CVE-2026-43116: Software Security Vulnerability Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-88rv-c8gv-rfv7
CVSS 7.8
CWE-362
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-43116 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.8) security vulnerability vulnerability (CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')) affecting Software libraries in the Maven ecosystem. The weakness occurs when the product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.. Remediation is available in the latest vendor maintenance releases.

CVE-2026-43116 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-43116
GHSA Identifier GHSA-88rv-c8gv-rfv7
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.8
CWE Classification CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
Affected Product Software
Package Ecosystem Maven
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.8

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Local (AV:L)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-43116

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Software dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

mvn dependency:tree

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Java application is affected by CVE-2026-43116, inspect your build dependencies using the Maven Dependency Plugin:

mvn dependency:tree

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Software in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than the patched release), your application is affected.

Note: The mvn dependency:tree command inspects the resolved dependency graph declared in your project's POM files; it does not perform automated security scanning or inspect runtime dynamic classpaths. Always verify runtime container classpaths and shaded JARs.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'), where the product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently. In Software, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: ensure safe access to master conntrack Holding reference on the expectation is not sufficient, the master conntrack object can just go away, making exp->master invalid. To access exp->master safely: - Grab the nf_conntrack_expect_lock, this gets serialized with clean_from_lists() which also holds this lock when the master conntrack goes away. - Hold reference on master conntrack via nf_conntrack_find_get(). Not so easy since the master tuple to look up for the master conntrack is not available in the existing problematic paths. This patch goes for extending the nf_conntrack_expect_lock section to address this issue for simplicity, in the cases that are described below this is just slightly extending the lock section. The add expectation command already holds a reference to the master conntrack from ctnetlink_create_expect(). However, the delete expectation command needs to grab the spinlock before looking up for the expectation. Expand the existing spinlock section to address this to cover the expectation lookup. Note that, the nf_ct_expect_iterate_net() calls already grabs the spinlock while iterating over the expectation table, which is correct. The get expectation command needs to grab the spinlock to ensure master conntrack does not go away. This also expands the existing spinlock section to cover the expectation lookup too. I needed to move the netlink skb allocation out of the spinlock to keep it GFP_KERNEL. For the expectation events, the IPEXP_DESTROY event is already delivered under the spinlock, just move the delivery of IPEXP_NEW under the spinlock too because the master conntrack event cache is reached through exp->master. While at it, add lockdep notations to help identify what codepaths need to grab the spinlock.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-43116?
CVE-2026-43116 is a security vulnerability in Software classified as a security vulnerability vulnerability under CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition').
Which Software versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to current release patches.
What version fixes CVE-2026-43116?
Upgrading to current release patches (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43116?
CVE-2026-43116 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-43116?
CVE-2026-43116 is classified under CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') (The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.).
How can I check Maven dependencies for CVE-2026-43116?
Run the dependency tree command: 'mvn dependency:tree'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-88rv-c8gv-rfv7",
  "modified" : "2026-10-15T03:35:51Z",
  "published" : "2026-05-06T12:30:28Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-43116" ],
  "details" : "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ctnetlink: ensure safe access to master conntrack\n\nHolding reference on the expectation is not sufficient, the master\nconntrack object can just go away, making exp->master invalid.\n\nTo access exp->master safely:\n\n- Grab the nf_conntrack_expect_lock, this gets serialized with\n  clean_from_lists() which also holds this lock when the master\n  conntrack goes away.\n\n- Hold reference on master conntrack via nf_conntrack_find_get().\n  Not so easy since the master tuple to look up for the master conntrack\n  is not available in the existing problematic paths.\n\nThis patch goes for extending the nf_conntrack_expect_lock section\nto address this issue for simplicity, in the cases that are described\nbelow this is just slightly extending the lock section.\n\nThe add expectation command already holds a reference to the master\nconntrack from ctnetlink_create_expect().\n\nHowever, the delete expectation command needs to grab the spinlock\nbefore looking up for the expectation. Expand the existing spinlock\nsection to address this to cover the expectation lookup. Note that,\nthe nf_ct_expect_iterate_net() calls already grabs the spinlock while\niterating over the expectation table, which is correct.\n\nThe get expectation command needs to grab the spinlock to ensure master\nconntrack does not go away. This also expands the existing spinlock\nsection to cover the expectation lookup too. I needed to move the\nnetlink skb allocation out of the spinlock to keep it GFP_KERNEL.\n\nFor the expectation events, the IPEXP_DESTROY event is already delivered\nunder the spinlock, just move the delivery of IPEXP_NEW under the\nspinlock too because the master conntrack event cache is reached through\nexp->master.\n\nWhile at it, add lockdep notations to help identify what codepaths need\nto grab the spinlock.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43116"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-457936.html"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-784472.html"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/497f99b26fffdc5635706d1b4811f1ed8ee21a5b"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5e1c1d22268ae710c238342c8030c21daf298168"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9e1196d27ef496f404c76f7a9d03761142d991c4"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bffcaad9afdfe45d7fc777397d3b83c1e3ebffe5"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d52fa1fa7440676b8c238037a050ab008c22737f"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f338ced0473849c9f6ed0b77ca99f1aab5826787"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-362" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : false,
    "github_reviewed_at" : null,
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-05-06T10:16:25Z"
  }
}