CVE-2026-87011: Open WebUI Unauthenticated Requests Can Stall The Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-3g9q-v48f-hh9w
CVSS 7.5
CWE-405 CWE-770
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-87011 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) unauthenticated requests can stall the vulnerability (CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) affecting Open WebUI libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves unauthenticated requests can stall the server via uncached oidc fetches in back-channel logout. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.11.1.

CVE-2026-87011 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-87011
GHSA Identifier GHSA-3g9q-v48f-hh9w
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.5
CWE Classification CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
Affected Product Open WebUI
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality None (C:N)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability High (A:H)

How to Fix CVE-2026-87011

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Open WebUI dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

open-webui fixed: 0.11.1
pip install open-webui>=0.11.1
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show open-webui

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-87011, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show open-webui

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Open WebUI in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.11.1), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show open-webui command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification), where the product does not properly control situations in which an adversary can cause the product to consume or produce excessive resources without requiring the adversary to invest equivalent work or otherwise prove authorization, i.e., the adversary's influence is "asymmetric.". In Open WebUI, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

## Summary The OIDC back-channel logout endpoint is unauthenticated by design, because the identity provider calls it without a browser session. Before checking whether the submitted logout token was genuine, the handler fetched the provider's discovery document and its signing keys over the network, and repeated both fetches on every request because nothing was cached. The signing-key fetch also ran as a blocking call inside the async event loop. A small number of requests carrying a worthless token was therefore enough to make the whole instance stop answering. ## Preconditions - `ENABLE_OAUTH_BACKCHANNEL_LOGOUT=true`. The default is `False`, so a stock deployment is not affected. This setting is recommended in the Open WebUI hardening documentation, which is why the issue is treated as in scope. - At least one OIDC provider configured (`OAUTH_CLIENT_ID`, `OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET`, `OPENID_PROVIDER_URL`). - No account, credential, session or secret identifier is required. The attacker needs network access to the instance and the configured issuer string, which is published in the provider's own discovery document. ## Impact Against 0.11.0, with the identity provider answering in 150 ms, 60 concurrent requests carrying a token whose signature was four characters long stalled the async event loop for 8.3 seconds, measured against an idle baseline of 10.8 ms. For the length of that stall the process answers nothing: no chat requests, no API calls, no health check. Open WebUI runs a single worker by default, so the effect is instance-wide rather than per-connection, and no rate limit sits in front of the endpoint. The same traffic is also amplified outward: 20 sequential requests produced 20 discovery fetches and 40 key-set fetches at the identity provider, so an attacker can drive load onto the provider through the instance. No data is read, modified or exposed, and the forged token is still rejected. The cost is paid before the rejection. ## Fix Fixed in 0.11.1. The handler now resolves both the discovery document and the signing keys through the already-configured OAuth client, so each is fetched once per provider and reused afterwards, and both fetches are asynchronous rather than blocking the event loop. A token carrying no `kid` header is rejected before any key lookup happens. Upgrading is sufficient, and no configuration change is required. ## Root cause Affected component: the OIDC back-channel logout handler in `backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py`, reached through `POST /oauth/backchannel-logout`. Affected setups: releases 0.9.0 through 0.11.0 with back-channel logout enabled and an OIDC provider configured. The handler treated its network work as cheap preparation rather than as work worth protecting. For every request it opened a new HTTP session per configured provider to re-read the discovery document, then constructed a fresh JWKS client, whose own cache consequently started empty each time, and asked that client for the signing key through a synchronous call issued directly on the event loop. All of this ran before the token signature was verified, so an attacker unable to produce a valid token still cost the server two network round trips and a blocked loop per request. Both fetches used the library default timeout of five minutes. ## Proof of concept Reproduced by running the unmodified handler from the 0.11.0 and 0.11.1 backends against a loopback identity provider that counted every inbound request and could answer with a configured delay. The submitted token carried a valid issuer and audience, a `kid` naming a key the provider does not hold, and `AAAA` as its signature. 20 sequential requests, provider answering immediately: | Version | Discovery fetches | Key-set fetches | Response | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 0.11.0 | 20 | 40 | 400 | | 0.11.1 | 1 | 1 | 400 | 60 concurrent requests, provider answering in 150 ms: | Version | Wall time | Discovery fetches | Key-set fetches | Worst event-loop stall | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 0.11.0 | 18.6 s | 60 | 120 | 8255 ms | | 0.11.1 | under 0.01 s | 0 | 0 | none measurable | Idle event-loop stall was 10.8 ms in both cases. On 0.11.1 the first request an instance receives warms both caches, and every request after that reaches the signature check without any outbound network call. ## Credits @galanko, for reporting the issue and identifying both the missing caching and the blocking call.

