CVE-2026-59925: Mistune inline_parser Quadratic-time Parsing On Long Runs Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-4j32-57v6-6g45
CVSS 7.5
CWE-1333 CWE-407
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-59925 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) quadratic-time parsing on long runs vulnerability (CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity) affecting Mistune inline_parser libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves quadratic-time parsing on long runs of `**x**` and `***x***` emphasis pairs. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 3.3.0.

CVE-2026-59925 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-59925
GHSA Identifier GHSA-4j32-57v6-6g45
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.5
CWE Classification CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
Affected Product Mistune inline_parser
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-59925

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Mistune inline_parser dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

mistune fixed: 3.3.0
pip install mistune>=3.3.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show mistune

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-59925, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show mistune

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Mistune inline_parser in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 3.3.0), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show mistune command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity, where the product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential. In Mistune inline_parser, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary **Type:** Algorithmic-complexity DoS in core emphasis parsing. A long sequence of well-formed `**x**` (strong) or `***x***` (strong-emphasis combined) pairs causes O(N²) parser work. Distinct from the bracket-bomb DoS (`[` repetition) and from the formatting-plugin DoS (`~~`/`==`/`^^`); this one fires on default-config mistune with no plugins required. **File:** `src/mistune/inline_parser.py` lines 41-48 (the `EMPHASIS_END_RE` family) and the surrounding emphasis dispatch. **Root cause:** for every opening run of `*`s the parser scans forward using one of `EMPHASIS_END_RE['*']` / `['**']` / `['***']` to find the matching close. Each scan is bounded per call, but the parser invokes the scan from every potential start position. For input shaped `**x**` repeated N times, every `**` is treated as a potential start, each scan can cover up to the end of input. Total work is O(N²). The triple-emphasis variant `***x***` is slightly worse due to the extra alternation between `*`, `**`, and `***` close patterns. Reproducible against default mistune with no plugins. ## Affected Code **File:** `src/mistune/inline_parser.py`, lines 41-48. ```python EMPHASIS_END_RE = { "*": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*(?!\*)"), "_": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])_(?!_)\b"), "**": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*\*(?!\*)"), "__": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])__(?!_)\b"), "***": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*\*\*(?!\*)"), "___": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])___(?!_)\b"), } # Each of the six end-patterns is invoked from every emphasis open position # fired by the inline rule `r"\*{1,3}(?=[^\s*])|\b_{1,3}(?=[^\s_])"`. The # scan itself is bounded per call; the cost comes from the parser invoking # the scan at every matching open marker, giving O(N²) total work. ``` **Why it's wrong:** same shape as the formatting-plugin and bracket-bomb DoS findings. The CommonMark reference parser handles emphasis in linear time using a delimiter-stack algorithm (`commonmark.js`, `commonmark-py`, `markdown-it-py` all do this). mistune retries the close-scan from each open marker. The bounded regex is not enough; the surrounding loop is the source of the quadratic. ## Exploit Chain 1. Application uses mistune to render user-supplied markdown. No plugins required — affects the default `mistune.create_markdown()` configuration. 2. Attacker submits a 40 KB payload of `**x**` repeated 8000 times. 3. Server CPU pegs for ~4 seconds; 16 KB → ~17 seconds. Doubling input quadruples time. 4. Repeating the request floods the worker pool. ## Security Impact **Severity:** sec-high. Network-reachable, no authentication, no plugin requirement. Default mistune is vulnerable. **Attacker capability:** O(N²) CPU cost from a single small input. Predictable scaling, easy to combine with concurrent requests for service denial. **Preconditions:** application uses `mistune.create_markdown()` (default config) on attacker-supplied markdown. No plugins required. **Differential:** PoC-verified against mistune@3.2.1, default config: ```python import mistune, time md = mistune.create_markdown() # no plugins for n in [500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000]: s = '**x**' * n t = time.time() md(s) print(f' **x** * {n} ({len(s)}b): {(time.time() - t) * 1000:.0f}ms') # Output (Python 3.13, Linux, 2.5GHz CPU): # **x** * 500 (2500b): 20ms # **x** * 1000 (5000b): 74ms # **x** * 2000 (10000b): 284ms # **x** * 4000 (20000b): 1079ms # **x** * 8000 (40000b): 4309ms # Triple-emphasis is similar: md('***x***' * 4000) # ~1500ms # Linear in N for non-emphasis input of comparable size: md('xxxxx' * 8000) # 1ms (4000x faster) ``` The patched build (with the suggested fix below — delimiter-stack rewrite or hard cap on simultaneous open markers) keeps the time linear in N. ## Suggested Fix Cap the number of unmatched opening emphasis markers the parser will track simultaneously, treating the rest as literal text: ```diff --- a/src/mistune/inline_parser.py +++ b/src/mistune/inline_parser.py @@ ... in the emphasis-handling code path + # Bound the number of open emphasis markers tracked. CommonMark gives + # no semantics to deeply nested unmatched emphasis; this cap turns the + # parser-level O(N^2) into O(N) for adversarial inputs while preserving + # behaviour on every realistic markdown document. + MAX_OPEN_EMPHASIS = 100 + if open_emphasis_count > MAX_OPEN_EMPHASIS: + # treat remaining * / _ as literal text + ... ``` The proper fix is a delimiter-stack pass, the same approach the formatting-plugin advisory and the bracket-bomb advisory recommend. All three DoS findings share the same algorithmic pattern; a single rewrite of the inline-token retry loop closes them together. Add a regression test asserting that `md('**x**' * 50_000)` completes in under 1 second.

