CVE-2026-46338: Pymdown extensions Path Traversal Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h
CVSS 4.3
CWE-22
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-46338 is a MODERATE (CVSS 4.3) path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')) affecting Pymdown extensions libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves regression in pymdownx.snippets reintroduces sibling-prefix path traversal bypass despite restrict_base_path. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 10.21.3.

CVE-2026-46338 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-46338
GHSA Identifier GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 4.3
CWE Classification CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Affected Product Pymdown extensions
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 4.3

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction Required (UI:R)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality Low (C:L)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-46338

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Pymdown extensions dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

pymdown-extensions fixed: 10.21.3
pip install pymdown-extensions>=10.21.3
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show pymdown-extensions

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-46338, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show pymdown-extensions

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Pymdown extensions in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 10.21.3), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show pymdown-extensions command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), where the product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. In Pymdown extensions, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

# Summary `pymdownx.snippets` has a regression of the CVE-2023-32309 / GHSA-jh85-wwv9-24hv fix. With `restrict_base_path: True` (the default), the current `filename.startswith(base)` containment check does not enforce a directory boundary. As a result, a markdown snippet directive can read files from sibling paths that share the same prefix as `base_path`, such as `docs` vs `docs_internal`. The regression was introduced in PR #2039 / commit `7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d`, which replaced the original directory-identity check with a plain string-prefix comparison. # Details The regression was introduced in commit `7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d` (2023-05-15, #2039 *"Fix regression of snippets nested deeply under specified base path"*), which relaxed the original `os.path.samefile(base, os.path.dirname(filename))` check to a plain `startswith(base)`. `SnippetPreprocessor.get_snippet_path()` in `pymdownx/snippets.py`: ```python if self.restrict_base_path: filename = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(base, path)) # If the absolute path is no longer under the specified base path, reject the file if not filename.startswith(base): continue ``` `base` is `os.path.abspath(b)` and has no trailing separator. `str.startswith(base)` is `True` for any `filename` whose string representation begins with the same characters as `base`, regardless of whether those characters end at a directory boundary. Concrete example: * `base = "/x/docs"` * `path = "../docs_secret/leak.txt"` (inside the markdown snippet directive) * `os.path.join(base, path)` → `"/x/docs/../docs_secret/leak.txt"` * `os.path.abspath(...)` → `"/x/docs_secret/leak.txt"` * `filename.startswith(base)` → `True`, because `"/x/docs_secret/..."` begins with the literal string `"/x/docs"`. All releases from **10.0.1 (2023-05-15) through 10.21.2 (current)** are affected. # Impact Arbitrary file read within the host the build runs on, bounded by the prefix match. With `base_path = /x/docs` the attacker can read files from any sibling directory whose path begins with the literal string `/x/docs` followed by any non-separator character — for example `/x/docs_internal/`, `/x/docs.bak/`, `/x/docs2/`. The threat model is the same as the original CVE-2023-32309: markdown content processed by the snippets preprocessor in a build pipeline (typical scenario: an MkDocs documentation site built in CI from PR contributions or otherwise less-trusted markdown) can read files outside the configured base. CI builds that publish the generated HTML expose the read file to the public; CI builds with secrets on disk leak those secrets. # Reproduction Minimal local PoC, non-destructive: ```python import os, shutil, tempfile, markdown work = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="pmx_poc_") try: base = os.path.join(work, "docs") sibling = os.path.join(work, "docs_secret") os.makedirs(base) os.makedirs(sibling) with open(os.path.join(sibling, "leak.txt"), "w") as f: f.write("TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR\n") out = markdown.markdown( '--8<-- "../docs_secret/leak.txt"\n', extensions=["pymdownx.snippets"], extension_configs={ "pymdownx.snippets": { "base_path": [base], "restrict_base_path": True, "check_paths": True, } }, ) print(out) # -> <p>TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR</p> finally: shutil.rmtree(work) ``` Default `restrict_base_path: True` is sufficient — no non-default option is required. # Suggested fix Minimal change — require the separator after the base prefix: ```diff - if not filename.startswith(base): + # Append `os.sep` so a sibling directory whose name shares a prefix + # (e.g. `/x/docs` vs `/x/docs_evil`) cannot satisfy the check. + if not filename.startswith(base + os.sep): continue ``` This preserves the original intent (allow snippets nested at any depth under `base_path`) while restoring the directory-boundary check. It does not affect the `os.path.isdir(base)` branch where `base` is a file (that branch still uses `os.path.samefile`). Alternative: `os.path.commonpath([base, filename]) == base` is equivalent and slightly more idiomatic, though it raises `ValueError` on different drives on Windows and would need a `try/except`. The `startswith(base + os.sep)` fix is the smaller diff. Note: this fix does not change behaviour for symlinks inside `base_path`. The existing implementation uses `os.path.abspath` (not `os.path.realpath`), so a symlink within `base_path` pointing outside is still followed. That is a separate concern — symlinks require write access to `base_path`, a much higher bar than the current bypass — and matches the behaviour the CVE-2023 fix established. # Regression test A regression test class `TestSnippetsSiblingPrefix` was added in `tests/test_extensions/test_snippets.py`. It uses `tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested` as `base_path` and a new fixture directory `tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt`. It asserts that the markdown directive `--8<-- "../nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt"` raises `SnippetMissingError`. * Without fix: test fails (`AssertionError: SnippetMissingError not raised`, sibling file is silently read). * With fix: test passes. Full suite: `python -m pytest tests/ -q` → **738 passed** (737 baseline + 1 new regression test). No regressions. # Affected versions `>= 10.0.1, <= 10.21.2`