CVE-2026-87011 Affected Open WebUI Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
0.11.1
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
open-webui
PyPI
≥ 0.9.0
< 0.11.1
0.11.1

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-87011?
CVE-2026-87011 is a security vulnerability in Open WebUI involving Unauthenticated requests can stall the server via uncached OIDC fetches in back-channel logout under CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification).
Which Open WebUI versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 0.11.1 across affected packages: open-webui.
What version fixes CVE-2026-87011?
Upgrading to 0.11.1 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is open-webui affected?
Yes, open-webui is affected in releases prior to 0.11.1. Upgrade your dependency to 0.11.1 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-87011?
CVE-2026-87011 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-87011?
CVE-2026-87011 is classified under CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) (The product does not properly control situations in which an adversary can cause the product to consume or produce excessive resources without requiring the adversary to invest equivalent work or otherwise prove authorization, i.e., the adversary's influence is "asymmetric.").
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-87011?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show open-webui'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-3g9q-v48f-hh9w",
  "modified" : "2026-09-10T22:44:42Z",
  "published" : "2026-09-10T22:44:42Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-87011" ],
  "summary" : "Open WebUI: Unauthenticated requests can stall the server via uncached OIDC fetches in back-channel logout",
  "details" : "## Summary\n\nThe OIDC back-channel logout endpoint is unauthenticated by design, because the identity provider calls it without a browser session. Before checking whether the submitted logout token was genuine, the handler fetched the provider's discovery document and its signing keys over the network, and repeated both fetches on every request because nothing was cached. The signing-key fetch also ran as a blocking call inside the async event loop. A small number of requests carrying a worthless token was therefore enough to make the whole instance stop answering.\n\n## Preconditions\n\n- `ENABLE_OAUTH_BACKCHANNEL_LOGOUT=true`. The default is `False`, so a stock deployment is not affected. This setting is recommended in the Open WebUI hardening documentation, which is why the issue is treated as in scope.\n- At least one OIDC provider configured (`OAUTH_CLIENT_ID`, `OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET`, `OPENID_PROVIDER_URL`).\n- No account, credential, session or secret identifier is required. The attacker needs network access to the instance and the configured issuer string, which is published in the provider's own discovery document.\n\n## Impact\n\nAgainst 0.11.0, with the identity provider answering in 150 ms, 60 concurrent requests carrying a token whose signature was four characters long stalled the async event loop for 8.3 seconds, measured against an idle baseline of 10.8 ms. For the length of that stall the process answers nothing: no chat requests, no API calls, no health check. Open WebUI runs a single worker by default, so the effect is instance-wide rather than per-connection, and no rate limit sits in front of the endpoint.\n\nThe same traffic is also amplified outward: 20 sequential requests produced 20 discovery fetches and 40 key-set fetches at the identity provider, so an attacker can drive load onto the provider through the instance.\n\nNo data is read, modified or exposed, and the forged token is still rejected. The cost is paid before the rejection.\n\n## Fix\n\nFixed in 0.11.1. The handler now resolves both the discovery document and the signing keys through the already-configured OAuth client, so each is fetched once per provider and reused afterwards, and both fetches are asynchronous rather than blocking the event loop. A token carrying no `kid` header is rejected before any key lookup happens. Upgrading is sufficient, and no configuration change is required.\n\n## Root cause\n\nAffected component: the OIDC back-channel logout handler in `backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py`, reached through `POST /oauth/backchannel-logout`. Affected setups: releases 0.9.0 through 0.11.0 with back-channel logout enabled and an OIDC provider configured.\n\nThe handler treated its network work as cheap preparation rather than as work worth protecting. For every request it opened a new HTTP session per configured provider to re-read the discovery document, then constructed a fresh JWKS client, whose own cache consequently started empty each time, and asked that client for the signing key through a synchronous call issued directly on the event loop. All of this ran before the token signature was verified, so an attacker unable to produce a valid token still cost the server two network round trips and a blocked loop per request. Both fetches used the library default timeout of five minutes.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\nReproduced by running the unmodified handler from the 0.11.0 and 0.11.1 backends against a loopback identity provider that counted every inbound request and could answer with a configured delay. The submitted token carried a valid issuer and audience, a `kid` naming a key the provider does not hold, and `AAAA` as its signature.\n\n20 sequential requests, provider answering immediately:\n\n| Version | Discovery fetches | Key-set fetches | Response |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 0.11.0 | 20 | 40 | 400 |\n| 0.11.1 | 1 | 1 | 400 |\n\n60 concurrent requests, provider answering in 150 ms:\n\n| Version | Wall time | Discovery fetches | Key-set fetches | Worst event-loop stall |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 0.11.0 | 18.6 s | 60 | 120 | 8255 ms |\n| 0.11.1 | under 0.01 s | 0 | 0 | none measurable |\n\nIdle event-loop stall was 10.8 ms in both cases. On 0.11.1 the first request an instance receives warms both caches, and every request after that reaches the signature check without any outbound network call.\n\n## Credits\n\n@galanko, for reporting the issue and identifying both the missing caching and the blocking call.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "open-webui"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0.9.0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "0.11.1"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 0.11.0"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-3g9q-v48f-hh9w"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-87011"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/aeda6ff13a25d3b3ba1b303609f35382db22142c"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.1"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-405", "CWE-770" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-10T22:44:42Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : "2026-09-09T21:17:05Z"
  }
}