CVE-2026-56833: Praisonai Path Traversal Vulnerability

HIGH
Advisory Identifier: GHSA-22cj-m4wf-fv2c
CVSS 7.5
CWE-200 CWE-22
Published
Advisory Summary

CVE-2026-56833 is a HIGH (CVSS 7.5) path traversal vulnerability (CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) affecting Praisonai libraries in the PyPI ecosystem. The issue involves praisonai dynamic context history and terminal tools read files outside configured storage via path traversal. Remediation is available by upgrading affected packages to version 4.6.59.

CVE-2026-56833 at a Glance

CVE Identifier CVE-2026-56833
GHSA Identifier GHSA-22cj-m4wf-fv2c
Severity HIGH
CVSS v3.1 Base Score 7.5
CWE Classification CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Affected Product Praisonai
Package Ecosystem PyPI
Published Date
Last Updated

Security Impact

CVSS: 7.5

The security impact metrics below are parsed directly from the CVSS v3.1 vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Attack Vector Network (AV:N)
Attack Complexity Low (AC:L)
Privileges Required None (PR:N)
User Interaction None (UI:N)
Scope Unchanged (S:U)
Confidentiality High (C:H)
Integrity None (I:N)
Availability None (A:N)

How to Fix CVE-2026-56833

To remediate this vulnerability, upgrade all affected Praisonai dependencies to a patched release. Both direct and transitive dependencies should be checked, as frameworks or security libraries may pull in vulnerable versions transitively.

praisonai fixed: 4.6.59
pip install praisonai>=4.6.59
Verify Direct and Transitive Dependencies

Run the following command in your project directory to verify that all resolved dependencies use the patched release:

pip show praisonai

How to Check if You Are Affected

To determine whether your Python environment is affected by CVE-2026-56833, inspect your installed packages using pip:

pip show praisonai

Analyze the terminal output to locate any version of Praisonai in your dependency tree. If any resolved version matches the vulnerable ranges listed in the table below (for example, versions earlier than 4.6.59), your application is affected.

Note: The pip show praisonai command checks currently installed packages in your active Python environment.

Technical Details

Vulnerability Mechanism & Technical Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, where the product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. In Praisonai, software state validation or input boundaries are circumvented during processing. Review the official source advisory statement below for specific affected components, classes, and reproduction details.

