CVE-2020-15133: Faye websocket Missing TLS Certificate Verification Vulnerability
HIGHCVE-2020-15133 is a HIGH (CVSS 8.0) missing tls certificate verification vulnerability (CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation) affecting Faye websocket libraries in the RubyGems ecosystem. The issue involves missing tls certificate verification in faye-websocket. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 0.11.0.
CVE-2020-15133 at a Glance
Security Impact
CVSS: 8.0
The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).
How to Fix CVE-2020-15133
To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Faye websocket dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.
Upgrade faye-websocket to 0.11.0
Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:
inspect dependencies for faye-websocket
How to Check if You Are Affected
To determine whether your application is affected by CVE-2020-15133, inspect your project dependencies for Faye websocket:
inspect dependencies for faye-websocket
Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Faye websocket in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 0.11.0), your application is affected.
Note: Verify declared build manifests and deployed runtime container environments.
Technical Details
Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation, where the product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. In Faye websocket, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.
Source Advisory Statement
CVE-2020-15133 Affected Faye websocket Versions
1 component(s)| Product / Package | Ecosystem | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
|
faye-websocket
|
RubyGems |
< 0.11.0
|
0.11.0
|
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2020-15133?
Which Faye websocket versions are affected?
What version fixes CVE-2020-15133?
Is faye-websocket affected?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-15133?
What CWE is associated with CVE-2020-15133?
How can I check RubyGems dependencies for CVE-2020-15133?
Machine-readable OSV JSON
OSV v1.5 Schema
{
"schema_version" : "1.4.0",
"id" : "GHSA-2v5c-755p-p4gv",
"modified" : "2023-05-16T16:01:20Z",
"published" : "2020-07-31T17:40:04Z",
"aliases" : [ "CVE-2020-15133" ],
"summary" : "Missing TLS certificate verification in faye-websocket",
"details" : "The `Faye::WebSocket::Client` class uses the [`EM::Connection#start_tls`][1] method in [EventMachine][2] to implement the TLS handshake whenever a `wss:` URL is used for the connection. This method does not implement certificate verification by default, meaning that it does not check that the server presents a valid and trusted TLS certificate for the expected hostname. That means that any `wss:` connection made using this library is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack, since it does not confirm the identity of the server it is connected to.\n\nThis has been a requested feature in EventMachine for many years now; see for example [#275][3], [#378][4], and [#814][5]. In June 2020, [em-http-request][6] published an [advisory][7] related to this problem and fixed it by [implementing TLS verification][8] in their own codebase; although EventMachine does not implement certificate verification itself, it provides an extension point for the caller to implement it, called [`ssl_verify_peer`][9]. Based on this implementation, we have incorporated similar functionality into [faye-websocket for Ruby][10], such that we use the `OpenSSL` module to perform two checks:\n\n- The chain of certificates presented by the server is valid and ultimately trusted by your root certificate set -- either your system default root certificates, or a set provided at runtime\n- The final certificate presented by the server is valid for the hostname used in the request URI; if the connection is made via a proxy we use the hostname from the request, not the proxy's hostname\n\nAfter implementing verification in v1.1.6, em-http-request has elected to leave the `:verify_peer` option switched off by default. We have decided to _enable_ this option by default in faye-websocket, but are publishing a minor release with added functionality for configuring it. We are mindful of the fact that this may break existing programs, but we consider it much more important that\nall clients have TLS verification turned on by default. A client that is not carrying out verification is either:\n\n- talking to the expected server, and will not break under this change\n- being attacked, and would benefit from being alerted to this fact\n- deliberately talking to a server that would be rejected by verification\n\nThe latter case includes situations like talking to a non-public server using a self-signed certificate. We consider this use case to be \"working by accident\", rather than functionality that was actively supported, and it should be properly and explicitly supported instead. To that end, we have added two new options to the `Faye::WebSocket::Client` constructor: `tls.root_cert_file`, and `tls.verify_peer`.