CVE-2026-72794: SiYuan The Session-cookie Signing Key (Conf.CookieKey) Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-34fj-mwm6-fjfg
CVSS 8.6
CWE-522
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-72794 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.6) the session-cookie signing key (conf.cookiekey) vulnerability (CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials) affecting SiYuan libraries in the Go ecosystem. The issue involves the session-cookie signing key (conf.cookiekey) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/system/getconf. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a.

CVE-2026-72794 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-72794
GHSA Identifier GHSA-34fj-mwm6-fjfg
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 8.6
CWE Classification CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials
Affected Product SiYuan
Package Ecosystem Go
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 8.6

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Changed (S:C)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-72794

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected SiYuan dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel fixed: 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

inspect dependencies for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2026-72794, inspect your project dependencies for SiYuan:

inspect dependencies for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of SiYuan in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a), your application is affected.

Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials, where the product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. In SiYuan, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

**CVE:** This vulnerability corresponds to [CVE-2026-72794](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72794). ### Summary `/api/system/getConf` returns `Conf.CookieKey`, the key used to sign the server's session cookies in its response body. The endpoint is registered with `CheckAuth` only, so the field reaches the publish `RoleReader` token and the anonymous account when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`. The configuration-export endpoint in the same file strips this exact field before returning config, so the project already treats it as secret. The reader-facing masking path does not. ### Details | Item | Detail | |---|---| | Route | `kernel/api/router.go:70` `POST /api/system/getConf` → `model.CheckAuth` → `getConf` | | Middleware | `CheckAuth` only — no `CheckReadonly`, no `CheckAdminRole` | | Leaked field | `AppConf.CookieKey`, serialized as `cookieKey` | | Purpose of the field | Signing key for the `siyuan` session cookie | **The field survives every stage of the masking chain.** `getConf` masks through `GetMaskedConf()` → `HideConfSecret()` (non-administrators) → `FilterConfByPublishIgnore()` (readers) → the browser-side System-path strip. `CookieKey` is removed by none of them: - `GetMaskedConf` masks `UserData`, `MCPOAuth` and `AccessAuthCode` only. - `HideConfSecret` nulls `AI`, `Api`, `Flashcard`, `ServerAddrs`, `Publish`, `Repo`, `Sync`, `Secrets`, `Variables` and the System paths. It contains no reference to `CookieKey`. - `FilterConfByPublishIgnore` touches `UILayout` only. - The browser-side strip removes System paths only. **The key is live, not vestigial.** It is passed straight into the session store at startup: ``` cli/cmd/serve.go:67 go server.Serve(false, model.Conf.CookieKey) kernel/server/serve.go:152 sessionStore = cookie.NewStore([]byte(cookieKey)) kernel/server/serve.go:159 ginServer.Use(sessions.Sessions("siyuan", sessionStore)) ``` `gin-contrib/sessions/cookie.NewStore` constructed with a single key uses that key as the `gorilla/securecookie` HMAC key. The `siyuan` session cookie is therefore signed with the value the endpoint hands out. An attacker holding it can mint and modify session cookies that the server accepts as authentic. **Guarded sibling, in the same file.** `exportConf` (`kernel/api/system.go:299`) clones the configuration before returning it and explicitly clears both secrets: ``` kernel/api/system.go:360 clonedConf.CookieKey = "" clonedConf.NotebookCrypto = nil ``` The project has already classified `CookieKey` as a value that must not leave the server. The `getConf` masking path omits the same field. **Ceiling is environment-dependent, floor is not.** Escalating a forged session to administrator additionally requires the forged `SessionData` to carry the matching `AccessAuthCode`, which `GetMaskedConf` does mask or the instance to have no access-auth code configured, which is a common deployment. The unconditional impact, present on every instance, is the disclosure of a persistent cryptographic secret to an unauthenticated party together with the cookie-forgery capability that follows from it. Rotating the key invalidates all existing sessions, so this is not a secret that can be quietly refreshed. ### Proof of Concept Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`, otherwise any publish reader account. ``` POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/getConf {} → 200 The response body's conf object contains a cookieKey field holding the server's session-signing key in cleartext. ``` Differential check against the endpoint that does strip it: ``` POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/exportConf → cookieKey is empty, notebookCrypto is null ``` The same value is withheld by one endpoint and returned by the other. ### Impact An anonymous reader in publish mode or any publish `RoleReader` obtains the server's session-cookie signing key. This is a persistent cryptographic secret whose disclosure cannot be remediated without invalidating every active session. Possession of the key permits forging and tampering with `siyuan` session cookies that the server will validate as authentic. On instances with no access-auth code configured, or where a forged session's contents otherwise satisfy the server's checks, this extends to authenticating as a privileged user. ### Suggested fix Clear `CookieKey` in `HideConfSecret` for all non-administrator responses. The more durable fix is to route non-administrator `getConf` through the `exportConf` cloner, which already handles `CookieKey`, `NotebookCrypto`, `Account`, `Stat`, `System.ID`, `Export.PandocBin` and the AI keys replacing the current blocklist, which fails open on every field nobody thought to add, with the allowlist-style cloner the project already maintains.