Source Advisory Statement

# PraisonAI Dynamic Context history and terminal tools read files outside configured storage via path traversal ## Summary PraisonAI's Dynamic Context module provides filesystem-backed history and terminal-log storage. The SDK reference describes the module as providing: - artifact storage for tool outputs, history, and terminal logs; - history persistence with search; and - terminal session logging. The module also exports agent-callable tool factories: - `create_history_tools()` returns `history_search`, `history_tail`, and `history_get`. - `create_terminal_tools()` returns `terminal_tail`, `terminal_grep`, and `terminal_commands`. Those tools accept `run_id` and `agent_id` arguments from the tool caller. The underlying stores join those values into filesystem paths without rejecting absolute paths or `..` traversal: ```python history_dir = self.base_dir / run_id / "history" return history_dir / f"{agent_id}.jsonl" ``` ```python terminal_dir = self.base_dir / run_id / "terminal" return terminal_dir / f"{agent_id}.log" ``` Because `run_id` can be an absolute path and `agent_id` can contain traversal, a lower-trust prompt/user that can call these tools can read `.jsonl` and `.log` files outside the configured Dynamic Context base directory. ## Affected Product - Repository: `MervinPraison/PraisonAI` - Ecosystem: `pip` - Package: `praisonai` - Component: Dynamic Context history and terminal tools - Current source paths: - `src/praisonai/praisonai/context/history_store.py` - `src/praisonai/praisonai/context/terminal_logger.py` - Latest PyPI version validated: `4.6.58` - Current `origin/main` validated: `1ad58ca02975ff1398efeda694ea2ab78f20cf3e` - Current `origin/main` tag validated: `v4.6.58` Suggested affected range: ```text pip:praisonai >= 3.8.1, <= 4.6.58 ``` Representative local sweep: - `3.8.1`: vulnerable - `4.0.0`: vulnerable - `4.5.113`: vulnerable - `4.6.33`: vulnerable - `4.6.34`: vulnerable - `4.6.40`: vulnerable - `4.6.50`: vulnerable - `4.6.58`: vulnerable ## Root Cause `HistoryStore._get_history_path()` and `TerminalLogger._get_log_path()` treat logical identifiers as path segments, but never validate that the resolved path stays under `base_dir`. History path construction: ```python def _get_history_path(self, run_id: str, agent_id: str) -> Path: history_dir = self.base_dir / run_id / "history" history_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) return history_dir / f"{agent_id}.jsonl" ``` Terminal path construction: ```python def _get_log_path(self, run_id: str, agent_id: str) -> Path: terminal_dir = self.base_dir / run_id / "terminal" terminal_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) return terminal_dir / f"{agent_id}.log" ``` The agent tools pass caller-controlled `run_id` and `agent_id` directly into these helpers: ```python def history_tail(agent_id: str = "default", run_id: str = "default", count: int = 10) -> str: messages = history_store.get_last_messages(agent_id=agent_id, run_id=run_id, count=count) ``` ```python def terminal_tail(agent_id: str = "default", run_id: str = "default", lines: int = 50) -> str: return term_logger.tail_session(agent_id=agent_id, run_id=run_id, lines=lines) ``` There is no check equivalent to: ```python resolved = candidate.resolve() base = self.base_dir.resolve() resolved.relative_to(base) ``` There is also no identifier allowlist preventing `/`, `\`, or `..` in `run_id` or `agent_id`. ## Local PoV Run against the latest PyPI package: ```bash uv run --with 'praisonai==4.6.58' \ python poc/pov_prai_cand_027_history_terminal_tools_path_traversal.py --json ``` The PoV: 1. Creates a temporary Dynamic Context base directory. 2. Creates a separate outside directory containing `secret.jsonl` and `secret.log`. 3. Creates legitimate in-base history and terminal log controls. 4. Calls `history_tail()` and `history_get()` with `run_id=<outside-dir>` and `agent_id=../secret`. 5. Calls `terminal_tail()` and `terminal_grep()` with the same traversal. 