CVE-2026-46338 Affected Pymdown extensions Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
10.21.3
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
pymdown-extensions
PyPI
≥ 10.0.1
< 10.21.3
10.21.3

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-46338?
CVE-2026-46338 is a security vulnerability in Pymdown extensions involving Regression in pymdownx.snippets reintroduces sibling-prefix path traversal bypass despite restrict_base_path under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal').
Which Pymdown extensions versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 10.21.3 across affected packages: pymdown-extensions.
What version fixes CVE-2026-46338?
Upgrading to 10.21.3 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is pymdown-extensions affected?
Yes, pymdown-extensions is affected in releases prior to 10.21.3. Upgrade your dependency to 10.21.3 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46338?
CVE-2026-46338 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.3 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-46338?
CVE-2026-46338 is classified under CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-46338?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show pymdown-extensions'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h",
  "modified" : "2026-05-19T20:00:29Z",
  "published" : "2026-05-19T20:00:29Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-46338" ],
  "summary" : "Regression in pymdownx.snippets reintroduces sibling-prefix path traversal bypass despite restrict_base_path",
  "details" : "# Summary\n\n`pymdownx.snippets` has a regression of the CVE-2023-32309 / GHSA-jh85-wwv9-24hv fix. With `restrict_base_path: True` (the default), the current `filename.startswith(base)` containment check does not enforce a directory boundary. As a result, a markdown snippet directive can read files from sibling paths that share the same prefix as `base_path`, such as `docs` vs `docs_internal`.\n\nThe regression was introduced in PR #2039 / commit `7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d`, which replaced the original directory-identity check with a plain string-prefix comparison.\n\n# Details\n\nThe regression was introduced in commit `7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d` (2023-05-15, #2039 *\"Fix regression of snippets nested deeply under specified base path\"*), which relaxed the original `os.path.samefile(base, os.path.dirname(filename))` check to a plain `startswith(base)`.\n\n`SnippetPreprocessor.get_snippet_path()` in `pymdownx/snippets.py`:\n\n```python\nif self.restrict_base_path:\n    filename = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(base, path))\n    # If the absolute path is no longer under the specified base path, reject the file\n    if not filename.startswith(base):\n        continue\n```\n\n`base` is `os.path.abspath(b)` and has no trailing separator. `str.startswith(base)` is `True` for any `filename` whose string representation begins with the same characters as `base`, regardless of whether those characters end at a directory boundary.\n\nConcrete example:\n\n* `base = \"/x/docs\"`\n* `path = \"../docs_secret/leak.txt\"` (inside the markdown snippet directive)\n* `os.path.join(base, path)` → `\"/x/docs/../docs_secret/leak.txt\"`\n* `os.path.abspath(...)`     → `\"/x/docs_secret/leak.txt\"`\n* `filename.startswith(base)` → `True`, because `\"/x/docs_secret/...\"` begins with the literal string `\"/x/docs\"`.\n\nAll releases from **10.0.1 (2023-05-15) through 10.21.2 (current)** are affected.\n\n# Impact\n\nArbitrary file read within the host the build runs on, bounded by the prefix match. With `base_path = /x/docs` the attacker can read files from any sibling directory whose path begins with the literal string `/x/docs` followed by any non-separator character — for example `/x/docs_internal/`, `/x/docs.bak/`, `/x/docs2/`.