CVE-2026-59925 Affected Mistune inline_parser Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
3.3.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
mistune
PyPI
< 3.3.0
3.3.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-59925?
CVE-2026-59925 is a security vulnerability in Mistune inline_parser involving quadratic-time parsing on long runs of `**x**` and `***x***` emphasis pairs under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity.
Which Mistune inline_parser versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 3.3.0 across affected packages: mistune.
What version fixes CVE-2026-59925?
Upgrading to 3.3.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is mistune affected?
Yes, mistune is affected in releases prior to 3.3.0. Upgrade your dependency to 3.3.0 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-59925?
CVE-2026-59925 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-59925?
CVE-2026-59925 is classified under CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity (The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-59925?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show mistune'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-4j32-57v6-6g45",
  "modified" : "2026-07-20T21:32:40Z",
  "published" : "2026-07-20T21:32:40Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-59925" ],
  "summary" : "Mistune inline_parser: quadratic-time parsing on long runs of `**x**` and `***x***` emphasis pairs",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\n**Type:** Algorithmic-complexity DoS in core emphasis parsing. A long sequence of well-formed `**x**` (strong) or `***x***` (strong-emphasis combined) pairs causes O(N²) parser work. Distinct from the bracket-bomb DoS (`[` repetition) and from the formatting-plugin DoS (`~~`/`==`/`^^`); this one fires on default-config mistune with no plugins required.\n**File:** `src/mistune/inline_parser.py` lines 41-48 (the `EMPHASIS_END_RE` family) and the surrounding emphasis dispatch.\n**Root cause:** for every opening run of `*`s the parser scans forward using one of `EMPHASIS_END_RE['*']` / `['**']` / `['***']` to find the matching close. Each scan is bounded per call, but the parser invokes the scan from every potential start position. For input shaped `**x**` repeated N times, every `**` is treated as a potential start, each scan can cover up to the end of input. Total work is O(N²). The triple-emphasis variant `***x***` is slightly worse due to the extra alternation between `*`, `**`, and `***` close patterns. Reproducible against default mistune with no plugins.\n\n## Affected Code\n\n**File:** `src/mistune/inline_parser.py`, lines 41-48.\n\n```python\nEMPHASIS_END_RE = {\n    \"*\": re.compile(r\"(?:\" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r\"\\\\\\*|[^\\s*])\\*(?!\\*)\"),\n    \"_\": re.compile(r\"(?:\" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r\"\\\\_|[^\\s_])_(?!_)\\b\"),\n    \"**\": re.compile(r\"(?:\" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r\"\\\\\\*|[^\\s*])\\*\\*(?!\\*)\"),\n    \"__\": re.compile(r\"(?:\" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r\"\\\\_|[^\\s_])__(?!_)\\b\"),\n    \"***\": re.compile(r\"(?:\" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r\"\\\\\\*|[^\\s*])\\*\\*\\*(?!\\*)\"),\n    \"___\": re.compile(r\"(?:\" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r\"\\\\_|[^\\s_])___(?!_)\\b\"),\n}\n# Each of the six end-patterns is invoked from every emphasis open position\n# fired by the inline rule `r\"\\*{1,3}(?=[^\\s*])|\\b_{1,3}(?=[^\\s_])\"`. The\n# scan itself is bounded per call; the cost comes from the parser invoking\n# the scan at every matching open marker, giving O(N²) total work.