6. Confirms the traversal paths resolve to files outside the configured base. Observed output summary from `evidence/pov-pypi-4.6.58.json`: ```json { "package": "praisonai", "package_version": "4.6.58", "controls": { "valid_history_read_works": true, "valid_terminal_read_works": true, "outside_history_file_outside_base_dir": true, "outside_terminal_file_outside_base_dir": true, "traversal_history_path_resolves_to_outside_file": true, "traversal_terminal_path_resolves_to_outside_file": true }, "outside_history_tail": "Last 1 messages:\\n\\n[system]: PRAI-CAND-027-HISTORY-SECRET", "outside_terminal_tail": "PRAI-CAND-027-TERMINAL-SECRET\\nsecond line\\n", "outside_terminal_grep": "Found 1 matches:\\n\\n--- Line 1 ---\\n> PRAI-CAND-027-TERMINAL-SECRET\\n second line", "vulnerable": true } ``` The PoV is local-only. It does not start a server, contact a third-party target, or use real credentials. ## Why This Is Not Intended Behavior This report does not claim that history and terminal helpers should be unable to read legitimate history or terminal logs. The issue is narrower: logical `run_id` and `agent_id` values can escape the configured Dynamic Context base directory. The controls show the intended boundary: - legitimate in-base history remains readable; - legitimate in-base terminal logs remain readable; - the outside `.jsonl` and `.log` files are not under the configured `base_dir`; and - the tools still disclose those outside files through traversal identifiers. The official context reference describes history persistence and terminal logging as filesystem-backed Dynamic Context features. The context security documentation also treats absolute paths, path traversal, and sensitive files as privacy/security risks. Reading files outside the configured context store conflicts with that documented boundary. ## Impact If a PraisonAI application exposes these Dynamic Context tools to untrusted or lower-trust prompts, the lower-trust caller can read files outside the configured context storage when the target file can be reached with the tool-imposed suffix: - `history_*` tools can disclose reachable `.jsonl` files; - `terminal_*` tools can disclose reachable `.log` files; and - cross-run or cross-agent context/history/logs can be disclosed if their path is known or guessable. This can expose conversation history, prompts, terminal output, command logs, tokens, API keys, cloud credentials, operational data, or other secrets stored in JSONL/log files readable by the PraisonAI process. The impact is confidentiality-only in the tested surface. Integrity and availability are not claimed for this report. ## Severity Suggested severity: High. Rationale: - `AV`: applies when an application exposes an agent with these tools over a network chat/API surface. - `AC`: the traversal needs only chosen `run_id` and `agent_id` values. - `PR`: an unauthenticated or public-facing agent endpoint can be exploited without an account. Deployments that require authenticated chat/API access may score this as `PR:L`. - `UI`: the attacker directly supplies the prompt/tool argument to the exposed agent surface. - `C`: conversation history and terminal logs can contain secrets and private operational data. - `I:N/A`: this report demonstrates read-only disclosure. ## Remediation Treat `run_id` and `agent_id` as logical identifiers, not path components. Recommended fixes: 1. Reject absolute paths, path separators, and traversal components in `run_id` and `agent_id`. 2. Build candidate paths, call `.resolve()`, and reject any path that is not under `self.base_dir.resolve()`. 3. Apply the same containment helper to history append/read/search/clear/export and terminal log/read/search/clear/export paths. 4. Prefer opaque server-generated run and agent IDs in tool schemas. 5. Add regression tests for absolute `run_id`, `../` in `run_id`, and `../` in `agent_id` for history and terminal tool factories. Minimal containment shape: ```python def _safe_child(self, *parts: str) -> Path: candidate = self.base_dir.joinpath(*parts).resolve() base = self.base_dir.resolve() try: candidate.relative_to(base) except ValueError as exc: raise PermissionError("Context path is outside configured base_dir") from exc return candidate ``` Pair this with an identifier allowlist, because `run_id` and `agent_id` should not need filesystem syntax.

