GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc: Vikunja Cross-project Task Disclosure Through Subtask Vulnerability

MODERATE
CWE-862 CWE-200
Published
Advisory Summary

GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc is a MODERATE cross-project task disclosure through subtask vulnerability (CWE-862: Missing Authorization) affecting Vikunja libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves cross-project task disclosure through subtask expansion. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 2.6.0.

GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc at a Glance

CVE Identifier N/A
GHSA Identifier GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc
Severity MODERATE
CVSS v3.1 Base Score N/A
CWE Classification CWE-862: Missing Authorization
Affected Product Vikunja
Package Ecosystem Go
Published Date
Last Updated

How to Fix GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Vikunja dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

code.vikunja.io/api fixed: 2.6.0
Upgrade code.vikunja.io/api to 2.6.0
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for code.vikunja.io/api

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc, inspect your project dependencies for Vikunja:

inspect dependencies for code.vikunja.io/api

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Vikunja in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 2.6.0), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-862: Missing Authorization, where the product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. In Vikunja, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

### Summary Vikunja lets a task in one project have a subtask that lives in a different project. When listing a project's tasks, an option pulls in those subtasks (?expand%5B%5D=subtasks). The main listing is correctly filtered to the projects the caller can access, but the subtask expansion is not: it returns the linked subtasks regardless of whether the caller has any access to the project they belong to. So a member with read-only access to one project can read the full content of tasks in other, private projects, any task that is a (recursive) subtask of a task the member is allowed to see. ### Details Subtasks can cross project boundaries; a task in an accessible project can be linked as the parent of a subtask that lives in a private project. Creating that link requires access to both tasks, so the link itself is set up legitimately by someone who has it. The problem is what happens afterwards, on read. When a task list is requested with subtask expansion, the server takes the tasks the caller is allowed to see and walks their subtask relations recursively to fetch the linked tasks. That fetch doesn't apply the access-control filter the main listing use, it returns every linked task by ID, with no check on whether the caller can access the project it belongs to. Because the walk is recursive, it also returns the entire subtree beneath each linked task. The effect is a cross-project read. A read-only member of project P who has no access at all to a private project Q can retrieve Q's tasks, full objects, including title, description, dates, assignees, labels, and attachment metadata, as long as some task in Q is linked as a subtask under a task in P. The links persist after access changes, so a former collaborator who has been removed from Q, but still has read access to P, keeps this read channel into Q. The fix is to apply the same project-access filter to the expanded subtasks that the main listing already applies, so only subtasks in projects the caller can access are returned. ### PoC Setup: the attacker has read-only access to project P. A task in P has a subtask that lives in a private project Q the attacker cannot access (a normal cross-project subtask, created earlier by someone with access to both). 1. List P's tasks with subtask expansion: ``` GET /api/v1/projects/<P>/views/<view>/tasks?expand%5B%5D=subtasks ``` 2. The response includes the task from Q as a full object, title, description, dates, assignees, labels, attachment metadata, even though the attacker has no access to Q. Because the expansion is recursive, the entire subtree of subtasks beneath it is returned too. The same works against the account-wide listing: ``` GET /api/v1/tasks?expand%5B%5D=subtasks ``` ### Impact Cross-project confidentiality break. A user with read access to one project can read the full content of tasks in other projects they were never granted access to, whenever those tasks are linked as subtasks (directly or recursively) under a task they can see. The disclosure is read-only, no modification, but it exposes arbitrary private task data, and it survives access revocation, since the underlying links remain after a collaborator is removed. Exploitation depends on a suitable cross-project subtask link already existing; the attacker cannot create one to a project they can't access.

GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc Affected Vikunja Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
2.6.0
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
code.vikunja.io/api
Go
< 2.6.0
2.6.0

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc?
GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc is a security vulnerability in Vikunja involving Cross-project task disclosure through subtask expansion under CWE-862: Missing Authorization.
Which Vikunja versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 2.6.0 across affected packages: code.vikunja.io/api.
What version fixes GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc?
Upgrading to 2.6.0 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is code.vikunja.io/api affected?
Yes, code.vikunja.io/api is affected in releases prior to 2.6.0. Upgrade your dependency to 2.6.0 or later.
What CWE is associated with GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc?
GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc is classified under CWE-862: Missing Authorization (The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.).
How can I check Go dependencies for GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for code.vikunja.io/api'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc",
  "modified" : "2026-10-09T20:54:46Z",
  "published" : "2026-10-09T20:54:46Z",
  "aliases" : [ ],
  "summary" : "Vikunja: Cross-project task disclosure through subtask expansion",
  "details" : "### Summary\nVikunja lets a task in one project have a subtask that lives in a different project. When listing a project's tasks, an option pulls in those subtasks (?expand%5B%5D=subtasks). The main listing is correctly filtered to the projects the caller can access, but the subtask expansion is not: it returns the linked subtasks regardless of whether the caller has any access to the project they belong to. So a member with read-only access to one project can read the full content of tasks in other, private projects, any task that is a (recursive) subtask of a task the member is allowed to see.\n\n### Details\nSubtasks can cross project boundaries; a task in an accessible project can be linked as the parent of a subtask that lives in a private project. Creating that link requires access to both tasks, so the link itself is set up legitimately by someone who has it. The problem is what happens afterwards, on read.\n\nWhen a task list is requested with subtask expansion, the server takes the tasks the caller is allowed to see and walks their subtask relations recursively to fetch the linked tasks. That fetch doesn't apply the access-control filter the main listing use,  it returns every linked task by ID, with no check on whether the caller can access the project it belongs to. Because the walk is recursive, it also returns the entire subtree beneath each linked task.\n\nThe effect is a cross-project read. A read-only member of project P who has no access at all to a private project Q can retrieve Q's tasks, full objects, including title, description, dates, assignees, labels, and attachment metadata, as long as some task in Q is linked as a subtask under a task in P. The links persist after access changes, so a former collaborator who has been removed from Q, but still has read access to P, keeps this read channel into Q.\n\nThe fix is to apply the same project-access filter to the expanded subtasks that the main listing already applies, so only subtasks in projects the caller can access are returned.\n\n### PoC\nSetup: the attacker has read-only access to project P. A task in P has a subtask that lives in a private project Q the attacker cannot access (a normal cross-project subtask, created earlier by someone with access to both).\n\n1. List P's tasks with subtask expansion:\n```\nGET /api/v1/projects/<P>/views/<view>/tasks?expand%5B%5D=subtasks\n```\n2. The response includes the task from Q as a full object, title, description, dates, assignees, labels, attachment metadata, even though the attacker has no access to Q. Because the expansion is recursive, the entire subtree of subtasks beneath it is returned too.\nThe same works against the account-wide listing:\n```\nGET /api/v1/tasks?expand%5B%5D=subtasks\n```\n### Impact\nCross-project confidentiality break. A user with read access to one project can read the full content of tasks in other projects they were never granted access to, whenever those tasks are linked as subtasks (directly or recursively) under a task they can see. The disclosure is read-only, no modification, but it exposes arbitrary private task data, and it survives access revocation, since the underlying links remain after a collaborator is removed. Exploitation depends on a suitable cross-project subtask link already existing; the attacker cannot create one to a project they can't access.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V4",
    "score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "Go",
      "name" : "code.vikunja.io/api"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "2.6.0"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 2.5.0"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/security/advisories/GHSA-3hc7-r24j-rpwc"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/pull/3688"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/commit/077dc4de79ce6f1ab59215a2c7bf9b30423685f2"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/releases/tag/v2.6.0"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-200", "CWE-862" ],
    "severity" : "MODERATE",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-10-09T20:54:46Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}