\n\nThe threat model is the same as the original CVE-2023-32309: markdown content processed by the snippets preprocessor in a build pipeline (typical scenario: an MkDocs documentation site built in CI from PR contributions or otherwise less-trusted markdown) can read files outside the configured base. CI builds that publish the generated HTML expose the read file to the public; CI builds with secrets on disk leak those secrets.\n\n# Reproduction\n\nMinimal local PoC, non-destructive:\n\n```python\nimport os, shutil, tempfile, markdown\n\nwork = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix=\"pmx_poc_\")\ntry:\n    base    = os.path.join(work, \"docs\")\n    sibling = os.path.join(work, \"docs_secret\")\n    os.makedirs(base)\n    os.makedirs(sibling)\n    with open(os.path.join(sibling, \"leak.txt\"), \"w\") as f:\n        f.write(\"TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR\\n\")\n\n    out = markdown.markdown(\n        '--8<-- \"../docs_secret/leak.txt\"\\n',\n        extensions=[\"pymdownx.snippets\"],\n        extension_configs={\n            \"pymdownx.snippets\": {\n                \"base_path\": [base],\n                \"restrict_base_path\": True,\n                \"check_paths\": True,\n            }\n        },\n    )\n    print(out)  # -> <p>TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR</p>\nfinally:\n    shutil.rmtree(work)\n```\n\nDefault `restrict_base_path: True` is sufficient — no non-default option is required.\n\n# Suggested fix\n\nMinimal change — require the separator after the base prefix:\n\n```diff\n-                        if not filename.startswith(base):\n+                        # Append `os.sep` so a sibling directory whose name shares a prefix\n+                        # (e.g. `/x/docs` vs `/x/docs_evil`) cannot satisfy the check.\n+                        if not filename.startswith(base + os.sep):\n                             continue\n```\n\nThis preserves the original intent (allow snippets nested at any depth under `base_path`) while restoring the directory-boundary check. It does not affect the `os.path.isdir(base)` branch where `base` is a file (that branch still uses `os.path.samefile`).\n\nAlternative: `os.path.commonpath([base, filename]) == base` is equivalent and slightly more idiomatic, though it raises `ValueError` on different drives on Windows and would need a `try/except`. The `startswith(base + os.sep)` fix is the smaller diff.\n\nNote: this fix does not change behaviour for symlinks inside `base_path`. The existing implementation uses `os.path.abspath` (not `os.path.realpath`), so a symlink within `base_path` pointing outside is still followed. That is a separate concern — symlinks require write access to `base_path`, a much higher bar than the current bypass — and matches the behaviour the CVE-2023 fix established.\n\n# Regression test\n\nA regression test class `TestSnippetsSiblingPrefix` was added in `tests/test_extensions/test_snippets.py`. It uses `tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested` as `base_path` and a new fixture directory `tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt`. It asserts that the markdown directive `--8<-- \"../nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt\"` raises `SnippetMissingError`.\n\n* Without fix: test fails (`AssertionError: SnippetMissingError not raised`, sibling file is silently read).\n* With fix: test passes.\n\nFull suite: `python -m pytest tests/ -q` → **738 passed** (737 baseline + 1 new regression test). No regressions.\n\n# Affected versions\n\n`>= 10.0.1, <= 10.21.2`",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "pymdown-extensions"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "10.0.1"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "10.21.3"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 10.21.2"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/facelessuser/pymdown-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/facelessuser/pymdown-extensions/pull/2039"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/facelessuser/pymdown-extensions"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-22" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-05-19T20:00:29Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}