CVE-2026-55514: Vllm Denial of Service Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2026-55514 is a HIGH denial of service vulnerability (CWE-617: Reachable Assertion) affecting Vllm libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves vllm denial of service via prompt embeds on m-rope models. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.24.0.
CVE-2026-55514 at a Glance
How to Fix CVE-2026-55514
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Vllm dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
pip install vllm>=0.24.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
pip show vllm
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-55514, inspect your installed packages using pip:
pip show vllm
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Vllm in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.24.0), your application is affected.
Note: The pip show vllm command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-617: Reachable Assertion, where the product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary. In Vllm, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2026-55514 Affected Vllm Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
vllm
|
PyPI |
≥ 0.12.0
< 0.24.0
|
0.24.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-55514?
Which Vllm versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2026-55514?
Is vllm affected?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-55514?
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-55514?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-33cg-gxv8-3p8g",
"modified" : "2026-07-20T19:13:07Z",
"published" : "2026-07-20T19:13:07Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-55514" ],
"summary" : "vLLM denial of service via prompt embeds on M-RoPE models",
"details" : "### Summary\n_Short summary of the problem. Make the impact and severity as clear as possible. For example: An unsafe deserialization vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the server._\n\nSending a pure prompt embeds payload in a `/v1/completions` request with a model using M-RoPE causes the EngineCore to fail an assertion and fatally crash, shutting down the entire server application.\n\nAny remote user who is authorized to make a `/v1/completions` endpoint can trivially make such a request and induce a crash.\n\n### Details\n_Give all details on the vulnerability. Pointing to the incriminated source code is very helpful for the maintainer._\n\nIn commit [56669c1](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/56669c1f293d5c53b6a19ddf2f78802fa9fff2c2), a simple assert intended to be a type-narrowing assert was added to the `_init_mrope_positions` method in `GPUModelRunner` (the offending line on main at the time of writing: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2d481f8a946ee0521872af0f098674a8ee01ce4a/vllm/v1/worker/gpu_model_runner.py#L1588-L1607).\n\n```python\nassert req_state.prompt_token_ids is not None, (\n \"M-RoPE requires prompt_token_ids to be available.\"\n )\n```\n\nThis type narrowing assert is to prevent mypy errors later in the function because `None` is not a valid type for `mrope_model.get_mrope_input_positions`. Unfortunately, this assertion is not always true. `/v1/completions` requests that specify `prompt=None` and `prompt_embeds=<not none>` will indeed create a CachedRequestState where `prompt_token_ids` is `None`. This triggers the assertion, which in turn crashes the EngineCore and the Server application.\n\n```\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/vllm/v1/worker/gpu_model_runner.py\", line 3997, in execute_model\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] deferred_state_corrections_fn = self._update_states(scheduler_output)\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/vllm/v1/worker/gpu_model_runner.py\", line 1239, in _update_states\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] self._init_mrope_positions(req_state)\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/vllm/v1/worker/gpu_model_runner.py\", line 1582, in _init_mrope_positions\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] assert req_state.prompt_token_ids is not None, (\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n(EngineCore pid=351) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [core.py:1167] AssertionError: M-RoPE requires prompt_token_ids to be available.\n(APIServer pid=1) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [async_llm.py:704] AsyncLLM output_handler failed.\n(APIServer pid=1) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [async_llm.py:704] Traceback (most recent call last):\n(APIServer pid=1) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [async_llm.py:704] File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/vllm/v1/engine/async_llm.py\", line 660, in output_handler\n(APIServer pid=1) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [async_llm.py:704] outputs = await engine_core.get_output_async()\n(APIServer pid=1) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [async_llm.py:704] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n(APIServer pid=1) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [async_llm.py:704] File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/vllm/v1/engine/core_client.py\", line 1030, in get_output_async\n(APIServer pid=1) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [async_llm.py:704] raise self._format_exception(outputs) from None\n(APIServer pid=1) ERROR 06-11 00:48:03 [async_llm.py:704] vllm.v1.engine.exceptions.EngineDeadError: EngineCore encountered an issue. See stack trace (above) for the root cause.