CVE-2026-56833 Affected Praisonai Versions

1 component(s)
Fixed Versions:
4.6.59
Product / Package Ecosystem Affected Versions Fixed Version
praisonai
PyPI
≥ 3.8.1
< 4.6.59
4.6.59

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-56833?
CVE-2026-56833 is a security vulnerability in Praisonai involving PraisonAI Dynamic Context history and terminal tools read files outside configured storage via path traversal under CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor.
Which Praisonai versions are affected?
Affected versions include releases prior to 4.6.59 across affected packages: praisonai.
What version fixes CVE-2026-56833?
Upgrading to 4.6.59 (or the latest patched release for your respective branch) resolves the vulnerability.
Is praisonai affected?
Yes, praisonai is affected in releases prior to 4.6.59. Upgrade your dependency to 4.6.59 or later.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-56833?
CVE-2026-56833 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N.
What CWE is associated with CVE-2026-56833?
CVE-2026-56833 is classified under CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor (The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.).
How can I check PyPI dependencies for CVE-2026-56833?
Run the dependency tree command: 'pip show praisonai'. This command lists direct and transitive dependencies in your build configuration so you can verify if a vulnerable version is resolved.
Machine-readable OSV JSON OSV v1.5 Schema
Normalized schema output
{
  "schema_version" : "1.4.0",
  "id" : "GHSA-22cj-m4wf-fv2c",
  "modified" : "2026-07-20T21:23:20Z",
  "published" : "2026-06-18T13:52:32Z",
  "aliases" : [ "CVE-2026-56833" ],
  "summary" : "PraisonAI Dynamic Context history and terminal tools read files outside configured storage via path traversal",
  "details" : "# PraisonAI Dynamic Context history and terminal tools read files outside configured storage via path traversal\n\n## Summary\n\nPraisonAI's Dynamic Context module provides filesystem-backed history and\nterminal-log storage. The SDK reference describes the module as providing:\n\n- artifact storage for tool outputs, history, and terminal logs;\n- history persistence with search; and\n- terminal session logging.\n\nThe module also exports agent-callable tool factories:\n\n- `create_history_tools()` returns `history_search`, `history_tail`, and\n  `history_get`.\n- `create_terminal_tools()` returns `terminal_tail`, `terminal_grep`, and\n  `terminal_commands`.\n\nThose tools accept `run_id` and `agent_id` arguments from the tool caller. The\nunderlying stores join those values into filesystem paths without rejecting\nabsolute paths or `..` traversal:\n\n```python\nhistory_dir = self.base_dir / run_id / \"history\"\nreturn history_dir / f\"{agent_id}.jsonl\"\n```\n\n```python\nterminal_dir = self.base_dir / run_id / \"terminal\"\nreturn terminal_dir / f\"{agent_id}.log\"\n```\n\nBecause `run_id` can be an absolute path and `agent_id` can contain traversal,\na lower-trust prompt/user that can call these tools can read `.jsonl` and\n`.log` files outside the configured Dynamic Context base directory.\n\n## Affected Product\n\n- Repository: `MervinPraison/PraisonAI`\n- Ecosystem: `pip`\n- Package: `praisonai`\n- Component: Dynamic Context history and terminal tools\n- Current source paths:\n  - `src/praisonai/praisonai/context/history_store.py`\n  - `src/praisonai/praisonai/context/terminal_logger.py`\n- Latest PyPI version validated: `4.6.58`\n- Current `origin/main` validated:\n  `1ad58ca02975ff1398efeda694ea2ab78f20cf3e`\n- Current `origin/main` tag validated: `v4.6.58`\n\nSuggested affected range:\n\n```text\npip:praisonai >= 3.8.1, <= 4.6.58\n```\n\nRepresentative local sweep:\n\n- `3.8.1`: vulnerable\n- `4.0.0`: vulnerable\n- `4.5.113`: vulnerable\n- `4.6.33`: vulnerable\n- `4.6.34`: vulnerable\n- `4.6.40`: vulnerable\n- `4.6.50`: vulnerable\n- `4.6.58`: vulnerable\n\n## Root Cause\n\n`HistoryStore._get_history_path()` and `TerminalLogger._get_log_path()` treat\nlogical identifiers as path segments, but never validate that the resolved path\nstays under `base_dir`.\n\nHistory path construction:\n\n```python\ndef _get_history_path(self, run_id: str, agent_id: str) -> Path:\n    history_dir = self.base_dir / run_id / \"history\"\n    history_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)\n    return history_dir / f\"{agent_id}.jsonl\"\n```\n\nTerminal path construction:\n\n```python\ndef _get_log_path(self, run_id: str, agent_id: str) -> Path:\n    terminal_dir = self.base_dir / run_id / \"terminal\"\n    terminal_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)\n    return terminal_dir / f\"{agent_id}.log\"\n```\n\nThe agent tools pass caller-controlled `run_id` and `agent_id` directly into\nthese helpers:\n\n```python\ndef history_tail(agent_id: str = \"default\", run_id: str = \"default\", count: int = 10) -> str:\n    messages = history_store.get_last_messages(agent_id=agent_id, run_id=run_id, count=count)\n```\n\n```python\ndef terminal_tail(agent_id: str = \"default\", run_id: str = \"default\", lines: int = 50) -> str:\n    return term_logger.tail_session(agent_id=agent_id, run_id=run_id, lines=lines)\n```\n\nThere is no check equivalent to:\n\n```python\nresolved = candidate.resolve()\nbase = self.base_dir.resolve()\nresolved.relative_to(base)\n```\n\nThere is also no identifier allowlist preventing `/`, `\\`, or `..` in\n`run_id` or `agent_id`.\n\n## Local PoV\n\nRun against the latest PyPI package:\n\n```bash\nuv run --with 'praisonai==4.6.58' \\\n  python poc/pov_prai_cand_027_history_terminal_tools_path_traversal.py --json\n```\n\nThe PoV:\n\n1. Creates a temporary Dynamic Context base directory.\n2. Creates a separate outside directory containing `secret.jsonl` and\n   `secret.log`.