CVE-2026-72794 Affected SiYuan Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Go
< 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a
0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-72794?
CVE-2026-72794 is a security vulnerability in SiYuan involving The session-cookie signing key (Conf.CookieKey) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/system/getConf under CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials.
Which SiYuan versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a across affected packages: github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel.
What version fixes CVE-2026-72794?
Upgrading to 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel affected?
Yes, github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel is affected in releases prior to 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a. Upgrade your dependency to 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72794?
CVE-2026-72794 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.6 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-72794?
CVE-2026-72794 is classified under CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials (The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval.).
How can I check Go dependencies for CVE-2026-72794?
Run the dependency tree command: 'inspect dependencies for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-34fj-mwm6-fjfg",
  "modified" : "2026-09-04T21:12:26Z",
  "published" : "2026-09-04T21:12:26Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-72794" ],
  "summary" : "SiYuan: The session-cookie signing key (Conf.CookieKey) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/system/getConf",
  "details" : "**CVE:** This vulnerability corresponds to [CVE-2026-72794](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72794).\n\n### Summary\n\n`/api/system/getConf` returns `Conf.CookieKey`, the key used to sign the server's session cookies in its response body. The endpoint is registered with `CheckAuth` only, so the field reaches the publish `RoleReader` token and the anonymous account when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`.\n\nThe configuration-export endpoint in the same file strips this exact field before returning config, so the project already treats it as secret. The reader-facing masking path does not.\n\n### Details\n\n| Item | Detail |\n|---|---|\n| Route | `kernel/api/router.go:70` `POST /api/system/getConf` → `model.CheckAuth` → `getConf` |\n| Middleware | `CheckAuth` only — no `CheckReadonly`, no `CheckAdminRole` |\n| Leaked field | `AppConf.CookieKey`, serialized as `cookieKey` |\n| Purpose of the field | Signing key for the `siyuan` session cookie |\n\n**The field survives every stage of the masking chain.** `getConf` masks through `GetMaskedConf()` → `HideConfSecret()` (non-administrators) → `FilterConfByPublishIgnore()` (readers) → the browser-side System-path strip. `CookieKey` is removed by none of them:\n\n- `GetMaskedConf` masks `UserData`, `MCPOAuth` and `AccessAuthCode` only.\n- `HideConfSecret` nulls `AI`, `Api`, `Flashcard`, `ServerAddrs`, `Publish`, `Repo`, `Sync`, `Secrets`, `Variables` and the System paths. It contains no reference to `CookieKey`.\n- `FilterConfByPublishIgnore` touches `UILayout` only.\n- The browser-side strip removes System paths only.\n\n**The key is live, not vestigial.** It is passed straight into the session store at startup:\n\n```\ncli/cmd/serve.go:67   go server.Serve(false, model.Conf.CookieKey)\nkernel/server/serve.go:152   sessionStore = cookie.NewStore([]byte(cookieKey))\nkernel/server/serve.go:159   ginServer.Use(sessions.Sessions(\"siyuan\", sessionStore))\n```\n\n`gin-contrib/sessions/cookie.NewStore` constructed with a single key uses that key as the `gorilla/securecookie` HMAC key. The `siyuan` session cookie is therefore signed with the value the endpoint hands out. An attacker holding it can mint and modify session cookies that the server accepts as authentic.\n\n**Guarded sibling, in the same file.** `exportConf` (`kernel/api/system.go:299`) clones the configuration before returning it and explicitly clears both secrets:\n\n```\nkernel/api/system.go:360   clonedConf.CookieKey = \"\"\n                           clonedConf.NotebookCrypto = nil\n```\n\nThe project has already classified `CookieKey` as a value that must not leave the server. The `getConf` masking path omits the same field.\n\n**Ceiling is environment-dependent, floor is not.** Escalating a forged session to administrator additionally requires the forged `SessionData` to carry the matching `AccessAuthCode`, which `GetMaskedConf` does mask or the instance to have no access-auth code configured, which is a common deployment. The unconditional impact, present on every instance, is the disclosure of a persistent cryptographic secret to an unauthenticated party together with the cookie-forgery capability that follows from it. Rotating the key invalidates all existing sessions, so this is not a secret that can be quietly refreshed.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\nPrecondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`, otherwise any publish reader account.\n\n```\nPOST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/getConf\n{}\n\n→ 200\n   The response body's conf object contains a cookieKey field holding the\n   server's session-signing key in cleartext.\n```\n\nDifferential check against the endpoint that does strip it:\n\n```\nPOST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/exportConf\n→ cookieKey is empty, notebookCrypto is null\n```\n\nThe same value is withheld by one endpoint and returned by the other.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn anonymous reader in publish mode or any publish `RoleReader` obtains the server's session-cookie signing key. This is a persistent cryptographic secret whose disclosure cannot be remediated without invalidating every active session. Possession of the key permits forging and tampering with `siyuan` session cookies that the server will validate as authentic. On instances with no access-auth code configured, or where a forged session's contents otherwise satisfy the server's checks, this extends to authenticating as a privileged user.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\nClear `CookieKey` in `HideConfSecret` for all non-administrator responses. The more durable fix is to route non-administrator `getConf` through the `exportConf` cloner, which already handles `CookieKey`, `NotebookCrypto`, `Account`, `Stat`, `System.ID`, `Export.PandocBin` and the AI keys replacing the current blocklist, which fails open on every field nobody thought to add, with the allowlist-style cloner the project already maintains.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "Go",
      "name" : "github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "0"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a"
      } ]
    } ]
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/security/advisories/GHSA-34fj-mwm6-fjfg"
  }, {
    "type" : "ADVISORY",
    "url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72794"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/commit/77421530be4ab1f43310d0f50fbab05d16c38675"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan"
  }, {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/siyuan-before-session-cookie-key-disclosure-via-getconf"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-522" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-09-04T21:12:26Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}