\n\nThe `:root_cert_file` option lets you provide a different set of root certificates in situations where you don't want to use your system's default root certificates to verify the remote host. It should be a path or an array of paths identifying the certificates to use instead of the defaults.\n\n```rb\nclient = Faye::WebSocket::Client.new('wss://example.com/', [], tls: {\n root_cert_file: 'path/to/certificate.pem'\n})\n```\n\nThe `:verify_peer` option lets you turn verification off entirely. This should be a last resort and we recommend using the `:root_cert_file` option if possible.\n\n```rb\nclient = Faye::WebSocket::Client.new('wss://example.com/', [], tls: {\n verify_peer: false\n})\n```\n\nTo get the new behaviour, please upgrade to v0.11.0 of the [Rubygems package][10]. There are, unfortunately, no workarounds for this issue, as you cannot enable `:verify_peer` in EventMachine unless the calling library contains an implementation of `ssl_verify_peer` that actually checks the server's certificates.\n\nFor further background information on this issue, please see [faye#524][12] and [faye-websocket#129][13]. We would like to thank [Tero Marttila][14] and [Daniel Morsing][15] for providing invaluable assistance and feedback on this issue.\n\n[1]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/eventmachine/eventmachine/EventMachine/Connection:start_tls\n[2]: https://rubygems.org/gems/eventmachine\n[3]: https://github.com/eventmachine/eventmachine/issues/275\n[4]: https://github.com/eventmachine/eventmachine/pull/378\n[5]: https://github.com/eventmachine/eventmachine/issues/814\n[6]: https://rubygems.org/gems/em-http-request\n[7]: https://securitylab.github.com/advisories/GHSL-2020-094-igrigorik-em-http-request\n[8]: https://github.com/igrigorik/em-http-request/pull/340\n[9]: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/eventmachine/eventmachine/EventMachine/Connection:ssl_verify_peer\n[10]: https://rubygems.org/gems/faye-websocket\n[12]: https://github.com/faye/faye/issues/524\n[13]: https://github.com/faye/faye-websocket-ruby/pull/129\n[14]: https://github.com/SpComb\n[15]: https://github.com/DanielMorsing",
"severity" : [ {
"type" : "CVSS_V3",
"score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N"
} ],
"affected" : [ {
"package" : {
"ecosystem" : "RubyGems",
"name" : "faye-websocket"
},
"ranges" : [ {
"type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
"events" : [ {
"introduced" : "0"
}, {
"fixed" : "0.11.0"
} ]
} ]
} ],
"references" : [ {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/faye/faye-websocket-ruby/security/advisories/GHSA-2v5c-755p-p4gv"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15133"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/eventmachine/eventmachine/issues/275"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/eventmachine/eventmachine/issues/814"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/faye/faye/issues/524"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/eventmachine/eventmachine/pull/378"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/faye/faye-websocket-ruby/pull/129"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/igrigorik/em-http-request/pull/340"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://blog.jcoglan.com/2020/07/31/missing-tls-verification-in-faye"
}, {
"type" : "PACKAGE",
"url" : "https://github.com/faye/faye-websocket-ruby"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/faye-websocket/CVE-2020-15133.yml"
}, {
"type" : "ADVISORY",
"url" : "https://securitylab.github.com/advisories/GHSL-2020-094-igrigorik-em-http-request"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://www.rubydoc.info/github/eventmachine/eventmachine/EventMachine/Connection:ssl_verify_peer"
}, {
"type" : "WEB",
"url" : "https://www.rubydoc.info/github/eventmachine/eventmachine/EventMachine/Connection:start_tls"
} ],
"database_specific" : {
"cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-295" ],
"severity" : "HIGH",
"github_reviewed" : true,
"github_reviewed_at" : "2020-07-31T17:39:00Z",
"nvd_published_at" : "2020-07-31T18:15:00Z"
}
}