\n3. Creates legitimate in-base history and terminal log controls.\n4. Calls `history_tail()` and `history_get()` with\n   `run_id=<outside-dir>` and `agent_id=../secret`.\n5. Calls `terminal_tail()` and `terminal_grep()` with the same traversal.\n6. Confirms the traversal paths resolve to files outside the configured base.\n\nObserved output summary from `evidence/pov-pypi-4.6.58.json`:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"package\": \"praisonai\",\n  \"package_version\": \"4.6.58\",\n  \"controls\": {\n    \"valid_history_read_works\": true,\n    \"valid_terminal_read_works\": true,\n    \"outside_history_file_outside_base_dir\": true,\n    \"outside_terminal_file_outside_base_dir\": true,\n    \"traversal_history_path_resolves_to_outside_file\": true,\n    \"traversal_terminal_path_resolves_to_outside_file\": true\n  },\n  \"outside_history_tail\": \"Last 1 messages:\\\\n\\\\n[system]: PRAI-CAND-027-HISTORY-SECRET\",\n  \"outside_terminal_tail\": \"PRAI-CAND-027-TERMINAL-SECRET\\\\nsecond line\\\\n\",\n  \"outside_terminal_grep\": \"Found 1 matches:\\\\n\\\\n--- Line 1 ---\\\\n> PRAI-CAND-027-TERMINAL-SECRET\\\\n  second line\",\n  \"vulnerable\": true\n}\n```\n\nThe PoV is local-only. It does not start a server, contact a third-party\ntarget, or use real credentials.\n\n## Why This Is Not Intended Behavior\n\nThis report does not claim that history and terminal helpers should be unable\nto read legitimate history or terminal logs. The issue is narrower: logical\n`run_id` and `agent_id` values can escape the configured Dynamic Context base\ndirectory.\n\nThe controls show the intended boundary:\n\n- legitimate in-base history remains readable;\n- legitimate in-base terminal logs remain readable;\n- the outside `.jsonl` and `.log` files are not under the configured\n  `base_dir`; and\n- the tools still disclose those outside files through traversal identifiers.\n\nThe official context reference describes history persistence and terminal\nlogging as filesystem-backed Dynamic Context features. The context security\ndocumentation also treats absolute paths, path traversal, and sensitive files\nas privacy/security risks. Reading files outside the configured context store\nconflicts with that documented boundary.\n\n## Impact\n\nIf a PraisonAI application exposes these Dynamic Context tools to untrusted or\nlower-trust prompts, the lower-trust caller can read files outside the\nconfigured context storage when the target file can be reached with the\ntool-imposed suffix:\n\n- `history_*` tools can disclose reachable `.jsonl` files;\n- `terminal_*` tools can disclose reachable `.log` files; and\n- cross-run or cross-agent context/history/logs can be disclosed if their path\n  is known or guessable.\n\nThis can expose conversation history, prompts, terminal output, command logs,\ntokens, API keys, cloud credentials, operational data, or other secrets stored\nin JSONL/log files readable by the PraisonAI process.\n\nThe impact is confidentiality-only in the tested surface. Integrity and\navailability are not claimed for this report.\n\n## Severity\n\nSuggested severity: High.\n\nRationale:\n\n- `AV`: applies when an application exposes an agent with these tools over a\n  network chat/API surface.\n- `AC`: the traversal needs only chosen `run_id` and `agent_id` values.\n- `PR`: an unauthenticated or public-facing agent endpoint can be exploited\n  without an account. Deployments that require authenticated chat/API access\n  may score this as `PR:L`.\n- `UI`: the attacker directly supplies the prompt/tool argument to the\n  exposed agent surface.\n- `C`: conversation history and terminal logs can contain secrets and private\n  operational data.\n- `I:N/A`: this report demonstrates read-only disclosure.\n\n## Remediation\n\nTreat `run_id` and `agent_id` as logical identifiers, not path components.\n\nRecommended fixes:\n\n1. Reject absolute paths, path separators, and traversal components in\n   `run_id` and `agent_id`.\n2. Build candidate paths, call `.resolve()`, and reject any path that is not\n   under `self.base_dir.resolve()`.\n3. Apply the same containment helper to history append/read/search/clear/export\n   and terminal log/read/search/clear/export paths.\n4. Prefer opaque server-generated run and agent IDs in tool schemas.\n5. Add regression tests for absolute `run_id`, `../` in `run_id`, and `../` in\n   `agent_id` for history and terminal tool factories.\n\nMinimal containment shape:\n\n```python\ndef _safe_child(self, *parts: str) -> Path:\n    candidate = self.base_dir.joinpath(*parts).resolve()\n    base = self.base_dir.resolve()\n    try:\n        candidate.relative_to(base)\n    except ValueError as exc:\n        raise PermissionError(\"Context path is outside configured base_dir\") from exc\n    return candidate\n```\n\nPair this with an identifier allowlist, because `run_id` and `agent_id` should\nnot need filesystem syntax.",
  "severity" : [ {
    "type" : "CVSS_V3",
    "score" : "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N"
  } ],
  "affected" : [ {
    "package" : {
      "ecosystem" : "PyPI",
      "name" : "praisonai"
    },
    "ranges" : [ {
      "type" : "ECOSYSTEM",
      "events" : [ {
        "introduced" : "3.8.1"
      }, {
        "fixed" : "4.6.59"
      } ]
    } ],
    "database_specific" : {
      "last_known_affected_version_range" : "<= 4.6.58"
    }
  } ],
  "references" : [ {
    "type" : "WEB",
    "url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-22cj-m4wf-fv2c"
  }, {
    "type" : "PACKAGE",
    "url" : "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
  } ],
  "database_specific" : {
    "cwe_ids" : [ "CWE-200", "CWE-22" ],
    "severity" : "HIGH",
    "github_reviewed" : true,
    "github_reviewed_at" : "2026-06-18T13:52:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at" : null
  }
}