CVE-2026-88001: Open WebUI Server-side Fetches Reach Blocked And Vulnerability

MODERATE
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w
CVSS 5.0
CWE-918
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-88001 is a MODERATE (CVSS 5.0) server-side fetches reach blocked and vulnerability (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) affecting Open WebUI libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated http redirect targets. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.11.1.

CVE-2026-88001 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-88001
GHSA Identifier GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 5.0
CWE Classification CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Affected Product Open WebUI
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 5.0

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required Low (PR:L)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Changed (S:C)
Confidentiality Low (C:L)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-88001

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Open WebUI dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

open-webui fixed: 0.11.1
pip install open-webui>=0.11.1
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show open-webui

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-88001, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show open-webui

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Open WebUI in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.11.1), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show open-webui command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the web server receives a url or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this url, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. In Open WebUI, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary Open WebUI protects server-side web fetches with two controls: the operator's list of excluded hosts, and a check that refuses private and internal addresses. Neither control was applied to the destination of an HTTP redirect. On a deployment where redirect following is enabled, any authenticated user who can cause the server to fetch a URL could submit a page that redirects, and the server would fetch the redirect destination without either control being applied to it. The server therefore connects to hosts the operator excluded, and to internal addresses including loopback, private networks and cloud metadata endpoints. ## Preconditions `AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS` must be set to `true`. Its default is `false`, and on the default the affected fetch paths do not follow redirects at all, so a deployment that has not changed this setting is not affected. The attacker needs an authenticated account of any role, with access to any feature that causes the server to fetch a URL. Web search, ingesting a URL into a collection, the built-in page fetch tool and image URLs in chat all reach it. No internal hostnames need to be known, because the loopback and cloud metadata addresses are fixed and identical on every deployment. Neither `ENABLE_LOCAL_WEB_FETCH` at its default of `false` nor any set of entries in `WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST` prevents this. ## Impact An authenticated user can make the server issue requests to hosts the operator deliberately excluded, and to addresses on the internal network including loopback, private ranges and the cloud metadata endpoints of the major providers. What reaches the attacker depends on which HTTP client the fetch path uses, and is stated here as verified rather than assumed. On the paths built on `requests`, the fetched body is returned to the caller, so the response of an excluded host is readable: the built-in page fetch tool hands it to the model, and the URL ingestion endpoint returns it in its response. Those paths kept a working private-address check at connection time, so what they reach is excluded public hosts and internal names, not private IP addresses. On the paths built on aiohttp, which are the ones that reach private addresses written as IP literals, fetched content reaches the web search response, a retrievable collection, or model input as base64 through chat image URLs. A path on that client returning an attacker-chosen response verbatim to the requester was not demonstrated. The operator has no configuration that prevents this. `169.254.169.254` ships in the default excluded list, so an operator reviewing their configuration would reasonably conclude the metadata endpoint is out of reach. The documentation for the redirect setting further recommends the excluded-host list as a compensating control when enabling redirects, and that is precisely the control the redirect path skipped. ## Fix Fixed in 0.11.1 by https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/27823. The excluded-host list is now evaluated once per request on both HTTP clients, where the real destination is known and a reused connection cannot skip it, so it applies to every redirect hop. The private-address check stays at connection time and is now hooked where aiohttp resolves a host, which is also reached for hosts written as IP literals. One case is not resolved by the upgrade alone. Where the server reaches the internet through a forward proxy, the private-address check sees the proxy's address rather than the final destination, so it does not constrain where the proxy is asked to connect. The excluded-host list is still applied to the destination on that path. Operators who route outbound fetches through a proxy should enforce destination restrictions on the proxy itself. ## Root cause Affected components: - the web retrieval fetch paths, on both the aiohttp and `requests` clients - the built-in page fetch tool - the URL ingestion endpoint Affected setup: builds that carry the redirect-following setting, which was introduced in 0.9.5. Earlier builds have no such setting. The two controls sat at different layers, and each sat where only the originally submitted URL passes through. The excluded-host list was consulted inside URL validation, which runs once against what the user submitted, so a redirect destination never reached it on either client. The private-address check was placed inside the aiohttp resolver, and aiohttp answers a host written as an IP address itself without consulting a resolver, so for exactly those hosts the check never ran. Redirect following was added later as an option, and neither control was revisited at that point, so turning it on moved the real destination out of reach of both. ## Proof of concept Both vectors were reproduced against the shipped code of 0.11.0 and confirmed closed against 0.11.1, with `AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS=true` in both runs. A local HTTP server serves a redirect and a body, DNS is stubbed so the test hostnames resolve to loopback, and the guards themselves are unmodified. Excluded-host list, redirect destination `203.0.113.1` excluded, submitted URL not excluded: ``` 0.11.0 no check runs against the redirect destination, the server opens a connection to it 0.11.1 blocked at the redirect hop before any connection is attempted ``` Private-address check, host written as an IP literal, with `ENABLE_LOCAL_WEB_FETCH` at its default of `false`: ``` 0.11.0 fetch returned 'LOOPBACK-CONTENT-REACHED', no check ran 0.11.1 blocked, non-global address 127.0.0.1 ``` Instrumenting 0.11.1 on a redirect that is allowed shows both controls running against the redirect destination as well as the submitted URL, and an ordinary public fetch is unaffected. ## Credits - @arpitjain099, original report: the excluded-host list is not re-applied to redirect destinations. - @Classic298: the private-address check is bypassed for redirect destinations written as IP literals, through aiohttp's resolver shortcut.