\n```\n\nAll requests using the `/v1/chat/completions` endpoints will have text/`prompt_token_ids` parts (corresponding to the chat template), and `prompt_embeds` parts are handled as mm_features. This method (rightly) filters out those `prompt_embeds` content parts as they are treated as text positions.\n\nA sufficient solution to type narrowing here without raising a fatal assertion is to instead replace the assertion with a using dummy token ids:\n\n```python\ndef _init_mrope_positions(self, req_state: CachedRequestState):\n model = self.get_model()\n assert supports_mrope(model), \"M-RoPE support is not implemented.\"\n mrope_model = cast(SupportsMRoPE, model)\n\n # Filter out prompt_embeds modality (text-only position info)\n mrope_features = [\n f for f in req_state.mm_features if f.modality != \"prompt_embeds\"\n ]\n \n # Handle both token_ids and embeddings-only inputs\n if req_state.prompt_token_ids is not None:\n input_tokens = req_state.prompt_token_ids\n elif req_state.prompt_embeds is not None:\n # For text-only embeddings, dummy token IDs are safe since\n # get_mrope_input_positions only uses len(input_tokens) when mm_features is empty\n seq_len = req_state.prompt_embeds.shape[0]\n input_tokens = list(range(seq_len))\n # Verify no mm_features remain (should be true after prompt_embeds filter)\n assert len(mrope_features) == 0, (\n \"M-RoPE with prompt_embeds-only input should have no multimodal features\"\n )\n else:\n raise ValueError(\n \"M-RoPE requires either prompt_token_ids or prompt_embeds.\"\n )\n\n req_state.mrope_positions, req_state.mrope_position_delta = (\n mrope_model.get_mrope_input_positions(\n input_tokens,\n mrope_features,\n )\n )\n```\n\nTechnically, in isolation, this method still crashes in the case where `req_state.prompt_token_ids is None and req_state.mm_features`, so the solution above still leaves that potential vector open. As far as can be determined, however, such a `req_state` is impossible in the first place in online mode, because it would require a `/v1/completions` request with `prompt_embeds` AND multimodal features, but the `/v1/completions` request schema does not expose multimodal inputs in any discernible way. Today, those are the only two endpoints with `prompt_embeds` support. \n\nWhen in offline mode, it *is technically* possible to directly create an `EngineCoreRequest` that has `prompt_embeds and not prompt_token_ids and mm_features`, and pass that to `LLM.generate`. That would trigger this same assertion, and no validation would prevent that combination. It is strongly suspected, though, that this combination would be undefined in any model that support M-RoPE, because it would not be possible to determine which token positions correspond to `mm_features`. The proposed solution above would end up not setting `req_state.mrope_positions` and `req_state.mrope_position_delta` in this scenario, which could result in undefined behavior.\n\n`prompt_embeds` is far more familiar here than M-RoPE, and it is understood that each model that supports it is responsible for defining its own `get_mrope_input_positions` which have varying implementations. There is insufficient knowledge to be prescriptive in how the two features should interact in the offline case, other than possibly raising a validation error earlier on preventing that combination (which would emulate the current assertion behavior). Regardless, in offline mode, the chances of a remote user being able to exploit this are slim-to-nil compared to the online case which is incredibly straightforward.\n\n### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\n\n- Denial of Service caused by an incorrect assertion inside of the `GPUModelRunner` which causes a fatal EngineCore exception\n- Any configuration with `--enable-prompt-embeds` and M-RoPE-supported model is vulnerable\n- The attack is extremely easy from the remote attacker's perspective (copying the official `prompt_embeds` online mode docs examples almost-verbatim, accounting for model-name and connection details, of course, will induce a guaranteed shutdown)",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V4",
"score" : "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "PyPI",
"name" : "vllm"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0.12.0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.24.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-33cg-gxv8-3p8g"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55514"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/45252"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/470229c37efaf69c86e8bc97482b0b1ff7551c65"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vllm/PYSEC-2026-2303.yaml"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/releases/tag/v0.24.0"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-617" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2026-07-20T19:13:07Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2026-07-06T21:16:57Z"
}
}