CVE-2026-53513: @better auth/sso @better-auth/sso Provider Registration Has Server-side Vulnerability
CRITICALCVE-2026-53513 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 9.6) @better-auth/sso provider registration has server-side vulnerability (CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')) affecting @better auth/sso libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves @better-auth/sso provider registration has server-side request forgery via unvalidated oidc endpoints. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.6.11.
CVE-2026-53513 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 9.6
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2026-53513
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected @better auth/sso dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
npm install @better-auth/sso@1.6.11
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
npm ls @better-auth/sso
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-53513, inspect your project dependencies using npm:
npm ls @better-auth/sso
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of @better auth/sso in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.6.11), your application is affected.
Note: The npm ls @better-auth/sso command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy'), where the product receives a request, message, or directive from an upstream component, but the product does not sufficiently preserve the original source of the request before forwarding the request to an external actor that is outside of the product's control sphere. this causes the product to appear to be the source of the request, leading it to act as a proxy or other intermediary between the upstream component and the external actor. In @better auth/sso, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-53513 Affected @better auth/sso Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
@better-auth/sso
|
npm |
≥ 0.1.0
< 1.6.11
|
1.6.11
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-53513?
Which @better auth/sso versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-53513?
Is @better-auth/sso affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53513?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-53513?
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-53513?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4v",
"modified" : "2026-07-20T19:24:38Z",
"published" : "2026-07-07T20:56:19Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-53513" ],
"summary" : "@better-auth/sso provider registration has server-side request forgery via unvalidated OIDC endpoints",
"details" : "### Am I affected?\n\nUsers are affected if all of the following are true:\n\n- Their application uses `@better-auth/sso` at a version `>= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11` on the stable line, or any `1.7.0-beta.x` on the pre-release line.\n- The `sso()` plugin is added to their application's `betterAuth({ plugins: [...] })` array.\n- Any user with a valid Better Auth session can reach `POST /sso/register` (the plugin's default gate accepts any session).\n\nFor the non-blind SSRF impact (full IAM credential or internal HTTP body exfiltration), no further configuration is required.\n\nFor the account takeover escalation, additionally:\n\n- Developers set `sso({ trustEmailVerified: true, ... })`.\n- The developer's application deployment has accounts whose `email` overlaps with attacker-chosen domains.\n\nIf developers do not enable the SSO plugin, their application is not affected.\n\nFix:\n\n1. Upgrade to `@better-auth/sso@1.6.11` or later.\n2. If developers cannot upgrade, see workarounds below.\n\n### Summary\n\nThe `@better-auth/sso` plugin's `POST /sso/register` endpoint accepts attacker-controlled `oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint`, `tokenEndpoint`, and `jwksEndpoint` URLs when `skipDiscovery: true` is set, persists them on the `ssoProvider` row without origin validation, then issues server-side fetches to those URLs during the OIDC callback. The fetched response body is reflected through the user profile, producing a non-blind SSRF reachable by any authenticated session. The same primitive exists on `POST /sso/update-provider`.\n\n### Details\n\nThe schema field types accept bare strings: no `.url()` validator, no origin gate. The discovery branch (`skipDiscovery: false`) routes URLs through `validateDiscoveryUrl`; the skip-discovery branch persists them as-is. At callback time three fetch sites read the stored URLs: `validateAuthorizationCode` for the token endpoint, `betterFetch` for the userInfo endpoint, and `validateToken` for the JWKS endpoint.\n\nWhen `trustEmailVerified: true` is configured, the attacker can escalate to account linking. A malicious userInfo response with `emailVerified: true` and a chosen `email` triggers OAuth auto-link against any pre-existing user row with that email, compounding the SSRF into account takeover.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in `@better-auth/sso@1.6.11`. Provider registration (`POST /sso/register` with `skipDiscovery: true`) and every `POST /sso/update-provider` request now validate each supplied OIDC endpoint URL (`authorizationEndpoint`, `tokenEndpoint`, `userInfoEndpoint`, `jwksEndpoint`, `discoveryEndpoint`) at registration time. A URL is rejected unless it satisfies one of two conditions:\n\n1. Its host is publicly routable on the internet, evaluated through the `@better-auth/core/utils/host.isPublicRoutableHost` gate. RFC 1918 private ranges, RFC 4193 unique-local addresses, link-local addresses (including the cloud-metadata IP `169.254.169.254`), loopback, multicast, broadcast, and reserved ranges are rejected, along with cloud-metadata FQDNs.\n2. Its origin is already listed in the application's `trustedOrigins` configuration. This preserves the documented escape hatch for customers running internal IdPs intentionally on private networks.\n\nThe schema also tightens from `z.string()` to `z.url()` on those fields, so malformed URLs fail at parse time rather than at fetch time. Deployments running internal IdPs that previously worked must add the IdP's origin to `trustedOrigins` to keep working after upgrade.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf developers cannot upgrade immediately:\n\n- **Disable provider self-registration**: set `sso({ providersLimit: 0 })`. The limit is enforced before the schema branch, blocking every `/sso/register` regardless of `skipDiscovery`.\n- **Reverse-proxy gate**: block `POST /sso/register` and `POST /sso/update-provider` at the edge, or restrict to a denylist of source IPs and a small admin user list.\n- **Network-level egress controls**: block egress from the auth server to RFC 1918, RFC 4193, link-local ranges (`169.254.0.0/16`, `fe80::/10`), and the cloud-metadata FQDN list at the firewall or VPC level. AWS users should additionally enforce IMDSv2 (`HttpTokens: required`).\n- **Set `trustEmailVerified: false`** until upgrade. This caps the impact at non-blind SSRF and removes the account-takeover escalation, but does not stop the SSRF.\n\n### Impact\n\n- **Server-Side Request Forgery (non-blind)**: the attacker reads response bodies from any HTTP endpoint reachable from the auth server, including cloud metadata services (AWS IMDS, GCP metadata FQDN), internal-only APIs, and infrastructure services such as Redis or admin panels bound to localhost.\n- **Account takeover** (when `trustEmailVerified: true`): the attacker mints a malicious userInfo response asserting `emailVerified: true` for an arbitrary email, triggering OAuth auto-link against pre-existing user rows.\n\n### Credit\n\nReported by Vaadata.\n\n### Resources\n\n- [CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html)\n- [CWE-20: Improper Input Validation](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html)\n- [CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/441.html)\n- [CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/345.html)",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "npm",
"name" : "@better-auth/sso"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.1.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.6.11"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4v"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53513"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9574"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/37f60cb176cb53147da7dfd5ec15afa5b486e81e"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-20", "CWE-345", "CWE-441", "CWE-918" ],
"severity" : "CRITICAL",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-07T20:56:19Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-07-15T18:16:47Z"
}
}