CVE-2026-88001 Affected Open WebUI Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
0.11.1
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
open-webui
PyPI
≥ 0.9.5
< 0.11.1
0.11.1

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-88001?
CVE-2026-88001 is a security vulnerability in Open WebUI involving Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
Which Open WebUI versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 0.11.1 across affected packages: open-webui.
What version fixes CVE-2026-88001?
Upgrading to 0.11.1 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is open-webui affected?
Yes, open-webui is affected in releases prior to 0.11.1. Upgrade your dependency to 0.11.1 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-88001?
CVE-2026-88001 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.0 (MODERATE) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-88001?
CVE-2026-88001 is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-88001?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show open-webui'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w",
  "modified" : "2026-09-09T23:54:08Z",
  "published" : "2026-09-09T23:54:08Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-88001" ],
  "summary" : "Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\nOpen WebUI protects server-side web fetches with two controls: the operator's list of excluded hosts, and a check that refuses private and internal addresses. Neither control was applied to the destination of an HTTP redirect. On a deployment where redirect following is enabled, any authenticated user who can cause the server to fetch a URL could submit a page that redirects, and the server would fetch the redirect destination without either control being applied to it. The server therefore connects to hosts the operator excluded, and to internal addresses including loopback, private networks and cloud metadata endpoints.\n\n## Preconditions\n\n`AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS` must be set to `true`. Its default is `false`, and on the default the affected fetch paths do not follow redirects at all, so a deployment that has not changed this setting is not affected.\n\nThe attacker needs an authenticated account of any role, with access to any feature that causes the server to fetch a URL. Web search, ingesting a URL into a collection, the built-in page fetch tool and image URLs in chat all reach it. No internal hostnames need to be known, because the loopback and cloud metadata addresses are fixed and identical on every deployment.\n\nNeither `ENABLE_LOCAL_WEB_FETCH` at its default of `false` nor any set of entries in `WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST` prevents this.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn authenticated user can make the server issue requests to hosts the operator deliberately excluded, and to addresses on the internal network including loopback, private ranges and the cloud metadata endpoints of the major providers.\n\nWhat reaches the attacker depends on which HTTP client the fetch path uses, and is stated here as verified rather than assumed. On the paths built on `requests`, the fetched body is returned to the caller, so the response of an excluded host is readable: the built-in page fetch tool hands it to the model, and the URL ingestion endpoint returns it in its response. Those paths kept a working private-address check at connection time, so what they reach is excluded public hosts and internal names, not private IP addresses. On the paths built on aiohttp, which are the ones that reach private addresses written as IP literals, fetched content reaches the web search response, a retrievable collection, or model input as base64 through chat image URLs. A path on that client returning an attacker-chosen response verbatim to the requester was not demonstrated.\n\nThe operator has no configuration that prevents this. `169.254.169.254` ships in the default excluded list, so an operator reviewing their configuration would reasonably conclude the metadata endpoint is out of reach. The documentation for the redirect setting further recommends the excluded-host list as a compensating control when enabling redirects, and that is precisely the control the redirect path skipped.\n\n## Fix\n\nFixed in 0.11.1 by https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/27823. The excluded-host list is now evaluated once per request on both HTTP clients, where the real destination is known and a reused connection cannot skip it, so it applies to every redirect hop. The private-address check stays at connection time and is now hooked where aiohttp resolves a host, which is also reached for hosts written as IP literals.\n\nOne case is not resolved by the upgrade alone. Where the server reaches the internet through a forward proxy, the private-address check sees the proxy's address rather than the final destination, so it does not constrain where the proxy is asked to connect. The excluded-host list is still applied to the destination on that path. Operators who route outbound fetches through a proxy should enforce destination restrictions on the proxy itself.\n\n## Root cause\n\nAffected components:\n\n- the web retrieval fetch paths, on both the aiohttp and `requests` clients\n- the built-in page fetch tool\n- the URL ingestion endpoint\n\nAffected setup: builds that carry the redirect-following setting, which was introduced in 0.9.5. Earlier builds have no such setting.\n\nThe two controls sat at different layers, and each sat where only the originally submitted URL passes through. The excluded-host list was consulted inside URL validation, which runs once against what the user submitted, so a redirect destination never reached it on either client. The private-address check was placed inside the aiohttp resolver, and aiohttp answers a host written as an IP address itself without consulting a resolver, so for exactly those hosts the check never ran. Redirect following was added later as an option, and neither control was revisited at that point, so turning it on moved the real destination out of reach of both.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\nBoth vectors were reproduced against the shipped code of 0.11.0 and confirmed closed against 0.11.1, with `AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS=true` in both runs. A local HTTP server serves a redirect and a body, DNS is stubbed so the test hostnames resolve to loopback, and the guards themselves are unmodified.\n\nExcluded-host list, redirect destination `203.0.113.1` excluded, submitted URL not excluded:\n\n```\n0.11.0  no check runs against the redirect destination, the server opens a connection to it\n0.11.1  blocked at the redirect hop before any connection is attempted\n```\n\nPrivate-address check, host written as an IP literal, with `ENABLE_LOCAL_WEB_FETCH` at its default of `false`:\n\n```\n0.11.0  fetch returned 'LOOPBACK-CONTENT-REACHED', no check ran\n0.11.1  blocked, non-global address 127.0.0.1\n```\n\nInstrumenting 0.11.1 on a redirect that is allowed shows both controls running against the redirect destination as well as the submitted URL, and an ordinary public fetch is unaffected.\n\n## Credits\n\n- @arpitjain099, original report: the excluded-host list is not re-applied to redirect destinations.\n- @Classic298: the private-address check is bypassed for redirect destinations written as IP literals, through aiohttp's resolver shortcut.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "open-webui"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0.9.5"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "0.11.1"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 0.11.0"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/27823"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/e3e4bd87df6fc629e7e22081d980d55a7632b8b7"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.1"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-918" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-09T23:54:08Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}