GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6: SiYuan /history/*path And /repo/diff/*path Potentially Exposing Vulnerability
MODERATEGHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6 is a MODERATE (CVSS 4.9) /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing vulnerability (CWE-862: Missing Authorization) affecting SiYuan libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishaccess.json and data/templates/*. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.0.0-20260816034002-035bf9a8c311.
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 4.9
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
How to Fix GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected SiYuan dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to 0.0.0-20260816034002-035bf9a8c311
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6, inspect your project dependencies for SiYuan:
inspect dependencies for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of SiYuan in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.0.0-20260816034002-035bf9a8c311), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-862: Missing Authorization, where the product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. In SiYuan, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6 Affected SiYuan Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
|
Go |
< 0.0.0-20260816034002-035bf9a8c311
|
0.0.0-20260816034002-035bf9a8c311
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6?
Which SiYuan versions are affected?
What version fixes GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6?
Is github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel affected?
What is the CVSS score of GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6?
What CWE is associated with GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6?
How can I check Go dependencies for GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6",
"modified" : "2026-10-05T17:32:44Z",
"published" : "2026-10-05T17:32:44Z",
"aliases" : [ ],
"summary" : "SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*",
"details" : "### Summary\n`GHSA-c8r8-95hg-mp34` added a centralized guard,\n`util.IsForbiddenAbsPath()`, specifically to block access to a small\nset of sensitive files: `conf/conf.json` (plaintext\n`accessAuthCode`/API token/cookie key), `data/snippets/conf.json`,\nthe entire `data/templates/` directory, and\n`data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json` (plaintext publish-mode passwords).\nIt was applied to `kernel/api/file.go` and `kernel/mcp/tools/file.go`.\nTwo other routes in the same server that serve arbitrary files by path,\n`/history/*path` and `/repo/diff/*path`, construct their target paths\nindependently and were not updated to call this new guard. Since the\nrepo/history snapshot system's tracked root is `data/` (confirmed by\n`getSyncIgnoreLines()`, whose ignore file lives at\n`data/.siyuan/syncignore` with entries relative to `data/`), both\n`data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json` and `data/templates/*` fall within\nthe scope that can legitimately be captured in historical snapshots,\nmeaning a prior version of either file can exist in\n`util.HistoryDir`/the repo-diff temp checkout even after the live file\nhas been protected by the new guard. This is CWE-862 (Missing\nAuthorization) applied to a very recently introduced protection\nmechanism.\n\n### Details\n`kernel/server/serve.go`, `/history/*path` (around line 994):\n```go\nginServer.GET(\"/history/*path\", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckAdminRole, func(context *gin.Context) {\n p := filepath.Join(util.HistoryDir, context.Param(\"path\"))\n // 加密笔记本的历史是密文(.sy/assets/AV),需先解密再输出\n if serveEncryptedHistory(context, p) {\n return\n }\n secureAssetContentHeaders(context, p, p)\n http.ServeFile(context.Writer, context.Request, p)\n})\n```\nNo call to `util.IsForbiddenAbsPath(p)` anywhere in this handler.\n\n`kernel/server/serve.go`, `/repo/diff/*path` (around line 1241):\n```go\nginServer.GET(\"/repo/diff/*path\", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckAdminRole, func(context *gin.Context) {\n requestPath := filepath.Clean(context.Param(\"path\"))\n if strings.Contains(requestPath, \"..\") {\n context.Status(http.StatusUnauthorized)\n return\n }\n ...\n p := filepath.Join(repoDiffBaseDir, requestPath)\n if !gulu.File.IsSubPath(repoDiffBaseDir, p) {\n context.Status(http.StatusUnauthorized)\n return\n }\n http.ServeFile(context.Writer, context.Request, p)\n})\n```\nThis route does have its own traversal protection (`..` rejection and\n`IsSubPath` containment within `repoDiffBaseDir`), but that only\nprevents escaping the diff-checkout directory, it does nothing to\nprevent retrieving a *legitimately checked-out historical copy* of\n`publishAccess.json` or a templates file from within that directory,\nwhich is exactly what the new guard exists to prevent regardless of\nwhich directory the copy currently sits in.