\n```\n\n**Why it's wrong:** same shape as the formatting-plugin and bracket-bomb DoS findings. The CommonMark reference parser handles emphasis in linear time using a delimiter-stack algorithm (`commonmark.js`, `commonmark-py`, `markdown-it-py` all do this). mistune retries the close-scan from each open marker. The bounded regex is not enough; the surrounding loop is the source of the quadratic.\n\n## Exploit Chain\n\n1. Application uses mistune to render user-supplied markdown. No plugins required — affects the default `mistune.create_markdown()` configuration.\n2. Attacker submits a 40 KB payload of `**x**` repeated 8000 times.\n3. Server CPU pegs for ~4 seconds; 16 KB → ~17 seconds. Doubling input quadruples time.\n4. Repeating the request floods the worker pool.\n\n## Security Impact\n\n**Severity:** sec-high. Network-reachable, no authentication, no plugin requirement. Default mistune is vulnerable.\n**Attacker capability:** O(N²) CPU cost from a single small input. Predictable scaling, easy to combine with concurrent requests for service denial.\n**Preconditions:** application uses `mistune.create_markdown()` (default config) on attacker-supplied markdown. No plugins required.\n**Differential:** PoC-verified against mistune@3.2.1, default config:\n\n```python\nimport mistune, time\nmd = mistune.create_markdown()                     # no plugins\nfor n in [500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000]:\n    s = '**x**' * n\n    t = time.time()\n    md(s)\n    print(f'  **x** * {n} ({len(s)}b): {(time.time() - t) * 1000:.0f}ms')\n\n# Output (Python 3.13, Linux, 2.5GHz CPU):\n#   **x** *  500  (2500b):    20ms\n#   **x** * 1000  (5000b):    74ms\n#   **x** * 2000 (10000b):   284ms\n#   **x** * 4000 (20000b):  1079ms\n#   **x** * 8000 (40000b):  4309ms\n\n# Triple-emphasis is similar:\nmd('***x***' * 4000)   # ~1500ms\n\n# Linear in N for non-emphasis input of comparable size:\nmd('xxxxx' * 8000)     # 1ms (4000x faster)\n```\n\nThe patched build (with the suggested fix below — delimiter-stack rewrite or hard cap on simultaneous open markers) keeps the time linear in N.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nCap the number of unmatched opening emphasis markers the parser will track simultaneously, treating the rest as literal text:\n\n```diff\n--- a/src/mistune/inline_parser.py\n+++ b/src/mistune/inline_parser.py\n@@ ... in the emphasis-handling code path\n+    # Bound the number of open emphasis markers tracked. CommonMark gives\n+    # no semantics to deeply nested unmatched emphasis; this cap turns the\n+    # parser-level O(N^2) into O(N) for adversarial inputs while preserving\n+    # behaviour on every realistic markdown document.\n+    MAX_OPEN_EMPHASIS = 100\n+    if open_emphasis_count > MAX_OPEN_EMPHASIS:\n+        # treat remaining * / _ as literal text\n+        ...\n```\n\nThe proper fix is a delimiter-stack pass, the same approach the formatting-plugin advisory and the bracket-bomb advisory recommend. All three DoS findings share the same algorithmic pattern; a single rewrite of the inline-token retry loop closes them together. Add a regression test asserting that `md('**x**' * 50_000)` completes in under 1 second.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "mistune"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "3.3.0"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/lepture/mistune/security/advisories/GHSA-4j32-57v6-6g45"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59925"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/lepture/mistune/commit/5de41fb8e527004dbc363e047a3c380c9288c74f"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/lepture/mistune"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/lepture/mistune/releases/tag/v3.3.0"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mistune/PYSEC-2026-2213.yaml"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-1333", "CWE-407" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-20T21:32:40Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-07-08T17:17:28Z"
  }
}