline reproducer:\n\n```python\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom tempfile import TemporaryDirectory\n\nfrom fastapi.testclient import TestClient\nfrom praisonai import AgentApp\nfrom praisonaiagents import AgentOSConfig\n\nclass StubAgent:\n name = \"pov_agentos_agent\"\n role = \"tester\"\n instructions = \"private instruction marker\"\n\n def __init__(self, out):\n self.out = out\n\n def chat(self, message):\n self.out.write_text(self.out.read_text() + message + \"\\n\")\n return \"PRAI_CAND_007_AGENTOS_EXECUTED:\" + message\n\nwith TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:\n side_effect = Path(tmp) / \"side_effects.txt\"\n side_effect.write_text(\"\")\n app = AgentApp(\n agents=[StubAgent(side_effect)],\n config=AgentOSConfig(host=\"0.0.0.0\", port=8000),\n )\n client = TestClient(app.get_app())\n\n assert client.get(\"/api/agents\").status_code == 200\n assert client.post(\"/api/chat\", json={\"message\": \"no-auth\"}).status_code == 200\n assert client.post(\n \"/api/chat\",\n headers={\"Authorization\": \"Bearer definitely-wrong\"},\n json={\"message\": \"wrong-bearer\"},\n ).status_code == 200\n assert side_effect.read_text().splitlines() == [\"no-auth\", \"wrong-bearer\"]\n```\n\n## Version Sweep\n\n| Target | Result |\n| --- | --- |\n| `v4.5.126` | vulnerable |\n| `v4.5.128` | vulnerable |\n| `v4.6.9` | vulnerable |\n| `v4.6.10` | vulnerable |\n| `v4.6.56` | vulnerable; generated deploy API control returns `401/401/200` |\n| `v4.6.57` | vulnerable; generated deploy API control returns `401/401/200` |\n| current `2f9677abb` | vulnerable; generated deploy API control returns `401/401/200` |\n\nEvidence files are retained locally under the bundle's `evidence/` directory\nand can be provided if useful.\n\n## Duplicate / Incomplete-Fix Notes\n\nThis report is related to `GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x` / `CVE-2026-40151`. The\npublished advisory describes AgentOS instruction disclosure and lists\n`4.5.128` as patched. It also mentions unauthenticated `/api/chat` as a chained\ninstruction-extraction path.\n\nThe current report should be treated as an incomplete fix / affected-range\ncorrection with a broader demonstrated impact:\n\n- the published patched version `v4.5.128` still reproduces;\n- latest release `v4.6.57` still reproduces;\n- current main still reproduces;\n- the PoV proves unauthorized agent invocation and side effects, not only\n instruction disclosure.\n\nThis is distinct from private `PRAI-CAND-003` / `GHSA-x8cv-xmq7-p8xp`, which\ncovers `praisonaiagents.AgentTeam.launch()` routes. This report covers\n`praisonai.app.AgentOS` and `AgentApp` alias routes.\n\n## Impact\n\nIf an operator exposes an AgentOS app on a reachable interface, any client that\ncan reach it can:\n\n- enumerate deployed agents through `GET /api/agents`;\n- read agent names, roles, and instruction snippets;\n- invoke the default agent or a named agent through `POST /api/chat`;\n- trigger downstream tools, private context reads, memory accesses, API\n integrations, browser actions, or other side effects attached to the agent;\n- consume model/API budget through repeated invocation.\n\nThe exact downstream impact depends on the deployed agents. The framework-level\nboundary failure is that a production deployment surface exposes agent control\nwithout authentication and defaults to binding on all interfaces.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nUse the same security model already applied to generated API deployments:\n\n- add authentication fields to `AgentOSConfig` / `AgentAppConfig`;\n- default auth to enabled;\n- default bind host to `127.0.0.1`;\n- reject no-auth and wrong-bearer requests for `GET /api/agents` and\n `POST /api/chat`;\n- fail closed for non-loopback binds unless auth is configured or an explicit\n unsafe development opt-out is set;\n- avoid returning instruction text from unauthenticated metadata endpoints;\n- add regression tests for no auth, wrong bearer, correct bearer, and external\n bind without auth.\n\nMaintainers can either update `GHSA-pm96-6xpr-978x` with the corrected affected\nrange and broader impact or publish a separate incomplete-fix advisory.\n\n## Suggested Severity\n\nSuggested severity: Critical.\n\nThe Critical score matches the unauthenticated agent-control model: network\nattacker, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high\ndeployment-dependent impact when agents are connected to tools, private data,\nor cost-bearing services. If maintainers score only a minimal no-tool demo\nagent, the impact may be lower, but the current default framework behavior is\nstill unauthenticated agent invocation.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "praisonai"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "4.2.1"
}, {
"fixed" : "4.6.59"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 4.6.57"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-892r-p3jq-jp24"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-200", "CWE-306", "CWE-862" ],
"severity" : "CRITICAL",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-18T13:57:47Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}