\n\n`util.IsForbiddenAbsPath()` itself (`kernel/util/path_guard.go`,\nintroduced by the referenced fix) confirms the intended scope:\n```go\n// 禁止访问 data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json(含发布模式明文访问密码)\npublishAccessPath := NormalizeAndResolve(filepath.Join(DataDir, \".siyuan\", \"publishAccess.json\"))\nif fileNorm == publishAccessPath {\n return true\n}\n```\nand\n```go\n// 禁止访问 data/templates 目录(含目录本身及其全部子路径)\ntemplatesBase := NormalizeAndResolve(filepath.Join(DataDir, \"templates\"))\nif fileNorm == templatesBase || gulu.File.IsSubPath(templatesBase, fileNorm) {\n return true\n}\n```\nBoth are paths within `data/`, the same root the sync/history/repo\nsystem tracks.\n\n### Step-by-step reproduction\n1. As the workspace admin, enable Publish with a password on at least\n one notebook (creating `data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json` with a\n plaintext password), then let a sync/backup snapshot capture this\n state (or check whether local history capture already covers\n `data/.siyuan/` in the deployed version).\n2. Change or remove the publish password, so the live\n `publishAccess.json` no longer contains the old plaintext password\n the new guard is meant to hide, going forward.\n3. As the admin, request the historical/diff version instead of the\n live file:\n ```bash\n curl -s http://<target>:6806/history/<snapshot-path-to-publishAccess.json> \\\n -u \"<workspaceName>:<accessAuthCode>\"\n curl -s http://<target>:6806/repo/diff/<diff-path-to-publishAccess.json> \\\n -u \"<workspaceName>:<accessAuthCode>\"\n ```\n4. Expected if consistently protected, matching the behavior the new\n guard already provides on the live-file endpoints: rejected.\n Observed: neither handler calls `IsForbiddenAbsPath`, so the\n historical copy is served if it exists in that location.\n\n*(Not run against a live compiled kernel, same sandbox limitation noted\nthroughout this review; both handlers are read directly from source at\nthe reviewed commit, and `IsForbiddenAbsPath`'s scope, plus the\nsync-root confirmation via `getSyncIgnoreLines()`, are quoted directly\nabove. Whether these specific files are captured by history/repo\nsnapshots in a given deployment depends on the workspace's actual\nusage history and was not independently verified against a live\ninstance in this review.)*\n\n### Impact\nAn admin-authenticated request to either route can potentially retrieve\na historical copy of `data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json` (disclosing a\nplaintext publish-mode password even after it has been changed or the\nlive file has been protected) or a `data/templates/*` file, directly\nundermining the protection `GHSA-c8r8-95hg-mp34` was written four days\nprior to this review specifically to provide, via two routes that\npredate that fix and were not updated alongside it.\n```\n\n## Affected products\n\n| Field | Value |\n|---|---|\n| Ecosystem | **Go** |\n| Package name | `github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel` |\n| Affected versions | Present as of commit `251596f` (2026-08-12, the version this review confirmed), i.e. postdates and was not covered by the `GHSA-c8r8-95hg-mp34` fix (commit `3542530`, 2026-08-08) |\n| Patched versions | *(none yet, leave blank until a fix is released)* |\n\n## Severity\n\n| Field | Value |\n|---|---|\n| Vector string | `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:M/I:N/A:N` |\n| Score | **~5.9 (Medium)**, `PR:H` since admin authentication is required at the HTTP layer, confidentiality impact scoped to whatever sensitive historical content happens to exist in the tracked snapshots for a given deployment (a real but deployment-dependent condition, honestly reflected as Medium rather than assumed to always be present), no integrity/availability impact since both are read-only. |\n\n## Weaknesses (CWE)\n\n- **CWE-862**: Missing Authorization (primary)\n- **CWE-200**: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor\n\n## Notes for filing\n- Direct, narrow follow-up to `GHSA-c8r8-95hg-mp34`; recommend\n referencing that advisory directly when filing, since this is\n precisely the \"sibling caller missed\" pattern that fix's own\n centralization (moving the check into a shared `util` function) was\n presumably intended to prevent, just for two callers that existed\n before the shared function did and weren't migrated to it.\n- Suggested fix: add `if util.IsForbiddenAbsPath(p) { ... reject ... }`\n to both handlers, matching the pattern already applied in\n `kernel/api/file.go` and `kernel/mcp/tools/file.go`.",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "Go",
"name" : "github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.0.0-20260816034002-035bf9a8c311"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/security/advisories/GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/commit/035bf9a8c311c6f8468f2f1054b4d5e1711787e2"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/releases/tag/v3.8.1"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-200", "CWE-862" ],
"severity" : "MODERATE",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-10-05T17:32:44Z",
"nvd_published_at" : null
}
}